RTG Random Jackpots - check this out!

Hi Gang

Check out this from the latest Inetbet newsletter:




What do you think the chances are of hitting 4 in one month???

:eek: :eek: :eek:
...............ive done it, hit 2 r/j back to back on same game within 15 mins. of each other.goldbeard was over 7k when i hit it the first time and a few mins. later i hit it for 1k and some change, so yes it can happen, call it pure luck, who knows. its no different from being at a b/m casino and hitting alot, i see this as just great luck for the player at inetbet and my congrats go out to that very lucky person:thumbsup:
 
I'd say the chances pretty good if you're a high roller.
i was betting 2.00 at the time and 5.00 on the second r/j and i have hit before on a 1.00 bet on diamond dozens,i have to dis-agree with you s/w although i admire all your posts , you dont have to be a high roller to hit one,i never play on big deposits, i build up my bankroll and i either make it or break it and thats gambling imo.
 
i was betting 2.00 at the time and 5.00 on the second r/j and i have hit before on a 1.00 bet on diamond dozens,i have to dis-agree with you s/w although i admire all your posts , you dont have to be a high roller to hit one,i never play on big deposits, i build up my bankroll and i either make it or break it and thats gambling imo.
Yeah but I have a feeling for this person to have hit one per week (on average) that they were betting big. I've never hit one at all, and I've placed bets of 0.20, 0.40, 1.00, 2.00, 5.00, 10.00, 20.00, and even 100.00 a few times (waaaay back in the day, before the UIGEA, before my luck went away :D)... although I try to stick to video poker at iNetBet these days unless I'm playing the manager bonus.
 
Yeah but I have a feeling for this person to have hit one per week (on average) that they were betting big. I've never hit one at all, and I've placed bets of 0.20, 0.40, 1.00, 2.00, 5.00, 10.00, 20.00, and even 100.00 a few times (waaaay back in the day, before the UIGEA, before my luck went away :D)... although I mostly stick to video poker at iNetBet these days unless I'm playing the manager bonus.
.......have you ever known anyone to hit on a 40 or 20 cent bet? ive always wondered as i was told several years ago by a c.s rep that it wont happen? can it be done? i would love to know. i have hit those rapid fire jackpots at the old sands of the caribbean when we could play there, best money i have ever made, i miss crypto casinos and i would hit those on the smallest bet you could make.
 
This is why many RTG casinos struggle for business a lot of the time. Considering its actually LOW rollers that make up most casinos bread and butter, the fact that only high rollers are likely to win the RJ to me is utter nonsense. There should be an equal chance of winning the RJ REGARDLESS of stake wagered but everyone knows that isnt the case. I must have made hundreds of deposits at various rtgs over the years, sometimes staying on the same slot for days! Have I won a rj? have i buggery lol Sure occasionally they throw a dog a bone by allowing someone to win a rj while low rolling but this is just to say to everyone look guys `Hey it CAN be won on a low roll` My own personal belief is Bollox can it.

If you speak to a rtg casino operator they all say that yes you can win on a 0.20 or 0.40 bet but i call them filthy liers lol
 
i was betting 2.00 at the time and 5.00 on the second r/j and i have hit before on a 1.00 bet on diamond dozens,i have to dis-agree with you s/w although i admire all your posts , you dont have to be a high roller to hit one,i never play on big deposits, i build up my bankroll and i either make it or break it and thats gambling imo.

sorry my friend but 5.00, 2.00 and even 1,00 is NOT low rolling. Play on a0.20 bet and lets see how many you win then ;) my guess is erm NONE :thumbsup: lol
 
sorry my friend but 5.00, 2.00 and even 1,00 is NOT low rolling. Play on a0.20 bet and lets see how many you win then ;) my guess is erm NONE :thumbsup: lol
..............i have played on 20 cent bets and have won 20.00 or 30.00 on features and then thats when ill slowly make my bets alittle bigger and build up my bankroll until i can make those 2.00 and 5.00 and up bets.some games ive noticed will allow you to win more features on 20 and 40 cent bets so i wouldnt want to throw away my hard earned bankroll until i get to a balance when i feel like uping the bet. we all have different ways we play. im not a high roller or a low roller, i just roll with the flow and hope for the best:D..........laurie:)
 
But there are a few of yours Laurie where you were betting $20, I saw on two of them and on another one you were betting $10. You won about 6 or 7 since last December!! You have been very fortunate, you lucky lil vixen!

