Hyper casino

[L&L-Jan]

Did you guys change your protocals then? When I played there all the time, the only time I got this stuff was upon withdrawal.

Thats because you always had a withdrawal

 

[L&L-Jan]

Jason, would you give me some more information regarding this please.

we need to conduct CCJ checks at those values Jason explained. We do this automatically, you dont have to provide anything but depending what type of Tier the reponse is, you might get a very low deposit limit imposed.

 

[justdoit]

Jason, would you give me some more information regarding this please.

My credit rating is not awful but also not awesome so wouldn't want my sessions (which are small deposits and far, far from every day) blocked because someone misinterprets whether I can afford to play or not.

if you have high street bank account they have credit score on bank app you can check how is searching for your credit score, they can check any UK bank exept Revolut

 

[Jono777]

if you have high street bank account they have credit score on bank app you can check how is searching for your credit score, they can check any UK bank exept Revolut

No loans, no large outstanding debt or other finance, no missed payments for years on anything, 2 CC with low limits fully up to date, average UK monthly income. Yet an average credit rating (690/999 with Experian last check)

I self impose my own deposit allowance and have done since I started this gaming lark back in 2003 and 99.99% of the time stuck to it.

As a 3rd party knowing this above information about a player, I wouldn't slightly worry about them in terms of AML of affordability but it's been proven countless times UKGC rules are often misinterpreted (in general, I mean, nothing specifically to do with L&L whom I've never had a problem with)

My concern (possibly part paranoia) is that if I've been in complete control for the past 20 years+, why try and fix something which is clearly not broken?

 

[jasonuk]

Jason, would you give me some more information regarding this please.

My credit rating is not awful but also not awesome so wouldn't want my sessions (which are small deposits and far, far from every day) blocked because someone misinterprets whether I can afford to play or not.

It's the implementation of the same discussion we had in May.

It'll be more about warning signs of bad credit - excessive loans, missed payments, bankruptcy proceedings etc. If there are too many then I imagine your account will be closed (e.g. a bankrupt player is forbidden by T&Cs anyway), otherwise it'll be a lower limit.

As mentioned at the time, it should introduce more transparency - e.g. "you can deposit £200 per month, if you want a higher limit you need to jump through these additional hoops". If it stops operators using CDD as a faux-reversal tactic, that'll be a huge win to be honest.

 

[justdoit]

No loans, no large outstanding debt or other finance, no missed payments for years on anything, 2 CC with low limits fully up to date, average UK monthly income. Yet an average credit rating (690/999 with Experian last check)

I self impose my own deposit allowance and have done since I started this gaming lark back in 2003 and 99.99% of the time stuck to it.

As a 3rd party knowing this above information about a player, I wouldn't slightly worry about them in terms of AML of affordability but it's been proven countless times UKGC rules are often misinterpreted (in general, I mean, nothing specifically to do with L&L whom I've never had a problem with)

My concern (possibly part paranoia) is that if I've been in complete control for the past 20 years+, why try and fix something which is clearly not broken?

I paid a company to remove all my data from some stupid companis they keep doing soft search every month

 

[lockinlove]

Thats because you always had a withdrawal

And then you didnt get an Ontario license so most of the players I brought over cant play there. Sad Panda

 

[L&L-Jan]

then I imagine your account will be closed

Limited, e.g. tier 1 match = max 400 monthly deposit limit on our end.

 

[Reelsoffun]

No loans, no large outstanding debt or other finance, no missed payments for years on anything, 2 CC with low limits fully up to date, average UK monthly income. Yet an average credit rating (690/999 with Experian last check)

Two CC with low limits can be a red flag, as your overall credit utilisation could be higher than if the limits were higher. I have the max rating of 999 on Experian, but not on the other two. For example clearscore only rates me as 827/1000 ( uk average 585 ) so clearly not as good as 999/999! Yet I’m the same person LOL

As the three main credit agencies all rate differently it’s always better to monitor all three, and they all free so why not, it will give you a better idea of your overall picture, not sure which casinos actually use in the UK but will definitely explain why some are more favourable than others depending which they using.

However from what you have put you sound low risk as a player.

 

[lasevenz69]

All these rules and regs will put a finish to me using any online gambling sites when it all gets too much with the nonsense that comes with it. Easier to gamble in arcades, bingos, bookies etc. never in the same one much so never really encounter any problems and always get your money. I understand the rules have to be followed and that's why I won't be using online when it comes into full affect. If I did it would be a none u.k regulated site that doesn't ask any questions and has a good honest review

 

[jasonuk]

If I did it would be a none u.k regulated site that doesn't ask any questions and has a good honest review

The same rules impacting UK sites are also starting to affect the high seas as well - Curacao "licenses" can't accept UK players anymore, and the new breed like Costa Rica and Anjouan are rapidly turning into a dumpster fire of fraudsters because there are few (if any) checks on the operator.

Be very careful with review sites - because there are an increasing number that are happy to shill extremely dodgy sites (as in they are actively scamming people) as "legit" and "safe"... when they are anything but. The CM accredited list would be a good place to start... one that has stood the test of time.

 

[Webzcas]

@jasonuk makes a very valid point about review sites, the pure proliferation of these 'Casinos not on GamStop' sites are a good example.

If I was 'green' when it came to playing at a casino online, like with any other product I am interested in purchasing online, I would check more than one or two sites and their reviews of said product.

Furthermore in addition to the accredited list here on Casinomeister, take a minute or two to check the active PAB's the PAB team have dealt with.

Online Casino Complaints Summary 2024

This will certainly advise you where NOT to play based on the outcome of the PAB's that have been handled.