external image

GP, MGS, and affiliates

The reason I am keen on MGS taking an interest is because they are the ONLY ones who might have actual evidence of the real size of the playerbase at the time of the mapping over. They would be the only people other than GP itself who know this, and it would be very useful information.

But I guess we are just screwed.
 
The reason I am keen on MGS taking an interest is because they are the ONLY ones who might have actual evidence of the real size of the playerbase at the time of the mapping over. They would be the only people other than GP itself who know this, and it would be very useful information.

But I guess we are just screwed.

:confused:

Okay - you've totally lost me. The mapping of players happened around two years before the closure - not two weeks. You promoted them for two years (or whatever) knowing how many "legacy" players you had. Or did you not look at your stats for that amount of time?

And if MGS knew the size of the player base then or now, how would you figure which players were referred there by you?

C'mon, Dom - you're clutching at straws here.

Has it occured to you that your players either quit playing or perhaps won a lot of money? You need to enter that into the equation.
 
If the database transferred by MGS was (picking a size just to make to make a point, so please don't argue the numbers, they are ficticious) 100,000 affiliate credited players, and what eCOGRA saw was 10,000 affiliate credited players, something is amiss. Even though 2 years passed. Knowing the sizes of the database transferred from Referspot and the size of the database presented to eCOGRA would go a long way. Especially since eCOGRA based calculations going backward in time on expected future player performance. So the data are not as far apart as two entire years.

I actually have no idea how many players I had, I can't keep current player numbers at some 30 places in my head for years, I only know what approximate income I had per month from legacy players, as they were displayed seperately. Only access to the old affiliate sites of GP and Referspot can make it possible to retrieve actual data. But GP will never allow that.

The buy-out proposed by eCOGRA after they computed what I was owed from what they saw was less than one month's legacy income. It however fits the non-legacy players, which were far and between after no new US players were accepted.

Every affiliate I talked to who did NOT qualify for any reimbursement says that they had EXCLUSIVELY Referspot legacy players still playing and they were still collecting comissions from these at the time of closure.

Consequently, the Referspot legacy data was excluded from the data eCOGRA was presented with.

Whether there were two seperate feeds (possible since the stats were displayed seperately) or whether players were simply untagged - we don't know.

I don't know how to explain this any better, and I know GP is giggling as they read this because they have succeeded completely in what they set out to do, and that with places such as eCOGRA and MGS and even Jetset and Bryan satisfied that all is on the up and up.

It is not ok, it is blatant theft and deception, and it has shaken my trust in this industry to the core.
 
But you were nevertheless aware of this audit through the message boards you frequent and the news vehicles you read as a conscientious and involved affiliate/industry observer, surely, Spear?

Dom refers in her post above to Bryan and I being "satisfied" that everything is "on the up and up", and that once again is an unfounded assumption deserving of correction.

Speaking for myself, my interest in this affiliate issue is largely one of curiosity tinged with astonishment that so much energy has been expended on forum speculation and name calling, with little apparent hard information being presented. Outrage is on temporary hold until I see more factual evidence.:eek2:

And as far as I can tell, this is all without anyone finding out what the legal options open to affiliates are. That would have been one of my first business moves when GP unilaterally closed their program and left me feeling that I had been screwed over back in December 2008.

But, no - I'm not 'satisfied' because the manner in which GP has gone about this issue smells afaic, assuming we are being presented with the whole truth and nothing but the truth by the affiliate community.

Unfortunately, what I am seeing is a great deal of abuse, unfair accusations against peripheral companies and rampant speculation that is fast becoming accepted as the truth by affiliates who seem incapable of taking aboard the factual responses with which they have been presented - eg that MGS claims it did not, and has never, been in possession of any of the data from the GP program changes in which it was involved two years ago, and the assurance by eCOGRA that its professionals did a fair and unbiased assessment on what affiliates were owed in what it believed was the sole and complete GP database.

In the process, the affiliate community has quite possibly alienated organisations that could be useful to them in the future. This may be 20/20 hindsight, but my feeling is that it's really a great pity that a more businesslike approach was not taken from the beginning.

I agree with Bryan that this issue doesn't seem to be going anywhere constructive or productive at present, and that affiliates may need to collectively regroup and consider a more evidence and litigation based approach to the dispute.

