Casinos

Casinos By Status

Popular Filters

By Banking Options

Games

All Games

Bonuses

Popular Bonus Filters

Forums

Popular Forums

Forum User Features

Complaints

Submit A Complaint (PAB)

PAB Rules and Guidelines

Browse PABs

Gambling News

Popular News Sections

About Us

About Us

external image

Cherry Red random jackpot results - For real?

I'd like to say I don't want to see this thread closed. I'm reading it with great interest.

As far as I can tell, Louise said they were all Random Jackpot wins.

I'm no longer at player at Cherry Red, and I've never joined Rushmore or Slots Oasis.

Since these are all sister casinos, I have a couple of questions that may have been covered at one point or another, but I remain unclear on.

Are jackpots shared amongst the Rushmore properties? Or maybe linked is a better term? i.e. does play at Cherry Red increase say the Paydirt Jackpot at all three?

Are the games that are linked static? i.e. is Roberta's Castle jackpot always linked with the same games? e.g. Roberta's Castle, T-Rex, Wooden Boy, Diamond Dozen and Crazy Vegas form one group of linked slots, Paydirt, Victory, Tally-Ho, Enchanted Garden and London Inspector form another, etc.

I play a number of linked progressives at my favourite B&M, but there are 4 different games on the Jackpot Party linked progressive, but they are always the same 4 games, and the Reel Fortune is a different group of linked slots (three I think).

Can you tell us the betsize that the progressives were hit at? Inetbet routinely publishes this information, so I can't believe it would be something you cannot divulge. I'm not asking for the player's whole history, just the bet that triggered the jackpot.

I'm sorry if these questions have been asked before.
 
all4greed said:
And finally one other thing...

Do any of these players, especially the one that hit at least 2 RJ's totalling over $155,000, post about their amazing wins? I searched for some of those winners and sure couldn't find any.

It would be fascinating to read their stories. INetBet has little winners blogs on their newsletters. I've even done a couple for wins I've had there.
Click to expand...

Ok, I have to tell you that if I won that kind of money I'd be a bit reserved in going out and telling a bunch of people about it. I'd be afraid of the unwanted attention.
 
Jas, you and I both know that legit questions are one thing... but these inunendo attacks are another.

If folks want the thread to stay open for legit questions, I guess I'm out voted.

But the innunendo attacks need to stop.
 
Jasminebed said:
Are jackpots shared amongst the Rushmore properties? Or maybe linked is a better term? i.e. does play at Cherry Red increase say the Paydirt Jackpot at all three?
Click to expand...

No, in fact I checked on a couple a few days ago thinking maybe the casinos were linked (like Jackpot Pinatas) and went back now:

Cherry Red (Aztec T) - $9,985
Rushmore (Aztec T) - $34,826

Cherry Red (Aladdin's W) - 21,441
Rushmore (Aladdin's W) - $7,585

Can you tell us the betsize that the progressives were hit at? Inetbet routinely publishes this information, so I can't believe it would be something you cannot divulge. I'm not asking for the player's whole history, just the bet that triggered the jackpot.

I'm sorry if these questions have been asked before.
Click to expand...

There were not and they are damn good questions. Nice to see someone else looking at this thread...
 
takethemoney said:
Ok, I have to tell you that if I won that kind of money I'd be a bit reserved in going out and telling a bunch of people about it. I'd be afraid of the unwanted attention.
Click to expand...

I hear you. But if you look at the combined data on those sheets that DP compiled, there are more than a few winners winning a lot of money. Some of those winners are winning every other day. Look at that lady that won 5 randoms at INetBet and posted here about it.

Just expected to read a OMG I'VE WON A SH*TLOAD OF MONEY AND CAN PAY OFF THE (fill in the blank) post somewhere...:D
 
lots0 said:
Do we really have to drege them back up? I for one don't want to.

If you read the thread and you don't see them... then your not looking. ;)
Click to expand...

Went through this thread and sorry to say I don't see the boogieman. Unless you take questioning a casino as attacks upon yourself.

I don't know WTH you are talking about. DP has actually been very respectful of you and conducted himself/herself appropriately.
 
