Casinos

Casinos By Status

Popular Filters

By Banking Options

Games

All Games

Bonuses

Popular Bonus Filters

Forums

Popular Forums

Forum User Features

Complaints

Submit A Complaint (PAB)

PAB Rules and Guidelines

Browse PABs

Gambling News

Popular News Sections

About Us

About Us

Nightmare screenshots

Umm Mr. Mac...

Take a look at this thread a little better.

See his screenshots?

Hes lost in everyone of them and goes and makes another deposit after another after another in all different casinos ffs.

If thats not a gambling problem then what is it?
 
bAdSmoker said:
If thats not a gambling problem then what is it?
Click to expand...
A gambling problem is when you lose money you can not afford, lose all self control over your betting, or get into serious debt.

I don't know Caruso either, but I seriously doubt he falls into this category! ;)
 
Well if you lose and lose and lose your money over and over in the same time frame, Yes that is a problem.


If they are from months apart then i apologize but he posted them as if to show us what he just lost over and over.
 
I didn't post them to show I lost "over and over" or otherwise miss-represent anything - I posted the thread originally to share that evil sequence of splits and doubles requiring two redeposits with anyone who might be interested. Since then, whenever I've had another monumental suckout on a big bet, I've posted it.

Yes, I do have a gambling problem: everytime I suffer a substantial loss I head-butt the computer. This costs me a packet in monitors and bandages, and the embarrassment on one occasion of having to be freed from the aparatus by a team of four firemen and a paramedic.

I'm not sure that Gamblers' Anonymous cater for these problems, but I might give them a ring on the off-chance.
 
i hate to call anyone an idiot but i really can't think of a better term/wording

look at the posting date at the start of thread, now look at the latest posting date...

is lifetime what you define as a "timeframe"?

btw, you need to work out some ignorance before pigeon-holing someone as a "problem gambler", for one thing, bet size is irrelevant in compulsive behavior and is only relative to your overall bankroll

bAdSmoker said:
Well if you lose and lose and lose your money over and over in the same time frame, Yes that is a problem.


If they are from months apart then i apologize but he posted them as if to show us what he just lost over and over.
Click to expand...
 
caruso said:
Yes, I do have a gambling problem: everytime I suffer a substantial loss I head-butt the computer. This costs me a packet in monitors and bandages, and the embarrassment on one occasion of having to be freed from the aparatus by a team of four firemen and a paramedic.
Click to expand...
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :D
 
ezc3m said:
i hate to call anyone an idiot but i really can't think of a better term/wording

look at the posting date at the start of thread, now look at the latest posting date...

is lifetime what you define as a "timeframe"?

btw, you need to work out some ignorance before pigeon-holing someone as a "problem gambler", for one thing, bet size is irrelevant in compulsive behavior and is only relative to your overall bankroll
Click to expand...

Ignorance?

Like i said you idiot "If there not from the same time frame then i apologize".
FFS YOU EVEN QUOTED IT!!

Obviously You need to read my post more clearly.

"People take the internet to seriously"

Lighten up.
 
Back on track here

It's not isolated as others have pointed out....again, perfect double - 11 vs 5. Rigged? Not quite. That's why they call it gambling. I can't complain, as I was down to $15 and had 2 great streaks right before this. $50 deposit + $30 bonus. Still made me cringe when I saw the dealer's card come out lol...oh well, that's blackjack for you; whether you're playing online or off it doesn't matter. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Hahahahaha!! :lolup: :lolup: :lolup:

No offense, bigwin, but seeing "meatwad" as a Boss nickname -- especially when you're posting a Nightmare screenshot is absolutely classic!!

Couldn't have been more appropriate for that specific hand! :thumbsup:
 
You pushed three and won one - how is that at all problematic? You're a net winner, there's no loss.
 
Last edited:
bAdSmoker said:
Ignorance?

Like i said you idiot "If there not from the same time frame then i apologize".
FFS YOU EVEN QUOTED IT!!

Obviously You need to read my post more clearly.

"People take the internet to seriously"

Lighten up.
Click to expand...

Sorry you are in the wrong. Should have though carefully before you first posted. After all the newbs on the forum have got to be picked on :P
 
Not exactly a 'nightmare screenshot' but a nightmare run if only I had not been playing minimum stakes.

This, straight from the start of my session this morning.