Spear's investigative initiative looks like a positive move away from abuse and speculation with the goal of achieving a fair and real world solution in my view.

I truly hope that it is the start of something more productive for affiliates.
 
"Even though 2 years passed. Knowing the sizes of the database transferred from Referspot and the size of the database presented to eCOGRA would go a long way." [to proving that something was amiss?]

Do you really believe that this sort of postulation would stand legal scrutiny, Dom? Because that's what it would have to survive in an action against GP.

That seems to be clutching at straws to me.
 
...
I don't know how to explain this any better, and I know GP is giggling as they read this because they have succeeded completely in what they set out to do, and that with places such as eCOGRA and MGS and even Jetset and Bryan satisfied that all is on the up and up...
That is such bullshit Dom. Where have I ever said I was "satisfied". :what:

I am giving you information right from the source. Unfortunately, you don't like this information, you don't want to accept it so you turn the argument around stating I'm satisfied.

This whole situation is ridiculous and Jetset hit the nail on the head with this:

Unfortunately, what I am seeing is a great deal of abuse, unfair accusations against peripheral companies and rampant speculation that is fast becoming accepted as the truth by affiliates who seem incapable of taking aboard the factual responses with which they have been presented - eg that MGS claims it did not, and has never, been in possession of any of the data from the GP program changes in which it was involved two years ago, and the assurance by eCOGRA that its professionals did a fair and unbiased assessment on what affiliates were owed in what it believed was the sole and complete GP database.

I'll say it once, and I'll say it again, affiliates are their worst enemy - in fact many shouldn't even be allowed to run a business - if in fact they are capable in running one at all. I'm not saying you Dom, but that comment is directed to many.

Most affiliates boast of running companies, right? Why didn't any of these companies hire capable lawyers and tackle GP in civil court? Because of the expense? Well that's an easy solution - these "hundreds" or "thousands" could have chipped in $100 a piece and hired a legal dream team via CAP or the GPWA's resources and file a class action lawsuit in GP's home town. I'm sure there are some South African webmasters who could have easily arranged that.

If this issue was so important, why didn't this happen? I'll tell you why, people like to bitch and moan, and that's about it. It's easy and it's fun! Woohoo! :p What did CAP do? What did the GPWA do? What did anybody do except for JTodd posting videos at YouTube?

And this serves as a template for the next program that decides to close it's doors. They know that they don't need to take affiliates seriously because all they'll do is bitch and moan in the message boards and upload videos at Youtube. When GP shut down its affiliate program, the affiliate community lost a huge opportunity to be taken on as a serious professional entity.
 
But you were nevertheless aware of this audit through the message boards you frequent and the news vehicles you read as a conscientious and involved affiliate/industry observer, surely, Spear?

Yes, of course. The point I'm making, however, is that it is not necessarily true that GP mailed all their affiliates - or, in fact, mailed only the GP affiliates and not those who originally signed up with Referspot, or even only those who had GP accounts.

I signed up with Referspot when it opened. I never signed up with GP, which "replaced" Referspot sometime in 2007. So one can surmise that perhaps Referspot affiliates, or those who didn't convert to GP afterwards, did not receive emails.

Come to think of it, Dom, Bonustreak, others, were you required to sign up with GP and then request a migration, or were you automatically signed up with GP - and did you get the email from GP advising about the audit?

Spear's investigative initiative looks like a positive move away from abuse and speculation with the goal of achieving a fair and real world solution in my view.

As we would all prefer, I'm sure. But there are no guarantees attached - maybe not enough data, or the data gathered doesn't constitute enough reason for a further investigation, or whatever.

It does bug me having to play a little hardball on occasion - and recently I'm a bit more irritable than normal LOL. But sometimes it requires a harsher-than-normal wake-up call before anything happens.
 
You know, just reflecting on this and Spear's commendable fact-gathering initiative:

Surely affiliates running businesses keep detailed records or maybe copies of their statements from the programs? Do these contain useful facts or stats, and can they be combined to present a more comprehensive picture than that available to the individual affiliate?

Or do affiliates rely solely on the programs to retain pertinent financial and other information and justify what they (the affiliates) are being recompensed for?

It would be much more credible to see this sort of collaborative approach between affiliates rather than the obviously unproductive circus we have been observing thus far.

Just a thought.....
 
Are you both now saying that this is all the affiliates fault?

