Yes the problem with the megaways reel strips is that they have clusters of the same symbol so unless you are lucky enough to line them up they act more as blockers on reels 2 and especially 3 thus minimising cascades and controlling the multiplier.i have played it on other sites too. from my experience it just offers so much but produces little
when you have 10 free spins left in the bonus and you are sitting on a 15x multiplier and you have a screen that is full of megaways you expect to at least get some wins but most of the time you will get nothing just dead spins
i can say the same for every btg slot. they all offer so much and produce little
I'm pretty sure the 117,000+ 'ways' are just there to tilt, so don't feel bad haha
It depends if you believe in predetermined or not. Either way there is no proof. Only that theoretically it leads you to obviously think it has better potential (more spins more wins) but how many games pay more time and time again with a lower starting trigger and how many turn out awful with a higher number of starting spins?
Look at @Luckyscouser45. £2,800 odd off 8 spins. Who’s to say if she had started with 24 it would have paid more?
Yes also with that in mind it makes you think the game must be able to adapt in some way concerning rtp. Hypothetically if 100 people gamble and lose and their accumulative win would of been 2k then compared with the opposite scenario the game has to play differently than it would of to keep rtp in line.There's every chance that 8 could have been gambled and lost, and we would have never known about her heroics.
Which yes, makes one think whether the gamble feature is nothing more than a 2nd chance for the provider
It’s all mind games the 8 spins will pay if it wants toIt depends if you believe in predetermined or not. Either way there is no proof. Only that theoretically it leads you to obviously think it has better potential (more spins more wins) but how many games pay more time and time again with a lower starting trigger and how many turn out awful with a higher number of starting spins?
Look at @Luckyscouser45. £2,800 odd off 8 spins. Who’s to say if she had started with 24 it would have paid more?
probably hahahaha that makes sense actually!Yes also with that in mind it makes you think the game must be able to adapt in some way concerning rtp. Hypothetically if 100 people gamble and lose and their accumulative win would of been 2k then compared with the opposite scenario the game has to play differently than it would of to keep rtp in line.
Maybe @Luckyscouser45 had a one off rtp adjuster donated by all the people who lost gambles.
It depends if you believe in predetermined or not. Either way there is no proof. Only that theoretically it leads you to obviously think it has better potential (more spins more wins) but how many games pay more time and time again with a lower starting trigger and how many turn out awful with a higher number of starting spins?
Look at @Luckyscouser45. £2,800 odd off 8 spins. Who’s to say if she had started with 24 it would have paid more?
It was a whole screen still salivating thinking of the beauty of it wish I would of got the screenshot but I was laying down not really paying attention half asleep thinking here we go another shit bonus round!!I think @Luckyscouser45 hit a full screen of purple chillis. At least that’s how she described it. I did work out how many she would of needed for the win and it wasn’t as many as you may think. Always meant to ask if it was just purples and no other symbol.
I have read numerous posts where taking 8 spins has paid a good return and constantly see posts where larger amounts pay nothing. Look at the Bonanza thread last night. @pinnit hit the dream and extremely rarely seen 27 spin start and it paid awfully.
What I am saying here is let’s not be naive. There will be more built into slots than we imagine. When I first came to the forum I knew slots didn’t work exactly the way we are lead to believe but I didn’t know how.
I still don’t exactly but the information I have gathered has helped me understand things a lot better and then the x% I can’t be told accounts for the rest.
When I say let’s not be naive I mean there’s a competition to reach 50 spins. How bad would it of looked if the comp ran for months and nobody hit it. Worst publicity ever. It was a given that someone would hit it. Whether randomly chosen who knows but it was a cert but never seen since.
Then you have the different usage of reel strips. It doesn’t tell you about that on the front of the box. The 117,649 ways uses different reel strips in the base game. God knows how many different strips in the bonus round so even if you hit 50 spins you may get the worst reel sets and 8 spins may get the best.
Another thing that crossed my mind with the unlimited multiplier is that I don’t believe for a second that you could let the bonuses play out truly randomly on a megaways slot and have it retain its correct rtp. The deviations and variables would be enormous even testing billions of spins would prove very little.
Always big hits on 20p for some reasonYeah so essentially 72 ways of purples. There are a few different combinations that it could have delivered to reach the total. Which if I remember right was £2,880 on 20p.
I think @Luckyscouser45Then you have the different usage of reel strips. It doesn’t tell you about that on the front of the box. The 117,649 ways uses different reel strips in the base game. God knows how many different strips in the bonus round so even if you hit 50 spins you may get the worst reel sets and 8 spins may get the best.