New Slot Announcement Bonanza by Big Time Gaming

[ChopleyIOM]

Even old @ChopleyIOM is struggling to contain his joy nowadays that he discovered this game.

Haven't played it for a month or so (whenever it was last on the channel). I'm well aware my long-term results are ridiculously good and I don't want to be around for the kickback, but more than that I genuinely think it's a bad slot, for reasons I've explained many times already so I won't repeat myself I have no idea why so many people keep beating themselves over the head and bankroll with it.

Also, your £200 deposit on £2 spins isn't a bad strategy in itself, as long as the person in question doesn't mind losing £200 in a short period of time without getting a feature for a quarter of their sessions. When I deposit £200 I want at least an evening's entertainment and a goodly number of features and fun.

I had a pretty decent session last night (over 4000 spins) but they were all on Immortal Romance and Sizzling Spins, both of which kick Bonanza into the long grass IMO.

But yeah, here are my total lifetime stats on Bonanza (I've only ever played it at VS), and as you can also see, I haven't really played it that much - and that's because I think it's a pretty crap slot.

 

[aceking123]

The fact is Dunover is not correct about the slot , its maybe one of the worst slots to spend hundreds & thousands of pounds,dollars etc etc

You ask why ? >>simples because it does not deliver those massive wins that BTG state can happen , you have many many more slots that can pay far more & given tracking stats from some very very players in here who lets say aren't stupid ,you should take note. take note to the thread created & show me those monthly wins from the slot of over 1000x considering the amounts its played ??? you cant , i would however point out a slot which has shown up this slots jammin jars have no doubt produced more wins over a shorter period. that says it all)

you would be better spending those funds elsewhere not on this slot.

 

[Mouche12]

As to a BTG game that gave me wins close to 800-900 a few times: Donuts. Both in the base game and in the feature. My highest win on Bonanza is around 400x in the feature. Others may find that Donuts is absolute filth, dead spin after dead spin - as I've experienced too, but the few good wins I had make up for that.

 

[nutnut]

The fact is Dunover is not correct about the slot , its maybe one of the worst slots to spend hundreds & thousands of pounds,dollars etc etc

You ask why ? >>simples because it does not deliver those massive wins that BTG state can happen , you have many many more slots that can pay far more & given tracking stats from some very very players in here who lets say aren't stupid ,you should take note. take note to the thread created & show me those monthly wins from the slot of over 1000x considering the amounts its played ??? you cant , i would however point out a slot which has shown up this slots jammin jars have no doubt produced more wins over a shorter period. that says it all)

you would be better spending those funds elsewhere not on this slot.

You're correct about the lack of x1000. Dunover is slightly bias due his massive win, lets face it we all would be. The fact we don't see weekly x1000 wins is odd given other games shit them out monthly.

 

[Jono777]

when a complete month's budget is about 300, 200 in one deposit just isn't viable.

However surely moving the decimal point,(IE 20 deposit, 0.20 credits spins) would be the same tactic?

It doesn't work very often, trust me.

Bottom line, without affy RTP we have no chance

 

[nutnut]

I've had days I've lost 400 at 60p a spin so £2 a spin on 200 won't last long.

This game isn't about throwing cash at it, it's about catching it right. You can deposit 10 and hit bonus after bonus and get a balance of a few hundred.

Problem is those catch it right days are such a short span of time and rare.

 

[aceking123]

The point is , im a long member here as most of you , as players ,this site is period the best hands down with just very clever players who destroy providers on slots to which is great , it shows the best & worst from providers, dont get me wrong i have no problem with BTGaming , i don't like some of its games but wouldn't say they're terrible , but what i would say considering the amounts played in this game here & the conclusion going from results the game does not & will not deliver these mega wins if on a 6 month rotation because something isnt right with them. where are these monster wins this game has been cranked for a stupid amount of spins , but still no monster wins on any frequent level or time.