Please tell me you are not going to try and blame affiliates who were just doing there job and promoting a group that "had" been a respectable program at one time. No, i didn't keep records of all my payments or player stats, that would of been ridiculous to think I could, i am not set up to do this at every program that i work with,but i did have my payments on file with the ewallet's that were used to receive my payments monthly,but then they shut down also,taking any records i had from GP....now i can't even sign in via those ewallets because i am in the US.....

I don't care how you twist the story, its not our fault that a program decided to screw us over,no more than its a players fault when a casino that was a respected casino, decides to not pay them for thier winnings either.
 
I have mentioned this before and I will mention it again. Why were there only 70 odd claims filed with eCOGRA?

ANY affiliate who does this job full time reads the main industry forums such as GPWA, GIA, CAP, AGD and others, even if they do not participate. So why so few claims? You can't tell me the majority of affiliates with an issue with Grand Prive were not aware of the audit to be carried out by eCOGRA.

Whilst I am of the position that claims should not have had to be lodged with eCOGRA, the fact of the matter is that they were. Yet only 70 odd affiliates bothered to file. :what:

What is it with that?

Does that seem like an extremely low number to you? It sure does to me.

This therefore intimates to me that either the majority of affiliates got 'paid off' by GP when they closed down, or/and the level of affiliates spurned by GP is nowhere near the level, the message board and video campaigns would lead one to believe.

One last point. It is extremely telling that the large super affiliates that you would expect to be beating the 'war drums' are and have been extremely quiet on the whole GP issue.
 
I'll say it once, and I'll say it again, affiliates are their worst enemy - in fact many shouldn't even be allowed to run a business - if in fact they are capable in running one at all. I'm not saying you Dom, but that comment is directed to many.


Alrighty then I hear yah no point in discussing the issue further here at the CM there are other channels.

They know that they don't need to take affiliates seriously because all they'll do is bitch and moan in the message boards and upload videos at Youtube.

A ridiculous statement but very funny.

Nice characterization of us all. Yes we try and keep the spirit of the web alive. Never before in human history has large companies, Government Agencies ever been held more accountable. Thanks to the web we can actually make change happen through words and not bullets. Oh yes no back door passes required anymore. No more attending secrete boardroom meeting whose decisions may seriously affect the lively hoods of others.

The ultimate act of betrayal.

I will show myself the way to the door.

greek39
 
I have mentioned this before and I will mention it again. Why were there only 70 odd claims filed with eCOGRA?

No workable stats and seriously eCogra with no affiliate representation. Yeah okay sounds groovy. This sort of attitude keeps the dirty business alive and provides a good Petri dish for these fungus organization to thrive. Much like the Virtual group.

greek39
 
Are you both now saying that this is all the affiliates fault?

Please tell me you are not going to try and blame affiliates who were just doing there job and promoting a group that "had" been a respectable program at one time. No, i didn't keep records of all my payments or player stats, that would of been ridiculous to think I could, i am not set up to do this at every program that i work with,but i did have my payments on file with the ewallet's that were used to receive my payments monthly,but then they shut down also,taking any records i had from GP....now i can't even sign in via those ewallets because i am in the US.....

I don't care how you twist the story, its not our fault that a program decided to screw us over,no more than its a players fault when a casino that was a respected casino, decides to not pay them for thier winnings either.

This emotional and aggressive response to legitimate questions relevant to the issue under discussion (along with the one from Greek 39 following it and rushing off in a huff) is precisely the reason why some affiliates tend to become their own worst enemies.

What's with the throwing unwarranted insults and accusations around like confetti, and drawing conclusions valid only in your own minds?

You're running a business, even if it is only a small one, and to me that suggests a modicum of independent care is essential in keeping accurate records - especially where these pertain to revenues. Maybe if those affiliates posting on the issue had done that the collective would not now be scratching for numbers to backup their claims? Ya think?

No one is trying to "twist" (in itself an offensive insult in my view) anything here. What is being asked for is hard information backed by a little more than supposition and noise.

Or an understanding of why affiliates seem incapable of producing same.

Or some sign of a concrete plan based on the realities of the situation - litigation for instance.
 
Last edited:
I have mentioned this before and I will mention it again. Why were there only 70 odd claims filed with eCOGRA?

