external image

Must Read The 'Not on GamStop' Industry Has a Body Count

Must read this

Nate

Forum Moderator
Staff member
webmeister
CAG
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Location
Cyberspace

They Hunted Him: GamStop, Offshore Casinos, and the Death of Ollie Long

Ollie Long.webp


The Long family are facing another year without their eldest son. Ollie Long took his own life in 2024, aged 36, after eight years of gambling addiction, recovery attempts, and relapse. He had done everything right. He had signed up with GamStop. He had installed Gamban. He had worked for a charity helping other people with gambling problems.

None of it was enough, because the offshore casino industry had decided people like Ollie were worth targeting.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
It is worth reading in full. What follows is what it means in the context of what we see here every day. We also recently covered the follow-up Guardian investigation into the Santeda network itself — that article is here.

How the Trap Works


GamStop does what it says. Register, choose your exclusion period, and every UKGC-licensed operator must lock you out. More than half a million people have signed up. For many of them, it has been genuinely life-changing.

The problem is that "Not on GamStop" has become a search term, a product category, and a business model.

Affiliate websites have built entire operations around directing self-excluded players to offshore casinos that hold no UK licence and have no obligation to honour GamStop exclusions. The affiliates take a cut of every player they send through. The casinos take the deposits. The player, who registered with GamStop precisely because they knew they had a problem, has no protection whatsoever on the other side of that click.

Yield Sec, a data analytics firm that investigates offshore gambling, estimates that more than 84% of illegal gambling content in the UK stems from Not on GamStop search traffic. The illicit market grew from £122 million in UK takings in 2022 to £583 million last year.

Yield Sec's founder, Ismail Vali, put it plainly: "They came into the UK marketplace to make money from the most vulnerable at-risk communities. Gamblers were being hunted."

The Names in Ollie's Bank Statements


In his final month, Ollie made 55 transactions totalling around £5,000, sent to recipients with names like MadsWinterEU, MadsWinterCom and Wintermads.com. The trail leads to Santeda International, the Curaçao-registered operator behind Donbet, MyStake, Goldenbet and Velobet, among others.

A Casinomeister warning thread on Santeda has been running for some time. We also have dedicated threads for MyStake, Goldenbet, and Donbet. The complaints in those threads, unpaid withdrawals, ignored responsible gambling requests, and accounts closed without explanation, map directly onto what the Guardian investigation describes.

According to illicit market analysis firm GAMRS, the Santeda network takes £2 billion in bets from UK players annually.

What the Regulator Has Done


The Gambling Commission secured 214 website removals from search engines and social media in the fourth quarter of 2025 alone, and blocked 180 sites. The government has allocated £26 million over three years to assist with enforcement, a significant increase on the previous annual budget of £1.5 million for this work.

And yet, as of the Guardian's publication, the Santeda sites remained fully accessible from the UK.
Ismail Vali, who also serves as president of Gaming Compliance International, said the Commission had been "asleep at the wheel." He wants the platforms that carry Not on GamStop advertising, including Google and Facebook, held accountable for hosting it.

What Ollie's Family Said


His sister Chloe described the business model as "morally incomprehensible." She said the offshore network was "abusive and malicious, exploiting people at their most vulnerable for their own financial gain."

"Ollie's death has shattered our family," she said. "The government must act urgently to replace the current ineffective approach with an enforcement strategy genuinely committed to reducing the accessibility of black market sites and protecting those at risk. Anything less will cost more innocent lives."

The Bottom Line


Casinomeister has been documenting what these operators do to players for years. The complaints we receive are individual stories, and they matter on their own terms. What the Guardian's reporting adds is the scale: half a billion pounds a year, flowing from people who had already raised their hands and asked to be protected, to operators in Curaçao and other similar offshore jurisdictions who face no meaningful consequences.

If you have played at any Santeda brand and encountered problems, please share your experience in the relevant thread. These records matter.
 
Its tragic that a young man lost his life due to a gambling addiction and agree more must be done.

But I just have to make a comment that many will not like but feel I need to say it.

I know Casinomeister has always been about protecting the player and being there to help.

But at the end of the day its also here to make money. Its an affiliate site. Unlike a few years ago there are now many Crypto and Bitcoin casinos advertised here. Yes I know UK players aren't supposed to play there but we all know from many members on here they can.

So no offence but I am sure there are players that have gambling addictions and Gamstopped that will be actively signing up to these casinos through Casinomeister links.And the owners will be profiting from these players losing everything they have and maybe even committing suicide as well.

I know times change. A few years ago the casino world was different. But now it seems any crypto casino can get a rep here. Can get put In grey area with a warning that basically the site doesn't know if they are good or bad. Look at 2 days ago. A Crypto casino got a review. By all accounts its been a shit casino but review says new owners maybe they will change. Fair enough but really how can it get a 6.2 rating. Should be way lower till it proves itself.

If i saw a rating of 6.2 id think maybe worth a chance. And like I said there's loads like that now. All casinos that might take the problem gamblers you write about. And if so the site will be profiting from their misery.

As stated I know this will not be a popular post. Im sensible enough to know the casino world has changed so.much that to stay in business this site has to add more casinos to make money.

All fair enough as its a business. But at times its a bit much reading about how much other sites prey on the vulnerable when this site has to be making money from problem gamblers with some of casinos added and reviewed in last year.
 
A lot of the onus should be on the slot providers for allowing their games to be hosted at bent casinos, and in turn played by people who shouldn't be able to. They're getting a cut of the profits after all, and some of the studios don't give a fuck where the money comes from because they're headed-up by parasites with grandiose opinions of themselves, and low empathy. A dangerous mix of character traits.
 
It is sad that a young man lost his life by playing offshore where Regulation is not as tight as in the UK. He happened to play at a casino where a warning was issued against here on Casinomeister, but could easily have selected one of the many crypto casinos linked here with the same result.

I play offshore and whilst this may not be popular, why should further Regulation in the UK attempting me to going to stop playing offshore because some can't control their gambling?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top