New Slot Announcement Extra Chilli, BTG

[pinnit2014]

If you've ever SE'd at any of these, you will be SE'd at LeoVegas now.
21.co.uk
betuk.com
bingogodz.com
bingoloopy.com
bingos.co.uk
bingostars.com
castlejackpot.co.uk
crownbingo.com
mcasino.com
pinkcasino.co.uk
slotboss.co.uk
slotmob.com
slotto.co.uk
ukcasino.com

I have asked with which one it's meant to be with (i have 3 of those, none SE)

Got this response, which i presume is a typo

 

[kou187]

I closed my account with UKCasino.com years back. I will contact Leo Vegas live chat and see if everything is all good to continue playing there.

Edit: Leo Vegas live chat response when asking about my UKCasino account closure affecting my membership on there website.....

As far as I am aware they have not merged into the LeoVegas group so any limit or exclusion you may have set with them will not carry over for now

My UKCasino account was closed as it was dormant and i already had enough accounts at similar sister sites. I asked the chat if this would affect my account in the future if Leo Vegas do take over UKCasino.com.

As far as I am aware of you will be fine, especially as its only dormant account

So i should be ok i guess? Who knows, we shall see.

 

[brianmon]

I closed my account with UKCasino.com years back. I will contact Leo Vegas live chat and see if everything is all good to continue playing there.

Edit: Leo Vegas live chat response when asking about my UKCasino account closure affecting my membership on there website.....

As far as I am aware they have not merged into the LeoVegas group so any limit or exclusion you may have set with them will not carry over for now

My UKCasino account was closed as it was dormant and i already had enough accounts at similar sister sites. I asked the chat if this would affect my account in the future if Leo Vegas do take over UKCasino.com.

As far as I am aware of you will be fine, especially as its only dormant account

So i should be ok i guess? Who knows, we shall see.

It's not a matter of, if LeoVegas take over UKcasino in the future. They already have taken it over, and the rest of the group.
Those casinos no longer have their own license. They've all been transferred to the LeoVegas license.

secure.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PublicRegister/Search/Detail/39198

 

[pinnit2014]

I closed my account with UKCasino.com years back. I will contact Leo Vegas live chat and see if everything is all good to continue playing there.

Edit: Leo Vegas live chat response when asking about my UKCasino account closure affecting my membership on there website.....

As far as I am aware they have not merged into the LeoVegas group so any limit or exclusion you may have set with them will not carry over for now

My UKCasino account was closed as it was dormant and i already had enough accounts at similar sister sites. I asked the chat if this would affect my account in the future if Leo Vegas do take over UKCasino.com.

As far as I am aware of you will be fine, especially as its only dormant account

So i should be ok i guess? Who knows, we shall see.

With LV now to look at - they're going to contact/find out whatever casino it apparently is. All support said was it was Rocket X, which i think is their term for the old IPS's. Did say it was effective from 8.57pm yesterday, which is weird as i was playing DOA in RPanda waiting for extra chilli When i asked for the casino they couldn't tell me - so shall see....

 

[Chipkin9]

Walk away Chip and don’t get drawn back into it/

It is indeed a very dangerous a slot.

No worries...I did my 20 spin rule, 20 then out

I love that you are so caring about people's well being and mental health

Believe me, Bonanza has wisened me up a little

 

[nutnut]

Ok ok......ive had to have a go myself.....cant slag it off without losing money. so since got deposit limit everywhere leovegas £10 in at 40p a spin. be back in 3mins to report my findings

 

[Jono777]

playing at same place right now nutnut. £15 down in less than 5 minutes, highest win £3.10 (all rest wins less than 2x)

Feature buy is £1.08 but I'd rather have an extra 12 spins on DoA

 

[nutnut]

playing at same place right now nutnut. £15 down in less than 5 minutes, highest win £3.10 (all rest wins less than 2x)

Feature buy is £1.08 but I'd rather have an extra 12 spins on DoA

went from 10 to 25 quickly back down to 10 and triggered bonus..........gambled and lost it! then deposit gone.

really think gamble feature is cancer to this game. base game is identical to bonanza

still maintain its a shit version of a shit bonanza. wont be touching it again

 

[goatwack]

went from 10 to 25 quickly back down to 10 and triggered bonus..........gambled and lost it! then deposit gone.

really think gamble feature is cancer to this game. base game is identical to bonanza

Quite cynical of BTG with the gamble feature. The game is Bonanza with a gimped bonus, but surely a better alternative should have been 10 free spins or gamble for 18-20.