ANY affiliate who does this job full time reads the main industry forums such as GPWA, GIA, CAP, AGD and others, even if they do not participate. So why so few claims? You can't tell me the majority of affiliates with an issue with Grand Prive were not aware of the audit to be carried out by eCOGRA.

Whilst I am of the position that claims should not have had to be lodged with eCOGRA, the fact of the matter is that they were. Yet only 70 odd affiliates bothered to file. :what:

What is it with that?

Does that seem like an extremely low number to you? It sure does to me.

This therefore intimates to me that either the majority of affiliates got 'paid off' by GP when they closed down, or/and the level of affiliates spurned by GP is nowhere near the level, the message board and video campaigns would lead one to believe.

One last point. It is extremely telling that the large super affiliates that you would expect to be beating the 'war drums' are and have been extremely quiet on the whole GP issue.


Actually, only 58 complaints, but imo this is as valid a question as the many accusations and theories that are currently being bandied about with little if any information of substance to back them.

The possibility appears to be spurned out of hand, perhaps because those affiliates doing all the posting don't want to consider it as something that detracts from what they wish to believe.

BTW, none of this affiliate probing should exonerate GP for not being more forthcoming and communicative with affiliates both from the get-go and subsequently, which might have obviated this massive furore in the first place way back in December 2008.
 
Forgot to mention CM’s huff the affiliate is not the enemy here. Not even sure if enemy is the correct word when business partners are victimized.

It is extremely telling that the large super affiliates that you would expect to be beating the 'war drums' are and have been extremely quiet on the whole GP issue.

Another suggestion affiliates are treated under a class system. Sorry I am only a midsized affiliate don’t pay me I not worthy. Know I work hard but please keep my earnings I will apply for food stamps. Please I will try and suppress my rage.

Want facts I will get them. One fact is Ecogra is in no position to audit anything and Microgaming has an obligation to make sure their software is not used for criminal activities. There two iron clad facts.

IMO

greek39
 
Another suggestion affiliates are treated under a class system. Sorry I am only a midsized affiliate don’t pay me I not worthy.

With respect Greek you have taken my comment entirely out of context. I do not class affiliates based on their revenue. Anyone who knows me or who has met me in person, knows I am not like that.

However the point I am making is that why have the obvious larger affiliates, whose revenue dwarfs the likes of mine or yours been silent on this issue?

Surely they would be the ones leading the chase?
 
Another suggestion affiliates are treated under a class system.

As I stated "another suggestion". And yes it does worry me somewhat the big ones accepted a massive payout. If true it was at the expense of smaller affiliates, tragic, unfair, and sick IMO.

greek39
 
Forgot to mention CM’s huff the affiliate is not the enemy here. Not even sure if enemy is the correct word when business partners are victimized.



Another suggestion affiliates are treated under a class system. Sorry I am only a midsized affiliate don’t pay me I not worthy. Know I work hard but please keep my earnings I will apply for food stamps. Please I will try and suppress my rage.

Want facts I will get them. One fact is Ecogra is in no position to audit anything and Microgaming has an obligation to make sure their software is not used for criminal activities. There two iron clad facts.

IMO

greek39

Whilst I agree MGS has a duty to ensure its software is not used for criminal purposes, surely in a civilised world that criminal conduct has to be proved? Back to square one for the affiliates, I'm afraid - that has yet to be done.

Your comment on eCOGRA is far from an "iron-clad fact" and is in fact yet another unsupported personal opinion that bears scant resemblance to reality. Have you ever taken a look at the professional qualifications of the eCOGRA staff? I suggest you do, because they are well qualified to "audit anything" as you put it.

By all means supress your rage and deliver some solid information that takes the issue forward, rather than emotional ramblings and suggestions that those with an opinion different to your own are rogues and thieves on a par with Virtual et al LOL.
 
Ok, I very much want this to be my last comment here, this is starting to seriously affect me in a way business should not affect anyone.

1. The point of GP's exercise was to get rid of US affiliates who could not continue to send the usual number of players after MGS closed to new US players.

2. US citizens are ill advised to take part in lawsuits involving online gambling.

I have spent much of this thread trying to EXCLUDE peripherally involved organisations from the discussion except when needed to find facts. They keep being introduced by others.

