Where have all the Fruit machines gone? (Microgaming AWP)

Maybe this has something to do with it... cocky b@stard on one of the other forums been bouncing around all the MG casinos since February milking them

He (or she) posted this yesterday

10nxlie.jpg

What forum is this?

You really should send a message to generalenquiries@microgaming.co.uk asking about the missing games. :thumbsup:

They don't respond to enquiries from players (it's been tried before).
 
Whoever posted pic is a fool. Not only should they not have that much cash sitting in a bank account doing naught for them, they have given any potential scam artist, identify theft ring or hackers enough info to make a serious attempt at stealing from them.
 
Whoever posted pic is a fool. Not only should they not have that much cash sitting in a bank account doing naught for them, they have given any potential scam artist, identify theft ring or hackers enough info to make a serious attempt at stealing from them.

That's a hell of a lot to have sitting in a Sandander 123 account:what: Don't they know interest is paid only on the first £20,000.

Looks more like they have had a minor progressive win, there is no way they could have won that much since February by playing the AWPs.

It's possible though that such a bold claim has actually scared operators and Microgaming into a bit of a panic, just as a poster here managed to scare a casino into getting Microgaming investigate Premier Roulette after he posted that he could beat the game using his system.
 
Black Hat Forum - SEO and Money Making Forums

I'm only a member there cause I pick up tips on SEO and web design. Lots of bull$hit of people making millions from Google AdSense and other get quick rich schemes.

It could be his affiliate payments then, the proceeds of plenty of black hat SEO and bending the rules of the affiliate program.

I could find no reference to claims of milking Microgaming AWPs anywhere on the net other than the ones I make here:)
 
They've probably only removed them from YOUR casino accounts because you know how to beat them.
They're still available for everyone else... :p

KK

I checked that, they don't work on various free to play sites, so no account details get checked.

ROFLMAO.

You actually CHECKED that????

Thankyou so much for the best laugh I've had all week.

I can't believe you actually thought they may have removed them all for just you.

Yes, I have checked, all gone across the board.

:D:thumbsup::notworthy

The posts above is almost to good to be true.

The fact that you haven't been banned from playing them shows that they're more than happy to take your action, which means they're not constantly losing money to you......which means you have no control over the payouts, because if you did you would constantly beat them, which you don't.

The machines have a house edge of around 5% and they don't payout before players have filled them, the casinos will not lose money to players at all. The money VWM won (if he won in the long run) are from other players. Casinos don't care who won on it as long as they still have that 5% HE. It's not as when players notice that they could gain an advantage over the casino as in the case of RTG Orc VS Elf.

32red Support say they are not coming back, and that they were removed as they were not popular :p

:D Poor VWM.

You can NOT "spot a community fed streak coming". To state that you can is nonsense of the highest order.

IF VWM can recognize patterns and this in the long run gave him an advantage, this might have given him a personal RTP of above 100%. As other players after him have to fill it up again he can't return to the machine until this is done and this takes time. What VWM has done is (if I'm guessing correct) to have an account at almost every MG casino there is to have more chances.

Another guess is that he looks at the slot temp meters to see if other players have used them. If they haven't moved since he looked the last time, he doesn't even open the game up. ;)
 
:D:thumbsup::notworthy

The posts above is almost to good to be true.



The machines have a house edge of around 5% and they don't payout before players have filled them, the casinos will not lose money to players at all. The money VWM won (if he won in the long run) are from other players. Casinos don't care who won on it as long as they still have that 5% HE. It's not as when players notice that they could gain an advantage over the casino as in the case of RTG Orc VS Elf.

Here is where the misconception lies. In a land based fruitie....YES. In an online AWP....NO. Why? Because you have no way of knowing who has been feeding it and for how long, and there are no mechanical "tricks" (e.g. certain button combinations) or specific reel setups etc that give you a hint as to whether it might be ready to pay out.