As far as the 20 40 cent bets....kakata won $15K at CW on a 20 cent bet, I saw it. and there was 2 others than won on a 40 cent bet. Like I have said before, I think most people win on atleast $5 bets and they let a few win on the lower wages to keep them playing. I gotta be honest, If I havnt seen people win on small bets, I wouldnt be playing for the RJ, but I do play it when it's gonna bust (over9K/10K)
 
..............i have played on 20 cent bets and have won 20.00 or 30.00 on features and then thats when ill slowly make my bets alittle bigger and build up my bankroll until i can make those 2.00 and 5.00 and up bets.some games ive noticed will allow you to win more features on 20 and 40 cent bets so i wouldnt want to throw away my hard earned bankroll until i get to a balance when i feel like uping the bet. we all have different ways we play. im not a high roller or a low roller, i just roll with the flow and hope for the best:D..........laurie:)

:eek: you must have built up a balance large enough to be able to wager at 5.00 a spin tho lol I could deposit 200 quid right now and play at a 5.00 a spin and I KNOW 3 mins later im sat looking at 0 :mad: lol
 
But there are a few of yours Laurie where you were betting $20, I saw on two of them and on another one you were betting $10. You won about 6 or 7 since last December!! You have been very fortunate, you lucky lil vixen!

As far as the 20 40 cent bets....kakata won $15K at CW on a 20 cent bet, I saw it. and there was 2 others than won on a 40 cent bet. Like I have said before, I think most people win on atleast $5 bets and they let a few win on the lower wages to keep them playing. I gotta be honest, If I havnt seen people win on small bets, I wouldnt be playing for the RJ, but I do play it when it's gonna bust (over9K/10K)

Thats what I think babs, that occasionally they will throw in the odd rj win on a low bet just to show that it can happen and keeps peoples hopes up who play at that bet level. But realistically I think we all know your chances of winning on a 0.20 bet is very very small unless your one of the lucky people they choose to allow to win. More kind of a publicity stunt than anything else i think :confused:
 
Actually in the INET newsletter last month or the month before someone hit a 10K+ RJ on a $.40 bet..you could see the screenshot. Normally I lose there so I'm not promoting them but my husband did hit a 6K RJ at a different casino betting $1 a spin and we are definitely NOT high rollers. This was the first RJ since we started online gambling which goes way back....;)
 
Hi Everyone,
Just a quick point in regards to the initial thread, jandj actually only won 3 Random Jackpots in the past few weeks. There was an error in the newsletter that has subsequently been updated. The Crystal Waters Jackpot was hit by gracek.
There are testimonials from both players in the winners section of the same newsletter.

In regards to players winning Random Jackpots on smaller denominations. Yes that is perfectly possible; jandj actually hit all of theirs at $2
However 8 Jackpots this month were hit at 0.40cents
There are some screenshots in the winners section showing this. For example: If you take a look at the screenshot provided by echap11 for their win of over $7800 on Mermaid Queen you can see they were spinning for 0.40cents.

The relevant links are as follows for anyone interested:

Newsletter: www.inetbet.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

Winners Section: www.inetbet.com/newsletter/bigwinner.asp

Hope this clarifies things for everyone.
Have a good week.

Best Regards
iNetBet Promos
 
High rolling certainly improves your chances. I hit 2 in 2 days playing $20.

It shouldn't though, if it is truly going to be marketed as being totally random, hence "Random Jackpot" no matter the bet size...:confused: Seems as though that would skew the randomness right...
 
