1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Bars and Tripe! Odds are definitely Sods!

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by loganberry, Aug 26, 2006.

    Aug 26, 2006
  1. loganberry

    loganberry Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    No more Heroes
    I was wondering if any of you mathematical geniuses out there could throw some light on the following:

    I have just finished playing a long session with Bars and Tripe, getting the 3 hat bonus a total of 32 times.

    Every single time my pick gave me the lowest amount going. Every damned time. Not the middle amount, but always the lowest. It was absolutely heartbreaking to 'win' 250 coins when 25000 was frequently available. So my question is: what is the mathematical probability of this happening 32 times in a row?

    Whenever I play Mad Hatters and get the cuckoo clock bonus there, I feel the odds are evenly balanced, as my picks result in sometimes winning, sometimes losing the highest amount on offer.

    Definitely not my experience with Bars and Tripe. :confused:

    I hestitate to say it....no I don't :D ..Is this game rigged?
     
  2. Aug 26, 2006
  3. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    Keeping in mind that I am not a math-head but merely a cursed 'picker' who always picks the lowest denom or gets the 'pooper' on the first or second pick (games like Pollenation) regardless of the game: I feel that players are not actually 'choosing' but only revealing what the game is giving us for the bonus.

    The huge amounts they reveal that we did not win I regard as an MG 'neener neener neener'.... :D
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Aug 26, 2006
  5. winbig

    winbig Keep winning this amount.

    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Pennsylvania

    Definatly sounds like their VP "double". You're right, it's predetermined.

    IMO, showing the large amounts that you *could* win as being available only leads to some people thinking "damn, if I had only picked that one..." to keep 'em playing. Alot do know there's no rhyme or reason for picking in the bonus rounds, but yet there are a few out there that try and pick up on a pattern that simply doesn't exist.
     
    1 person likes this.
  6. Aug 26, 2006
  7. thetest32

    thetest32 Non-Gambler

    Yes.. I am sure the game is simply 'displaying' the result as picked in the background. So... you hit spin, the RNG picks a number which corresponds to, say, a 10 win. The game could show this as a reel win or as a feature. If it's a picking feature you still pick 10 as this was what the RNG selected... the others are for show. Just like all the times on three-reel slots you get Jackpot, Jackpot, one above / below jackpot. It's to make you think "oh...next time it'll be there".

    Well... I think that's how it works! I know Section 16 random 500 games in the UK work on that basis...

    B.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Aug 26, 2006
  9. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    I'm not familiar with the game, but if there are 3 choices, and there is a 1/3 chance of drawing the lowest choice; then the odds of drawing the lowest choice 32 times in a row is roughly 1 in 500,000. It's safe to say there is more than a 1/3 choice of drawing the lowest result. Perhaps they use weighed odds, so that there is a 90+% chance of the lowest choice and a very low chance of the big wins.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. Aug 26, 2006
  11. SlotsWizard

    SlotsWizard Dormant account

    Occupation:
    I currently work for the Wizard of Odds
    Location:
    North of Antarctica
    The prize is more than likely chosen as soon as your bet reaches the server. In addition to this predetermined prize, it randomly selects another 2 amounts for show. The only purpose the other two choices serve is to create the illusion of a missed opportunity (or sometimes, a great pick on your part), and I am sure that nearly all "pick an object" type bonus rounds function in this manner.

    AusVegas and Lasseters are decent enough to actually disclose that this is exactly how their bonus rounds function, for example:

    -SlotsJunkie
     
    4 people like this.
  12. Aug 27, 2006
  13. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    Thanks, Slotjunkie! I had forgotten about that. I like it that they are up front about it.
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Aug 27, 2006
  15. nafanny29

    nafanny29 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    financail adviser
    Location:
    London, England
    Fair enough they are up front about it, but showing the lowest out of the 3 amounts 32 times in a row is just plain wrong IMO.

    If it was random the chances of drawing the lowest result from 3, 32 times in a row is so remote it would never happen. (My calculater wont display it cause its too long LOL
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. Aug 27, 2006
  17. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Dumb mistake, sorry. 1 in 3^32 = 1 in 1.85 quadrillion... statistically impossible.
     
  18. Aug 27, 2006
  19. Zoozie

    Zoozie Ueber Meister CAG PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    Denmark
    Because of the rigged/deceptive VP doubling at MG which really stunned me,
    I am not willing to belive you have a case.

    I have seen a 'high' prize about 20 times during my play on the slot, but only managed to pick it 3 or 4 times. This is a little below excepted, but it also caught my suspecion.

    I find it highly unacceptable to cheat players this way. But I know a good reason it could be true. Like in Poker, you have people going on tilt and loosing a lot of money. Cheating players this way will manage to do the same. The picked the wrong hat, blame themself and get angry and they believe they were close to a big win if they had picked another hat. They keep playing believing they have a 1/3 chance to pick the good hat when one of they has a high prize.

    Zoozie
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. Aug 27, 2006
  21. loganberry

    loganberry Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    No more Heroes
    Played again this morning (same Casino) and the picks were better - resulting in 25000 x 1, 12500 x 2, 10000 x 2, 7500 x 1, 5000 x 1, 750 x 2 and 250 x 1.

    Have also noticed the same pattern with Moonshine, e.g. either 10 - 14 spins @ 3x or 4x or I pick the 'Start Spin Now' with my first pick. And whichever way it goes on my first pick, it remains that way for the entire time I am playing.

    The only games with bonus picks I consider to be 'fair' are Cashanova and Mad Hatters - a mix of high and low consistently thoughout the entire game. A genuine case of sometimes I win, sometimes I lose.

    What I found most upsetting about Bars and Tripe was that not once within 32 bonus picks did I win anything decent, and I am still having trouble accepting that as normal, particularly if the odds to achieve this really are as great as have been quoted above.

    BTW, have noticed that with B&T, whenever I win a lot of scatters (4 and ocasionally 5), the Hats seem to be conspicuous by their absence.

    Also found that with Mad Hatters - if the cuckoo clocks appear a lot, then those immensely cute little bunnies don't!

    Thanks very much for everyone's input into this. Very dispiriting as I thought that it was all random! Anyway, should I deduce from all of this that if I am consistently 'picking' low, then I should go away and come back another day?
    :lolup:
     

Share This Page