In other words, online AWPs don't need to be "filled" before they will hit. The only game that shows any type of "fill" level indication is Treasure Ireland and it's clones, but these are local games specific to the player's account. You can "force" that slot by refusing all wins until it offers 500x win etc or the TI feature at which point it pays out. In extremely rare cases, it pays out a "megastreak" such as VWM hit 7 years ago. It is almost certain that this amount came from some kind of "pool" made up of a % of all players losses across the network....although it is possible that it also came from VWM's own losses that had accumulated over the years on that game, given that the Ti feature does NOT always mean a net win i.e. it might cost you 1500xbet to hit the 500xbet top pay. In any case, it is completely out of the control of the player when and if this megastreak hits, and cannot be predicted in any way whatsoever. VWM has provided proof of this fact himself by mentioning on multiple occasions that he could "see" or "predict" another megastreak.....and it did not happen. The last time was a very public "prediction" that fell flat on it's backside
.


:D Poor VWM.



IF VWM can recognize patterns and this in the long run gave him an advantage, this might have given him a personal RTP of above 100%. As other players after him have to fill it up again he can't return to the machine until this is done and this takes time. What VWM has done is (if I'm guessing correct) to have an account at almost every MG casino there is to have more chances.

Another guess is that he looks at the slot temp meters to see if other players have used them. If they haven't moved since he looked the last time, he doesn't even open the game up. ;)

Even if he or anyone else could "recognize patterns", it wouldn't make any difference overall unless you could make them happen at will. The game will payout the jackpot or it won't, just like any other slot machine. Nothing the player does changes what the game will or won't do (apart from the very limited example of games like Treasure Ireland where one can refuse wins etc to hit the final feature as per above).

The slot temp meters are a load of crapola. Meaningless. I've hit the top jackpot many times on Game On etc and days later it hasn't gone up or down. Same with the video poker after RFs. Following those is embarking on a fool's errand.

Hence, there is no way to know if another player just hit big, and therefor no way to know what part of the "cycle" the game is currently in (if such a thing exists), and therefor NO way to "predict" if an AWP is going to pay a jackpot/megastreak. These facts alone show that nothing anybody does to the game makes any difference to the TRTP. If VWM's personal RTP is over 100% (impossible to say even for him I'd imagine without meticulous session records over 10+ years), it is due to that one megastreak at 32Red all those years ago which was down to pure luck and nothing else. Take that out of the equation, and the results are just like any other Joe who plays AWPs. As I said earlier, the only thing that makes people say "OOoooooo" and "Wowwwww" and believe the guff he sprouts about being some kind of "expert" who can influence the games somehow is the large stakes and resulting large wins involved. As I also mentioned earlier, except for that one megastreak, I have screenies and wins with the equivalent xBet wins just with much lower stakes....and I don't claim to be any kind of expert and certainly don't think anything I do makes a spit of difference to the result.

VWM DOES have a "system". It's a very simple one, and anyone can do it:

1. Start with a large bankroll

2. Keep pressing SPIN

3. Wait for the jackpot. If it doesn't happen before your bankroll runs out, then:

4. Rinse and repeat.

There really is nothing else to it. When one looks at the facts, VWM claiming he can "manipulate" the AWPs is no different to the people who mosey in here saying they can predict roulette numbers consistently. It's just a load of nonsense.

Remember....and this is important....online AWPs are TOTALLY different from the land based fruities of old. VWM is a master of the latter no doubt, but nobody is a master of the former.
 
I always assumed that MG AWP's are "non random" games. Do you mean that every single spin on these are totally independent of previous spins and outcomes?
 
I always assumed that MG AWP's are "non random" games. Do you mean that every single spin on these are totally independent of previous spins and outcomes?

No they aren't "random" in a video slot kind of way.

However, just because each spin isn't random, doesn't mean there is a pattern nor does it mean it is able to be manipulated to pay out more than it's TRTP.

The AWPs just throw out dead spin after dead spin while they are not paying, and throw out a winning combination when it is ready to pay out. Unless you know when that payout is going to happen......and nobody can....you cannot "beat" them consistently/over the long term.

Even if you knew that a big payout happens after 3 ships comes up twice in a row or whatever, it means nothing in terms of "beating" the game, because you cannot make it happen in the first place. All it does is "tells" you that a jackpot is going to hit in the next few spins, which is useless as a one-legged man in an arse-kicking contest if all you're doing is hitting SPIN over and over until it hits anyway.