Never said dp was attacking me... nowhere.

what do you call this????

all4greed said:
Yes indeed it is supposed to be. But when you see randoms going off quickly within days, for large amounts, and won by the same person it should raise an eyebrow.
Click to expand...

why should it "raise eyebrow" this has happened to people here and been verified by many.

Your quote, in case you didn't realize it, is an attack by innuendo.

You made the innuendo that something is wrong "raise an eyebrow" when the very fact that there are winners that have been paid and that hit the jp more than once has been shoved in your face this entire thread.

Your not seeing the attacks by innuendo because your doing it, all4greed.
 
Nifty29 said:
Lets not gloss over the fact that some people in this thread are implying that an accredited casino is cheating or somehow fudging the Random Jackpot winners.
Click to expand...

The thread was started by someone with disbelieve, and a few others took it upon themselves to question some things. Although I have only played a few times at this casino group, as a customer I can question anything I like.

The people concerned can dress it up as "Oh I was only asking" or "It just looks a bit suss" etc etc, but it amounts to exactly what I just stated.
Click to expand...

Stop with the drama.

IMO Its time for those concerned to produce hard evidence that the Rushmore Group is somehow behaving in a dishonest manner - or admit they are wrong and drop it.
Click to expand...

It's more likely the lack of evidence and the little bit there is to work with that a player has available. We have a casino that posted big winners and another website that lists big winners.

How can I be wrong about something that quite a few others have commented on in regards to it looking odd?

Forget the spreadsheets of winners and the amounts - they mean zip.
Click to expand...

Forget the casino figures and a website that has all the casino figures? Not going to happen.

Nobody here knows how many players play at each casino on each slot each day, how much each player wagers on each slot at each casino on each day, what the % contribution is to the RJ pool or what the seed amount was at each casino on each slot...
Click to expand...


Agree with that. But for people to say 7,000,000 in wagers by all players on linked games appears acceptable is strange. Show me one other time when this has happened to drive a RJ up that high and NOT on a progressive.

Some of you really need to take a long hard look at yourselves and stop making wild accusations about accredited casinos at the first sniff of something unusual. I mean, has anyone ever heard of being discreet?? How about a PM to Bryan or Max to check it out?? Hell no! Lets just make a whole thread about it and let that witch burn!!!!
Click to expand...

I didn't start the thread. But I will ask questions if I don't understand something. I don't need babysitters to inquire for me.
 
I notice you did not bother to defend your attack by innuendo.

I never said anything about not asking questions... ask away.

But your sideways and ill disguised attempts to discredit this casino will be met with logic and responsible discourse.
 
You just can not go around bad mouthing casinos, especially the ones that are accredited here.

Like Lotso says, the innuendos in this entire thread are out and out slander against the Rushmore Group. You guys ask for things that Louise says she can not give you. That should not be an invitation to keep on spewing your innuendos.

Then, you try to justify your right to ask questions. Ask away, but keep your questioning to the point, not by posting accusations against a reputable casino group.
 
lots0 said:
I notice you did not bother to defend your attack by innuendo.

I never said anything about not asking questions... ask away.

But your sideways and ill disguised attempts to discredit this casino will be met with logic and responsible discourse.
Click to expand...

That's because I'm not just sitting on the computer waiting for a response. Also, I had started my response to another member which I heavily edited to avoid more drama than it will most likely already invoke.

Ill disguised attempts? Well on the Rushmore thread I was the first to contact support, technical support, and management. I posted my progress and any responses. I've asked Louise on that thread for further information that should be simple to attain.

As far as innuedo attacks, sorry but we will disagree on that. Perhaps if I put lots of :):D:) that will soften my comments/questions?

I do "get" where you are coming from... Now I will admit that is an innuendo.;)
 
:eek: I really dont get it why these threads has to continue and continue :eek:
I think we should do a voting if all this is really necessary.....:what:

And then the player or players who really wants Clearification on these Random jackpots that are in dispute, to take all this up behind closed doors with the casino or casinos involved, yes for my sake even PAB if this is such a big worry...