No, I don't have detailed records except what Statsremote provides, and I deleted Referspot and GP during the Stats remote update earlier this year because they were inactive, had no chance of becoming active again and took up valuable space on my PC as the program attempts to gather new info several times a day. I am still trying to restore stats on an old computer but since the old version doesn't run after this update and I am non-tech it has been a pain so far.

Another point in case is that ALL other MGS affiliate programs continue to pay on US players as agreed, and I can look at these stats as comparison. If GP was still running, I would expect similair numbers there. The numbers have been similair throughout my working relationship with MGS casinos.

GP didn't screw ALL affiliates, only a specific group. Affiliates who were able to deliver after MGS' exit from the US were compensated and moved to the affiliate program #3, Fortuna. They were valuable for GP's future, US affiliates were so much trash, like I said before, the monkey on GP's back.
 
Your comment on eCOGRA is far from an "iron-clad fact" and is in fact yet another unsupported personal opinion that bears scant resemblance to reality.

Well then I suppose it would okay for Online Casinos to audit themselves for fair play. Much like Ecogra partly funded by MGS conducts audits themselves. Where is the unbiased third party? Not required lets keep it in the family sort of speak. Lets do away with the TST system I am confident the casino can do it themselves fairly.

JMO

greek39
 
...
A ridiculous statement but very funny.
No it's not. Both CAP and the GPWA claim to be large associations of webmasters - am I correct? What exactly did these organizations do to pursue this issue in the interests of their members? Please remind me because I am unsure exactly what it was.

Nice characterization of us all.
I said many, not all. Big difference - but sure, put words in my mouth if it suits your agenda. :rolleyes:

Oh yes no back door passes required anymore. No more attending secrete boardroom meeting whose decisions may seriously affect the lively hoods of others.

The ultimate act of betrayal.
If you are referring to me meeting with MGS 1) it wasn't "secret" - it was all very public. I announced it and requested members to post questions and issues that we could cover. 2) I wasn't there making "decisions", I was there gathering information and sharing with MGS concerns of players and affiliates. 3) wtf - betrayal? Do you want some dramatic music with that comment, or are you throwing that out there because it sounds intimidating? Ad hominem tactics seem to be the norm for the affiliate community I gather.

I will show myself the way to the door.

greek39
Whatever.
 
No it's not. Both CAP and the GPWA claim to be large associations of webmasters - am I correct? What exactly did these organizations do to pursue this issue in the interests of their members? Please remind me because I am unsure exactly what it was.

Very little because like most boards as their members increase their founding ideology tends to get polluted. Some where along the way they corrupt themselves and loose focus on what I consider matters most the members. No members, no power, and then holy crap I am loosing money here.

I said many, not all. Big difference - but sure, put words in my mouth if it suits your agenda.

Fair enough many and you just put words in my mouth by suggesting I have some sort of agenda. Alrighty then I wonder what? maybe a noble pursuit suites me fine.

If you are referring to me meeting with MGS 1) it wasn't "secret" - it was all very public. I announced it and requested members to post questions and issues that we could cover. 2) I wasn't there making "decisions", I was there gathering information and sharing with MGS concerns of players and affiliates. 3) wtf - betrayal? Do you want some dramatic music with that comment, or are you throwing that out there because it sounds intimidating? Ad hominem tactics seem to be the norm for the affiliate community I gather.

No several others have also met with MGS and nothing. Gathering information from players, affiliates to present to MGS. Will you claim affiliates use Ad hominem tactics and are the enemy lol? Sorry CM maybe you lost your focus IMO. Peoples lively hoods were affected by GP actions you appear to be trivializing many affiliates claims.

All said always remember what your pillars rest on same goes for other public boards.

greek39
 
Mr C. i am also genuinely upset and angered by your attack of affiliates, and before you trivialize what i am saying, look back over you last few remarks and its obvious you have no respect for any affiliates, but aren't you one also? Don't you have link to casinos for players to join through you? How can you speak so lowly of affilaites, what the hell have we done to you? I just don't understand the remarks that are being said....?

I guess this is just a Players forum, and us low life affiliates need to stop coming by.
 
Can we please stay on topic?

The last topical question was about the numbers of affiliates that were affected, and I answered that above.

Please lets not turn this into a bashing thread. It is supposed to be constructive, not destructive.
 
Can we please stay on topic?

The last topical question was about the numbers of affiliates that were affected, and I answered that above.

Please lets not turn this into a bashing thread. It is supposed to be constructive, not destructive.

