- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Location
- Kent
"We can all figure out this would not happen if the player were able to buy 5 more features, then the this bigger win would have triggered after 5 more features or not at all"
*blinks* Oh gawwd. Dude
"The software is not random when it triggers this phenomenon"
But it IS random if the player loses deposit after deposit like the guy who recently made 11 x £100 deposits and gave it to reactacoons¿ with no win that would possibly have made the difference in keeping him coming back/hooked for a long time if it had appeared?
Or was that another triggered phenomenon, like the phenomenon that jono777 claims he is up (i believe) about 8k at a ceartin casino group as a low roller, where they never decided to trigger any of these available phenomenons.
For example, triggering a phenomenon where he loses almost every single deposit and giving 0 balance savers after once the software is aware he was approximately into 4k profit, being roughly 160 deposits ahead, but decided to go against the softwares calculations by refusing to apply any phenomenon to stop him continuing this dangerously consistant run, and therefore giving him the opportunity to take it further and eventually reach approximately 320 deposits infront, which would now require 320 deposits with 0 withdrawals to get the casino group just back to breaking even before including cost, assuming he still continues to deposits with the same amount(s) each time.
But instead, they decided to trigger 0 phenomenons and go with the old trusted 'letting luck take its course' until deciding to to simply bonus ban him because they know that at his depositing style of 20-25 quid per deposit that they likely wont be able to recover the 8k over the next century even with all the phenomenon's available to trigger that could have, if initiated, turn it the other way, however subtle.
Glad you figured it out anyway. Unfortunately despite your claims we can't all do the same, especially myself, there is simply a bit to much thought processing involved for me to undertake on a sunday.
*blinks* Oh gawwd. Dude
"The software is not random when it triggers this phenomenon"
But it IS random if the player loses deposit after deposit like the guy who recently made 11 x £100 deposits and gave it to reactacoons¿ with no win that would possibly have made the difference in keeping him coming back/hooked for a long time if it had appeared?
Or was that another triggered phenomenon, like the phenomenon that jono777 claims he is up (i believe) about 8k at a ceartin casino group as a low roller, where they never decided to trigger any of these available phenomenons.
For example, triggering a phenomenon where he loses almost every single deposit and giving 0 balance savers after once the software is aware he was approximately into 4k profit, being roughly 160 deposits ahead, but decided to go against the softwares calculations by refusing to apply any phenomenon to stop him continuing this dangerously consistant run, and therefore giving him the opportunity to take it further and eventually reach approximately 320 deposits infront, which would now require 320 deposits with 0 withdrawals to get the casino group just back to breaking even before including cost, assuming he still continues to deposits with the same amount(s) each time.
But instead, they decided to trigger 0 phenomenons and go with the old trusted 'letting luck take its course' until deciding to to simply bonus ban him because they know that at his depositing style of 20-25 quid per deposit that they likely wont be able to recover the 8k over the next century even with all the phenomenon's available to trigger that could have, if initiated, turn it the other way, however subtle.
Glad you figured it out anyway. Unfortunately despite your claims we can't all do the same, especially myself, there is simply a bit to much thought processing involved for me to undertake on a sunday.