MGA ignored complaint re. live casino games, now with Swiss

[Hector]

I’m a long-time online casino player, and I’ve submitted a serious complaint to the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) regarding irregular behavior observed in a licensed live casino game.
I documented more than 10 videos, with a detailed technical breakdown of suspicious patterns — not just personal loss, but algorithmic anomalies that raise questions about fairness and compliance.
The MGA closed the case without reviewing the evidence. No one from their team asked for clarification, follow-up, or technical review. They simply shut it down.
I have now submitted everything to the Swiss gambling authority (ESBK) — a neutral, public body that doesn’t depend on the gaming industry and reports to the Department of Justice.
If they do not act, I will make everything public.
And what I have is strong. Very strong.
This is not a personal vendetta — it’s a systemic issue that could affect many players.
I’m not naming the game or provider yet to allow the proper authorities to do their job without public pressure. But when the time comes, I will post everything.
If you’ve noticed strange behavior in any licensed live casino game, let me know. Maybe you’re not alone.

 

[snorky510238]

I’ve never played “live games” but it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if it was totally corrupt. It’s so easy to do and with seemingly, no repercussions, should anybody detect foul play. The industry is a law unto itself. That’s why I’ve given up gambling, completely.

 

[Hector]

I’ve never played “live games” but it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if it was totally corrupt. It’s so easy to do and with seemingly, no repercussions, should anybody detect foul play. The industry is a law unto itself. That’s why I’ve given up gambling, completely.

I completely understand your perspective. That’s actually what motivated me to document everything thoroughly — not just assumptions, but real patterns, video evidence, and a complete analysis.
What shocked me wasn’t just the behavior I observed, but the fact that a regulator like the MGA shut the case down without even reviewing it.
I’m still giving the Swiss authority time to act, but if they don’t, I’ll publish everything. What I found goes beyond personal suspicion — and it could affect many.
Thanks for your comment. It shows I’m not alone in thinking something deeper is going on.

 

[xexe]

If they do not act, I will make everything public.

If I'm being honest with you, I can say with certainty that none of them are going to take this ultimatum seriously if your evidence of fraud is recordings of perceived result-patterns/variance. I'd still be curious to hear your analysis though, so you may as well link to the videos now if you'd like.

 

[Reelsoffun]

Well the OP said he won’t reveal the game or provider yet but I’m going to guess evolution, and either a roulette variant or crazy time / monopoly

 

[Hector]

If I'm being honest with you, I can say with certainty that none of them are going to take this ultimatum seriously if your evidence of fraud is recordings of perceived result-patterns/variance. I'd still be curious to hear your analysis though, so you may as well link to the videos now if you'd like.

Thanks for your honest reply — I appreciate it.
I agree that simple “perceived patterns” wouldn’t be enough to raise a case, and that’s why I’ve gone further. My submission includes:

• Over 10 video recordings with consistent, repeated anomalies
• Frame-by-frame slow-motion captures
• Technical notes comparing wheel behavior after specific multipliers
• Cross-day analysis that suggests algorithmic influence, not randomness

I’m holding the full material until the Swiss authority (ESBK) responds, to give them the chance to act independently — but I’ll definitely share everything publicly if they don’t.

I’m not here to claim conspiracy based on bad luck — what I found is more structured than that. I’ll keep you updated. Thanks again.

 

[Hector]

Well the OP said he won’t reveal the game or provider yet but I’m going to guess evolution, and either a roulette variant or crazy time / monopoly

I’ll neither confirm nor deny for now — but your guess shows that you already sense where the cracks may be.

What I’m exposing doesn’t focus on one provider alone. It’s about how a game, certified and promoted under the highest standards, might still behave in ways that contradict the very concept of “randomness”.

I’ll reveal it all if the ESBK (Swiss authority) doesn’t act.

For now, I appreciate everyone’s input. It shows the community is watching — and thinking.

