Show me the Money Screenshots (Min 1000xBet)

Hi Jasminebed. Are you able to explain how a .25cent bet paid over $300 when the pay shown is only a 500x multiplier. Was this the end of some sort of free spins?

During the feature I picked the win series feature (after turning down 40x bet), and it popped out quite a number of 80x pays, and then finished up with a jackpot.

VWM made it pop for $15,000 and $13,000 on $5 bets back in June.
 
Treasure Island is on Fire!

I cannot tell you how delighted I am. I've played this game since it's debut, and I've never gotten the pirates until this month, not even in freeplay.

I think he showed up 9 times in 50 win spins :D

And I'd had the capt'n twice tonight at 25cent bets!
 
I cannot tell you how delighted I am. I've played this game since it's debut, and I've never gotten the pirates until this month, not even in freeplay.

I think he showed up 9 times in 50 win spins :D

And I'd had the capt'n twice tonight at 25cent bets!

wow! :D you seem to know how to play that game. i've spent hundreds in it and it always makes me lose if i dont accept the first or second rewards (which are always crap for me) :l
 
During the feature I picked the win series feature (after turning down 40x bet), and it popped out quite a number of 80x pays, and then finished up with a jackpot.

VWM made it pop for $15,000 and $13,000 on $5 bets back in June.

This was in a run of 6 CONSECUTIVE features (a few spins in between), and took place on 8th June 2009

1) 13190 off 10 --- 1319 x bet - balance 13380
2) 13775 off 5 ---- 2755 x bet - balance 27050
3) 3740 off 5 ----- 748 x bet - balance 30765
4) 15360 off 5 ---- 3072 x bet - balance 46115
5) 4285 off 5 ----- 857 x bet - balance 50300
6) 1105 off 5 ----- 221 x bet - balance 51360

after which, it was dead:p:p

The 4th was the highlight in terms of monster bet multiples.

32Red in their "big winners" release put the haul at 50,460

Nearly sunk my bloody ship:eek:
 
1000X Line Bet!

I hit this little beauty last night at All Star Slots betting only 5 lines at .25c per line!! :thumbsup:

I was debating whether I should put it here or in ScreenShots that Suck...lol

If only the wild dude had fell one more slot down! :p

Old Attachment (Invalid)
 
Last edited:
Posted this in "Winner Screenshots" but I guess it belongs here :)

wholelottawilds.jpg
 
one from ages ago

See now, here - you say this is from ages ago; do I understand correctly (from another thread, I think the Winner Screenshots) that RTG has changed the rules, such that this 2000x win would not be paid today, and would be limited to a maximum of 1000x bet? Or does that vary from RTG casino to RTG casino?

(On edit, I see that Jasminebed asked a very similar question of eu_lowroller above.)
 
See now, here - you say this is from ages ago; do I understand correctly (from another thread, I think the Winner Screenshots) that RTG has changed the rules, such that this 2000x win would not be paid today, and would be limited to a maximum of 1000x bet? Or does that vary from RTG casino to RTG casino?

(On edit, I see that Jasminebed asked a very similar question of eu_lowroller above.)

The limit is not per bet, but bet per line, per spin. 50,000x line bet for all the Real Series slots to the best of my knowledge, but happens on paydirt other slots with expanding wilds from time to time.
 
See now, here - you say this is from ages ago; do I understand correctly (from another thread, I think the Winner Screenshots) that RTG has changed the rules, such that this 2000x win would not be paid today, and would be limited to a maximum of 1000x bet?

No a 1000x bet maximum cashout were never on any RTG casino, but since he plays with a $1 bet per spin he could make the highest win on one spin/bonus round of $2,500 instead of $2,000 which was before.

now the highest payout is increased to 50,000x bet instead of 40,000x betline.

on my screenshot with the 5 crowns (expanding wilds) 1 winline was $200 so x 20 this should be 4,000 but it is capped by the maximum payout per betline, so if i've played only with 5 lines on $0,02 per betline (which is 0,10 cent) i had won the same amount of $1,000 because the highest payout is my betline (2 cents) x 50,000 which is exactly 1,000 dollars :)

that#s the problem on the new slot triple twister, which have fixed 50 bet lines, because the highest win on this is only $500 (1 cent per betline x 50,000), so you have to play $1 (2 cent per betline) for winning $1,000 (max win)

i really like this new slot, but the risk is much higher and the maximum win is only 1,000x the full bet, because you can't choose less than 50 bet lines, so maybe RTG should really change their rules and makes it depend on either the full bet amount, or much better, they delete this (in my opinion) silly rule, because i had never seen such a rule on any another casino, except on RTG casinos :(
 
tripple twister

I was thinking the same thing with this high variance slot. No doubt you can win a nice amount playing the min, but you can never really reach its true payout potential no matter what you play. In fact you simply cannot on most Reel Series slots.