Game: Blackjack
Starting at [2005/05/28 09:04:59] and lasting for 0:03:48
Start balance: 109.11 End balance: 88.11
Total bets: 25.00 No of bets: 20
Result: -21.00


Hand # 1
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 7 Spades, Jack Hearts (17)
Dealer's cards showing: 7 Hearts
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 7 Hearts, Ace Hearts (8/18)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 108.11 GBP

Hand # 2
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 4 Spades, King Spades (14)
Dealer's cards showing: Jack Diamonds
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 4 Spades, King Spades, Queen Diamonds (BUST)
Dealer's hand: Jack Diamonds, 4 Clubs (14)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 107.11 GBP

Hand # 3
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 10 Spades, 9 Spades (19)
Dealer's cards showing: 2 Spades
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 2 Spades, Ace Hearts, 7 Diamonds (10/20)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 106.11 GBP

Hand # 4
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 10 Clubs, 9 Spades (19)
Dealer's cards showing: Jack Clubs
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: Jack Clubs, Queen Diamonds (20)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 105.11 GBP

Hand # 5
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 2 Hearts, 7 Hearts (9)
Dealer's cards showing: 6 Diamonds
Your response: DOUBLE DOWN
Your new hand: 2 Hearts, 7 Hearts, 7 Diamonds (16)
Dealer's hand: 6 Diamonds, 4 Spades, 8 Spades (18)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 103.11 GBP

Hand # 6
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: Queen Hearts, 7 Spades (17)
Dealer's cards showing: 6 Hearts
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 6 Hearts, 8 Spades, 2 Diamonds, 4 Diamonds (20)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 102.11 GBP

Hand # 7
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 4 Diamonds, Queen Spades (14)
Dealer's cards showing: 2 Diamonds
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 2 Diamonds, 10 Diamonds, 8 Diamonds (20)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 101.11 GBP

Hand # 8
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: Queen Spades, 3 Spades (13)
Dealer's cards showing: Ace Spades
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: Queen Spades, 3 Spades, 3 Clubs (16)
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: Queen Spades, 3 Spades, 3 Clubs, King Clubs (BUST)
Dealer's hand: Ace Spades, 6 Diamonds (7/17)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 100.11 GBP

Hand # 9
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: Jack Diamonds, 7 Clubs (17)
Dealer's cards showing: 5 Diamonds
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 5 Diamonds, 6 Clubs, 3 Spades, 4 Diamonds (18)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 99.11 GBP

Hand # 10
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 7 Hearts, 6 Clubs (13)
Dealer's cards showing: Queen Clubs
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 7 Hearts, 6 Clubs, Jack Spades (BUST)
Dealer's hand: Queen Clubs, 7 Spades (17)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 98.11 GBP

Hand # 11
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 6 Spades, 3 Hearts (9)
Dealer's cards showing: Ace Diamonds
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 6 Spades, 3 Hearts, 10 Clubs (19)
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: Ace Diamonds, 8 Hearts (9/19)
The result was: push
Your new balance: 98.11 GBP

Hand # 12
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 5 Hearts, 3 Hearts (8)
Dealer's cards showing: 2 Spades
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 5 Hearts, 3 Hearts, 9 Hearts (17)
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: 2 Spades, 3 Spades, Ace Spades, Ace Hearts (7/17)
The result was: push
Your new balance: 98.11 GBP

Hand # 13
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 2 Hearts, 7 Clubs (9)
Dealer's cards showing: 4 Spades
Your response: DOUBLE DOWN
Your new hand: 2 Hearts, 7 Clubs, 3 Clubs (12)
Dealer's hand: 4 Spades, Queen Hearts, 7 Clubs (21)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 96.11 GBP

Hand # 14
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 6 Clubs, Jack Clubs (16)
Dealer's cards showing: Queen Diamonds
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 6 Clubs, Jack Clubs, 10 Clubs (BUST)
Dealer's hand: Queen Diamonds, 10 Diamonds (20)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 95.11 GBP

Hand # 15
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 8 Hearts, 8 Clubs (16)
Dealer's cards showing: Ace Clubs
Dealer's hand: Ace Clubs, King Hearts (BLACKJACK)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 94.11 GBP

Hand # 16
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 7 Spades, 4 Spades (11)
Dealer's cards showing: 7 Diamonds
Your response: DOUBLE DOWN
Your new hand: 7 Spades, 4 Spades, 3 Clubs (14)
Dealer's hand: 7 Diamonds, Jack Diamonds (17)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 92.11 GBP