They're aware of how 8 is nowhere near adequate and that punters will do anything to bolster that number. Fact is it should've had 10 or 12 from the outset.

The stories I'm hearing of lost gambles and we're barely into the first week. It's working a treat for them.....

 

[nutnut]

Quite cynical of BTG with the gamble feature. The game is Bonanza bar the bonus, but surely a better alternative should have been 10 free spins or gamble for 18-20.

They're aware of how 8 is nowhere near adequate and that punters will do anything to bolster that number. Fact is it should've had 10 or 12 from the outset.

The stories I'm hearing of lost gambles and we're barely into the first week. It's working a treat for them.....

Ye id love to test it but would cost too much but i know i'd lose about 90% of them gambling. I hate fact you lose all spins. why not make it so 8 risk for 12 and if lose get 4 only. not give zero.

like i say its just a shitty more dangerous version of bonanza. cause lets say you buy a bonus for 20£ and gamble it and you lose you not only lost 20 but the free bonus you bought. it's a double whammy and frankly its sick and dangerous and a massive tilting feature.

should be banned.

 

[goatwack]

Ye id love to test it but would cost too much but i know i'd lose about 90% of them gambling. I hate fact you lose all spins. why not make it so 8 risk for 14 and if lose get 4 only. not give zero.

like i say its just a shitty more dangerous version of bonanza. cause lets say you buy a bonus for 20£ and gamble it and you lose you not only lost 20 but the free bonus you bought. it's a double whammy and frankly its sick and dangerous and a massive tilting feature.

should be banned.

I agree, where's the watchdogs on this? Nevermind the gamble itself, but surely you gamble your free spins, win= 4 extra spins, lose= 4 spins get deducted (making it nigh- on pointless, but still).

Can't believe they're permitted to get away with that feature in its current format....

 

[Jono777]

Wonder how many will agree but I had a think about this last night and this is my take on it, probs a bit hard to explain over "text/type talk" but here goes

Bonanza takes a minimum of 4 scatters to trigger feature and as we know it CAN pay well from the 12 spins (excluding any +5 or in feature re-triggers)

Chilli takes 3...or does it...

IMO the 8 FS feature (collected never gambled) serves a couple of purposes, 1) Dish out a very TINY portion of the games RTP. 2) Stop the forum talkers, streamers etc comparing the thousands of spins to trigger Bonanza. in essence a feature that is not really a feature and although we'll see it from time to time will never regularly dish out a big win that we are used to on Bonanza.

Now when gambled and won or the +4 comes naturally, this (again IMO) is a true feature which the slot WANTS to award so now we are in Bonanza territory when its make or break time but chances are a lot better (nothing to do with extra spins just the nature of the beast and how the math's / mechanics are designed)

Might sound like a load of balloney (that's if you can even understand me in the first place ) but I feel I am along the right lines with this one

 

[goatwack]

Wonder how many will agree but I had a think about this last night and this is my take on it, probs a bit hard to explain over "text/type talk" but here goes

Bonanza takes a minimum of 4 scatters to trigger feature and as we know it CAN pay well from the 12 spins (excluding any +5 or in feature re-triggers)

Chilli takes 3...or does it...

IMO the 8 FS feature (collected never gambled) serves a couple of purposes, 1) Dish out a very TINY portion of the games RTP. 2) Stop the forum talkers, streamers etc comparing the thousands of spins to trigger Bonanza. in essence a feature that is not really a feature and although we'll see it from time to time will never regularly dish out a big win that we are used to on Bonanza.

Now when gambled and won or the +4 comes naturally, this (again IMO) is a true feature which the slot WANTS to award so now we are in Bonanza territory when its make or break time but chances are a lot better (nothing to do with extra spins just the nature of the beast and how the math's / mechanics are designed)

Might sound like a load of balloney (that's if you can even understand me in the first place ) but I feel I am along the right lines with this one

Are you implying the game is compensated in some way?

 

[Jono777]

Lol, yup, another AWP complete with incognito chillis

Feature buy reduced to 0.18p so I pushed the boat out



0.02p higher that yesterday's (post #237) RANDOM outcome - Back's up my theory above for now

 

[goatwack]

Lol, yup, another AWP complete with incognito chillis

Feature buy reduced to 0.18p so I pushed the boat out

View attachment 89985

0.02p higher that yesterday's (post #237) RANDOM outcome - Back's up my theory above for now

Wow, what a whopper. What was the multiplier at? 9x???

