external image

Curacao Gaming Authority finishes appearance refresh

Same Reliably Mediocre Authority, New Look.​

1769034679421.webp
1769031872867.webp

I first noticed issues with the certificate links a couple of weeks ago where they would not resolve, take a long time or seemingly be down. A few days later they were completely down across the board for the entire day. When I woke up the next morning the links were now working but all redirecting to cert.cga.cw from cert.gcb.cw. This indicated that they were moving away from the Gaming Control Board branding and opting for the more authoritative option of using the actual authority in the seals. With each new day i started to wonder when/if they would replace the seals to fall in line with the new url.

I didn't check any certificates for the last week or so but I was very pleasantly surprised to see, after checking one today, an updated appearance that is cleaner and space efficient.

Orange "Pending Licence" Certificates are finally no more​

1769034383044.webp
1769034465468.webp

One of the things that, for me, was very annoying to track early on with Curacao, was the vast number of casinos with orange seals. They were not on any licence register and I had to manually find them from search engine indexing, brute force and happenstance. Time has allowed the CGA to catch up with their backlog and there were a fraction of them left with most applicants either receiving a licence, having it suspended or withdrawing it to take one elsewhere.

The state of play now is finally something simple. If its on the register PDF, its licenced. If it isn't its not. The orange seal was always intended to be a transitionary vehicle for continuity and it had far outstayed its welcome. It appears any new applicants won't have any sort of licence/seal until their application has been approved.

A licence can be revoked, suspended or withdrawn. These should be stated in the licence register and/or enforcement register. For the time being it is unclear which carries the most negative weight. Revoked tends to be mostly used for non-renewals, in addition to enforcement actions by the authority (early revocation to rabidi for example). Suspended and withdrawn are very similar but they are both statuses that happen due to a licence ending before it's intended expiration. Suspended is when the decision is made (seemingly by the licensee) and withdrawn is when it has been finalised.

1769034915511.webp
1769034941621.webp
1769034957200.webp


All Important Seals To Look Out For​

1769035779472.webp
1769035858157.webp
1769036002033.webp
1769035886709.webp

Green is good obviously. I haven't seen a blue yet but it might appear on a B2B platform website soon (still using green). There has been a long time issue with the seal colour not catching up to status. As can be seen with Throne Entertainment. I believe that the only orange seals will be those that havent caught up rather than ones indicating a pending licence. Grey is invalid/fake. It appears that casinos who make fake certificate links by copying the HTML/CSS (entire page) of a real licence page and only replacing a few words will have their seals go grey as it detects this and uses a different subdomain (portalimgrn instead of portalimg) with the token saying "FAke=" at the end which is a nice nerdy touch.
1769036839214.webp
1769036940357.webp
1769036978292.webp


There's still lots of typos and other issues with the PDF but hopefully with changes happening they might do their licence register more professionally.
 
Mulven podrías hablarme de Helixbet
No it's one of these. As per the post their fake seal is an image and also still says GCB instead of the new CGA.
 
@mulven Can a casino be Curacao licenced without showing any seal and just showing text?
I have been playing at a casino called Betobet. I get good promotions from them. Verification took one week and withdrawals are processed in 5 to 7 days.
I don't see the license seal but text at the bottom shows they are Curacao licensed. Casino guru, AG and lots of other forums say they are Curacao licensed too.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2026-04-26-11-42-54-81_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.webp
    Screenshot_2026-04-26-11-42-54-81_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.webp
    79.3 KB · Views: 26
I looked at that casino, no proof its licensed(ie not on the register under Counder B.V. or their domain) and the 365/JAZ claim is troubling(see below thread from August 2024). Atleast from my brief research.


Live support fobbed me off telling me to ask support about it via email which I never bothered to, any half decent casino live chat would be able to tell you license details easily imo if they had one.
 
@maxd Trino casino listed on CM has Curacao license but when you click on the seal it redirects you to the licensing authority with a black seal. It's sister site Spellwin also does this. All affiliate sites are saying their license is valid. But according to this thread it's fake.
Is black Curacao seal genuine?
P.S. Bitstarz too.
 
Interesting, TBH I’m unfamiliar with that “black seal” but I’ll look into it. Thanks for bringing it up.

- Max
 
I did a small research myself and it turns out that all major casinos with Curacao license(at the bottom of the page with green seal) redirects to the Curacao portal having a black seal.
Looks like the black seal is not fake as mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
Ok, couldn’t get to Trino but did see this on Bitstarz:

bitstarz-footer-260519.webp


That looks perfectly normal to me, the green CGA seal is clickable, takes you to this:

bitstarz-cga-page-260519.webp

Again, all good, no idea what the black CGA seal at the bottom means.

Looked here —
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
— and there’s no mention of it.

So, if that black seal means something its purpose is unknown to me, so far.

- Max
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top