Ive mentioned this in other thread, and must admit it gives me more and more anger (wonder) the more gets in here in the threads :confused:

Am i the only one feeling like this? :rolleyes: :)

But yes i know if i dont wanna know then i can just stay away from these threads hehe, but no i feel we need to get to bottom of this, and get these threads stopped and let them drop to bottom, and then when there is something proper like proof that a casino is cheating with the jackpots or if a proof comes that everything is correct. Then get this thread and or other one up again and get it posted.....
I just feel other important posts/threads looses their importance with all this.
Everything else seems :eek:
 
Honestly to me this was an interesting thread.
It's almost like it's being bullied into closure.

Maybe I am not seeing something that others are, I don't know.
To me it was just a case of "are these winner names REAL people".
I *think* that's the underlying issue...maybe?

Probably because I am not an aff. nor a customer of said casinos I am not taking it all so much to heart.

It does kind of bother me that someone said you can't accuse an accredited. Have no accredited casinos ever been yanked for doing wrong?

Please don't jump all over me.
Again, not taking ANY sides just wishing for fairness and less drama :(.
 
Actually was totally by accident I posted here, I don't want to repost and would prefer it be moved, basically so I don't now become accused of not only being a shill but a spammer to boot :)

Feel free to repost it for me though :)
 
darkpixie said:
Actually was totally by accident I posted here, I don't want to repost and would prefer it be moved, basically so I don't now become accused of not only being a shill but a spammer to boot :)

Feel free to repost it for me though :)
Click to expand...

Grow a pair! You could edit out all of your content with two words: Oops sorry! ;)
 
RedAndi said:
Honestly to me this was an interesting thread.
It's almost like it's being bullied into closure.

Maybe I am not seeing something that others are, I don't know.
To me it was just a case of "are these winner names REAL people".
I *think* that's the underlying issue...maybe?

Probably because I am not an aff. nor a customer of said casinos I am not taking it all so much to heart.

It does kind of bother me that someone said you can't accuse an accredited. Have no accredited casinos ever been yanked for doing wrong?

Please don't jump all over me.
Again, not taking ANY sides just wishing for fairness and less drama :(.
Click to expand...

Yes, in theory an accredited casino could lose their status. It is not likely based on the flimsy accusations with no proof that exist in this thread.

darkpixie said:
Oops that post really belongs on the Rushmore thread, can it be moved?
Click to expand...

As takethemoney stated, you can easily delete and re-do your post in the other forum, rather than saying someone else should do it for you. The fact that you don't makes me feel that you are just trying to get a rise out of some of the posters here that do not agree with you.

Your spiel is getting old very quickly, Darkpixie. IMO only, of course. :rolleyes:
 
Post has been moved to Rushmore.

Wow, hard to believe anyone would find my hesitation in moving a post to have some kind of Evil motivations. Especially when moving it will only ensure its gets more views....

Bizarre.
 
RedAndi said:
Honestly to me this was an interesting thread.
It's almost like it's being bullied into closure.
Click to expand...

It sure has had a lot of views. Note that the primary person wanting it shut down is an affliate.

Maybe I am not seeing something that others are, I don't know.
To me it was just a case of "are these winner names REAL people".
I *think* that's the underlying issue...maybe?
Click to expand...

Real people, real RJs. The issue isn't so much if these were wins in bonuses but RJs. I've seen screenshots of hits for thousands, no problem there.

Probably because I am not an aff. nor a customer of said casinos I am not taking it all so much to heart.

It does kind of bother me that someone said you can't accuse an accredited. Have no accredited casinos ever been yanked for doing wrong?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to look but I thought the Rivals were all yanked after the Tradition BJ issue.

Please don't jump all over me.
Again, not taking ANY sides just wishing for fairness and less drama :(.
Click to expand...

OK!:thumbsup:
 
LOL gotta love the well-considered replies like "Stop with the drama". It really supports your argument. :rolleyes:

And finally one other thing...

Do any of these players, especially the one that hit at least 2 RJ's totalling over $155,000, post about their amazing wins? I searched for some of those winners and sure couldn't find any.

It would be fascinating to read their stories. INetBet has little winners blogs on their newsletters. I've even done a couple for wins I've had there.

