Quickly! Cashout fast!
Do the same as that lady in America, cashout! You might at least get a steak dinner out of it!
:eat::
New Slot Announcement Jurassic World - Microgaming
- Thread starter Wild Reels
- Start date
Do the same as that lady in America, cashout! You might at least get a steak dinner out of it!
:eat::
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario
@Tropicana50
Yes, the mobile version crashed on me in free play mode. They rushed the cake out the door before it was completely baked. Julianne Moore deserves better than this!
Yes, the mobile version crashed on me in free play mode. They rushed the cake out the door before it was completely baked. Julianne Moore deserves better than this!
- Joined
- May 31, 2017
- Location
- Lancashire
Exactly this, just terrible in every way.
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario
Then this Bryce Dallas Howard woman looks a lot like her. Yes, that's her birth name and not a studio name.
No reason now to play.
- Joined
- May 30, 2014
- Location
- work
Only played this on demo and A £100 quid lasted about 15 mins on quick spins at 0.30p steaks.
For such a big release this is a awful slot. Don't think i be playing this one with real money.
For such a big release this is a awful slot. Don't think i be playing this one with real money.
geordiecolin
Sporney eyed parrot faced wazzock
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2015
- Location
- Novacastrian
I tried it for the first time this evening. Even though I did well on it I have no intention of playing it again. Like many have already said. Its like a poorly cooked broth of a number of other games. Very disappointed considering the huge build up to its release 
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2012
- Location
- Portugal
Just one of the worst slot games I've ever played.
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario
I did try it yesterday. It did bonus frequently and I did get one "Big Win" but it is inexcusable how these new games run so poorly on iPad Mini 4. Every single one crashes. My PC is a POS; I wanna gamble on the one device I own that is actually fairly new. I play slots on Safari, by the way.
Too early to give it a Yay or Nay but it seems like many have pegged it as the "Most disappointing slot of 2017".
Too early to give it a Yay or Nay but it seems like many have pegged it as the "Most disappointing slot of 2017".
- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Location
- Cumbria
I had problems playing games in Safari on my Iphone 7. But they worked perfectly using the Google chrome app. Maybe you could try that?
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario
I'll try that. I use Safari because it runs those Thunderkick games.
- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Location
- Cumbria
I hope Dunover won't hold this against me.
He makes many reviews lately, but not about Jurassic World.
And in Beautiful Bones thread he said:
Did he change his minds about JW?
Ha ha ha, wish it did pay 450x, 900, or 1000x.
I've only had it twice in 1500+ spins and it was 11x both times
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Location
- Wolverhampton
- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Location
- Cumbria
11x stake or 11x win ?
Have to ask as I've yet to see it at all
11x my stake
I did try to load the helpfile to see if there's a range listed. But I haven't found a copy of the game anywhere, where the helpfile link actually works. and the paytable just says UPTO 1000x total bet
But it's probably the only times I'll see the feature anyway, Since I doubt I'll be playing it much in the future.
I know I've only had 1577 spins. but with a loss of £178 and an RTP of 84%. It's enough to make me think twice about playing it again
lockinlove
Editing my post so I dont get in trouble
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Location
- Canada
I thought MG slots give freespins 1 every 150 spins on average how it is possible I just went 1354 spins without a feature on this
Im absolutely blown away at how horrific of ajob they did on this game. MG has went down the toilet what a disgrace
Edit: here ya go guys 1488 spins and hit the feature. Incredible slot. Mind blowing really.
Im absolutely blown away at how horrific of ajob they did on this game. MG has went down the toilet what a disgrace
Edit: here ya go guys 1488 spins and hit the feature. Incredible slot. Mind blowing really.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Location
- Wolverhampton
I tried it again last night, I have to agree its crap and shouldn't have been released until finished OR not bothered all together if they couldn't afford the full licence cost to make it worthwhile.
Original 9-liners with outdated graphics and jerky spins are 100 x better than this.
Original 9-liners with outdated graphics and jerky spins are 100 x better than this.
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Location
- UK
The I-rex is what kills it for me. every spin, every win, you're just praying for him to appear as it's near enough the only way to get big wins in base game, they should have left him out and improved the base game and free spin payouts, maybe given him his own free spin round, where he eats the smaller dinos over time a bit like I-Nets Aloha free spins round maybe.
