What are your opinions on casino's that have a minimum play through requirement? I don't mean for bonuses- I am referring to when you deposit and play with your own funds but decide to cash out after a short time for one reason or another (i.e. no bonus taken).
Personally I think this is a very unfair term and has major implications when it comes to fair play and responsible gambling.
As you may be able to tell I have just fallen foul of this term (I am angry at myself for not seeing it in the terms) and was simply withdrawing due to the minimum bet being $5 in roulette and Blackjack (I am definitely a low roller!) which I thought were beyond my bankroll (I tend to deposit about $100). The slots were not that impressive either but I managed to turnover $75. I lost $25 in total before attempting cashing out. Nothing untoward here.
My gripe isn't really with the casino because it was my fault for missing the term I guess, and I will complete wagering (lol, the CSR actually told me how to do low risk wagers on roulette ) but rather with the ethics of being able to have such a term at all (they carry logos of both GamCare and GA and surely this forcing of play goes against everything they stand for?). The argumentative responses from their CSR's means I will never deposit at this particular RTG casino again.
Imagine a land based casino telling you you can only come in if you agree to wager everything in your pocket!
Personally I think this is a very unfair term and has major implications when it comes to fair play and responsible gambling.
As you may be able to tell I have just fallen foul of this term (I am angry at myself for not seeing it in the terms) and was simply withdrawing due to the minimum bet being $5 in roulette and Blackjack (I am definitely a low roller!) which I thought were beyond my bankroll (I tend to deposit about $100). The slots were not that impressive either but I managed to turnover $75. I lost $25 in total before attempting cashing out. Nothing untoward here.
My gripe isn't really with the casino because it was my fault for missing the term I guess, and I will complete wagering (lol, the CSR actually told me how to do low risk wagers on roulette ) but rather with the ethics of being able to have such a term at all (they carry logos of both GamCare and GA and surely this forcing of play goes against everything they stand for?). The argumentative responses from their CSR's means I will never deposit at this particular RTG casino again.
Imagine a land based casino telling you you can only come in if you agree to wager everything in your pocket!