- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Location
- IOM
It's not a slot!
You mean this from that other forum. Fun play.
So you see, it has options, not always the same scratchcard. That one is 19,684.40x and the other one was 19,480.20x.
It's not like you can predict what will happen when a sequence starts. It is deff not boring.
But it is only for "hit and run" play. Do a few spins and go.
You mean this from that other forum. Fun play.
View attachment 98395
It's not like you can predict what will happen when a sequence starts. It is deff not boring.
But it is only for "hit and run" play. Do a few spins and go.
Each to their own and everyone has their favourite slots but I’d argue that with exposure it is getting it would be fairly quickly apparent when you are at the start of a significant win (and can therefore run around the room getting excited without bothering to watch it play out). You may not find it boring which is completely fair, but many do so not really a statement of fact. As for your last statement, I’d say that is the very definition of a scratch card. Buy a few, hope to hit a big win. Stop because you know most of the time you’re only getting half your money back.
One thing is very telling about all this. The rules still have not been changed. The rules still do not state the maximum win of 20,000x. The Push rep has disappeared of the face of the planet. For me, that says everything I need to know.
Yes just my opinion
What rules? What is the problem with max win? Sorry for asking, didn't read most of the thread.
The issue with Jammin Jars isn’t so much about the game design (predetermined results) although it is felt that it could be better. The area myself and a few others have issues with is that, by the rules stated, the movement of the jars and therefore outcome of each game is random. This is simply not true. The addition of not inlcuding a maximum win can also fairly be accused to be misleading as it implies each bonus game can have pretty much unlimited potential.
The likelihood of this happening if it were truly random is clearly something more likely than Bonanza as you could end up with a cluster of jars which would just carry on winning. Indeed the general consensus is that the slot was originally designed this way then certain wins were selected as being possible resulting in the slot as it is. At design level the random element of the jars moving was likely true. However that is clearly no longer the case.
Being generous I would say this is an oversight. Being cynical I’d say this, combined with the clear lack of a defined maximum win, is a little “dodgy”.
My standpoint on this has always been from the legal/ethical side. I personally have accepted the slot such as it is and, like a scratchcard and against my better judgement occasionally have 20-30 spins on it. However, the potential in future for manufacturers to present ever increaing, misleading slots with the addition of streamers hitting eye catching wins is potentially pretty serious which is why I don’t take the, “don’t like it, don’t play it” line.
The fact is the rules don't say the movement of the jars is random.
The rules also don't say the multiplier is unlimited.
View attachment 98402
I think it does. Also by not presenting the true maximum win it is also fair to say that, by implication of above, that wins should be capable of going to any level. Not good enough to say that’s fairly unlikely, it is by design, impossible.
Edit: Do agree that BTG also do present things which are dubious but not, as far as I’m aware at least, untrue.
We've covered this many times over already nikantw (in this very thread) - do keep up!
11121.4x !!!!!!!It went nuts again.You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 102595
11121.4x !!!!!!!
which is used about as much as a sandwich toaster.