, dead or alive still produces, Immortal romance produces blue print napoleon has produced already jammin jars , just to name a few , but where's bonanza you players must be the most unluckiest set in the universe not to see more frequent wins. says it all

 

[pinnit2014]

I play it, I like it, I moan at it. It's a very clever game in that respect. Is it the best? No in terms of wins, but for some weird reason, playability possibly (for some)

You rank it's 1000X pluses against other games and, conversely to being No1 in the charts, it'll be struggling to break into the Champions League places.

Bonanza shouldn't work. Logically. 460 bonus round on average, probably closer to 800. Coupled with it's 100x average bonus when it does come, any sane person wouldn't play it. But play it we do. That's humans/gamblers - we're weird and when was gambling ever predicated on logic.

You want a game that will actually put it's money where it's mouth is then probably over to JJ, Napoleon, some of the Novo's. You like being kicked in the nuts (sorry Nutnut) and still come back for more cos your a sadist- Bonanza's your man (or woman or non binary)

 

[dunover]

The fact is Dunover is not correct about the slot , its maybe one of the worst slots to spend hundreds & thousands of pounds,dollars etc etc

You ask why ? >>simples because it does not deliver those massive wins that BTG state can happen , you have many many more slots that can pay far more & given tracking stats from some very very players in here who lets say aren't stupid ,you should take note. take note to the thread created & show me those monthly wins from the slot of over 1000x considering the amounts its played ??? you cant , i would however point out a slot which has shown up this slots jammin jars have no doubt produced more wins over a shorter period. that says it all)

you would be better spending those funds elsewhere not on this slot.

Yeah it does! I've had 3628x, 2552x 1400x, a few more 1000+ x's and numerous in the 400-800x range. J*mm*n' J*rs is a different bonus set-up, it pays 95% shitters for the more frequent 1000x ones. Bonanza pays less shitters and a has a higher median bonus. DoA is quite like J*mm*n' J*rs in that 95% of its bonuses are abysmal in order to give higher amount of 4-figure ones. The volatility set-up of the bonus rounds themselves should be considered here rather than the frequency of 1000x plus results.

 

[aceking123]

Yeah it does! I've had 3628x, 2552x 1400x, a few more 1000+ x's and numerous in the 400-800x range. J*mm*n' J*rs is a different bonus set-up, it pays 95% shitters for the more frequent 1000x ones. Bonanza pays less shitters and a has a higher median bonus. DoA is quite like J*mm*n' J*rs in that 95% of its bonuses are abysmal in order to give higher amount of 4-figure ones. The volatility set-up of the bonus rounds themselves should be considered here rather than the frequency of 1000x plus results.

Dunover you can try & i mean try to convince players otherwise , but that's just your luck . i dont see many if any players having the same luck as youve had since promoting them

Also some of these players have done way way more spins via it & had nowhere near your results.

DOA total different set up to jammin jars cannot compare the two slots ! DOA can keep you going for ages ask other people i think your miles out on your games of late.

Abysmal bonuses come in leaps & bounds on bonanza including crappy base play , this happens on loads of slots so why try to boost it so its such great base play is beyond me it may of used to be but base game has changed over last 5 months or so, the slots in question i had named for just naming other than jammin jars, they can play far better than Bonanza in base game as well . whether you want to agree or not.

They have produced better payouts & more payouts in less time as bonanza to which says it all to me )

You also more conveniently missed out how much bonanza is hammered compared to the other slots, so in effect we would see on here many many big wins , but please carry on defending them because it seems your always correct when speaking about slots , its not a dig but ive been around & played enough to know better ) those wins don't seem to be trending on this thread or in main screen shot thread whether you like it or not.

 

[mack341]

oddly DOA base game seems to keep you ticking over much more than jammin jars.

On bonanza a 200x bonus win at 20p is only £40, which most players won't bother withdrawing straightaway, but at dun's £2 stake it's £400, nearly half a grand, which many would withdraw.

What I take from dunover's approach as the key to success is the disclipine, a £200 deposit and no more; that way he can play it more often at different sites and therefore is more likely to catch it in generous mode. Whereas I've played it at 20p and kept redepositing small amounts till its taken £80 with no bonus [equivalent to £800 at £2 stake, 4 x dun's £200 sessions] so I've wasted all my bonanza deposits in one session, when the rng was hitting dead spins and 0.5 x wins.

