Bonus Complaint InterCasino Confusing Bonus Terms - Do You Agree?

[jackieonweb]

I can tell you for sure that I only log into my InterCasino on my PC at home though, so I didn't break any of their rules!

 

[heador112]

Good catch , Bryan and Rainmaker

Sounds like Jackie is a bonuswhore with multiple accounts .

 

[jackieonweb]

I can assure you I have only one account at Casinomeister and InterCasino.

Whether someone logged into CM on the same public IP/PC as me, I can't tell you. But I 100% have logged into InterCasino on my laptop at home.

 

[LaHutti]

:eat:

 

[threescatters]

If this is multiple accounting then shame on the OP.

However that is up for Intercasino to find out. I think everyone would agree confiscation of winnings gained through multi accounting/fraud is fair. I trust intercasino will only carry this out if its proven however, they are a 100% trusted outfit and I am sure they would not do this without absolute certainty.

On the other hand OPs claim about the bonus terms is perfectly valid, the 10% max bet rule only applies to the one bonus (that they did not claim). I am sure the manager of intercasino will realise this as well when they look at the thread on here as well.

What I think is needed here is clarification on if this is a fraud/multi accounting confiscation or if it is confiscation because of the bonus terms.

 

[jackieonweb]

I have always used InterCasino from home, due to their terms, so there is no way they can link me to other people.
If I knew about these linked accounts on CM, why would I log in here?
When you said MAC, I assume you are referring to my iPhone, which is used all over the country on the 3G network.

 

[threescatters]

Also I think if this is multiaccounting/fraud then that is up to intercasino to decide and noone else as they have the relevant info. "trial by forum" with members just assuming guilt of the OP is not fair imo (but neither is a poster lying to us and accusing a casino of being rogue)

 

[The Dude]

oh what a tangled web weave...

There is no "trial by forum". "Jackie" is a fraudster.

There are no less than 11 accounts at Intercasino that have been opened on her computers. Two accounts belong to other "members" of this forum, one of which was banned two years ago for pulling the same stunt elsewhere.

The M.O. is exactly the same connected to multi-accounts as well.

Of course she'll deny it until the cows come home, but she is a fraudster - there is no doubt.

What's a shame is that she probably pulled the same stunt with Grand Duke and they just didn't catch it. That sucks.

These are the players that are screwing up the playing field for everyone. Casinos are overly cautious to the point of paranoia, normal players get screwed with unobtainable bonus wagering, tons of $$$ are spent fighting this fraud, money that could be well spent elsewhere.

As for the bonus term - the casino reps agreed that the promo was sloppy - it shouldn't happen again. But since jackieonweb is attempting to defraud this casino, it has become a moot issue (in her case).

And in case anyone is thinking "well, the casino can just give the Casinomeister BS and he'll believe it", please keep in mind I don't call fraudsters out unless I am 100% certain. Believe me - she/he is one.

@jackie - Bye!

 

[threescatters]

Thanks for the clarification casinomeister

 

[Nifty29]

Thanks Bryan

Sometimes you can just smell em can't ya

I knew there was something dodgy about her/him/it/etc

 

[heador112]

What's a shame is that she probably pulled the same stunt with Grand Duke and they just didn't catch it. That sucks.

I think Jacky have not been paid until now . It is maybe a good idea to inform Grand Duke that this guy is a nasty fraudster .

Bryan i think it would be fair if you sent the information to Grand duke so their fraud department can check if this Tony (Jacky)guy has createt more accounts and exploitet their bonuses .

 

[chayton]

There are no less than 11 accounts at Intercasino that have been opened on her computers.

Well that just pisses me off. Just goes to show that you can't take what people say at face value.

Also, I'm glad that Intercasino agreed that the promo was sloppy even though that nothing to do with why the OP didn't get paid.

What a pile of hooey.

 

[sambaEah]

Lol, busted!!

Still doesn't make the original complaint valid by Intercasino mind, it's still a term that was incorrectly displayed IMO.

 

[Simmo!]

Still doesn't make the original complaint valid by Intercasino mind, it's still a term that was incorrectly displayed IMO.

This was covered in the busted post earlier:

As for the bonus term - the casino reps agreed that the promo was sloppy - it shouldn't happen again.