 

[snorky510238]

Electronic roulette is 100% bent. I saw enough and did structured betting patterns and can say with absolute confidence, that it’s just a compensated slot in disguise. I remember when they used to have roulette on TV (perhaps they still do). I always used to think, that although they appeared to be using a live dealer, as I remember, there was always a break in the recording between the dealer standing by the wheel and then just a shot of their hand spinning the ball. It would be so easy to just have a recording waiting, where the ball lands on the best number for the house. Nobody would ever be able to prove anything.

 

[Hector]

Electronic roulette is 100% bent. I saw enough and did structured betting patterns and can say with absolute confidence, that it’s just a compensated slot in disguise. I remember when they used to have roulette on TV (perhaps they still do). I always used to think, that although they appeared to be using a live dealer, as I remember, there was always a break in the recording between the dealer standing by the wheel and then just a shot of their hand spinning the ball. It would be so easy to just have a recording waiting, where the ball lands on the best number for the house. Nobody would ever be able to prove anything.

I know exactly what you mean — and that last line is what motivated me to dig deeper. I kept hearing “nobody can ever prove anything,” and that’s when I started documenting everything with precision.

Just to clarify: what I’ve been analyzing is not an electronic roulette — it’s a 100% real live roulette with a croupier, streamed live from a physical studio.

The patterns I found go far beyond personal suspicion — repeated triggers, visual anomalies, and post-multiplier behaviors that are not consistent with true randomness.

I’m still waiting on a response from the Swiss authority before I reveal everything, but I believe you’d be very interested in what I’ve captured.

Appreciate your insights — they echo exactly what pushed me to act.

 

[xexe]

Just curious, why are all your replies written by chatgpt? Am I witnessing dead internet theory, or are you a real person just using it to translate from a different language or something?

 

[Hector]

Just curious, why are all your replies written by chatgpt? Am I witnessing dead internet theory, or are you a real person just using it to translate from a different language or something?

Haha, fair question — I’m definitely a real person. English isn’t my first language, so I sometimes use AI to help structure and translate technical parts more clearly.

The case I’m bringing forward is serious, so I want to make sure my words don’t get dismissed due to grammar or phrasing. But everything I’ve shared comes from real observation and analysis I’ve done myself.

I get your skepticism though — this industry makes everyone suspicious.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Electronic roulette is 100% bent. I saw enough and did structured betting patterns and can say with absolute confidence, that it’s just a compensated slot in disguise. I remember when they used to have roulette on TV (perhaps they still do). I always used to think, that although they appeared to be using a live dealer, as I remember, there was always a break in the recording between the dealer standing by the wheel and then just a shot of their hand spinning the ball. It would be so easy to just have a recording waiting, where the ball lands on the best number for the house. Nobody would ever be able to prove anything.

Even putting that aside. The current variants of roulette with massive multipliers, there's no way they can let the game roll without influencing where the ball will land. Otherwise it would NEVER keep to the RTP specified.
It should still be 37/1 to land any number on roulette. The versions im talking about definitely aren't!

 

[Hector]

Even putting that aside. The current variants of roulette with massive multipliers, there's no way they can let the game roll without influencing where the ball will land. Otherwise it would NEVER keep to the RTP specified.
It should still be 37/1 to land any number on roulette. The versions im talking about definitely aren't!

That’s exactly what caught my attention too. Once you add huge multipliers (like 500x, 888x, or more), it becomes statistically impossible to keep the RTP consistent — unless the game compensates by selectively avoiding certain outcomes.

What I found were repeated instances where, right after a big multiplier hits or shows, the next round behaves in a way that clearly avoids letting another one land — sometimes even steering toward “safe” numbers.

I agree with you 100%. In theory, it’s still 37 to 1 — but in practice, I’ve seen something very different. And I’ve documented it round by round.

 

[SYPlayer95]

That’s exactly what caught my attention too. Once you add huge multipliers (like 500x, 888x, or more), it becomes statistically impossible to keep the RTP consistent — unless the game compensates by selectively avoiding certain outcomes.