Also at £2 you're wagering a lot more, could it be, putting on my foil hat carefully for a moment and not wishing to awaken trance, that the games bonus trigger is somehow affected by the amount wagered, kind of a reward for taking that bigger risk. 460 spins at 20p is £92, but £920 for £2. Obviously this can only go so far but maybe there is a small marginal plus effect on the bonus frequency?

I know the UKGC mention in their guidance/rules that games must play the same independent of stake and casino/slot makers have to keep an active watch/analysis to make sure this is happening, which to me suggests games could have unintended quirks/patterns in them relating to stake which only come to light through thorough analysis of results.

PS. I'm not recommending anyone play bonanza at £2.

 

[smart_croatia]

I personally love and hate bonanza, i play it every day and every bullet have some % of bonanza, but i never had 1000x win from day one, then i got 2300x win (two weeks ago) and plus won 200€ from btg comp and golden ticket, so last month i love it, we will see how it will perform in future (when @dunover is winning on it i do also), also i think this slot is one of the best slots ever made, also tbh i hate quickfire platform bonanza, it plays totally different then "original", no tell sings and no soul, also i read on trada rtp is 95.80% (they sent info mail), so i will stick to "original" one

 

[Jono777]

Right £2 stakes it is then, just depositing now....

click, click, spin, oooh, click, spin, shit, click, spin, slam button, oh shit I've bust that was a fun 30 seconds

Cheers @mack341

 

[dunover]

Dunover you can try & i mean try to convince players otherwise , but that's just your luck . i dont see many if any players having the same luck as youve had since promoting them

Abysmal bonuses come in leaps & bounds on bonanza including crappy base play , this happens on loads of slots so why try to boost it so its such great base play is beyond me it may of used to be but base game has changed over last 5 months or so, the slots in question i had named for just naming other than jammin jars, they can play far better than Bonanza in base game as well . whether you want to agree or not.

*************

Re-read what I said - the bonus on DoA reminds me of J*mm*n' J*rs not the base game which like Bonanza can maintain a long play duration. You've 3 HV games, DoA and Bonanza share the same kind of base game turnover although Bonanza can pay far more x bet in the base game than DoA. DoA shares a feature pattern with JJ. Bonanza has more median results in the bonus. This is why pro-rata those two DoA and JJ provide more frequent 1000x results, as I already said. I am not disagreeing about that.

I cannot however take your comments too seriously when you state "the base game has changed over the last 5 months or so" so how? Show us? The diamonds changed colour or more 10's added to the reels? The banjo player started screaming in a high C?

OR

" i dont see many if any players having the same luck as youve had since promoting them"

I mean, what the hell is that all about? I don't 'promote' any developer, only casinos same as every other aff on here. Perhaps you can explain how this situation you insinuate is executed - my IP gets a special BTG server with a 102% RTP at all casinos I play it at? The little man winds up the dial when he knows I'm playing? Do you not remember all the videos I used to post of being wiped out of £200 3 or 4 times on the bounce? Come on mate, be sensible here!

 

[snorky510238]

Most slots worth mentioning run at around 96% trtp so if we are to believe this actually happens over millions of spins then if you had the time and money and invested equal amounts of both into these games then after x amount of time theoretically you would be in the same situation with each of them. Therefore long term one is no better than another. In reality nobody has the time and money to do (or confirm) this. We are then obviously judging the slot on human nature as in IF WE HAVE BEEN LUCKY. Nobody is going to rant and rave about a slot they never win on no matter how good the concept is. Personally I think Immortal romance is one of the most boring slots I have ever played and I have never won anything remotely close to exciting but if I had hit a few x 1,000s I would be shouting it from the rooftops. The point being when all these games reach that finite point where rtp should be achieved there will be a lot of players left scratching their heads as to where their share has gone and a few thinking that’s the best game ever. Unless it was controlled and we all actually hit 96% but that couldn’t happen could it.