Last edited:
Let's say the slot itself is random, and paying back say 95%, regardless of the amount wagered. The last five percent is made up of 2% funding the RJ and the HE is 3%.

If I do $20 bets that means 40 cents of every spin go to fund the jackpot. If I do 40 cent spins, 0.008 cent of every spin fund the RJ.

IMHO the chances of hitting the RJ should be 50 times (20/0.4=50) higher when doing $20 spins compared to 40 cent spins.

For the record the percentages are made up - I have no idea what they really are.

Freddy
 
IMHO the chances of hitting the RJ should be 50 times (20/0.4=50) higher when doing $20 spins compared to 40 cent spins.

Freddy

So the Jackpot will not be completely Random :eek2:
I disagree: everyone should have even chances to hit the RJ! And it doesn't matter are you high or low-roller!
 
my impression is that the rj is random. it's been discussed before, but i believe that it's like a sequential lottery. .20 = 1 ticket while $20 = 100 tickets. each rj is calculated to hit at a certain point so that if it was "due" at, let's say, the next $20 in bets, the .20 better would hit it in 100 spins while the $20 better would hit it in one spin. (assumming you are the only one playing at that time)

any claim that bet size does not affect the chance of hitting a rj would have to be false.

think of it this way, we are sold 100 tickets sequentialy and the number 75 is randomly chosen to be the winner. i buy one, babs buys one, kakata buys 5, then nashvegas buys 70 :D, he would hit the rj.

but if nash bought first at 70 and kakata bought second at 5, kakata would hit the rj. obviously, whoever bets more has a mucher higher chance of hitting regardless of what number was randomly chosen.

anyway, that's my thinking.
 
I have had 4 of em in my gambling on line.......3 of em at either 20 or 40 cents ,the 4th one, which was actually my first one ever, was at $1 bet at Crystal Palace , cause that was the minimum bet.( Yes I did get paid:D)
 
my impression is that the rj is random. it's been discussed before, but i believe that it's like a sequential lottery. .20 = 1 ticket while $20 = 100 tickets. each rj is calculated to hit at a certain point so that if it was "due" at, let's say, the next $20 in bets, the .20 better would hit it in 100 spins while the $20 better would hit it in one spin. (assumming you are the only one playing at that time)

any claim that bet size does not affect the chance of hitting a rj would have to be false.

think of it this way, we are sold 100 tickets sequentialy and the number 75 is randomly chosen to be the winner. i buy one, babs buys one, kakata buys 5, then nashvegas buys 70 :D, he would hit the rj.

but if nash bought first at 70 and kakata bought second at 5, kakata would hit the rj. obviously, whoever bets more has a mucher higher chance of hitting regardless of what number was randomly chosen.

anyway, that's my thinking.

I love the last part of your post.Thanks:p
 
my impression is that the rj is random. it's been discussed before, but i believe that it's like a sequential lottery. .20 = 1 ticket while $20 = 100 tickets. each rj is calculated to hit at a certain point so that if it was "due" at, let's say, the next $20 in bets, the .20 better would hit it in 100 spins while the $20 better would hit it in one spin. (assumming you are the only one playing at that time)

any claim that bet size does not affect the chance of hitting a rj would have to be false.

think of it this way, we are sold 100 tickets sequentialy and the number 75 is randomly chosen to be the winner. i buy one, babs buys one, kakata buys 5, then nashvegas buys 70 :D, he would hit the rj.

but if nash bought first at 70 and kakata bought second at 5, kakata would hit the rj. obviously, whoever bets more has a mucher higher chance of hitting regardless of what number was randomly chosen.

anyway, that's my thinking.


Hippo, what is your rationale on that thought ?

On your second point there you say "whoever bets more has a much higher chance of hitting"...this should not be the case if it is True Randomness, but whomever plays more should have a better chance of winning the RJ no matter the bet size...statistical odds you know...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top