On another note, I wonder if the videos and animations will ever be fixed or finished at all
On another note, I wonder if the videos and animations will ever be fixed or finished at all
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Location
- London
A miracle happened last few days - a streamer called Shirok actually got a 1000x stake win on this (on the multiplier bonus). Its on you tube.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Location
- Scotland
Shirox 1980 hit a MEGA win?
That's a shock! I bet he was still miserable He has a 596x hit on the multiplier bonus, not a 1000x
I find it really fascinating how bad Jurassic World is. And that's not sarcasm! I'd really love to know who made the various design decisions that saw this iteration being released. Because I think they've ruined what could have been a perfectly good slot.
I'm not as down on recent MG games as some. I think there's a tendency to judge slots based on an outdated archetype of how individual parts of older slots used to operate, rather than judging them as a whole. I think this is because we tend to be most attached to the slots we played when we first started. For example, expectations about what bonuses and 5OAKs should pay only make sense if they're coming up with the same frequency and paying out in the same way. If a one-line 5OAK is a rare treat, then of course it should pay well. If you're getting all kinds of multi-line, multi-wild shenanigans as standard, then the fact a single 5OAK only pays 5x or 10x is irrelevant. Comparing paytables is a rubbish way to compare slots, as a rule.
To give a more specific example: I think Bridesmaids wasn't given a fair shake. It's got a lot of varied features, bonus hits pretty frequently, and can pay big (yes the individual line payout are bad, but that's because you usually hit on a lot of lines at once). I've won thousands on it over the past few years - it's probably single-handedly responsible for keeping me in slot profit. Sure, the theme is going to be off-putting to some, but that's why there's a million different slots. For people who like (or aren't actively repulsed!) by the theme, I think it's well designed. The new Beautiful Bones actually has some good potential too. I've won a couple of 100x hits in the base game, and some 200x+ hits in the free spins. It's not incredibly exciting, but that's the pay-off for the almost guaranteed bonus trigger every couple of dozen spins (if you choose the 10x).
I guess I'm just tolerant. I can see the good points of most slot designs, even if there's lots I don't choose to play.
Which is why Jurassic World is such a baffling crock of shit. I'm definitely the target audience for this, but they've actively made it so I don't want to play. I think the core gimmick - 2 scatters turn wild rather than giving a payout - is neat. And the three bonuses are nice and varied. People are down on the Raptor one for resetting the wilds after three, but I think the point of that is the sticky scatter wilds ALSO pay as scatters when they hit. So you're much more likely to get the 5x scatter hit payout, because you can start with two in play pre-spin. That's a pretty novel mechanic.
And of course the enormous I-Rex multiplier could be really exciting. But the psychology is all wrong. There's no way to get excited about possibly hitting a huge win, because there's no way to know one might appear. If the I-Rex bonus was like the T-Rex bonus from the original Jurassic Park (Oh shit! For the next 10 spins, I-Rex could show up!) then it would be a lot more exciting. Or even if there was just a cheapo fake-out sound cue every couple of dozen spins (Rumble rumble, is I-Rex coming? Nope!). That would be piss annoying, of course, but at least it would be exciting. As it is, when someone eventually does hit the 1000x I-Rex multiplier, it'll just come off as a bizarre afterthought to an otherwise normal win.
The slot seems simple to fix. Add some better sound cues so you know something exciting MIGHT be about to happen. Maybe change the I-Rex to a feature rather than just a random popup. Reduce the I-Rex multiplier so you can give a better payout on the rest of the slot (is chasing a random 500x, 250x or even 100x multiplier actually any less exciting than chasing a 1000x multiplier?). I might also change the Gyrosphere bonus so the multiplier doesn't reset all the way to 2x. The variance is dropped, but then the average bonuses and base hits are better, which makes people feel less insulted. Despite my points about paytables above, there ARE limits. Paying out 9p on a £1.50 bet is poor psychology. In terms of annoyance, I think most people would really rather win 0!
I'm not as down on recent MG games as some. I think there's a tendency to judge slots based on an outdated archetype of how individual parts of older slots used to operate, rather than judging them as a whole. I think this is because we tend to be most attached to the slots we played when we first started. For example, expectations about what bonuses and 5OAKs should pay only make sense if they're coming up with the same frequency and paying out in the same way. If a one-line 5OAK is a rare treat, then of course it should pay well. If you're getting all kinds of multi-line, multi-wild shenanigans as standard, then the fact a single 5OAK only pays 5x or 10x is irrelevant. Comparing paytables is a rubbish way to compare slots, as a rule.
