1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

9 New games at Intercasino!

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by KasinoKing, Jun 8, 2007.

    Jun 8, 2007
  1. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Downloading at this very moment, and sound very interesting!

    Three 25-line progressive jackpot slots:
    Captain America
    Hulk - Ultimate Revenge
    Wolverine


    Two non-progressive 25-line slots:
    Dino Delight
    Quest of Kings


    Non-progressive 30-line slot:
    Enchanted Beans

    Casual Slot:
    Jewel Quest (Maybe a variation on Bejewjeled/Cubis...?)

    Sudoku (?)

    Multi-hand Video Blackjack... :what:

    I'm a bit disappointed all the new slots have too many lines... :(

    Reviewers wanted! (Zoozie...? :rolleyes:)
    I'll volunteer for Jewel Quest! ;)

    KK
     
  2. Jun 8, 2007
  3. kwblue

    kwblue Webmaster webmeister

    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    USA
    Yeah, I had fun playing them (in fun mode) :) Sure wish I could play for real!
     
  4. Jun 9, 2007
  5. Sodax77

    Sodax77 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Human Being
    Location:
    EU|FI
    I believe that they have a deal with Astraware or/and PopCap or Mumbojumbo or someone :D

    Well, i know these games, played all (real versions), and i made a research.
    After 30 minutes, here are the results (some):

    Information:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Bejeweled:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link./You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Jewel Quest:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Cubis:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    Download/Play Online:
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
    You must register/login in order to see the link.
     
  6. Jun 9, 2007
  7. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Brief reviews (I need to go play! :p)

    Jewel Quest:
    As expected, a bit like Bejeweled & Cubis.
    Very low variance (see below) - lots of very small wins.
    Potential for big wins, but don't seem very likely.
    Winning combinations turn the grid gold, when it's all gold the level is over and you get a bonus which was always 100% for me. 100% of what, I don't know!
    Tried to catch it in this screenshot, but it goes VERY fast!

    View attachment 6443

    Playing at $1 a go, I wagered $151 & finished $15.72 up! :thumbsup:
    I played to the end of Level 3 and stopped because Level 4 looks too difficult.
    However - when I went back to check my stats this-morning I found the game still at the beginning of level 4, and I get the feeling you HAVE to complete all the levels & can't just stop & re-start.

    But however(2) this game could just have a winning strategy methinks... :rolleyes:


    Sudoku:
    To be honest, I didn't have much of a clue what on earth was going on!
    There's just too much on the screen to take in, so I just hit 'play' and waited for the payout!
    This one also seems to be very low variance.
    I don't know if it was beginners luck or what, but I got 15 free 'spins' at x2 multiplier twice in 56 goes & both times it re-triggered for 30 spins!

    This was the result of the first one, just 34 to 1:-

    View attachment 6444

    The second time I only got $24 which just proves the low-variance.

    There's a second bonus round called 'Sudoku Numbers' which I got about 4 times, but again with this you need to be exceptionally lucky to win anything half decent.

    Thanks to the bonus rounds: Wagered $56, finished $34 up! :cool:

    Conclusion:
    From my very small sample both these games seem very low variance. Will be fun for the first 15 minutes of play but could soon get boring if it's big wins you seek. However, they could be very good for turning over slots WR... ;)

    KK
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Jun 9, 2007
  9. blaqpoet

    blaqpoet Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Software Engineer
    Location:
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    I'm loving their Multi-hand Video Blackjack :thumbsup:
     
  10. Jun 10, 2007
  11. Scooter7

    Scooter7 Meister Member

    Occupation:
    Gaming
    Location:
    Toronto
    I'm pretty impressed with it myself.

    Questions:

    If using 'normal' basic strategy, should you expect to see the same house edge?

    With each hand being measured against many hands, does that give you a bigger chance of large wins or losses, or does it have more of a leveling effect?
     