Do you get what I mean? Even if you DO work out when its about to pay, the information itself doesn't actually help you because the event is already happening and you didn't and can't generate it in the first place anyway.
 
The problem is of course that you would also probably have to make countless spins in the first place to get to the point of when the "tell" occurs. Meaning you could have spent a fortune in order to get to that point in the first place.

The mind will always see patterns even when they may not be there. I swear I see patterns in slots sometimes too. But it's totally meaningless and irrelevant really. If it's going to happen, it's going to happen. Pattern or not. I figure it's just my mind trying to keep me playing more than anything else.
 
As Microgaming drop them for not being popular enough, other casinos running different softwares are adding such games. The UK fruit machine developers are now converting many of their popular land games so that they can be offered online. Clearly, they hold a different opinion to that of Microgaming. It's possible that what is becoming unpopular are the Viper download casinos and the old style Flash ones, and more popular now are the browser based multi provider casinos, which is where these newly converted to online land fruities are turning up.
 
Black Hat Forum - SEO and Money Making Forums

I'm only a member there cause I pick up tips on SEO and web design. Lots of bull$hit of people making millions from Google AdSense and other get quick rich schemes.

Hey Nicola, I still didn't manage to find the forum/post you refer to, any chance of a link? Just intrigued thats all :) THX
 
I'm surprised they didn't remove these years ago.

  • They could be manipulated and they were readable. Crucially, they had an option to change stake - and all stakes shared the same ledger, which could lead to bizarreness like a 10p a play AWP trying to pay out £5,000.
  • They could be fed with bonus money, and emptied using real cash (so no wagering hoops or restrictions).
  • The first spin on a game is dead. My theory is that with each spin there was a calculated chance of it upping a gear in happiness. Each gear was recognisable by behaviour, and could be tested with varying stakes.
  • They were illegal. It always made me chuckle that under the game description was a disclaimer that explained that all games are random and every spin is independent.
  • Finally, even if they did have some small popularity, they probably attracted the wrong sort of customers anyway. Especially when combined with the above.

I've made some fairly decent money from them over the last 7 or 8 years. Now that they're gone I regret not capitalising on it more. I took the approach of doing it slowly and hiding the strategy within many pages of heavy betting in my play history - which was stressful to accomplish to say the least!

If the bank receipt image that Nicola posted above is linked to the AWPs (and with the many MG casinos, winning that much from them was definitely possible), then it seems that crashing through them quickly actually worked ...for one person. :rolleyes: And if that happened, I'm shocked they kept paying out. I wish I'd just done that now, not only would I have a nice fat bank balance but I would have saved myself a lot of trouble.
 
I'm surprised they didn't remove these years ago.

  • They could be manipulated and they were readable. Crucially, they had an option to change stake - and all stakes shared the same ledger, which could lead to bizarreness like a 10p a play AWP trying to pay out £5,000.
  • They could be fed with bonus money.
  • The first spin on a game is dead. My theory is that with each spin there was a calculated chance of it upping a gear in happiness. Each gear was recognisable by behaviour, and could be tested with varying stakes.
    [*]They were illegal. It always made me chuckle that under the game description was a disclaimer that explained that all games are random and every spin is independent.
  • Finally, even if they did have some small popularity, they probably attracted the wrong sort of customers anyway. Especially when combined with the above.

I've made some fairly decent money from them over the last 7 or 8 years. Now that they're gone I regret not capitalising on it more. I took the approach of doing it slowly and hiding the strategy within many pages of heavy betting in my play history - which was stressful to accomplish to say the least!

If the image above is linked to the AWPs (and winning that much from them was definitely possible), then it seems that crashing through them quickly actually worked ...for one person. :rolleyes: And if that happened, I'm shocked they kept paying out. I wish I'd just done that now, not only would I have a nice fat bank balance but I would have saved myself a lot of trouble.