I certainly agree lets move forward. But I see little worth in discussing this issue any further here.

So I am done with any further comments.

greek39
 
...No several others have also met with MGS and nothing. Gathering information from players, affiliates to present to MGS. Will you claim affiliates use Ad hominem tactics and are the enemy lol? Sorry CM maybe you lost your focus IMO. Peoples lively hoods were affected by GP actions you appear to be trivializing many affiliates claims...
I'm not trivializing anything; I'm giving you my viewpoint based on what I know. I am trying to cut through the BS and misinformation. Take it or leave it I guess.

Mr C. i am also genuinely upset and angered by your attack of affiliates, and before you trivialize what i am saying, look back over you last few remarks and its obvious you have no respect for any affiliates, but aren't you one also? Don't you have link to casinos for players to join through you? How can you speak so lowly of affilaites, what the hell have we done to you? I just don't understand the remarks that are being said....?

I guess this is just a Players forum, and us low life affiliates need to stop coming by.
No need to take things personal - I referred to many affiliates - not all. Some of my closest friends are affiliates, two of the moderators of this forum are affiliates. :p We have over 200 active members of this board who are affiliates - many of whom are prolific and knowledgeable posters. To say I'm anti-affiliate is a laugh.

But I will be critical when it comes to the way many affiliates go about their business. Probably because it affects players and this industry as a whole - and I'm sure many affiliates would agree with me on this - especially the ones who are active on this board - and not the ones who have been banned for being too annoying :p.

2. US citizens are ill advised to take part in lawsuits involving online gambling...
I'm not sure if this would have been considered a lawsuit involving "online gambling"per se. Most affiliate programs are set up as a B2B marketing agencies. If someone really had a case, I don't think it would have been out of the question to have a SA legal team tackle this. Do you think anyone would care if a US citizen was named as a plaintiff in a SA civil lawsuit? I don't, but then that's a question for the lawyers :p

But this should have been done while the iron was hot - what more can be done...who knows? Maybe Spearmaster (gasp - he used to be an affiliate!) will come up with something.
 
Come to think of it, Dom, Bonustreak, others, were you required to sign up with GP and then request a migration, or were you automatically signed up with GP - and did you get the email from GP advising about the audit?

No we were not required to sign up for this they sent a letter to affiliates and said they were going to have a new better affiliate program once it was live all we had to do was login with our usual login(Referspot) details. We did have to switch and change all links of course and they had a lot of issues with stats, mapping over players for a few months I do remember that much.

BTW- Spear check your spam mail I sent you mail a few days ago.

I just have to say this is how things get spun out of control and serious issues get over looked, someone says something and then another for some reason takes it as a personal attack. I personally don't feel like Bryan is attacking all affiliates he said quite clearly not all but many... He is right if we all could have just got together formed a plain and put it to action this would maybe have ended better for all affiliates but instead we had flame wars started up, affiliates attacking one another so much that the entire situation became so convoluted that I myself along with many others just could not be bothered to keep up with the threads.

I am curious has the large affilate forums sent out a poll to see exactly how many of their members were affilaites with GP/Referspot? I know that they are also in the business of sub affiliates anyway to remember exactly how many sub affiliates you had on your account for GP/ Referspot?
 
No we were not required to sign up for this they sent a letter to affiliates and said they were going to have a new better affiliate program once it was live all we had to do was login with our usual login(Referspot) details. We did have to switch and change all links of course and they had a lot of issues with stats, mapping over players for a few months I do remember that much.

Thanks for that :)

BTW- Spear check your spam mail I sent you mail a few days ago.

Yes, got it. Responding now.
 
Want facts I will get them. One fact is Ecogra is in no position to audit

Let me assist you - this is staffing information from eCOGRA readily available to those who wish to judge issues on a factual basis:

STAFFING

Full-time staff involved in compliance reviews and data analysis are as follows:
• Andrew Beveridge, CEO – Chartered Accountant, MBA
• Kyle Harris, Manager Compliance and Advisory Services Department – Chartered Accountant
• Gary Lupton-Smith, Manager Data Analysis Department – B.Com, CISA
• Sean Roberts – Chartered Accountant
• Gareth Muirhead – Chartered Accountant
• Louise Chunnet – Chartered Accountant
• Bradley Khoury – Chartered Accountant
• Shaun McCallaghan – Chartered Accountant (part qualified)
• Grant Bruintjies – National Diploma Internal Auditing
• Martin Theunissen - MCDBA,MCSA

QUALITY ASSURANCE

The compliance, advisory and data analysis services are overseen by eCOGRA’s Audit and Seals Compliance Committees.

