MUCH prefer Playboy to IM. Even after a nightmare session on
32Red where I somehow lost £140 on 30p bets trying to get ONE running wilds feature which paid me the grand sum of £1.21! It was the exception to the norm though, because I have ran pretty good on it (some £100+ profit sessions and a lot of £25 to £50 sessions when betting 60p per spin) ever since. I cannot say that at all about IM, where I am a consistent loser. To the extent that I won't more than the bare minimum 30p per spin.
So then, IM features. Wild Desire - sucks. Amber's feature - sucks. Sarah's Wild Wine - sucks. Not once have I hit anything over 10 quid on any of those three features. They are so bad that I actually do better in normal gameplay than I do in those bonus features. Troy's vampire bats is the only one I like (and have had any success with) on IM. And even then it was no more than £40. To sum up, this is how I compare the similar features in terms of my own experiences of run good/run bad on them.
Valkyrie (TS2) > Kimi (PB) > Amber (IM)
Ashley (PB) > Thor (TS2) > Michael (IM)
Troy (IM) > Odin (TS2)
Wild Nights > Wildstorm > Wild Desire
Loki (TS2) > Sarah (IM)
As far as Playboy is concerned, I slightly prefer Wild Nights to Running Wilds in much the same way that I prefer to take expanding wilds on Santa's Wild Ride instead of the stacked wilds. Ashley's rolling reels has been the best of them all in terms of my worst run on it.
Never won less than £20 on rolling reels but never more than £50 - 5OAKs especially difficult to hit as the 4th reels is usually a "stacked picture/AKQJTWild-free"
Won as little as £1.21 on running wilds but have also won £110+ (on one spin with 3 fully stacked wilds helping to make 5OAKs - it was "only" £110 because the wilds were in reels 2,3 and 4 instead of 1,2 and 3)
Won no less than £10 on Wild Nights but have also won £90+ (on one spin despite not making a 5OAK with wilds on reels 2,3 and 4.)