Question Question the authenticity of videoslots casino

Award winning Videoslots is reviewed by Casinomeister
When I did a random search using the acronyms, it came up mobile. When I did a full address search it came up this.

This site can’t be reached

mltcw.playngocasino.com’s server DNS address could not be found.
Search Google for mltcw playing casino
ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
 
There is a clear difference in RTP at from the mltcw.playngocasino.com domain to that at cw.playngocasino.com. For the mltcw. the book of dead slot like I previously mentioned over thousands of spins is running consistanly between 30-45% RTP averging 100 spins fluctuation. Also on the mltcw. URL at videoslots this is the only casino with no gamble feature on play n go slots to which nobody thus far has been able to explain.

I don't usually play Play n Go slots at videoslots due to high variance I tend to stick with other casino's and play them with deposit bonus as a good hit enhances your chances obviously to meet wager and cash out

Can you provide evidence of this ? clear cut evidence based on real statistics over 10s of 1000s of spins which would be needed to get any real idea if the RTP is different. Simply stating you have playing a few 100 or few 1000s spins is no where near enough. And in presenting such evidence be prepared for that evidence to be challenged. Many have tried and many have failed in the past to prove anything dodgy at all with reputable games providers or casinos (which VS certainly is! )


Personally i think you have hit a bad run and looking to blame someone. So its natural you will blame the casino, and start to think surely it cant just be luck , it has to be bent games or a bent casino. Not true. Just the game which at times can suck.

Im way up at VS this year - and had some great cash outs .... top notch outfit who would not have any needed anyway to even start to think of interfering with the games even if they could (they cant but if they could )

they dont need to as they know in the end we all loose thanks to the math of the slot.
 
Can you provide evidence of this ? clear cut evidence based on real statistics over 10s of 1000s of spins which would be needed to get any real idea if the RTP is different. Simply stating you have playing a few 100 or few 1000s spins is no where near enough. And in presenting such evidence be prepared for that evidence to be challenged. Many have tried and many have failed in the past to prove anything dodgy at all with reputable games providers or casinos (which VS certainly is! )


Personally i think you have hit a bad run and looking to blame someone. So its natural you will blame the casino, and start to think surely it cant just be luck , it has to be bent games or a bent casino. Not true. Just the game which at times can suck.

Im way up at VS this year - and had some great cash outs .... top notch outfit who would not have any needed anyway to even start to think of interfering with the games even if they could (they cant but if they could )

they dont need to as they know in the end we all loose thanks to the math of the slot.

For starters no I'm not looking for anyone to blame for hitting a bad run and yourself like most are missing my main concern the difference in URL and why and only why Videoslsots have no gamble feature on Book of Dead and any other Play N Go slot that has a gamble feature built in!
 
Watch this space ;) ;)

With regards to authenticity, I have a £5er left in my VS account that I am off to play after this post. If I get 5 scatters or a Wild Line then all is well with the world, if not their servers and software are made of Play Dough :p

Spinions at 5p mate honestly...then doa with the £10 you make.
 
For starters no I'm not looking for anyone to blame for hitting a bad run and yourself like most are missing my main concern the difference in URL and why and only why Videoslsots have no gamble feature on Book of Dead and any other Play N Go slot that has a gamble feature built in!

My post has probably got lost in the thread, but this is what I found.


When I did a random search using the acronyms, it came up mobile. When I did a full address search it came up this.

This site can’t be reached

mltcw.playngocasino.com’s server DNS address could not be found.
Search Google for mltcw playing casino
ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
 
The only thing that sucks so hard with VS is when i made a cashout from free spins suddenly they stoped sending mails with weekly free spins voucher. Dosen't matter how much I deposit they don't offer me free spins like they did before.

When I asked CS why I didn't recive any mails from them they can't give a decent answer, why not just say sorry you won on free spins therfore we don't send you any mails.

Thankfully the freespins thread here gives me all the vouchers I need, so keep on sending them just avoid making a cash out or you will suddenly also stop getting vouchers, lol.
 