NOT under UK laws they weren't. And MG clearly state they are 'AWP's'. Yes, you could feed them with bonus money which was a flaw which Vinyl liked. As for sharing the 'same ledger' I can't see that for sure. On one hand if you play on max stake (£10) in fun mode until you have gone say 100+ spins without a win, then drop the stake to 10p you immediately trigger a silly streak of thousands x stake. Compensation in its true form. On the other hand, I lost a couple of hundred over a few sessions on Track and Field Mouse at 20p stakes getting the usual 42- 80 x stake returns on 3 bars. I won on TSII and went back at £1 a stake, first 3 Bars paid 502x stake on the 12 spins (screenie here somewhere) putting me £300 up overall on it.
Prior to this I DID share a belief that the slot was account-specific and you could ONLY win with streaks you had funded yourself, i.e. 'bought' them. So I know from experience it's possible Vinyl did force streaks that resulted in big profits.

Nice to see Vinyl described as the 'wrong sort of customer'....:D

VINYL - you need to change your avatar description from 'you type well loads' to 'the wrong sort of customer'........lol
 
Are £10 a play, £5k jackpot AWPs legal? Either way, they broke the Casino's advertised terms.

The ledger is definitely shared between all stakes. I (quite sadly) have thousands of examples from over the years.

I mentioned the profit thing. Money-in buys a chance of upping it's mood, so there is a bit of randomness there. Several times I've had them suddenly want to pay out £5,000 after only a couple of hundred through - so you can certainly be in the black. That's my point - you can read the behaviour and make a judgement whether you're going to end up in profit or not. The happyometre uses some amount of randomness in the way it's calculated, but also uses fixed rules.

At first I thought that play began at a 'starting point' unique to each account/game/player, but this is disproved by the first spin always being 'dead'. From that point it's mood can only go up (until it pays out), but the speed it does so varies.

'Forcing' streaks by refusing all payouts until one big one, then stop? Erm yeah, that's the basic logic of AWPs.

Wrong type of customer was a general reference to all long-time machine players. There's a mentality of trying to beat the system. Usually that attitude is profitable for (and encouraged by) a casino, but not when they have openings to exploit.
 
Last edited:
Are £10 a play, £5k jackpot AWPs legal? Either way, they broke the Casino's advertised terms.

The ledger is definitely shared between all stakes. I (quite sadly) have thousands of examples from over the years.

I mentioned the profit thing. Money-in buys a chance of upping it's mood, so there is a bit of randomness there. Several times I've had them suddenly want to pay out £5,000 after only a couple of hundred through - so you can certainly be in the black. That's my point - you can read the behaviour and make a judgement whether you're going to end up in profit or not. The happyometre uses some amount of randomness in the way it's calculated, but also uses fixed rules.

At first I thought that play began at a 'starting point' unique to each account/game/player, but this is disproved by the first spin always being 'dead'. From that point it's mood can only go up (until it pays out), but the speed it does so varies.

'Forcing' streaks by refusing all payouts until one big one, then stop? Erm yeah, that's the basic logic of AWPs.

Wrong type of customer was a general reference to all long-time machine players. There's a mentality of trying to beat the system. Usually that attitude is profitable for (and encouraged by) a casino, but not when they have openings to exploit.

Yep. The gamble being will the forced EPP exceed your 'investment'? According to Vinyl it regularly does. On most of them you can't refuse all wins anyway.
 
Refusing all wins - where possible.

If impossible, that's where changing the stake comes in.

It doesn't really force it to owe more than it would have released... it's just the optimal way of playing - making it release it's bank in one hit. AWP logic is that scattered releases of money will grind down the percentage owed. Always avoid letting it do this (with the exception of exploiting a bug).

I was kind of posting with the assumption that anyone reading would take that for granted.

The main thing with the Microgaming AWPs is they were particularly transparent.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised they didn't remove these years ago.

  • They could be manipulated and they were readable. Crucially, they had an option to change stake - and all stakes shared the same ledger, which could lead to bizarreness like a 10p a play AWP trying to pay out £5,000.
  • They could be fed with bonus money, and emptied using real cash (so no wagering hoops or restrictions).
  • The first spin on a game is dead. My theory is that with each spin there was a calculated chance of it upping a gear in happiness. Each gear was recognisable by behaviour, and could be tested with varying stakes.
  • They were illegal. It always made me chuckle that under the game description was a disclaimer that explained that all games are random and every spin is independent.
  • Finally, even if they did have some small popularity, they probably attracted the wrong sort of customers anyway. Especially when combined with the above.