What I found were repeated instances where, right after a big multiplier hits or shows, the next round behaves in a way that clearly avoids letting another one land — sometimes even steering toward “safe” numbers.





I agree with you 100%. In theory, it’s still 37 to 1 — but in practice, I’ve seen something very different. And I’ve documented it round by round.

Fair play to you. You must have a lot more free time than I have personally.

To be short, of course the MGA turn a blind eye. They will benefit directly from it.
The majority of the Internet know the live games are rigged.

 

[Hector]

Fair play to you. You must have a lot more free time than I have personally.

To be short, of course the MGA turn a blind eye. They will benefit directly from it.
The majority of the Internet know the live games are rigged.

Thanks, I appreciate that. Honestly, I didn’t start this with free time — I started it with frustration and ended up with patterns that were just too suspicious to ignore.

The more I dug, the more it became clear this isn’t just “bad luck.” It’s something deeper — and the lack of regulatory response made it worse.

You’re absolutely right: if even a fraction of what I found is accurate, the current system is failing the players badly. That’s why I had to escalate it.

 

[Hector]

For those wondering about the response I got from the regulator:


Here’s the actual email from the MGA (Malta Gaming Authority), closing my case without ever reviewing the evidence I submitted.

Their justification? That the operator wasn’t under their jurisdiction — even though the game provider involved absolutely is.

No one asked to review the videos, the documents, or the analysis I offered. The case was just shut down.

I’m still keeping provider names private for now. But I think this screenshot speaks volumes.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Not sure why they are referring to RNG. There should be no RNG in a live roulette setting. Otherwise, how can it be live...

 

[Hector]

Not sure why they are referring to RNG. There should be no RNG in a live roulette setting. Otherwise, how can it be live...

That’s exactly what raised even more red flags for me. The game I reported is 100% live roulette with a real croupier, physical wheel and ball. So the MGA’s response about the RNG made no sense at all.

It almost felt like they just sent a generic template, without even identifying what type of game I was reporting — let alone reviewing the material I provided.

That’s part of the problem: if the regulators don’t even look at what’s being reported, how can they ensure fairness?

 

[itsme123]

With reference to the Malta answer, how would they be able to investigate if the don't license the original provider? It would be like asking the police in the UK to investigate a robbery in France, would never happen.
Rather than Malta or the Swiss authorities, wouldn't it be better to find out where the original provider is licensed and based and contact the relevant authorities there?

 

[Hector]

With reference to the Malta answer, how would they be able to investigate if the don't license the original provider? It would be like asking the police in the UK to investigate a robbery in France, would never happen.
Rather than Malta or the Swiss authorities, wouldn't it be better to find out where the original provider is licensed and based and contact the relevant authorities there?

That would make sense — if Malta didn’t license the game provider involved.

But that’s the whole point: the operator (the casino) is not licensed by the MGA, but the game provider is. This game was developed, operated, and streamed by a company fully licensed by the Malta Gaming Authority.

So it’s not like asking UK police to investigate France. It’s more like asking UK police to investigate a UK-licensed company operating through third-party venues abroad — still their responsibility.

That’s why I’m highlighting the inaction. The MGA ignored a case about a company they do regulate.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Whilst I understand your concerns and frustrations. Unfortunately, this will go nowhere and I fear you are just going to waste even more time than you have already.

All you have to do is YouTube search about Evolution live games and there are plenty examples of roulette balls defying the laws of physics and game shows clearly controlled by a motor as the wheel doesn't stop spinning

 

[Hector]

Whilst I understand your concerns and frustrations. Unfortunately, this will go nowhere and I fear you are just going to waste even more time than you have already.

All you have to do is YouTube search about Evolution live games and there are plenty examples of roulette balls defying the laws of physics and game shows clearly controlled by a motor as the wheel doesn't stop spinning

Just to clarify — this has nothing to do with Evolution Gaming.
The provider involved is not Evolution, and the anomalies I documented don’t involve CGI-style game shows or spinning wheels that never stop. This is a real, live-streamed roulette table with physical equipment and real dealers, running under the Malta Gaming Authority’s license.
My concerns are not based on conspiracy videos, but on structured evidence: repeatable ball behavior, recurring multiplier patterns, specific number outcomes after certain events — all documented across many sessions.