  12. Jun 10, 2007
  13. tencardcharlie

    tencardcharlie Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Bureaucrat
    Location:
    The playboy mansion.
    1. Yes, the house edge should be exactly the same.

    2. If you bet the same amount in total as you would bet on a single hand of BJ the variance will be smaller (smaller wins, smaller losses) since you often will win or lose fractions of your bet.

    Edit: But if you bet an amount equal to what you would bet on a single hand multiplied by the number of hands per game, the variance will be much higher than normal BJ.
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Jun 13, 2007
  15. Scooter7

    Scooter7 Meister Member

    Occupation:
    Gaming
    Location:
    Toronto
    I've been to You must register/login in order to see the link. and the Wiz has added some notes about the new BJ game, including a screenshot (which I've appropriated for this post:eek2:).


    I know my Blackjack very well, but don't play it very often. I'd like to hear what the hardcore BJ fanatics think of this.
     
  16. Jun 13, 2007
  17. Avatar73

    Avatar73 Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    Pilot
    Location:
    UK
    Mmm, just seems quite high variance. Turned 12,500 into 100,000 and then lost it all. I would think you might be a bit less happy to bust, thus altering strategy?

    Great when a BJ stuffs 50x dealer 3up.
    Sucks when you hit 12v2 and bust, losing 50 times.

    Interesting to see many dealer results tho. Did you realise how unlikely a dealer is to bust a 2up card? or even a 5 upcard? Also, if you have TTvT then you are highly likely to win? Ok, even 50 is a smallish sample, but i found this happened nearly every time.

    I would think..... if you want a double or bust, might be a good one to bet half your bankroll on 1 hand vs 50? less variance then 1v1, but lower rewards as well. would be interested in seeing an analysis.
     
  18. Jun 13, 2007
  19. aka23

    aka23 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technical
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Wizard of odds wrote:
    I'm a little puzzled about the comment about the six-deck strategy and the listed house edge. Isn't this an 8-deck game? If so, wouldn't the house edge be similar to Crypto standard BJ with 8 decks, or I am missing something? If it is 8 decks, I'd estimate the house edge to be ~0.50%, slightly above Cryptologic standard BJ due to the odd peeking rule. I'd rough guess that the strategy differences would be Stand on 15+, after splitting 8s vs 10, and Stand on 12+, after splitting 8s vs A. Note that if you bust on the first split hand against a 10, then you could use standard strategy for the 2nd without consequence.
     
  20. Jun 13, 2007
  21. Benke

    Benke Dormant account

    Location:
    Sweden
    I think Shackleford made a typo. If you look at his standard eight-deck Crypto strategy chart you can see that it says six decks on the chart but eight decks above it where he lists the Crypto BJ rules. This is because he uses the same chart for Boss Medias six deck game.

    I guess he now thought that Crypto uses a six deck game also.

    So I think the house edge should be 0.49% and not 0.45%, plus whatever edge that last rule gives the house.
     
  22. Jun 14, 2007
  23. cyprean

    cyprean Banned User PABnononaccred

    Occupation:
    Freelancer
    Location:
    Sun/Moon
    What am I missing here?

    and

    How can the dealer have BJ if all his hands are 8 up?
     
  24. Jun 20, 2007
  25. Corpus

    Corpus Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Gaming Analyst
    Location:
    Australia
    Go Marvel

    The Marvel Games absolutely blew me out of the water. The Animation, music & sfx were the best I have ever seen on a slot machine.

    The other games Dino Delight & Enchanted Beans were cool as well.

    There was only one downside to the game, the download times, but well worth it to play them.

    :thumbsup:
     
  26. Jun 21, 2007
  27. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Welcome to the forum! :thumbsup:

    I agree the new Marvel games are Marvelous! :rolleyes:
    But those Enchanted Beans were Enchanted crap for me. I thought this game was diabolical (and so did my bank balance). I guess the bonus feature might play quite well, but since I never got one in over 260 spins I wouldn't know... :mad:

    KK
     

Share This Page