 

[Jono777]

Wow, what a whopper. What was the multiplier at? 9x???

lol, unreal 6x in first 2 spins followed by 6 dead un's

Currently in rescue mode again (IE: Doa at 9p bets )

 

[interlog]

Wonder how many will agree but I had a think about this last night and this is my take on it, probs a bit hard to explain over "text/type talk" but here goes

Bonanza takes a minimum of 4 scatters to trigger feature and as we know it CAN pay well from the 12 spins (excluding any +5 or in feature re-triggers)

Chilli takes 3...or does it...

IMO the 8 FS feature (collected never gambled) serves a couple of purposes, 1) Dish out a very TINY portion of the games RTP. 2) Stop the forum talkers, streamers etc comparing the thousands of spins to trigger Bonanza. in essence a feature that is not really a feature and although we'll see it from time to time will never regularly dish out a big win that we are used to on Bonanza.

Now when gambled and won or the +4 comes naturally, this (again IMO) is a true feature which the slot WANTS to award so now we are in Bonanza territory when its make or break time but chances are a lot better (nothing to do with extra spins just the nature of the beast and how the math's / mechanics are designed)

Might sound like a load of balloney (that's if you can even understand me in the first place ) but I feel I am along the right lines with this one

That and also to remember that some of the RTP sits in the coin drops that eventually will give you are free bonus round. That has to be paid for somehow.

 

[goatwack]

lol, unreal 6x in first 2 spins followed by 6 dead un's

Just browsing through the PC world 'monitors' section for you now Jon

 

[zap987]

Just think of the 8 spins as getting GOL, sometimes you get the D, sometimes you get nothing.

Can't really understand how people that like Bonanza doesn't like this one. If you ignore the feature buy and always gamble every feature to 12 spins, you are playing Bonanza with a different look. If you want lower variance than Bonanza you just never gamble, if you want higher you gamble more. Only difference is you only get +4 for retriggers and instead get a bit more features from the coins dropping. It's just Bonanza with more options.

 

[goatwack]

Just think of the 8 spins as getting GOL, sometimes you get the D, sometimes you get nothing.

Can't really understand how people that like Bonanza doesn't like this one. If you ignore the feature buy and always gamble every feature to 12 spins, you are playing Bonanza with a different look. If you want lower variance than Bonanza you just never gamble, if you want higher you gamble more. Only difference is you only get +4 for retriggers and instead get a bit more features from the coins dropping. It's just Bonanza with more options.

That's the whole problem though isn't it. It's impossible to ignore the gamble feature as it's thrust in your face, even positively encouraged.

Had it not had this, it would be like you state, a slightly less volatile Bonanza. In its bare state, it's Bonanza with less options and less win potential!

 

[Chipkin9]

That's the whole problem though isn't it. It's impossible to ignore the gamble feature as it's thrust in your face, even positively encouraged.

Had it not had this, it would be like you state, a slightly less volatile Bonanza. In its bare state, it's Bonanza with less options and less win potential!

Sadly enough, the only big wins you will see in this is will be from 20-24 spins. So you are almost even forced to do so.

 

[goatwack]

Sadly enough, the only big wins you will see in this is will be from 20-24 spins. So you are almost even forced to do so.

Didn't you get 36 spins on this yourself or am I dreaming it? Not sure.

Either way, I remember the outcome being somewhat underwhelming, given the number of spins (plus 'winning' spins).

The game looks pointless with the 8 spins as default....

 

[Chipkin9]

Didn't you get 36 spins on this yourself or am I dreaming it? Not sure.

Either way, I remember the outcome being somewhat underwhelming, given the number of spins (plus 'winning' spins).

The game looks pointless with the 8 spins as default....

Yea I did, it's on this thread a few pages back

618x it was. Pretty lucky.

 

[goatwack]

Yea I did, it's on this thread a few pages back

618x it was. Pretty lucky.

Ok not as bad as I first remembered it, but that's with 36

God help us all

 

[Chipkin9]

Ok not as bad as I first remembered it, but that's with 36

God help us all

Indeed.

I think it can be established that it's a simple fact that if you don't gamble all the way to 20 or 24 you can expect very little in return for the bonuses. There might be the odd 16 freespin start that may pay ok if you can retrigger.

Of course they've designed it this way. In a way it's "good". It is the opposite of getting 4 scatter on a NotEnt or Microgaming slot, where the bonus rounds always pay crap.

At least on this it seems you will actually get rewarded.

It's getting up there that will burn a hole in everyone's wallet.