I completely understand the skepticism, but this isn’t about wild physics-defying clips on YouTube. This is about regulated live roulette, and if a pattern holds under that environment, it deserves review.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Just to clarify — this has nothing to do with Evolution Gaming.
The provider involved is not Evolution, and the anomalies I documented don’t involve CGI-style game shows or spinning wheels that never stop. This is a real, live-streamed roulette table with physical equipment and real dealers, running under the Malta Gaming Authority’s license.
My concerns are not based on conspiracy videos, but on structured evidence: repeatable ball behavior, recurring multiplier patterns, specific number outcomes after certain events — all documented across many sessions.

I completely understand the skepticism, but this isn’t about wild physics-defying clips on YouTube. This is about regulated live roulette, and if a pattern holds under that environment, it deserves review.

The provider is irrelevant, theyre all the same, be it Pragmatic, Evolution, NetEnt.
Evolution was just an example.

Recurring multiplier patterns - I mean those of course aren't random.

You only win, if the provider wants you to win, because they need to keep to the set RTP of the game.

I'm sort of losing the trail a bit here, but if you can identify patterns, then surely you can also use that to your advantage...

Nevertheless, good luck in your quest.

 

[Hector]

The provider is irrelevant, theyre all the same, be it Pragmatic, Evolution, NetEnt.
Evolution was just an example.

Recurring multiplier patterns - I mean those of course aren't random.

You only win, if the provider wants you to win, because they need to keep to the set RTP of the game.

I'm sort of losing the trail a bit here, but if you can identify patterns, then surely you can also use that to your advantage...

Nevertheless, good luck in your quest.

I understand your point, and I agree that some systemic behavior appears across different providers. But the issue I’m reporting is not about RTP variation or isolated outcomes — it’s about a specific and repeatable mechanical pattern in a live roulette game with physical components, which should not behave like an algorithmic cycle.
That’s why I submitted it to a neutral Swiss authority. My concern is not that “I lost” — it’s that something deeper may be affecting the fairness of the game mechanics.

 

[xexe]

I understand your point, and I agree that some systemic behavior appears across different providers. But the issue I’m reporting is not about RTP variation or isolated outcomes — it’s about a specific and repeatable mechanical pattern in a live roulette game with physical components, which should not behave like an algorithmic cycle.
That’s why I submitted it to a neutral Swiss authority. My concern is not that “I lost” — it’s that something deeper may be affecting the fairness of the game mechanics.

Mate, your best way of proving this and being taken seriously is to simply exploit it enrich yourself. If it behaves like an algorithmic cycle, then ride the algorithmic wave and make millions. Complaining that it's not landing on your numbers because it's rigged will always make you come off as a disgruntled gambling addict, just sayin'.

 

[Hector]

Mate, your best way of proving this and being taken seriously is to simply exploit it enrich yourself. If it behaves like an algorithmic cycle, then ride the algorithmic wave and make millions. Complaining that it's not landing on your numbers because it's rigged will always make you come off as a disgruntled gambling addict, just sayin'.

I’ve actually had sessions with significant wins — and that’s exactly what made the pattern stand out. It wasn’t frustration that made me report this, but consistency in behavior that defies probability.
If I were trying to “ride the wave” and profit in silence, I wouldn’t have sent evidence to the Swiss gambling authority (ESBK). But I chose integrity over silence, because if something is manipulating outcomes in a live dealer roulette, it affects all players, not just me.
This isn’t about one unlucky day — it’s about repeatable anomalies that undermine trust in regulation and fair gaming.

 

[Hector]

Mate, your best way of proving this and being taken seriously is to simply exploit it enrich yourself. If it behaves like an algorithmic cycle, then ride the algorithmic wave and make millions. Complaining that it's not landing on your numbers because it's rigged will always make you come off as a disgruntled gambling addict, just sayin'.

