<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="Clayman" data-source=""
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
Clayman said:
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
I read it as 1109 over ~35000 hands. Which isn't so bad. If it's over 1156 hands, as you say, they are cheating. No doubt at all. Do you know how many BJ's, 20's 21's over the 35000 hands? That is, I assume you got some on non-max-bets.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>1109 over 35000 would be way too low, that's even less likely, if that were true then the game would be rigged in the player's favour. The only way these numbers make sense if 35000 is off by a factor of 10, and the number of hands is only 3500.<br />
<br />
The probability of the dealer having 20, 21 or BJ 1109 times out of 3500 hands is tricky to calculate, becuase it is depends very strongly on the exact probability of 20, 21 or BJ, which in turn depends on the number of decks and whether the dealer hist soft 17 or not. Taking the probability of dealer's 20, 21 or BJ to be 0.3, the probability of the dealer having 20, 21 or BJ at least 1109 times out of 3500 is about 0.0144 or 1 in 69. If you change 0.3 to 0.305, the probability increases to 0.0618 or 1 in 16.<br />
<br />
Bruno712, can you check the numbers again because they don't seem right to me.</div>