Why have a max payout on a particular slot, when you really can't win it? Why not put in the paytable the true win at a max bet, rather than some unreachable payout if you hit everything available? Is RTG the only software with this sort of max per line payout?
 
on my screenshot with the 5 crowns (expanding wilds) 1 winline was $200 so x 20 this should be 4,000 but it is capped by the maximum payout per betline, so if i've played only with 5 lines on $0,02 per betline (which is 0,10 cent) i had won the same amount of $1,000 because the highest payout is my betline (2 cents) x 50,000 which is exactly 1,000 dollars :)

that#s the problem on the new slot triple twister, which have fixed 50 bet lines, because the highest win on this is only $500 (1 cent per betline x 50,000), so you have to play $1 (2 cent per betline) for winning $1,000 (max win)

i really like this new slot, but the risk is much higher and the maximum win is only 1,000x the full bet, because you can't choose less than 50 bet lines, so maybe RTG should really change their rules and makes it depend on either the full bet amount, or much better, they delete this (in my opinion) silly rule, because i had never seen such a rule on any another casino, except on RTG casinos :(

Vegasbum is a regular Winner's Screenshots member who bets less than max paylines always, and not just at RTG.

Paydirt was the first slot we started see many capped wins. And I think a lot of players may have figured out that less than max lines might be optimal strategy (not that I've had any capped wins personally).

RTG has avoided this in the game Triple Twister, and since lines bet are fixed, I'm sure it is easier to factor into a paytable and RTP.
 
I was thinking the same thing with this high variance slot. No doubt you can win a nice amount playing the min, but you can never really reach its true payout potential no matter what you play. In fact you simply cannot on most Reel Series slots.

Why have a max payout on a particular slot, when you really can't win it? Why not put in the paytable the true win at a max bet, rather than some unreachable payout if you hit everything available? Is RTG the only software with this sort of max per line payout?

I don't totally understand all these formulas, except that I think I can say with confidence that capping ANY payout would impact payout percentages, correct, just as random jackpots do? If I recall correctly, some RTG authority here on CM stated that the RTG payout percentages are calculated to include occurrences of Random Jackpot scores. So I guess it would be interesting to ask the casinos who cap max payout/spin if their stated payout percentages account for this diminished expected max payout? (I hope I'm making sense here, lol.)
 
I don't totally understand all these formulas, except that I think I can say with confidence that capping ANY payout would impact payout percentages, correct, just as random jackpots do? If I recall correctly, some RTG authority here on CM stated that the RTG payout percentages are calculated to include occurrences of Random Jackpot scores. So I guess it would be interesting to ask the casinos who cap max payout/spin if their stated payout percentages account for this diminished expected max payout? (I hope I'm making sense here, lol.)

Well, the RTGs that have updated the lobbies the paytables show what percentage of the bet goes to the RJ. They just have to factor in the seed money and the rest of the money comes from player bets. Much like progressives at land based casinos.

Also, I have seen capped payouts on machines at land based casinos, but I've never seen one that reached it's cap. Or even close.

Certainly nothing you would hit on a single bet with max bet during a bonus round.

Although I'm not sure about 100 lions...I think where I play if you hit a full screen of lions during the bonus round, the game stops and you don't get the rest of your spins. If anyone REALLY cares, pm me and I'll look during my next B&M visit (may not be the same as your B&M's payouts).
 
Well, the RTGs that have updated the lobbies the paytables show what percentage of the bet goes to the RJ. They just have to factor in the seed money and the rest of the money comes from player bets. Much like progressives at land based casinos.

Also, I have seen capped payouts on machines at land based casinos, but I've never seen one that reached it's cap. Or even close.

Certainly nothing you would hit on a single bet with max bet during a bonus round.

Although I'm not sure about 100 lions...I think where I play if you hit a full screen of lions during the bonus round, the game stops and you don't get the rest of your spins. If anyone REALLY cares, pm me and I'll look during my next B&M visit (may not be the same as your B&M's payouts).

Informative - thanks. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top