How far can it go from standard deviance?

shabik

Dormant account
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Location
Sweden
Hi.

I am playing at BetED unfortunaltly and I first lost 530$ in 605$ wagered betting 25$ and i thought that was kinda sick so i paused.

Now I have a lot more to wager and i have to do it b4 i cash out. Now i sat down playing and calculated that the intervall for that wagering with 95% confidence was -487$ and +471 and now I have reached about half the wagering (1500) and I am already down 1080$. I mean, how far can it go? Isnt that suspicious? I think its sick

There has been absolutely no busts for each 4, 5 or 6 of the dealer showing. Seriously. No single one.
 
Hi.

I am playing at BetED unfortunaltly and I first lost 530$ in 605$ wagered betting 25$ and i thought that was kinda sick so i paused.

Now I have a lot more to wager and i have to do it b4 i cash out. Now i sat down playing and calculated that the intervall for that wagering with 95% confidence was -487$ and +471 and now I have reached about half the wagering (1500) and I am already down 1080$. I mean, how far can it go? Isnt that suspicious? I think its sick

There has been absolutely no busts for each 4, 5 or 6 of the dealer showing. Seriously. No single one.

Not really sure I understood that.

You need to have game logs and tell us how many hands you have played (Blackjack I assume) and at what stake.
How many hands were win/push/lose for us to have any idea if something unusual is going on.
 
Well BetED uses AST/ThrillX software so everything is "possible" with that.

If you have wagered 1500 and you are down 1080 betting 25/hand thats an "impossible" result.

You can use this calculator at AKAs site:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Not really sure I understood that.

You need to have game logs and tell us how many hands you have played (Blackjack I assume) and at what stake.
How many hands were win/push/lose for us to have any idea if something unusual is going on.

Yes blackjack. $25 bet per hand.

I can do that.

Well BetED uses AST/ThrillX software so everything is "possible" with that.

If you have wagered 1500 and you are down 1080 betting 25/hand thats an "impossible" result.

You can use this calculator at AKAs site:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I am using this site already. Thanks thou
 
Do a search at the forum over there for BetED. Some interesting information, one player had his money refunded:rolleyes:
 
Well BetED uses AST/ThrillX software so everything is "possible" with that.

If you have wagered 1500 and you are down 1080 betting 25/hand thats an "impossible" result.

You can use this calculator at AKAs site:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

If that is correct a rough calculation would mean He has won a maximum of 8 hands out of 60 but probably much fewer.
 
I have asked BetED to send me the history in 5 emails but they havnt answered (its been 4 days).

I know you can get the history in the casino flash but it doesnt list all of my play.
 
Just keep up the pressure. Sportbookreview.com may prove to be a useful resource to you as BetEDs main focus is on sportsbetting.

And dont play on unfair/rigged software in the future even if the bonus may sound good.
 
Got this reply today:

Hello ,
Username:
Thank you for choosing betED.com, where you'll always find the best possible customer service.
Please note that our system only stores your transaction history for the current year.


Is this ok?
 
Is it okay? First i lost 530$ in about 608$ wagering and then I lost 970$ at $25 in wagering close to 4000$

Does it sound reasaonable and does it also sound reasonable that they only have records for the last year? Shouldnt i always be able to get my casinohistory?
 
Is it okay? First i lost 530$ in about 608$ wagering and then I lost 970$ at $25 in wagering close to 4000$

Does it sound reasaonable and does it also sound reasonable that they only have records for the last year? Shouldnt i always be able to get my casinohistory?

No it is not ok.

The problem here shabik is that the software and casino is little known here.

The Casino is neither rogue or accredited and no Casinos in those lists use the software as far as I can tell.

All you can do is PAB but since the Casino is not represented here you would really be asking Max to pull a rabbit out of the hat.
You could PM Max and refer Him to this thread and ask his opinion if it is at all worthwhile pursuing.

Other than that the only consolation you have is letting others know not to trust the Casino or software.
 
Okay, I took out the history from this year. That does NOT include from 1500 down to 970$ since they would not give me this old data.

4425$ wagered - 25$ bets according to beatingbonuses-chart.

4425$ wagered and 3675$ returned (83%).
That is 177 bets wagered and -30 bets lost.

I have wagered amount for each hand (includes doubles and splits) so im not sure how to count win/lost/tie.
 
Okay, I took out the history from this year. That does NOT include from 1500 down to 970$ since they would not give me this old data.

4425$ wagered - 25$ bets according to beatingbonuses-chart.

4425$ wagered and 3675$ returned (83%).
That is 177 bets wagered and -30 bets lost.

I have wagered amount for each hand (includes doubles and splits) so im not sure how to count win/lost/tie.

Your best bet is to post the history for us to look at.
You can do that by using attachments icon (paper clip) and uploading the file with your next post.
 
I can do that but what info do you really need except that I posted? I would think 99% of all people will get bored doing history but if that would help then sure.
 
If you are unwilling or unable to post the logs requested, anything said to you would be mere conjecture. I have personlly never heard of a casino that did not keep logs.
 
Okay, I took out the history from this year. That does NOT include from 1500 down to 970$ since they would not give me this old data.

4425$ wagered - 25$ bets according to beatingbonuses-chart.

4425$ wagered and 3675$ returned (83%).
That is 177 bets wagered and -30 bets lost.

I have wagered amount for each hand (includes doubles and splits) so im not sure how to count win/lost/tie.

This looks entirely normal.

If you do very few hands the results will always be dramatic.

The Woo probability of loss table is very helpful with issues like this.
 
Hey guys, can anyone answer my post like 2 months ago? Thanks!

177 bets losing 32 is fine.

The standard deviation of 177 bets is about 14 bets. So losing 32 is less than 3 standard deviations from the mean - not unusual. Assuming you play correct strategy.

Nothing to complain about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top