The Audit Committee is chaired by Bill Henbrey, a Chartered Accountant and former head of gaming services at leading international accounting firm BDO.

The Seals Compliance Committee is chaired by Bill Galston OBE, retired Chief Inspector for the Gambling Board of Great Britain.

KPMG, as a recognised international accounting firm, performs an annual quality assurance review with the objective of ensuring that the governance structure, responsibilities, processes and approach implemented within eCOGRA’s Data Services, and Compliance and Advisory Departments are in line with best practice and industry requirements, and comply with recognised audit practices and principles.
 
I have heard the total amount due after this audit was $63k across all accounts who filed claims. This seems very low to me. I can guarantee there are many affiliates who earned more than this from one program alone in the last year. Without going into details, one of the programs I promote generated more than this amount in 2009 - and I do not heavily promote them.

Like Webzcas I'm not a super aff either, but with the sheer number of affs promoting GP for all those years, it would certainly be a lot larger than 63K.

Oh and the life of players...

Although I do have drive by's who play a couple of times then never return. The majority of my players stay put. Although they may play elsewhere, I have players that play every month and have done so for years.

Of my whales, one's dropping high 5's to 6 figures every month for the past 2 years. I'm sure there are GP affs that would have this type of player portfolio also.



Cheers

:)

Dave
 
Grand Prive are no longer with MGS.

All casinos have been switched over to BetOnSoft.

So I suppose this thread is pretty useless now.

Why affiliates didn't do something about this back in 2008 when it happen, is just plain madness.

Maybe a class action back then would have saved all this heart ache.


Cheers

:)

Dave
 
This new development does raise the interesting question of whether GP has been in contact with affiliates on its books advising them of this move (or perhaps only selected super-affiliates???)

If it has, why has it not become more public through GPWA? I would have thought someone would have posted there.

Whilst this might assist GP in distancing itself from the blacklists and negative search engine material to some extent, I would have thought that a complete brand clean-up a la Warren Cloud would have been more efficient and comprehensive.

I don't think it makes GP any less vulnerable to litigation in the GP Affiliate Program closure context providing affiliates can build a fact-based case, however.
 
I don't think it makes GP any less vulnerable to litigation in the GP Affiliate Program closure context providing affiliates can build a fact-based case, however.

I agree. However longer it continues without legal intervention the harder it becomes. Things have a habit of become convoluted. Why affiliates did not band together and take a class action is anyone's guess.

My guess...Trying to get X number of affiliates to agree on taking legal action, agreeing on a solicitor and ponying up with contributions for a war chest fund, has about as much hope taking place as flying to the moon.

And as far as I'm aware, until I posted about the GP move the GPWA knew nothing about it.

Anyway, I've resigned my private and public membership there today, so whatever the GPWA or its affiliates do, it's of no concern to me.

I feel empathy for any integrity driven affiliate who was shafted by GP.

But frankly, affiliates who promoted rogue casinos and have lived off the misfortune of casino players being shafted, if these rogue affiliates have been caught up in the GP mess...I call it Karma and poetic justice.



Cheers

:)

Dave
 
Grand Prive are no longer with MGS.

All casinos have been switched over to BetOnSoft.

So I suppose this thread is pretty useless now.

Why affiliates didn't do something about this back in 2008 when it happen, is just plain madness.

Maybe a class action back then would have saved all this heart ache.


Cheers

:)

Dave

Ha! At first I thought it was an April Fools joke, but the Kahnawake and MGS logos are missing from Grand Prive. An interesting turn of events; I bet MGS and eCOGRA wished they made this move in Dec. 2008 - would have saved a lot of headaches :p

So to the aggrieved affiliates, now what?
 
Yep, no April Fools. Just got a call from MGS - they were as surprised as everyone else. So they are in the process of terminating their agreement with Grand Prive.

Strategic timing - it's a four day weekend for most Europeans...
 
It's a holiday weekend, and it's therefore difficult to get hold of managers for a comment on this.