I've made some fairly decent money from them over the last 7 or 8 years. Now that they're gone I regret not capitalising on it more. I took the approach of doing it slowly and hiding the strategy within many pages of heavy betting in my play history - which was stressful to accomplish to say the least!

If the bank receipt image that Nicola posted above is linked to the AWPs (and with the many MG casinos, winning that much from them was definitely possible), then it seems that crashing through them quickly actually worked ...for one person. :rolleyes: And if that happened, I'm shocked they kept paying out. I wish I'd just done that now, not only would I have a nice fat bank balance but I would have saved myself a lot of trouble.

Manipulated? Nope.

Readable? Some of them.

"Manipulated" means you can "make" them pay when you want them to and make you a profit (otherwise whats the point eh?). You CAN "make" them payout by dropping the stake, but you'll never make a profit that way as they are only paying out whatever's in the pot at that time which is normally less that your losses.

You might be able to "read" when they are going to hit (the Vinylweatherman special move.....that doesn't work, and he proved it publicly in these forums), but unless you can MAKE them hit then it's pointless knowledge. You can only "read" them by actually seeing the "signs" begin to appear (e.g. the 500x option on Treasure Ireland), and you can only do that by actually playing them until it happens....which might be days. So, again, it's pointless knowledge because you can't use it to win.

Anyone who has won at any time on AWPs has just been lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time and trigger the big pool payout. It's not really that much different from getting a big hit on any other kind of slot, except that we know for a fact they are compensated. Anyone can do it, and they have. I've got as many huge wins as VWM has, it's just that I was betting .50 or $1 and not $10 or $20 so it doesn't look as impressive. The actual xbet amount is the same.

Make no mistake. All you need to win playing online AWPs is knowing how to press SPIN and some luck. Nothing more, nothing less. Anyone who thinks they can "milk" these AWPs and consistently make a profit over the long term is deluding themselves. In fact, I'm sure VWM will admit that he's only ahead due to a mega win almost a decade ago (that anyone could have hit....just like a slot player hitting the cash splash progressive or something). He's talked (quietly) about some big losses, and some nasty near misses like with Six Bomb.

If the AWPs were costing the casinos a fortune, they would have disappeared years and years ago.
 
You're almost there Nifty.

I use the term 'manipulate' to mean that the player can take action that affects when it pays out. That part, combined with bonus money, is key.

I'm pretty sure I explained that they cannot be made to pay out more than they otherwise would. It's the finding out how much, and manipulating when that made them profitable as a whole.

When you are offered and refuse a win, it is effectively reserved by the fruit machine, to be plucked when you choose. There are also certain signs that effectively tell the player the same thing as if the win was offered. An obvious example is Treasure Island dropping in 40x or 80x wins when it's ready to offer the top feature or more. You could up the stake to prevent it, if you wish to carry on.

...When you're satisfied you know how it's going, you let it pay out. You're loss to the game's percentage cut is minimised due to the play style of making it pay out in one hit. By this, you have tested it's potential, and got out again. Never to play that game at that casino ever again (unless you stuff some bonus money in it if there's no better option). Occasionally they can be shitty, usually you get 80+% of your money back, often they pay 30%-100% profit, and sometimes they fast-track to happy and go nuts for thousands. Either way you play it and you leave it when you're finished, you have no choice as you've effectively emptied it.

The advantage of using bonus money to guarantee profit no matter what should be obvious by this point.

---

Years ago, I remember having a similar conversation with Vinyl Weatherman about casino patterns in general. I took the same position as you because I was curious what his reply would be. His Cops and Robbers avatar made it clear he played them, so I knew as a fruity player he must have noticed how to profit from them. Microgaming AWPs remained out of the conversation. Kind of an Elephant in the room. I certainly wasn't going to draw attention to them!

Due to their behaviour, AWPs are a bit of an anomaly for an online casino. At first I assumed they must be some kind of Pseudo-fruities, but no, they were good old influenceable AWPs.