But here’s the real problem: It’s because of casual, dismissive replies like yours — assuming every complaint is just another sore loser — that serious irregularities often go ignored. Players get brushed off without even reviewing the evidence.
I chose integrity over silence because this affects more than just me. This isn’t a personal vendetta — it’s a systemic issue. And I have no obligation to “exploit” a flaw in silence when the right thing is to expose it.

 

[xexe]

But here’s the real problem: It’s because of casual, dismissive replies like yours — assuming every complaint is just another sore loser — that serious irregularities often go ignored. Players get brushed off without even reviewing the evidence.
I chose integrity over silence because this affects more than just me. This isn’t a personal vendetta — it’s a systemic issue. And I have no obligation to “exploit” a flaw in silence when the right thing is to expose it.

Right, and I apologize if I came off as dismissive. I understand that in your mind, you genuinely believe the roulette wheels are rigged. And I'm telling you that the only way to really prove this, is to exploit it. I'm not even asking you to do so in "silence", do it loud and clear to demonstrate that they're rigged. The money you would earn would be taken from these (if true) crooks who facilitated rigged wheels *and* you would be able to actually expose them, rather than get brushed off.

 

[Hector]

Right, and I apologize if I came off as dismissive. I understand that in your mind, you genuinely believe the roulette wheels are rigged. And I'm telling you that the only way to really prove this, is to exploit it. I'm not even asking you to do so in "silence", do it loud and clear to demonstrate that they're rigged. The money you would earn would be taken from these (if true) crooks who facilitated rigged wheels *and* you would be able to actually expose them, rather than get brushed off.

I appreciate your clarification and the change in tone — thank you for that.
However, I believe exposing a systemic issue doesn’t require turning it into personal profit. That’s not my goal. I’m not chasing an exploit — I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.
That’s why I chose the transparent route: evidence, analysis, and a report to a neutral authority. I believe that’s what long-term accountability in this industry needs.

If the authorities decide to do nothing, I’ll eventually share the full evidence here — and when that happens, you’ll be the first to see it and realize how serious this really is.

 

[SYPlayer95]

I appreciate your clarification and the change in tone — thank you for that.
However, I believe exposing a systemic issue doesn’t require turning it into personal profit. That’s not my goal. I’m not chasing an exploit — I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.
That’s why I chose the transparent route: evidence, analysis, and a report to a neutral authority. I believe that’s what long-term accountability in this industry needs.

If the authorities decide to do nothing, I’ll eventually share the full evidence here — and when that happens, you’ll be the first to see it and realize how serious this really is.

I'd just share it now. Makes no different in my view.
If you want to show everyone how bent it is, what are you waiting for?

 

[Hector]

I'd just share it now. Makes no different in my view.
If you want to show everyone how bent it is, what are you waiting for?

I understand your curiosity. Just know that if regulators fail to act, I will make the evidence fully public — and you’ll be the first to see it. And once it’s out, there’s no turning back. That’s why timing matters.

 

[mulven]

Just curious, why are all your replies written by chatgpt? Am I witnessing dead internet theory, or are you a real person just using it to translate from a different language or something?

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

 

[Hector]

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

Yes, I do use ChatGPT to help translate and write clearly in English — especially for a topic this serious. It’s a tool, just like spellcheck or grammar suggestions. What matters is the evidence, not the punctuation.

 

[Hector]

“At this point, with how visible this thread has become, I’m quite certain someone from the industry or a regulatory body has already seen it. That’s exactly why I’m being methodical — when I decide to release the evidence, it won’t go unnoticed.”

 

[xexe]

Ha, the em dash gave it away didn't it!

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.

I’m raising awareness about a mechanical flaw that shouldn’t exist in a live game. If everyone just tried to “ride the flaw silently,” these issues would never be corrected, and countless players would continue to lose under false premises.