Hand # 17
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: Ace Spades, 7 Clubs (8/18)
Dealer's cards showing: 4 Clubs
Your response: DOUBLE DOWN
Your new hand: Ace Spades, 7 Clubs, King Spades (18)
Dealer's hand: 4 Clubs, Ace Clubs, Ace Hearts, 9 Clubs, 6 Hearts (21)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 90.11 GBP

Hand # 18
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 8 Diamonds, 7 Diamonds (15)
Dealer's cards showing: King Hearts
Your response: HIT
Your new hand: 8 Diamonds, 7 Diamonds, 3 Hearts (18)
Your response: STAND
Dealer's hand: King Hearts, 4 Spades, 2 Diamonds, 5 Hearts (21)
The result was: dealer won
Your new balance: 89.11 GBP

Hand # 19
Your bet was: 1 GBP
Your cards: 6 Clubs, 6 Diamonds (12)
Dealer's cards showing: 6 Hearts
Your response: SPLIT
Your cards, first hand: 6 Clubs, Jack Spades (16)
Your response for first hand: STAND
Your cards, second hand: 6 Diamonds, 8 Clubs (14)
Your response for second hand: STAND
Dealer's hand: 6 Hearts, Jack Diamonds, Ace Clubs (17)
The result for your first hand was: dealer won
The result for your second hand was: dealer won
Your new balance: 87.11 GBP

Did I do something wrong? :)
 
vgyhnji said:
Did I do something wrong? :)
Click to expand...
Yep - you played a Crypto!
Was that Intercasinoripoff by any chance?

But what about this:
Played their stupid 'Fruit Machine' again because I can't believe how shit is it.
Was amazed to get more than 10 squares round the 'Super Heavy Weight' feature without losing, land on 'Lucky Ladder' and get the top feature awarded! This is the one you can transfer to from the cash level of $500 - so I thought I MUST be on for something half decent!!
But my win was ONE DOLLAR! :eek:
_
 
Last edited:
Rigged Microgaming Blackjack

I have been reading/seeing screenshots of posts regarding Microgaming BJ. I have been complaining about this issue to the casino I play with for 3 months now with no result so I started taking screenshots. Random my butt! The following are "predictable" if player has two of same card (regardless of card and regardless of what dealer shows) dealer will get BJ or 21 95% of the time. Also, BJ's and 21's come in pairs, not always to same person one may be dealer other player but in two's 90% of the time as well. It is soo predictable that I even took insurance knowing dealer would have BJ which you can see from my payout which is my wager on the table plus 1/2 for the insurance I got back. I have literally dozens of screenshots to show this and play now for the purpose of gathering this information as I am seriously considering a "class action suit" against Microgaming. As someone else posted, I also had two 8's which I split for a total of four hands on the table, drew and doubled down and dealer STILL got BJ/21. But this has happened with two of any same card, two jacks, two kings, two sevens, doesn't matter. If that doesn't tell you that nothing you do as the player will affect the outcome I dont know what does. That's not random, that's rigged. In addition, if player has 11 or 14, about 80% chance dealer will have 21/BJ regardless of what is showing. I have screenshots of those as well. I think in light of what I've read, Microgaming needs to be held accountable for this rip off of players, anyone interested?
 
No offence but you sound like you just lost some money at a MG casino...
Do a search for 'rigged' and read up on that and see if you still think MG is rigging their casinos. Next, play 5000 hands and record the outcomes - then present it here with proof.
In my experience MG is up to par what is expected. That is, try depositing 500$ and set autoplay for 9999 hands, then record the final result. It should be around 464 if playing Vegas Strip BJ.

If you already have proof - please present it.
 
Gluten said:
No offence but you sound like you just lost some money at a MG casino...
Do a search for 'rigged' and read up on that and see if you still think MG is rigging their casinos. Next, play 5000 hands and record the outcomes - then present it here with proof.
In my experience MG is up to par what is expected. That is, try depositing 500$ and set autoplay for 9999 hands, then record the final result. It should be around 464 if playing Vegas Strip BJ.
Click to expand...
Your test wouldn't disprove the poster's hypothesis that it's rigged, though. It could be rigged as he suggests yet still give the correct long-term payout percentage. Not saying it is, though the more I play on it the more it does seem to play in wild swings during which you can predict outcomes & normal probabilities go out the window. Yeah, I know... why would they rig it when there's a house edge anyway, they'd lose a fortune if it was exploitable etc. etc. - it's an old argument where you can take either side (they'd rig it to increase the return - they'd lose less to those exploiting it than they gain from extra revenue from normal patterns of play etc.).