My post was a bit of a confession to be honest. I believe I've explained how they work to the best of my ability. I don't really know what I can add, other than the fact that they've helped bring in money to my family for the last 8 years. They were a safe profit. I'm not an insane roulette pattern analyst. The only monetary risk was in hiding it by 'recreational' gambling.

If the AWPs were costing the casinos a fortune, they would have disappeared years and years ago.
This surprises me too, as I said in the first sentence I wrote in this topic.

My thinking is that perhaps their internal records can easily show a total profit/loss per game, but doesn't so easily differentiate between bonus and real money, so at a glance, it looks like the games are taking the casino profit that they're designed to. Of course, I also have no idea how many other people were doing the same as me. I assumed there must be a lot, but as years went on with the games still available, I wasn't so sure.

As I say, I also took great efforts to hide my play style. Not by merely playing £1 hands of blackjack before and after a big fruit machine win, that obviously wouldn't cut it - when the pattern is repeated thousands of times. I decided the only way was to really gamble, with figures large enough to downplay the importance of the AWP win. This basically meant that for every time I gambled with and quadrupled my AWP winnings, I'd lose the lot (and sometimes more :facepalm: ) three times. Except I didn't always try to quadruple, I'd mix this up too. Another advantage is that I made less withdrawals this way, and the gambling all evens out in the end. That's what I'd try to remind myself, but that's also the difficult bit. One painful memory is when The Geegees quickly decided it was ready to pay out £5,000. I stopped playing it and went for some big bets on table games, knowing that whatever happened I could return later to collect the £5k. I made some large deposits so that the casino wasn't alerted to a £50 deposit - £5,000 withdrawal. I ended up having one of my worst blackjack runs and lost £4,500. How I managed to stop I don't know, I was able to pull myself away, chat to the wife, slept on it, then the next day I "collected" my £5,000 from the fruity, summoned all my restraint, made a few (hundred) bets for good measure, and withdrew. Only about £600 odd profit instead of the £5000+ it should have been, but I suppose at least my history looked just just another degenerate gambler ( again, :facepalm: ). And I was sure to get some decent bonuses I could make use of to pull me back too.

It annoys me that I may have wasted my time being so "careful" to keep the casino happy with stupid gambling, when others perhaps were not, but without it being possible to know what anyone else was up to, I carried on doing it that way.
 
You're almost there Nifty.

I use the term 'manipulate' to mean that the player can take action that affects when it pays out. That part, combined with bonus money, is key.

I'm pretty sure I explained that they cannot be made to pay out more than they otherwise would. It's the finding out how much, and manipulating when that made them profitable as a whole.

When you are offered and refuse a win, it is effectively reserved by the fruit machine, to be plucked when you choose. There are also certain signs that effectively tell the player the same thing as if the win was offered. An obvious example is Treasure Island dropping in 40x or 80x wins when it's ready to offer the top feature or more. You could up the stake to prevent it, if you wish to carry on.

...When you're satisfied you know how it's going, you let it pay out. You're loss to the game's percentage cut is minimised due to the play style of making it pay out in one hit. By this, you have tested it's potential, and got out again. Never to play that game at that casino ever again (unless you stuff some bonus money in it if there's no better option). Occasionally they can be shitty, usually you get 80+% of your money back, often they pay 30%-100% profit, and sometimes they fast-track to happy and go nuts for thousands. Either way you play it and you leave it when you're finished, you have no choice as you've effectively emptied it.

The advantage of using bonus money to guarantee profit no matter what should be obvious by this point.

---

Years ago, I remember having a similar conversation with Vinyl Weatherman about casino patterns in general. I took the same position as you because I was curious what his reply would be. Microgaming AWPs remained out of the conversation. I certainly wasn't going to draw attention to them!

Due to their behaviour, AWPs are a bit of an anomaly for an online casino. At first I assumed they must be some kind of Pseudo-fruities, but no, they were good old influenceable AWPs.

