Higher stakes screenshots on various megaways games

So you realise features are random right? There is no "guarantee" of a win of a certain size just because you got 5 scatter trigger.

Anyway, let's try a different tack here...

How much of a casinos income, as a percentage, do you think comes from high rollers? Just have a guess. By high rollers, let's assume stakes over 10 quid a spin.

Appreciate not aimed at me but fancied a stab, 10-15% ?
 
Now hold on just one minute....

Are you not forgetting the pages and pages of proof that all is not what it seems all over the WWW :what:

Link me up to them :)

Then let's discuss the pages and pages of "proof" the world is flat and not round. ;)
 
Link me up to them :)

Then let's discuss the pages and pages of "proof" the world is flat and not round. ;)
lmao - i nearly typed an identical response of 'if i had to base my beliefs on internet 'proofs' id fear walking off the edge of the planet'
 
Appreciate not aimed at me but fancied a stab, 10-15% ?

Maybe one of the reps will correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe that around 60 to 80% of a casinos income comes around 10% of its players - namely the high rollers.

So, given that's a fact - why would we be stupid enough to fuck over the high rollers?!
 
Maybe one of the reps will correct me if I'm wrong here, but I believe that around 60 to 80% of a casinos income comes around 10% of its players - namely the high rollers.

So, given that's a fact - why would we be stupid enough to fuck over the high rollers?!
Premier League footballers have to do something in their spare time I guess
 
Link me up to them :)

Then let's discuss the pages and pages of "proof" the world is flat and not round. ;)

lmao - i nearly typed an identical response of 'if i had to base my beliefs on internet 'proofs' id fear walking off the edge of the planet'

Short memories that's for sure :p

My post about the pages of proof was sarcastic, tongue in cheek aimed at the conspiracy theorists.

If you remember, I was converted to the good side of the force and promised never to make another none evidenced 'rigged' post again, something FWIW, I have stuck to :thumbsup:
 
Short memories that's for sure :p

My post about the pages of proof was sarcastic, tongue in cheek aimed at the conspiracy theorists.

If you remember, I was converted to the good side of the force and promised never to make another none evidenced 'rigged' post again, something FWIW, I have stuck to :thumbsup:
fully thought you were being facetious :)
 
Well when i look at a map of the world it is flat. But a globe is round.

How do i know what one is really the way the earth looks:what:

Well it has to be that flat one because everybody knows that a man can not really hold the earth up by himself endlessly without having to stop for lunch

u-g-PI9ZTW0.jpg
 
Short memories that's for sure :p

My post about the pages of proof was sarcastic, tongue in cheek aimed at the conspiracy theorists.

If you remember, I was converted to the good side of the force and promised never to make another none evidenced 'rigged' post again, something FWIW, I have stuck to :thumbsup:

I know mate, but I have to play along sometimes ;)
 
Well your hypothesis is flawed as casinos have been pissing me off for years !!!and I still play and maybe it’s because the higher stakes players are always chasing the dream.

Hand on heart if I hit a big win I would probably call it a day and close All my accounts! And find a new hobby!!

I am surprised at your figures although I have to say over the years that the way I’ve been treated by various VIP teams doesn’t reflect that higher rollers are as important at that..

That’s actually the reason I play at regalwins..:

Not the best site but VIP host is exceptional

Plus I’m gonna win a car tomorrow in their big draw:):)
 
So what is your response to spinUKs comments,

Is he wrong or does it just not make sense to piss off the higher rollers...


Also please bear in mind that I have a specific gripe as it were and I’m not generically just saying “ slots are rigged” I am saying they appear to be “ adversely skewed “

Taking out luck factor to an extent and just basing on years of playing 100 of thousands of spins, probability would say that I should have hit some higher returns than I’ve had at higher stakes when just doing some simple maths albeit rough... I except I don’t play as much at higher stakes but I’ve played them enough over such a long period that it’s not unreasonable to think I should have had some higher returns on these stakes when I compare to the vast number of big wins I have had at smaller stakes...
 
Let’s just put a scenario out there and I’ll use my goto game of 6 appeal as I’ve got years of experience on it...

So if we played 100 sessions simultaneously you at .40p stake with a £40.00 starting pot and me playing £10 a spin with a £1000 starting pot.

And we track the following.

How many features are hit.
The average return of feature
Number of 100x and higher features.

You are saying that allowing for variance of a small sample../ there would be no discernible diffenrce between the the 2 stakes and the results??
 
Oh and one other point

And I quote “ features are random right?”

That’s a bold statement, were you only talking about megaways games or features across the board on all games from all providers?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top