Before this turns into a hatting thread:

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/play-n-go-different-rtp-at-different-sites.76967/

Play N Go have a 'factory' RTP on their games but unlike say MG or Netent the operator can choose a different version of the RTP. The servers is possibly a geographic thing, say Europe and ROW have a separate one - I doubt it's anything to do with the RTP i.e. the casino has a lower one on their server and if they use the Play N Go factory setting it's on the PNG server. All games should be from the software provider's server as far as I know.

Games can have things removed and still retain the same RTP - Casumo's Novomatics like BoRe DO have the 50-50 gamble whereas it isn't (or wasn't when I last looked) on Sky Vegas's BoRe slot. The same goes for maximum bet limits and sometimes even minimum stake.

I know that gambling wins and losing them is alleged to trigger the feature more frequently on some Novo slots and other software too. It's alleged that if the player deliberately gambles all wins until they lose, every time, that they can behave like AWP's and start dropping things in because (allegedly) they RTP dips down to near zero for so many hundred spins and this triggers some sort of streak. I doubt that's why it's missing from BoD though.

Because a casino chooses to have different options on their games put there by the developer, it doesn't mean anything fishy is occurring.....
 
Alas I read your post a little too late matey lol :(

Another one way ticket to Bustville!

Okay. I have work to do, nice distraction, but you know.....VS will give you a full read out of your RTP,
You can also go to PlaynGo website to see what each game pays at that given moment. Some Casinos will add different things to their games, different betting amounts, gambling features. They do this because they can. The difference in url, and I will bet my life on it ( maybe not my life) is because for each platform, there needs to be a different program. Flash, mobile and download.
Smile, be happy. It isnt as sinister as you may think :)
 
My post has probably got lost in the thread, but this is what I found.


When I did a random search using the acronyms, it came up mobile. When I did a full address search it came up this.

This site can’t be reached

mltcw.playngocasino.com’s server DNS address could not be found.
Search Google for mltcw playing casino
ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED

Exacly the same for me 3 hits on google search. 1st and top search was the list of Play N Go mobile slots but no links to games. 2 was this thread and third was a casino add if I'm correct!
 
Exacly the same for me 3 hits on google search. 1st and top search was the list of Play N Go mobile slots but no links to games. 2 was this thread and third was a casino add if I'm correct!

I have had that message come up on flash before. My guess is that its a remote server issue, and has nothing to do with any Casino, none that they would be aware of anyways.
 
Right I'm not out to slander the casino like some seem to think. I have my concerns and shared them.

This day I started the thread was on mobile as likewise the day I played my session on mobile I noticed things seemed odd. The first that got me questioning and was unbale to post on mobile as I could not upload Pics was RUBY Slippers. I noticed when playing on 30 lines on mobile not all lines were paying. Ive double checked this now today on both mobile and web version and all seems ok but wasn't that day! Then I looked into the URLs ect as book of dead seemed suspiciously dead as I mentioned with the RTP.

Here's the 30 paylines
IMG_2237[1].jpg

Here payline 29 not paying that aroused my suspicion
IMG_2228[1].jpg

Today's confirmation that pay line 29 combination does pay
IMG_2240[1].jpg

And while I was obtaining this information to close this thread A nice 5x line hit on the Ruby Feature for 10% of my previous sessions losses.
IMG_2239[1].jpg

With regards to the different URL's I will probably contact Play N Go and secondly as for the payline 29 not paying the other day will present this to Videoslots support!
 
Okay. I have work to do, nice distraction, but you know.....VS will give you a full read out of your RTP,
You can also go to PlaynGo website to see what each game pays at that given moment. Some Casinos will add different things to their games, different betting amounts, gambling features. They do this because they can. The difference in url, and I will bet my life on it ( maybe not my life) is because for each platform, there needs to be a different program. Flash, mobile and download.
Smile, be happy. It isnt as sinister as you may think :)

eh, you've confused me now hun :confused:

I don't wear my foil hat on Wednesdays :D

My input of "to rig or not to rig" would be simply that VS has that huge of a player base they simply don't need to step over to the dark side lol :p
 
CM said sometime ago: (I'm paraphrasing :) ) "Casinos don't need to rig their games because the HE will drain players' balances anyway."
 
eh, you've confused me now hun :confused:

I don't wear my foil hat on Wednesdays :D

My input of "to rig or not to rig" would be simply that VS has that huge of a player base they simply don't need to step over to the dark side lol :p

Ha. Im good at confusing people when I am in a rush, and you are right. They don't have to step over :)
 
Right I'm not out to slander the casino like some seem to think. I have my concerns and shared them.