Just expected to read a OMG I'VE WON A SH*TLOAD OF MONEY AND CAN PAY OFF THE (fill in the blank) post somewhere...
Click to expand...

So unless someone actually posts somewhere about their win, it isnt legit?? Geez are you serious??

Have you considered that someone winning $40k while betting $100 (most likely scenario) is only winning 400xbet . I mean, if you hit $200 on a .40c bet would you be going all over the net posting about it??? Its the same thing. Its all proportional. $10k to you might be a fortune, but its like winning $100 to a high roller. The $110k win (1100xbet @$100) is nice by anyone standards, but most progressives pay at least 2000xbet as a minimum so, again, a high roller isnt necessarily go on a posting spree as a result. Ive hit 1600xbet at 3Dice and didnt post about it - so does that mean it didnt happen? Come on.

I really wish people would look at all the angles before they start making accusations and insinuations - and Lots0 is right, that is exactly what is happening. Louise has posted enough info here to satisfy a reasonable person, and certainly more than she is obligated to provide......the problem is that some people just wont accept it, which means they dont believe what she is saying, which in turn means they are accusing Rushmore of being dishonest. I dont see what other conclusion one can draw.

Ok, I have to tell you that if I won that kind of money I'd be a bit reserved in going out and telling a bunch of people about it. I'd be afraid of the unwanted attention.
Click to expand...

A good point......but we have to be careful we dont let the truth ruin a good story.

Can you tell us the betsize that the progressives were hit at? Inetbet routinely publishes this information, so I can't believe it would be something you cannot divulge. I'm not asking for the player's whole history, just the bet that triggered the jackpot.
Click to expand...

Question is - what difference would that make? The figures themselves are 'dodgy' if you believe what some people here say, so why would knowing that the players were betting $100 a spin matter? Since some are insinuating that Rushmore are telling porkies anyway, why would anyone believe them if they said "Oh yeah they were all betting $100"??? .

as a customer I can question anything I like.
Click to expand...

Of course you can. "Could you please provide some more information regarding these jackpot winners e.g. bet amounts?" is a question. "I continue to fail to see how a single player can hit RJ after RJ at substantial amounts only days, and in some cases hours apart" is an insinuation of dishonesty.(Just one example btw)

Some people refuse to see the difference.

It's more likely the lack of evidence and the little bit there is to work with that a player has available. We have a casino that posted big winners and another website that lists big winners.

How can I be wrong about something that quite a few others have commented on in regards to it looking odd?
Click to expand...

Lack of what evidence? All the figures have been provided, save for things like # of players each day and average bets etc etc which NO CASINO will provide to players - and there is nothing wrong with that.

Just because a few other people think its odd, doesnt mean that it is. Some people think 9/11 was a conspiracy, doesnt mean that it was. Some people thought National Socialism was a great idea, doesnt mean that it was.

My point is that if you dont accept what Rushmore says now, why would anything else they provide be acceptable? I mean, they are either being dishonest or they arent. You either believe those winners were real or you dont. However, if you dont then you have a responsibility to provide evidence to the contrary - and I havent seen one word of it anywhere, and without it, its just mud-slinging by some of the usual suspects that love to take a stab at a casino at every opportunity.

I didn't start the thread.
Click to expand...

Oh well thats OK - you're in the clear. You arent responsible for anything you say.....just blame the OP for starting the bandwagon moving in the first place.

**

I'm not going to look but I thought the Rivals were all yanked after the Tradition BJ issue.
Click to expand...

The Rivals were removed due to their horrendous customer service quite some time ago.
 
This is my thought on this subject. Besides this thread giving even me a headache, I have looked at the conditions for being accredited.


Operational Standards

Must pay winnings in a timely manner.
Must not disqualify any player from a payout if terms & conditions are met, except for situations of fraud (multiple-accounts, bogus ID documents, chargebacks, etc.,).
Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.
Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player.
No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.
Must pay out progressive jackpot wins in full or in reasonable chunks, regardless of any terms and conditions limiting payouts.*
Must remove any bonus and associated playthrough requirements at the request of the player if play has not commenced.
Will not entice players to reverse cash withdrawals with bonuses or other incentives.
Will not use outsourced support. Player support must be in-house.


