- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Just to put something straight here. SkyVegas are a pretty exemplary casino where players are concerned (as I've always maintained) and were accredited as you are no doubt aware. They ceased to be active and have a rep as per the accredited terms so left the list, Grey Zone at first IIRC.
Subsequently they introduced tariffs retroactively on their affiliates (conduct of the aff prog is another facet of the accreditation score and status) and then decided to shut their programme down, fleecing the lot of them, although later they seemed to realize this was a mistake and have it seems relented for some affs.
That action alone would get them pitted if they were accredited - here is the standard:
"Must not implement retroactive terms and conditions to their affiliate programs without explicit permission and agreement from the affiliate."
So regardless of player positives, this alone would be unacceptable for an accredited casino on CM.
Now whatever this site's relationship is with the SV Aff. prog. regarding their frankly rogue treatment of affiliates and/or what negative effects that may have on the CM business is the affair of the account managers and not us. What is certain though, is that CM doesn't accommodate them and therefore they have no review, as is required in those FS threads. Simples.
Why on earth would they be promoted here or by any other affected partner considering their previous conduct? Would you send players to them, via reviews or any other means?
To compare this to rogue casino reviews is facile and ridiculous. Those reviews are negative, warnings to everybody.
Subsequently they introduced tariffs retroactively on their affiliates (conduct of the aff prog is another facet of the accreditation score and status) and then decided to shut their programme down, fleecing the lot of them, although later they seemed to realize this was a mistake and have it seems relented for some affs.
That action alone would get them pitted if they were accredited - here is the standard:
"Must not implement retroactive terms and conditions to their affiliate programs without explicit permission and agreement from the affiliate."
So regardless of player positives, this alone would be unacceptable for an accredited casino on CM.
Now whatever this site's relationship is with the SV Aff. prog. regarding their frankly rogue treatment of affiliates and/or what negative effects that may have on the CM business is the affair of the account managers and not us. What is certain though, is that CM doesn't accommodate them and therefore they have no review, as is required in those FS threads. Simples.
Why on earth would they be promoted here or by any other affected partner considering their previous conduct? Would you send players to them, via reviews or any other means?
To compare this to rogue casino reviews is facile and ridiculous. Those reviews are negative, warnings to everybody.