Right, I explicitly said you could do it loudly though. If you genuinely have some sort of ethical concerns about taking money from a casino that utilizes rigged wheels, then you could livestream yourself predicting the numbers as they happen without betting. A pre-recorded where you allege you found patterns is likely going to get dismissed too, although I'm still curious to hear your analysis so I hope you do upload the vids!

 

[Hector]

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.


Right, I explicitly said you could do it loudly though. If you genuinely have some sort of ethical concerns about taking money from a casino that utilizes rigged wheels, then you could livestream yourself predicting the numbers as they happen without betting. A pre-recorded where you allege you found patterns is likely going to get dismissed too, although I'm still curious to hear your analysis so I hope you do upload the vids!

I understand the skepticism — that’s exactly why I’m being methodical. The footage I have already shows repeatable anomalies, and when I decide to publish it, you’ll be the first to see. I’m not trying to convince everyone. I’m trying to hold those responsible accountable. That takes clarity, not haste.

 

[mulven]

Haha, that's definitely a dead giveaway, but the thing that triggered me to even look for them to confirm was the bullet points in one of his comments, which is something that chatgpt does all the time, but would be so overly formal for any human to do in a casual forum posts where commas to separate the items would've sufficed.

Indeed, I eyeroll whenever I see a new forum post complaint that is structured with lots of sections, lots of bold text and lots of bullet points. Once you've seen the style once, its easy to notice when AI has been asked to structure a complaint properly.

It is definitely preferable to the walls of texts that get posted frequently but the AI always tends to give it a grandiose flair and writes about it like its the greatest injustice humanity has ever seen. That element really bothers me. e

 

[Hector]

Indeed, I eyeroll whenever I see a new forum post complaint that is structured with lots of sections, lots of bold text and lots of bullet points. Once you've seen the style once, its easy to notice when AI has been asked to structure a complaint properly.

It is definitely preferable to the walls of texts that get posted frequently but the AI always tends to give it a grandiose flair and writes about it like its the greatest injustice humanity has ever seen. That element really bothers me. e

If a complaint is well-structured and clearly written, the focus should be on its content — not its formatting. I chose to explain things properly because the issue deserves clarity, not noise. You’re free to roll your eyes, but I’ll keep prioritizing substance over style.

 

[goatwack]

I don't see the issue with the implementation of A.I when used for translation purposes, actually showcasing what a useful aid it can be to those not overly versed in another language. It's actually preferable to have that, than trying to decipher the Voynich Manuscript from those struggling to convey their message effectively

Of course if spamming boards with dubious salesmanship and suchlike, the ChatGPT 'posts' become all too apparent with their desperation, and therefore mercilessly mocked, as they should be

This being thematically a smite more 'serious' in nature, I would say "ChatGPT away", as the topic appears to warrant some attention, at least, maybe.

Yet as for attempting to get a straight answer from the MGA - or any other regulatory body - in regards to providers' transparency (or lack therof) or shady findings, I just don't think video snippets are going to get their attention. They'd just claim it's subjective, the footage has been edited, it's not able to be recreated enough to be considered a flaw etc.

They'll simply close ranks and treat you like a pariah, maybe even get children to throw eggs at you in the street. And that's something even A.I can't help you with!

 

[Hector]

I don't see the issue with the implementation of A.I when used for translation purposes, actually showcasing what a useful aid it can be to those not overly versed in another language. It's actually preferable to have that, than trying to decipher the Voynich Manuscript from those struggling to convey their message effectively

Of course if spamming boards with dubious salesmanship and suchlike, the ChatGPT 'posts' become all too apparent with their desperation, and therefore mercilessly mocked, as they should be

This being thematically a smite more 'serious' in nature, I would say "ChatGPT away", as the topic appears to warrant some attention, at least, maybe.

Yet as for attempting to get a straight answer from the MGA - or any other regulatory body - in regards to providers' transparency (or lack therof) or shady findings, I just don't think video snippets are going to get their attention. They'd just claim it's subjective, the footage has been edited, it's not able to be recreated enough to be considered a flaw etc.