To give a more specific example: I think Bridesmaids wasn't given a fair shake. It's got a lot of varied features, bonus hits pretty frequently, and can pay big (yes the individual line payout are bad, but that's because you usually hit on a lot of lines at once). I've won thousands on it over the past few years - it's probably single-handedly responsible for keeping me in slot profit. Sure, the theme is going to be off-putting to some, but that's why there's a million different slots. For people who like (or aren't actively repulsed!) by the theme, I think it's well designed. The new Beautiful Bones actually has some good potential too. I've won a couple of 100x hits in the base game, and some 200x+ hits in the free spins. It's not incredibly exciting, but that's the pay-off for the almost guaranteed bonus trigger every couple of dozen spins (if you choose the 10x).
I guess I'm just tolerant. I can see the good points of most slot designs, even if there's lots I don't choose to play.
Which is why Jurassic World is such a baffling crock of shit. I'm definitely the target audience for this, but they've actively made it so I don't want to play. I think the core gimmick - 2 scatters turn wild rather than giving a payout - is neat. And the three bonuses are nice and varied. People are down on the Raptor one for resetting the wilds after three, but I think the point of that is the sticky scatter wilds ALSO pay as scatters when they hit. So you're much more likely to get the 5x scatter hit payout, because you can start with two in play pre-spin. That's a pretty novel mechanic.
And of course the enormous I-Rex multiplier could be really exciting. But the psychology is all wrong. There's no way to get excited about possibly hitting a huge win, because there's no way to know one might appear. If the I-Rex bonus was like the T-Rex bonus from the original Jurassic Park (Oh shit! For the next 10 spins, I-Rex could show up!) then it would be a lot more exciting. Or even if there was just a cheapo fake-out sound cue every couple of dozen spins (Rumble rumble, is I-Rex coming? Nope!). That would be piss annoying, of course, but at least it would be exciting. As it is, when someone eventually does hit the 1000x I-Rex multiplier, it'll just come off as a bizarre afterthought to an otherwise normal win.
The slot seems simple to fix. Add some better sound cues so you know something exciting MIGHT be about to happen. Maybe change the I-Rex to a feature rather than just a random popup. Reduce the I-Rex multiplier so you can give a better payout on the rest of the slot (is chasing a random 500x, 250x or even 100x multiplier actually any less exciting than chasing a 1000x multiplier?). I might also change the Gyrosphere bonus so the multiplier doesn't reset all the way to 2x. The variance is dropped, but then the average bonuses and base hits are better, which makes people feel less insulted. Despite my points about paytables above, there ARE limits. Paying out 9p on a £1.50 bet is poor psychology. In terms of annoyance, I think most people would really rather win 0!
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Location
- UK
Tried (demo) 500 spins (now they have auto-play)...at 15th spin got 5x base game hit and T-rex gave 14x. 100 spins later got 30x base game hit...
This slot is so bad that I started to think that maybe Netent sent spies to MG (revenge for Jungle Jim copyrights). Microgaming should redraw this like never happened...
But they like themselves too much, who cares for players....
This slot is so bad that I started to think that maybe Netent sent spies to MG (revenge for Jungle Jim copyrights). Microgaming should redraw this like never happened...
But they like themselves too much, who cares for players....
- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Dunover's take....
....this game is SHITE!!! :mad
....this game is SHITE!!! :mad
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Location
- UK
I must have missed the 2011 movie, are you thinking of The lost world?
The second Jurassic world movie is on the way though 'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom'
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Location
- Ontario
Took a break from getting pounded with 40% rtp sessions by my "favorite casinos??" until I saw this game.
I can't believe how bad it is. It goes on worse runs than TSII and couple that with the .03 cent wins and 5x bonus rounds.
I counted 16 times 2 scatters dropped with out paying in one disturbing session.
I can't believe MGS can get away with it. Bollocks to you mgs
I can't believe how bad it is. It goes on worse runs than TSII and couple that with the .03 cent wins and 5x bonus rounds.
I counted 16 times 2 scatters dropped with out paying in one disturbing session.