I am sure this covers RJ's as well as it is pretty much the same as a progressive. Now, consider being on the accredited list and what unforeseen regulations a casino group must follow to stay on this list.
I would imagine that RJ's and Progressives are reported and monitored as to the casinos credibility to maintain their "Accredited" status.
I seriously doubt the whole way of becoming accredited is like a boy scout receiving a badge for learning how to properly build a campfire.
I would imagine there are guidelines and audits that take place all the time, between the casinos and the accreditation process.
I may not like how my return is at many casinos, but I do trust the Accredited listing and what they mean to the players.
Back in the Marty thread I had made a statement that I saw no difference at this point between an accredited and a rogue, but that was only referring to player return and not the other aspects of what the difference truly means.
For instance if I play at a rogue and win a substantial RJ, would I get it, doubtful, but if I play at an accredited casino, I would have no doubt that I would receive my winnings.
So if an accredited casino is deemed upfront and honest in so many aspects, why would they not be when it comes to RJ's, this would not make any sense to willingly give themselves a blemish and ruin the reputation they have worked for many years to build.
Reflecting upon the Marty thread again, look what extent the rogues are trying to go through just to get back into the mainstream, so why on earth when an accredited casino that is already in the mainstream, suddenly decide they want to go off into a tributary that leads to the bog.

JMO
 
all4greed said:
I'm done responding to you. I've PM'd Louise my questions regarding the bolded lines of the AT wins.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.

Dont forget to ask Louise for a description of what the winners were wearing at the time e.g. shoes, shirt, sunglasses, and a recent photo of them wearing the same outfit for comparison. Oh, and a screenie of their e-wallet account to prove they were paid.

You dont believe what Rushmore/Louise has stated already, so whats the point of sending her questions? If you cant accept that xyz won $abc on xxx date as confirmed by Louise earlier in this thread, then I dont see what else she can reveal (apart from the attire) that would convince you.

I know some of you are just waiting for that "AH-HAAA!!" moment.....well I would advise against anyone holding their breath as you are seeing a scandal that aint there.
 
This and the now locked thread exist(ed) because the RJs at Rushmore are way too high if they work like RJs at other RTGs. So the most plausible explanation is that they have lowered the chance to hit the random or increased the amount that goes to the JP pool (or both), wouldnt affect the long time RTP tough. Still would be better for the casino of course.

Pooling the randoms shouldnt still allow them to rise to the amounts before being hit that has been discussed if they hadnt done anything described above. If anyone of you ever have played with 100$ bets you know that the RJ rises fast but not nearly fast enough to justify the abnormal rise witnessed at Rushmore even if you play for hours.

And absolutely no evidence has been posted that would imply that Rushmore RJs works like they do at other casinos, not against it either to be fair. Knowing how shady they are nothing that this group does would surprise me tough. So maybe they just have prop players.
 
DogBoy has summarised RJ:s in a few words:

After the completion of a paid game there is a 1 in (n) chance of triggering a random jackpot (i.e.: the chance is not checked after each free game during a feature, but rather at the conclusion of all events springing from a single paid spin)

This chance is based on a $1 total bet, and is proportionately increased or decreased for amounts above and below that level.
e.g.: A 1c total bet would have 0.01*(n) and a $100 total bet would have 100*(n)

Total jackpot contribution is, as identified on the rules pages, no more than 1.5% of RTP (this includes both seed value and increment)

Operators may choose to group slots without impacting this...the slots then contribute to the same jackpot, but the reset value is still constant (e.g.: $1000 reset) and the trigger chance is still the same.
Alternately, operators may choose to have a higher reset (e.g.: $5000), with same increment, and a proportionately lower trigger chance, in order to maintain the same RTP as the standard.
Higher jackpot levels fall into this second model.

At no time can operators set the value that the jackpot will trigger at, the person it is awarded to, or the chance to trigger (other than choosing model 1 or model 2)
Click to expand...

In short:

Rushmore uses the reset value of 5000$ and this means that their RJ amounts are higher due to a lower triggering chance.

The RTP is the same.

For those who want to read more you have the link to the post DogBoy made here!