What we really need is genuine regulation of the software - i.e. an independent assessment of how the software performs by competent IT professionals & not a rubber stamp of statistics presented to an accountancy firm.
 
Just what type of "proof" do you need? The payout percentage is irrelevant in this situation and quite frankly, that's what they use to make things "appear" legit. Play 9999 hands I doubt it, I never win in that game (Atlantic City BJ) up down up down. This is about rigging certain hands such as those mentioned. Come on here, use common sense (thought that's not very common out there in the world), if I get two eights and split it four times, draw cards on each hand in addition to doubling and dealer STILL gets 21 that doesn't raise your eyebrows? Happens ALL the time and I have dozens of screenshots on this issue to prove it.
 
In addition, I have won plenty on various casino's with slots using MG. The issue is strictly with their Atlantic City BJ program (could be other BJ programs as well don't know since I don't play those). This isn't some grudge, I've won 12K a pop on a regular basis so that has nothing to do with it. Then again, I suppose it's a good reason for you to discount my comments writing them off as just being upset over losing..............not the case.
 
I thought I would revive an old thread with this nice hand. This was the dealer's 2nd 7 card winner in around 50 hands so I screenshot it. I ended up losing 24.5 bets in 135 hands in this session.

blackjack.gif
 
Yeah...Tell me about it =) Sitting there with over 1K- and can withdraw 50$...but I still think it's free cash- would've loved different terms though...I wouldn't have bet 10$ per round anyway if it was my own money...so I concider that 50$ won and the rest being fun money...kinda sucks but gotta give Sci-fi and Breakaway credit for being able to cashout at all...
-eRgs-
 
Now it's starting to feel unfair...eventhough Sci-fi and Breakaway are EXCELLENT casinos- this is making me think that I'll never use single freebie they send me...Yes I know- I wouldn't have bet it anyway but these machines seem to know that it's not my money... =(
theresult.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wish the forum software didn't accept attachments that blow the threads sideways and make them unreadable.

I originally made this thread for BS Microgaming blackjack suckouts on redeposits, as a possible indicator of foul play. You can prove little because there's no more than one hand ever played, but anyway, getting back on track:

This was the "Welcome back from Vegas" that Jupiter Club gave me. A good soft double on my $175 bet - A4 v. 6 - so I redeposited another $175 to cover it. I actually pulled a helpful card, looked good. Dealer pulled a 6, for ten, but then a 4, for 14 - so looking even better.

But then, I didn't take into account the Microgaming RNG (rigged number generator).
 
ergopro said:
Sitting there with over 1K- and can withdraw 50$..
Click to expand...
I'd still try to withdraw it, most they can do is say no. I just recently did a cashin at a casino with a bonus that, according to the T&C, was sticky and they gave it to me. Nothing ventured...
caruso said:
I didn't take into account the Microgaming RNG (rigged number generator).
Click to expand...
OUCH! Great way to lose a quick $175. :(
 
Bruce Hamilton said:
OUCH! Great way to lose a quick $175. :(
Click to expand...
It's made to look that way, isn't i?

Nay. $175 was the initial bet. $175 was the double redeposit. Total = $350 on that hand.
 
caruso said:
I wish the forum software didn't accept attachments that blow the threads sideways and make them unreadable.
Click to expand...
It is an external link.

caruso said:
I originally made this thread for BS Microgaming blackjack suckouts on redeposits, as a possible indicator of foul play. You can prove little because there's no more than one hand ever played, but anyway, getting back on track:

This was the "Welcome back from Vegas" that Jupiter Club gave me. A good soft double on my $175 bet - A4 v. 6 - so I redeposited another $175 to cover it. I actually pulled a helpful card, looked good. Dealer pulled a 6, for ten, but then a 4, for 14 - so looking even better.

But then, I didn't take into account the Microgaming RNG (rigged number generator).
Click to expand...
You should really stop doing this. :(
 
I'm totally sorry if this wasn't made available for all of you...I got 8megs/2megs and it shows just fine...it was to show all of you what happens when 10$ free chip turns into a nightmare with 50$ max.cashout.
Over 4K showing- and thinking that the software knows when to hit lol =) =) =)
 
ergopro said:
I'm totally sorry if this wasn't made available for all of you...I got 8megs/2megs and it shows just fine...it was to show all of you what happens when 10$ free chip turns into a nightmare with 50$ max.cashout.
Over 4K showing- and thinking that the software knows when to hit lol =) =) =)
Click to expand...
The problem is that your picture was too wide and messed up the page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top