However, I finally managed to contact a senior Microgaming exec earlier this morning, and the guy was as bemused and surprised as the rest of us.

After he had taken some time to look into this from his company's perspective, he came back to me confirming that GP appears to have switched off MGS access and changed software provider without bothering to let them know that it was doing so.

I imagine that this sort of rather strange and unilateral action will not go down well, and the owner of the group has proved hard to contact to boot, so I would guess that Microgaming will be considering their position carefully in light of what seems to be a pretty strange way of severing a business relationship!

This explains why there has been no formal announcement from Microgaming - they simply weren't aware that it had happened! I'm guessing the same applies to the KGC, because GP licensing now looks as if it comes from Curacao.

I'm personally grappling with the business logic of unilaterally abandoning a top software with a 400+ suite of games for a lesser known software with around 60 offerings. And I imagine that unless BetOnSoft has passed the eCOGRA seal inspections without anyone knowing about it, GP loses that accreditation.

In fairness, there are no KGC, MGS or eCOGRA seals on these new sites.

It all smacks of a move downmarket to me.
 
Last edited:
Betonsoft is US facing, no? But it is invitation only?

So they don't need the US facing affs they shafted.

Re. a lawsuit - GP was counting on US affs (and it shafted only US affs as far as I can tell) not stepping up to the legal plate.

Well, without re-branding they should continue to suffer from blacklistings. By choosing a software that is promoted exclusively by email and snail mail they probably hope to circumvent the issue.

Lol at switching software in the dark of the night, without notification of MGS. Looks like their relationship with MGS has been under a strain after all....

Solves the issue of being accredited by eCOGRA.

However, IMO eCOGRA might give some thought in future to linking the aff program certification with the operator/casino certification - if an outfit mistreats one group, they are quite likely to mistreat the other. It's a matter of character and integrity. We'd all like to think that someone accredited by eCOGRA is safe for all to do business with.
 
It certainly appears to have been a singularly unprofessional manner in which to terminate a business relationship, and it would seem to give all the grounds Microgaming could ever need to legally and justifiably cut GP completely loose.

On the face of it, the future for GP doesn't look too bright.
 
Possibly they just have cash flow problems and are looking to save money with a cheaper software provider.
 
Strategic timing - it's a four day weekend for most Europeans...

Given the sudden switch, it's feasible behind the scenes pressure was being applied to Grand Prive by MGS & eCOGRA but they were unable to disclose this information.

So...Everyone has been bent over the proverbial barrel.

Will be interesting to see the MGS/eCOGRA legal ramifications for Grand Prive. Surely it wont be a case of standing on the dock waving bye bye with hankies.


Cheers

:)

Dave
 
It certainly appears to have been a singularly unprofessional manner in which to terminate a business relationship, and it would seem to give all the grounds Microgaming could ever need to legally and justifiably cut GP completely loose.

On the face of it, the future for GP doesn't look too bright.

I was completely and utterly surprised when reading about this GP 'downgrade' to BetonSoft. The fact that they just packed up and left MG 'in the dead of night' with no announcement, however, doesn't surprise me. The fact they did this on a holiday weekend also doesn't surprise me.

Remember when (2005?) GP management suddenly decided everyone -- well almost every one -- of their loyal players were bonus abusers? It was during Xmas holidays if I remember correctly... and Marcus was MIA ... ummm... 'on holiday' ... and so was every last one of their management.... and a bare bones staff of CS was left with the task of facing irate, confused players who were being denied personal bonus offers for which they had deposited.

GP does these bizarre, head in the sand type things, then act as if nothing happened, and they just can't understand what the fuss is about. :rolleyes:

This time, tho, like Jetset, I'm thinking it's like watching a drowning man going down for the third time...
 
In the Grand Prive = BetOnSoft thread I posted that I have closed my accounts of 7 years at the two poker rooms that offer BetOnSoft games in protest.

I ask anyone here who has an account at Absolute Poker, Ultimate Bet or any BetOnSoft casino to join me.

Maybe if they lose enough players, the owners will force BetOnSoft to boot GrandPrive and that will (hopefully) be what puts them out of business for good.
 
Unless GP owns Betonsoft, as Robwin speculates elsewhere.

Either way, I won't be taking UB and Absolute back under the circumstances.

Too bad, I was just about to check back in on UB and Absolute to see what their conduct was of late.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top