My post was a bit of a confession to be honest. I believe I've explained how they work to the best of my ability. I don't really know what I can add, other than the fact that they've helped bring in money to my family for the last 8 years. They were a safe profit. I'm not an insane roulette pattern analyst. The only monetary risk was in hiding it by 'recreational' gambling.


This surprises me too, as I said in the first sentence I wrote in this topic.

My thinking is that perhaps their internal records can easily show a total profit/loss per game, but doesn't so easily differentiate between bonus and real money, so at a glance, it looks like the games are taking the casino profit that they're designed to. Of course, I also have no idea how many other people were doing the same as me. I assumed there must be a lot, but as years went on with the games still available, I wasn't so sure.

As I say, I also took great efforts to hide my play style. playing £1 hands of blackjack before and after a big fruit machine win and repeating thousands of times over MG casinos, obviously wouldn't cut it. I decided to really gamble, with figures large enough to downplay the importance of the AWP win. This basically meant that for every time I quadrupled my AWP winnings, I'd lose the lot (and sometimes more :facepalm: ) three times. Except I didn't always try to quadruple, I'd mix this up too. Another advantage is that I made less withdrawals this way, and the gambling all evens out in the end. That's what I'd try to remind myself, but that's also the difficult bit. One painful memory is when The Geegees quickly decided it was ready to pay out £5,000. I stopped playing it and went for some big bets on table games, knowing that whatever happened I could return later to collect £5,000. I made some large deposits so that the casino wasn't alerted to a £50 deposit - £5,000 withdrawal. I ended up having one of my worst blackjack runs and lost £4,500. How I managed to stop I don't know, I was able to pull myself away, chat to the wife, slept on it, then the next day I "collected" my £5,000 from the fruity, summoned all my restraint, made a few (hundred) bets for good measure, and withdrew. Only about £600 odd profit instead of the £5000+ it should have been, but at least my history will look just just another degenerate gambler. And I was sure to get some decent bonuses I could make use of to pull me back too.

It annoys me that I may have wasted my time being so careful when others perhaps were not, but without it being possible to know, I carried on doing it.



Ahhh yes.....but I fear we are barking up two different trees here.

Is there a way to USE AWPs to beat/maximise bonuses? Oh absolutely. I've done it on occasion with Treasure Ireland etc. It's not rocket science. You just basically load the AWP up with bonus money and then force it when you make a real money deposit, and cash it out. It's not always that simple though, as most times it takes far more input than the final output, so even though you end up converting some of that bonus money into cash, it doesn't necessarily mean you're better off in the long run.

What I was referring to is the use of AWPs via a "system" or "method" during regular play, such as the one/s VWM has boasted about for years (until his spectacular public fail when predicting a megastreak was going to happen and it didn't and still hasn't).

At the end of the day, unless you can MAKE the AWP pay out big feature at will, and ensure it delivers a profit on the session, then you may as well play video slots which often have a higher TRTP anyway. There is NO way to "make" an AWP pay a jackpot on demand in such a way.

The only "method" one can use in regular play is hitting SPIN ad nauseum until a big feature hits.....just like any other slot. The difference being that you can sit for hours with thousands of dead spins before the feature pays out big, rather than having nice hits along the way to spread the RTP over the whole session i.e. you get it all in one hit.

The VWM "system" is easy, and anyone can do it:

1. Load up your bankroll

2. Bet big.

3. Rinse and repeat.

Added to that, most of the AWPs aren't forceable like TI and Cops and Robbers etc and their ilk. Games like Game On and Ski Bunny can suck you dry for days and just hit out of the blue, and there is no way to tell if they are going to hit nor is there a way to force them to hit.

I suspect in VWMs and every other AWP player's case that they are probably behind overall, but way ahead at various points. Some might even be quite a way behind. When one is betting $10+ per spin, it doesn't take much of a dry spell to get behind the 8 ball again. Trouble is, hardly anyone is honest about their overall position and hardly anyone actually accurately tracks it either, and especially so when it comes to those who claim to have some kind of secret formula or method that makes them "better" at playing AWPs than others.

Some people make the mistake of comparing online AWPs with the old land fruities, and they are very different animals, regardless of how much they are made to look alike.
 
