These guys have just removed their very clear term about playing bets of only less than 25% of the bonus when playing with a bonus (fair enough), and replaced it with the following vague FU clause:
Why would they do such a thing, unless they wanted greater scope to confiscate at will.
I think this is pretty shoddy behaviour personally. What do you think?
InterCasino reserves the right to review transaction records and logs from time to time and for any reason. If, upon review, InterCasino becomes aware of a player who benefits from a promotion or offer by participating in strategies that InterCasino in its sole discretion deems to be abusive, InterCasino reserves the right to deny payment of a promotional bonus, refuse withdrawals and/or lock accounts.
Why would they do such a thing, unless they wanted greater scope to confiscate at will.
I think this is pretty shoddy behaviour personally. What do you think?