Logo
external image

Finally the Data to Prove It

Joined
Jun 29, 2023
Location
Chicago
I recently requested and audited my full 4,460-hand blackjack history from Ignition Casino covering September 5 through September 19, 2026. It was Single Deck.
On the surface, the overall deck metrics look completely standard and mathematically clean:
  • Overall Record: 1,925 Wins (43.16%), 2,184 Losses (48.97%), 351 Pushes (7.87%)
  • Natural Blackjacks: 219 for player (4.91%) vs. 217 for dealer (4.87%) — right at single-deck expectation (~4.83%)
  • Card Frequencies: 10-value cards dealt came out to 30.81% (expected: 30.77%), and Aces to 7.52% (expected: 7.69%)
  • Dealer Busts on Stiffs: When hitting hard 12–16, the dealer busted on the first hit 45.9% of the time, compared to 43.7% for the player.
However, segmenting the hands by wager size reveals where the session became unwinnable:

1. Zero Naturals on Wagers Over $20​

  • Bets $1.00 – $20.00 (4,402 hands): Dealt 219 natural blackjacks (4.98%).
  • Bets $21.00 – $60.00 (58 hands): Dealt 0 natural blackjacks (0.00%), while the dealer caught 2.

2. Massive Realized Edge on Pressed Bets​

  • Across all wagers between $1 and $10 (3,582 rounds), the loss rate was normal, averaging -$0.12 per round.
  • On the 58 wagers over $20, the win rate collapsed to 36.2% (21 wins, 32 losses, 5 pushes).
  • Out of $1,828.00 total action on those 58 hands, the net result was -$358.00—representing a realized house edge of 19.58%.
  • These 58 rounds made up just 1.3% of the total action, but generated nearly 30% of the entire session deficit.

3. Double-Down Bet Asymmetry on 11s​

  • On doubled 11s that won (85 hands), the average initial wager was $7.04.
  • On doubled 11s that lost (57 hands), the average initial wager jumped to $10.04 (maxing out at $34 / $68 total bet).
The bottom line is clear: the overall report is camouflage. Giving me a 4.9% blackjack rate on $5 throwaway hands means nothing when the software serves up a 0.0% blackjack rate and a 20% house take the moment real money hits the felt. You can't win a game where the math magically breaks down every single time you press your bet.
 
Play another 4,344 hands of $21-$60 and then re post all 8,920 hand data, then we can talk……

Until then you really can’t compare 4,402 hands of x amount with only 58 hands of x amount that’s not how stats and the laws of large numbers work.

How can you compare only 1% of hands to the other 99%?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Back
Top