He also provided other links in that post. Be my guest, read! :)
 
Just hit at Rushmore:

Thursday, May 27, 2010 $13,615 Aztec's Treasure Sylvia A. Germany

So why does the RJ still read $37,651.47

Believe me I have PM'd Louise asking if VIP's have a different client, so far no response.
 
darkpixie said:
Believe me I have PM'd Louise asking if VIP's have a different client, so far no response.
Click to expand...
Why would she (or anyone) waste their time answering such an inane question?

Did you ask her for a description of the clothing, shoes and jewlery the winners were wearing?? I do believe that would be a more pertinent question... :rolleyes:


Also that is Rushmore screen shot.. this thread is about Cherry Red.
 
Regardless of whether Nifty thinks my questions are important, I think they are important.

Lots0 says bigger jackpots are better. I say routinely big jackpots mean they are harder to hit.

It's important to me to understand how Rushmore manages linking their jackpots if they in fact do so.

DogBoy said there were only two models... seed at $1000 or seed at $5,000.

But if you can link them, (and there seems to be some evidence to that effect) how they are linked is important IMO.

As to triggering amounts, if Wayne won 5 randoms betting $100 bucks, or even $25, I'd be more happy to believe that he was a major contributor to those jackpots as well than if at 20cents or $2.00. Then he would just be really really lucky, and we do know that can happen.

Roberta's Castle is not one of my favourite slots, I don't know about other players. But if it was linked with one of the most popular slots, that might well explain such high jackpots.

I only asked my questions a couple of days ago, and I know Louise needs time to find out answers (even if it's to say "I can't tell"), so let's try to keep the thread open and the name calling halted.

Anyone with a fast computer want to take 1/2 hour on turbo and the stop button and let me know how many $100 spins you can make an hour? I'd suggest fun mode.

Big depositors might get big bonuses and have big WR to clear as well, and I know that I've wagered over $30K on a weekend at the B&M with none of my bets over $15, where slots tend to play slower.

7 Million in wagering doesn't sound that unusual to me, but 7 million without the jackpot popping sounds like a lot. I'm not say wrong or cheating, but I think it might be important to understand if they are linked or not, and if linked, how they are linked and how that affects the RTP.

At one point when I first started playing at RTG, I spun over 2000 times to trigger a bonus round on Robertas Castle, thinking it would be awesome when I got it. I was wrong. Not really relevant to this discussion.
 
@lots0

If you would prefer I can always start a new thread, however the same thing happens across this group of casinos so I thought it would fit best in this thread.

If you can explain how the RJ can be hit and moments later I can log onto the Casino and see the figure barely over what it was a couple days ago instead of the expected $1000 or $5000 I eagerly await your response.
 
I wondered that too however 2 things say its not.

#1 For as many players as they boast playing at high denominations I would think the feed would be littered with 'big wins'

#2 Why call a feed a 'Jackpot' feed and list the 'Jackpot' amounts in a 'Jackpot' column if all they are is bonus round wins or big wins.

Only the Casino that is providing this feed can say...

And if it is true, well at least they have managed to explain something. :)
 
Mavin1 said:
I would imagine that RJ's and Progressives are reported and monitored as to the casinos credibility to maintain their "Accredited" status.

I would imagine there are guidelines and audits that take place all the time, between the casinos and the accreditation process.
Click to expand...

If Casinomeister does that, I've never heard of it in the 9 or 10 years that I've been reading here...

That's a couple of good thoughts there but I imagine that Bryan would not have the resources available to be able to keep up with those type of audits and monitoring.

Interesting thread though!
____
____
 
Linked Games

Regarding linked games, generally it's five to a group. These are the linked games associated with AT, current RJ of $10,112:

aztek treasure
fruit frenzy
green light
sunken treasure
tiger treasures

It appears Wayne A. won another Aztek Treasure RJ making it 6 in a row:

May 17, 2010 - $15,255
May 12, 2010- $110,888
May 7, 2010 - $28,950
April 24, 2010 - $45,530
April 23, 2010 - $19,341
April 22, 2010 - $8,885
 
Last edited:
Just so no one is confused, The figures just posted by all4greed are for Cherry Red Casino, the ones posted earlier by myself with screen shot are Rushmore.

