Well as I said yesterday snorky, I've been reading (and occasionally posting to) this thread for years now, and I've been around on CM for over ten years, so I've seen a lot of this sort of stuff come and go in that time.
There are
literally hundreds of pages of this thread where you've been variously accusing
BTG of doing all sorts of nefarious stuff to Bonanza, and have never presented one single iota of proof for any of it.
As
@paul7388 noted here -
Bonanza by Big Time Gaming - Page 789 - Casinomeister Forum
There were people making pretty much exactly the same sort of complaints about Bonanza within weeks or months of its launch, as you're making now. The Bonanza they're describing, five and a half years ago, is the Bonanza you are insisting it's changed into at some point.
Maybe it's just possible that a slot with as complex a maths model as Bonanza, is simply capable of insanely long play cycles that might 'feel' good or bad, but are all within the bounds of what the maths can legitimately produce?
Or maybe BTG have changed it, I don't know, but ultimately as long as the game is certified and it meets RTP, it doesn't make any difference anyway, and you tearing your hair out over it, as deposit after deposit after deposit disappears down the drain, won't change that.
If you believe you've got a legitimate complaint about it and can prove your assertions, then hey, go for it, I wish you good luck, but ultimately I think, based on my own experiences and knowledge (which I am not claiming is encyclopaedic) - that it will go nowhere.