 

[pinnit2014]

Bonanzas one of the few games I don’t mind playing high ish stakes in. True - only a few have been good, like 400x on a fiver a few months ago but it’d take a bust on it than try Jumanji on that stake

May all be moot if QF don’t put that autospin back and everyone else takes that version

 

[goatwack]

I hate to say it but Bonanza is probably one of the most 'balanced' slots out there, on the fact that the base game (mostly) preserves one's bankroll, with the odd blockbuster thrown in. I've seen it with my own eyes

Because of the unpredictable yet generous base game, most bonuses will just inevitably be flat- out stinkers. Contrast that with DOA, I think we're all in agreement that the base game is more arid than a nun's chuff but 'saves' the distribution of payouts for the bonus.

So unless BTG were to 'update' Bonanza and shave a % or two off the base game, it's frustratingly understandable why that 14,000x hasn't materialized, preferring to dole out 1000xs with greater frequency

 

[dionysus]

I gotta say, while bonus rounds can be far and few between, like goatie says, i dont find the game to be a real balance eater, i can stay fairly par, or a slow trickle of losing, but i can get some playtime out of it, and possibly a bonus in a 20 buck attempt
by no means for me, the worst slot
but then, im not always expecting a 100x fs round

 

[lockinlove]

I cannot however take your comments too seriously when you state "the base game has changed over the last 5 months or so" so how? Show us? The diamonds changed colour or more 10's added to the reels? The banjo player started screaming in a high C?

Seems a bit high and mighty coming from someone who screams and swears up and down slots are rigged on your videos when you are running bad. And constantly suggests things are a set up especially when you think you can read how raging rhino works and can predict outcomes.

Actually I recall you making some claims against bonanza when you were getting terrible bonuses for awhile too. Now because you got some good hits, you're team bonanza?

C'mon.

You wanna defend the comments aimed at you promoting BTG because you're an affiliate, I get that. But alot of times you are leading the charge with the tin foil hat stuff. Now you mock people who do?

 

[lockinlove]

Bonanzas one of the few games I don’t mind playing high ish stakes in. True - only a few have been good, like 400x on a fiver a few months ago but it’d take a bust on it than try Jumanji on that stake

May all be moot if QF don’t put that autospin back and everyone else takes that version

Bonanza is really the only slot I felt ok betting $4 on sometimes. Until I get a bonus and it paid 23x every single time

 

[dunover]

Seems a bit high and mighty coming from someone who screams and swears up and down slots are rigged on your videos when you are running bad. And constantly suggests things are a set up especially when you think you can read how raging rhino works and can predict outcomes.

C'mon.

You wanna defend the comments aimed at you promoting BTG because you're an affiliate, I get that. But alot of times you are leading the charge with the tin foil hat stuff. Now you mock people who do?

Err...when you make videos, have heard of dramatic or comedic effects? You play to the type of audience you build up and the comments they make because the majority always suspect something's up...remember the chat on my video when I had that Bonanza run at Casumo? I jokingly stated I got a special 'affiliate RTP' and the shitstorm that caused still reverberates to this day, as you've not doubt seen when posters here mention 'affiliate RTP'...although on here they know it was a wind-up.

My failing predictions on Rhino became a subject of some good banter and laughs. And on Twin Spin.

And again, as it's not sinking in, I do NOT promote BTG, but promote online casinos. I just happen to like most of their slots, except EC.

 

[lockinlove]

Err...when you make videos, have heard of dramatic or comedic effects? You play to the type of audience you build up and the comments they make because the majority always suspect something's up...remember the chat on my video when I had that Bonanza run at Casumo? I jokingly stated I got a special 'affiliate RTP' and the shitstorm that caused still reverberates to this day, as you've not doubt seen when posters here mention 'affiliate RTP'...although on here they know it was a wind-up.

My failing predictions on Rhino became a subject of some good banter and laughs. And on Twin Spin.

And again, as it's not sinking in, I do NOT promote BTG, but promote online casinos. I just happen to like most of their slots, except EC.

lol you were not acting. You even posted some stuff in here about it way back when.

