neon claws
Non-Gambler
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
- Location
- Australia
I don't see how every different provider would conceivably replicate the exact same exploitable behaviour when simply programming in a random draw would be so much easier.I realize this thread is now 10 years old but I was intrigued by the original poster’s strategy so I went to a B&M casino Thursday and gave it a whirl. I started with $100. I hit (3) 4 of a kinds, all on different machines on the same little island then hit a Royal on 50 cents for $2000 all within 40 min. I’m not exaggerating on any of this. This strategy is the real deal.
Maybe report back once you've got more than forty minutes worth of data?
The only way I could think that this process might give the appearance of working is if VP slots are programmed to make a specific payout regardless of the players choices.
But since I don't play VP a lot of this "strategy" goes over my head... He seems to be saying don't go after lower paying/more likely combinations and instead go after the royal flush at all costs?
Also maybe that the left most card for some reason is the most prominent?.. because programming is... left to right???
Another possiblity is that by chasing the highest combination you drastically increase volatility, thus giving you the chance to see increased gains in the short term.