They'll simply close ranks and treat you like a pariah, maybe even get children to throw eggs at you in the street. And that's something even A.I can't help you

I appreciate your more balanced take. Yes, I’ve been using AI tools to help communicate more clearly, especially in a language that’s not my native one. The core message, however, is mine — and it reflects serious observations from long hours of gameplay.
I’m fully aware that regulators may dismiss videos as subjective. That’s why I didn’t just send isolated clips — I submitted patterns, timestamped behavior, technical analysis, and contextual data. If that still isn’t enough to raise at least some questions, then the system really is designed to remain closed.
But I believe some eyes will open eventually. Thanks for at least considering the topic seriously.

 

[spindoctor99]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

 

[Hector]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

Thanks for sharing this. It may be a different game, but your experience adds to a broader concern: live dealer games that behave in statistically odd ways. Whether it’s roulette or blackjack, if there’s a consistent imbalance or anomaly, it’s worth talking about. That’s why I opened this thread — to compare patterns and see how far it goes.

 

[spindoctor99]

Pretty conclusive proof of blackjack cheating.

 

[mulven]

If a complaint is well-structured and clearly written, the focus should be on its content — not its formatting. I chose to explain things properly because the issue deserves clarity, not noise. You’re free to roll your eyes, but I’ll keep prioritizing substance over style.

The problem is in most of the AI structured posts I've seen of complex complaints, the verbiage used is over the top sounding like its life and death. It's distracting whilst reading the post.

As I said in my message, I much prefer well structured posts to walls of texts and it is a good thing for people to do who don't speak a language all too well. I was just airing my frustrations with some of the unintended side effects.

 

[Hector]

Pretty conclusive proof of blackjack cheating.

right in his face

 

[xexe]

I know this is unrelated but I play live blackjack.. and use to play it a lot years ago. I've often wondered if its rigged just due to the dealers cards. The dealer always seems to get blackjack statistically more than it should. Generally when the dealer has a picture card, the other card is generally a picture card too and its not uncommon for the dealer to go on long winning streaks yet its fucken uncommon for the dealer to go on long losing streaks. I've seen the dealer win more than 20 hands straight.

How do you suppose they do this, concretely? The video you linked looks more like an innocent mistake dating back 8 years, you can see him wagging his finger up & down before he even takes the card out. How would he possibly know which card comes next? They also literally shuffle the decks right in front of your eyes.

Besides, even if, let's say, their shufflers are all world-class sleight of hand masters who've never slipped up and never spoken out (despite earning modest salaries in eastern Europe) how would they even know the order in which to shuffle the deck? They cannot predict how many people will play or how people will play, so there would be absolutely no way of planning to give the shuffler any card, those cards would, regardless of shuffle, be equally likely to end up in a player's hand.

 

[YouTubeSlots]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board.

Such nonsense If you ask me,

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

 

[Lemon]

'I lost money gambling online, therefore online gambling is bent.'

'The randomness didn't feel like I imagined it to feel, therefore it isn't random.'

Good luck either way

 

[Hector]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board. Such nonsense

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

Exactly — that’s why I brought my case to a neutral authority. What I’m reporting isn’t just a suspicion: I have repeated, documented patterns in a live-streamed game with real dealers. If even physical casinos are rigging games, we shouldn’t blindly assume online versions with multiplier mechanics are clean either. Someone has to call it out.”

 

[mulven]

Search on youtube for a guy called micky mase, he explains how they rig roulette wheels and blackjack etc in Las Vegas and get away with it.

Yet we're meant to belive they dont practice the same practices online and everything is above board.

Such nonsense If you ask me,

He even explains how the commission in charge of making sure the casinos don't cheat is funded and ran by the casinos themselves.

And that's why they have nothing to worry about. They govern there own law basically

micky mase is an absolute fraud btw, probably using daddys money for all his claims. He's shown "proof" hes a winning player (at baccarat... without edge sorting) by showing hes up but thats easy to cherry pick