Wayne A has also been pretty lucky this month at Rushmore as well:

Wednesday, May 26, 2010 $22,805 Aztec's Treasure Wayne A. USA
Sunday, May 23, 2010 $30,900 Aztec's Treasure Wayne A. USA
Wayne A. United States Aztecs Treasure (Video Slots) $33,285.00
 
Jackpot Graphs

Since we are all interested in facts, I contacted Jackpot Graphs regarding the data feed listing casino winners. Throw out the theory of big bonuses and big spins because these are all random jackpots or progressives.


From: "JackpotGraphs.com" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:36:41 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: Question

Hi xxx,

The wins shown on the RTG pages are progressive jackpot wins only. Some are network wide (progressive jackpot shared by all RTG casinos) and others are local progressives. None of the wins on those pages are just regular big wins -- every win is a progressive of some sort.

Hopefully that helps -- sorry for the delay in getting back to you.

Dave



From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Question

Hi,

I discovered your website and find it quite interesting. Regarding the RTG jackpots, are those random jackpots that were paid out, big wins (like in a bonus round), or a combination of both?

Any info appreciated!
 
Hi guys,

Quick correction to my email which was posted above. :D

In the RTG section of my site (i.e.: xhttp://www.jackpotgraphs.com/rtg-jackpots.html) -- those are RTG progressives only (network-wide and local, depending on the page you're looking at). That's what I thought all4greed was referring to, based on his first email asking about the "RTG jackpots."

But I see now that you're looking at the "winners" pages (pages with /winners/ in the URL). On these pages, the listings can be progressive and non-progressive. The content on these pages is generated from a completely different set of feeds.

I haven't read through this entire thread yet, but I will do that in a minute. I believe (as of now) that the winners feeds are real, but if it seems obvious that the data is just a bunch of BS, I'll be taking down the fake wins from my site ASAP.
 
Thank you Dave! Nice to see you on the boards!

On a side Note looks like Wayne A. Strikes again:

Thursday, May 27, 2010 $33,285 Aztec's Treasure Wayne A. USA

Rushmore JP still shows $38,626 though??? ;)
 
darkpixie said:
@lots0

If you would prefer I can always start a new thread, however the same thing happens across this group of casinos so I thought it would fit best in this thread.

If you can explain how the RJ can be hit and moments later I can log onto the Casino and see the figure barely over what it was a couple days ago instead of the expected $1000 or $5000 I eagerly await your response.
Click to expand...

Why would you want to start another thread... more stupid accusations? More inane questions that YOU KNOW are not going to be answered by the casino.

All I was saying in my previous post, is that in your quest to discredit this respected casino group... at least try to ask intelligent pertinent questions... and you haven't.

Obviously it does not matter what anyone says, you seem determined to plant questions about this group in peoples minds...

A group you don't even play at... as we all know, the only reason you even downloaded the casino client is try to prove your ridiculous accusations after you went on about this for days.

Just because you don't understand what is going on, does not make it wrong.

Your only pertinent question has been asked and answered ad nausm...
do Rushmore have these jackpots and pay them out... YES THEY DO.

All the rest of your questions, won't be answered, because they are inane insinuations and just meant to place questions in people minds about the Rushmore group.
 

Similar threads

Nate
  • Sticky
Must Read Black Hole Casinos: The New Face of Online Gambling Scams
Replies
29
Views
3K
Valhalla
Valhalla
Webzcas
Expired Promo Pragmatic Play Jelly Express 1500EUR Screenshot Competition
3 4 5
Replies
204
Views
5K
teckiwi
T
conker
Expired Promo Pragmatic Play 3k EUR and Gaming Chair Winter Screenshot Competition
4 5 6
Replies
261
Views
7K
Wait!What?
W
S
My experience as a high roller on crypto sites pros vs cons
Replies
14
Views
517
toslotornot
T
Webzcas
Expired Promo Pragmatic Play 1k EUR Saint Patrick's Day Screenshot Competition
2 3 4
Replies
176
Views
4K
sterenivan
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top