Yes, I think we're barking up different trees. The bonus money was essential. I don't think I neglected to say that.

I stuck with the same games, about a dozen I think. Usually there was a different selection on the flash casino. Some with little player input, like Lucky Bastard, were actually controllable because....

pubjoe said:
Crucially, they had an option to change stake
I don't think I played Ski Bunny. Game on, yes. That's one with a skill stop prize ladder feature isn't it? Simple. Miss it.

I don't really feel like going round and round reiterating this. It's late now and I'm going to bed.

In my brief conversation, I didn't believe Vinyl Weatherman about beating casino games (he never mentioned AWPs) with betting patterns either, and said that I suspect his "profit" would be a similar amount to the bonuses he recieved.

Fwiw, I kept records of all my deposits and withdrawals. But it wasn't exactly hard to realise that I wasn't just fooling myself with a bit of occasional luck. The profit was consistent, and decent. Yes, the payouts did vary, but it wasn't a case of 'most times it taking far more input than the final output"... the varying rate that the happyometre fills at meant that it averaged out in the end. A disappointingly small profit sometimes, a good one other times, and occasionally a huge one. ...All these outcomes offset each other to total the advertised %.

It was riding out the regular casino play to acquire bonuses that was the only hard part, but it all averaged out with me in undeniable and completely sane profit, consistently, regularly, for 8 years.

Nifty29 said:
Some people make the mistake of comparing online AWPs with the old land fruities, and they are very different animals, regardless of how much they are made to look alike.
Actually, Microgaming's AWPs were like caricatures of real AWPs. Receiving the win you know it has in it was insanely easy compared to real AWPs - which are usually tight to release, even when they've got a jackpot or two in them. Also the relatively high percentage that Microgaming AWPs were set to meant that deposit bonuses (even low proportion ones) would put you in a reliably calculable profit in the long run.
 
Last edited:
It seems the MG AWPs have gone for good. The only one widely available is Pub Fruity.

Does anyone know the official reason?. I used to enjoy playing them on occasion.
 
It seems the MG AWPs have gone for good. The only one widely available is Pub Fruity.

Does anyone know the official reason?. I used to enjoy playing them on occasion.

Because people blabbed on public forums BEFORE they were removed that they could be 'forced' or 'manipulated' with bonus money therefore MG removed the risk for their casinos/customers. Now their games are all proper random ones, and therefore you're not going to see '£10 stake, £5000 spin, same next spin, same next spin etc."
 
Because people blabbed on public forums BEFORE they were removed that they could be 'forced' or 'manipulated' with bonus money therefore MG removed the risk for their casinos/customers. Now their games are all proper random ones, and therefore you're not going to see '£10 stake, £5000 spin, same next spin, same next spin etc."

There was never an official reason given, and since this has been talked about for a number of years whilst the casinos were perfectly happy to keep the games, not everyone is convinced that this "conspiracy theory" reason is true.

I have been told they are "undergoing maintenance", which happened once before leaving many gone for 9 months. Others have been told they were not popular enough, and although MGS were never known to remove an old game, EVER, it seems that now they DO routinely retire games, even if only to retire an old version to replace it with a newer version (Loaded, for example).

Despite having been gone, I notice that a fresh reinstall of the whole Microgaming suite STILL downloads the client side architecture for these games, and they seem to come under something called "t3host", and separate from the main Microgaming offerings. This is evidence to support my view that there were all third party games, and were "hosted" much like Castle Builder is now. Castle Builder exhibits some serious balance tracking problems when played fast, and this was the reason for the earlier 9 month removal of these games.

As third party games, the developer could have ceased trading, causing the games to be pulled in a hurry. We saw this with the Sheriff games when they were raided by police and shut down.

Games that cause problems when bonus money is involved tend to get listed as "excluded games" for wagering, they are not pulled. The only MGS Fruit machine that was routinely a banned game was "Lucky Darts", only available in Flash and Quickfire.

MGS should at least do the job properly, and not leave partial legacy code kicking around for games that have gone for good. Legacy code can harbour bugs that can cause problems with the client, as well as being an unnecessary contribution to what is getting on for a 20Gig download.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top