But its ok. I like you and dont want to argue I was just like wow dunover of all people lecturing people about non riggedness


I dont agree with people suggesting you build up BTG because you affiliate casinos with them. You advertise lots of casinos with various providers and trash them plenty on here and your reviews. I thought you would get more upset, mocking about that than mocking about bonanza not being rigged.

 

[dunover]

lol you were not acting. You even posted some stuff in here about it way back when.

But its ok. I like you and dont want to argue I was just like wow dunover of all people lecturing people about non riggedness


I dont agree with people suggesting you build up BTG because you affiliate casinos with them. You advertise lots of casinos with various providers and trash them plenty on here and your reviews. I thought you would get more upset, mocking about that than mocking about bonanza not being rigged.

Well when I had bad losing runs the frustration was real enough, the cat is real and one or two of the farts were as well. The majority was acting up though, something I felt compelled to do as I don't benefit from natural insanity like many of the streamers or tubers. (wait for it...….)

I am completely honest about new slots I post and 99% are mediocre hence their threads die away fast. Seek out the BTG Temple Quest? thread (IIRC that was the name of their Aztec slot a while back) and recall the comments there, which on the video were so scathing I got a message from BTG....and then (Ask Trancemonkey, he was there!) I proceeded to repeat them in person to the BTG rep in London, and I even recall when saying "blah blah...because it's SHIT!' TM saying the word exactly the same time as me lol....

They're all rigged anyway, to take 3-4% of each buck you play through. Some look less obvious than others though.

 

[nutnut]

Lockinlove keeping it 100% real as usual.

Never heard anyone rant so much in videos what a load of rigged shite slots are as much as Dunover. And no way you're acting, you are simply being the same as all of us when we feel the raff of slots and also just as arrogant when winning easily.. So lecturing people for saying the game has changed is just as ridiculous as some of the stuff you come out in 99% of your videos. People should freely be able to rant they are rigged. Cause we all contradict ourselves me included.

 

[lockinlove]

oddly DOA base game seems to keep you ticking over much more than jammin jars.

On bonanza a 200x bonus win at 20p is only £40, which most players won't bother withdrawing straightaway, but at dun's £2 stake it's £400, nearly half a grand, which many would withdraw.

What I take from dunover's approach as the key to success is the disclipine, a £200 deposit and no more; that way he can play it more often at different sites and therefore is more likely to catch it in generous mode. Whereas I've played it at 20p and kept redepositing small amounts till its taken £80 with no bonus [equivalent to £800 at £2 stake, 4 x dun's £200 sessions] so I've wasted all my bonanza deposits in one session, when the rng was hitting dead spins and 0.5 x wins.

Also at £2 you're wagering a lot more, could it be, putting on my foil hat carefully for a moment and not wishing to awaken trance, that the games bonus trigger is somehow affected by the amount wagered, kind of a reward for taking that bigger risk. 460 spins at 20p is £92, but £920 for £2. Obviously this can only go so far but maybe there is a small marginal plus effect on the bonus frequency?

I know the UKGC mention in their guidance/rules that games must play the same independent of stake and casino/slot makers have to keep an active watch/analysis to make sure this is happening, which to me suggests games could have unintended quirks/patterns in them relating to stake which only come to light through thorough analysis of results.

PS. I'm not recommending anyone play bonanza at £2.

Not sure where all the rtp is placed in the game but the base game must have a good portion of it. I think I compare this game to gemix in terms of base game and wins. There is the very rare outside chance you can get a big win but most times its just going to help you wager. And I think if people banged on both slots equally they would see the similarities. Out of all the spins I did on this slot I barely ever got a big hit on it. Even 500x was very very hard.

Im not saying its exactly like gemix of course but in terms of those big wins occurring..ya. And obv bonanza is much better graphics wise and attractiveness and all that.

DOA is a beast on its own. I dont think either game is comparable at all. And the amount of monster wins on DOA vs bonanza isnt even close. And people absolutely bang away on bonanza way more than DOA. But thats because bonanza allows people to stay on it. DOA basegame is very meh and zzzzz