This day I started the thread was on mobile as likewise the day I played my session on mobile I noticed things seemed odd. The first that got me questioning and was unbale to post on mobile as I could not upload Pics was RUBY Slippers. I noticed when playing on 30 lines on mobile not all lines were paying. Ive double checked this now today on both mobile and web version and all seems ok but wasn't that day! Then I looked into the URLs ect as book of dead seemed suspiciously dead as I mentioned with the RTP.

Here's the 30 paylines
View attachment 77621

Here payline 29 not paying that aroused my suspicion
View attachment 77622

Today's confirmation that pay line 29 combination does pay
View attachment 77623

And while I was obtaining this information to close this thread A nice 5x line hit on the Ruby Feature for 10% of my previous sessions losses.
View attachment 77624

With regards to the different URL's I will probably contact Play N Go and secondly as for the payline 29 not paying the other day will present this to Videoslots support!

I have had issues with Play N Go before. I screenshot them and sent them off to be checked. It took a while to come back, but it did and in my favour. Now when it really screws up and pays 800 dollars from that screw up, we tend to keep our mouths shut. Right? :) Have a good day :D
 
It wouldn't pay because a wild does not substitute a jackpot icon. You only had two jackpot symbols that don't pay hence pay line 29 didn't pay.

Well I never knew that. So It substitutes for everything apart from the highest paying symbol pff! Saves an email I suppose.
 
Well I never knew that. So It substitutes for everything apart from the highest paying symbol pff! Saves an email I suppose.

You learn each day, even I do at my old ripe age :D

It is on the first page of the rules by the way, right at the top. A wild substitutes every symbol apart from the jackpot one.
 
I know that gambling wins and losing them is alleged to trigger the feature more frequently on some Novo slots and other software too. It's alleged that if the player deliberately gambles all wins until they lose, every time, that they can behave like AWP's and start dropping things in because (allegedly) they RTP dips down to near zero for so many hundred spins and this triggers some sort of streak. I doubt that's why it's missing from BoD though.
Absolutely not the case. It would be illegal for starters because you're linking games. That's the talk of someone who's used to playing compensated UK games and is looking for patterns which simply are not there.

Sky Vegas Novomatic slots don't have the gamble enabled most likely because the max stake goes up to £500 and they don't want to expose themselves to the extra variance that you would undoubtedly get on these (already volatile) slots.
 
Absolutely not the case. It would be illegal for starters because you're linking games. That's the talk of someone who's used to playing compensated UK games and is looking for patterns which simply are not there.

Sky Vegas Novomatic slots don't have the gamble enabled most likely because the max stake goes up to £500 and they don't want to expose themselves to the extra variance that you would undoubtedly get on these (already volatile) slots.

1. No, that's the talk of somebody who said 'ALLEGEDLY' (3 times!!!!) referring to tales abounding around the web - please read my post again! :rolleyes:

2. The gamble doesn't affect the variance in any way as it has a 100% return rate, as an after event no house edge and not related to the slot programme - you contradicted yourself there, because you're suggesting it affects volatility which means you must have linked games in some way lol. It can affect your temporary session RTP of course, but I think what you're getting at is casino exposure needs to be limited as they have a £500 spin limit. A screen of Explorers would thus be £2.5m win in FS - you cannot get close to that with the gamble as the x stake you are allowed to gamble is strictly limited. Get a 500x line of Explorers you'll see the gamble disabled, so incorrect again my friend.

3. The land-based Novomatics in Germany and Europe DID have a dodgy programming error where gambling any wins for a certain amount of spins and losing then changing stake WOULD always trigger a feature. It was a huge exploit that was re-chipped a few years ago. ;) Check it out!
 
Award winning Videoslots is reviewed by Casinomeister

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top