I can't believe MGS can get away with it. Bollocks to you mgs
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Location
- Republic Of West Yorkshire
Has anyone had the multiplier on over a 5x win?
Everytime I have had it, it has been between a 3x and a 4x win, except yesterday when it gave it on a 5x win.
And its always bloody 10x - 13x
Everytime I have had it, it has been between a 3x and a 4x win, except yesterday when it gave it on a 5x win.
And its always bloody 10x - 13x
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Location
- Melbourne
Well...I've had luck on this game.
I don't keep precise details on the numbers of spins or money gains/losses....but I have hit spin ( at 0.90 or 1.20 ) no more than about 40 times, won the feature twice. A $20 win on the first feature and $58 on the second ( the frozen wilds feature ). Add to this a couple of modest wins in the base game ( $60 on one spin ). So yes, I am satisfied with it and will play it again next fortnight when I deposit at the casino again. I actually like the graphics, it's clean cut, I like it.
I don't keep precise details on the numbers of spins or money gains/losses....but I have hit spin ( at 0.90 or 1.20 ) no more than about 40 times, won the feature twice. A $20 win on the first feature and $58 on the second ( the frozen wilds feature ). Add to this a couple of modest wins in the base game ( $60 on one spin ). So yes, I am satisfied with it and will play it again next fortnight when I deposit at the casino again. I actually like the graphics, it's clean cut, I like it.
After few minds I managed to get best Indominus rex feature so far:
Almost 600x alltogether...
Second best was 40x and third best 30x, all others between 10-13x...
Interestingly, Indominus ia activated when base game win is 4-5x.
Indominus feature is decent, about 45x alltogether average (worst was 27x). It is frequent like T-rex alert in Jurrasic Park slot.
Slot itself is very moody, it looks like less harsh than JP, but it can be cold (completely for 200-300 spins). I don't like FS features, Raptor is tilter, Gyrosphere is like IR Amber (maybe just a little less cruel since you have guaranteed win), so Creation Lab is something like Troy.
Almost 600x alltogether...
Second best was 40x and third best 30x, all others between 10-13x...
Interestingly, Indominus ia activated when base game win is 4-5x.
Indominus feature is decent, about 45x alltogether average (worst was 27x). It is frequent like T-rex alert in Jurrasic Park slot.
Slot itself is very moody, it looks like less harsh than JP, but it can be cold (completely for 200-300 spins). I don't like FS features, Raptor is tilter, Gyrosphere is like IR Amber (maybe just a little less cruel since you have guaranteed win), so Creation Lab is something like Troy.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Location
- Canada
I've had the I-rex feature once
it was something like 10x win times 11x or something silly like that
I've done like 50 spins on the slot since
it was something like 10x win times 11x or something silly like that
I've done like 50 spins on the slot since
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
- Location
- Uk
I quite like it. 11x is its favourite to give I always seem to get that.Best ever was x40.I expect you already know but once you have lit all the circles at the bottom of the feature page you can then choose your feature as opposed to getting what the game picks( just Incase you didn't know).I usually choose raptor den.Bonus rounds I find are quite frequent but good ones are like hen's teeth.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Location
- Canada
after giving this a proper gameplay it is actually a really good slot
bonus spins pays are quite low but the base game is amazing
indominus rex is not as rare as you might think but it gives mostly 10-14x multiplier
i had 2 indominus rex wins in 6 spins
bonus spins pays are quite low but the base game is amazing
indominus rex is not as rare as you might think but it gives mostly 10-14x multiplier
i had 2 indominus rex wins in 6 spins
Yes, very true...i stopped playing TS2, this one has variance that I find sustainable and amusing...
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Location
- Canada
okay it seems like they have changed a few things on this slot
indominus rex is harder to get now but it is now possible to get it if you hit a 10x win
bonus is harder to get and higher variance when you finally land it
base game is now all about the stacked wilds instead of the i-rex feature
indominus rex is harder to get now but it is now possible to get it if you hit a 10x win
bonus is harder to get and higher variance when you finally land it
base game is now all about the stacked wilds instead of the i-rex feature
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2009
- Location
- the land of snow and maple syrup
honestly, you described it pretty how how it appeared to me straight out of the gate
only saw indominus I think once, nary a FS round, and crap 10x wins and that was on its release
Similar threads
