Can someone shed some light on accruing bonus rounds?

Drew32

Newbie member
Joined
Jun 10, 2023
Location
UK
I read somewhere just now that the more you play on a specific game/online bookie, the more your odds of getting bonus rounds improves i.e. you gain 'credit' which makes bonus rounds more likely the more you bet/spend.

Which makes sense, I suppose.

But I also read that this 'credit' disappears if you take a play break of a few weeks or more.

Anyone care ot comment?

:)
 
I read somewhere just now that the more you play on a specific game/online bookie, the more your odds of getting bonus rounds improves i.e. you gain 'credit' which makes bonus rounds more likely the more you bet/spend.

Which makes sense, I suppose.

But I also read that this 'credit' disappears if you take a play break of a few weeks or more.

Anyone care ot comment?

:)
Yeah i will comment.

Not sure where you read it but that's a load of crap. Only slots that trigger a bonus after so many scatters collected etc. will trigger a bonus the more you play but vast majority do not work like that.
 
It's fair to say that's not the case. Bonus rounds aren't accrued, they pop up at random intervals, hence their addictive nature.

You're just as likely to go an eternity without seeing one, whilst other times they come in batches. Yet as for any 'storing' of them, that's a no, neither is 'bonus credit' built up.

Be bloody great if it was though 😀

Only thing that builds up as it were is the likelihood of getting closer to a bonus if playing longer, through mathematical probability, unless having a particularly barren run. Most games, depending on their volatility, will have an average bonus frequency, so expect it within that realm 🙏
 
This seems odd tbh. The other place I read this is full of people who comment that it is absolutely obvious that bookies have influence on the scarcity/regularity of bonus rounds. For example, and this is something we all agreed upon, after a number big win on bonus rounds, in short succession, we found that there was always a large barren patch that immediately followed.
 
The only thing I can think of somewhat like that are the slots like 333 fat frogs where you collect tokens and it edges you closer to a bonus round (at least that's what it looks like) but I've got like 33 free spins x8 waiting to trigger on that slot and it's no nearer to triggering that it ever was...it just tricks you into thinking it must be close. If I ever do trigger them I'll come back and let you know :laugh:
 
Big wall of text incoming... you have been warned! :drink:

--

So there are two very distinct cases here - slots with stored value and slots without stored value.

The latter is the easy one, and the default scenario people think of. No stored value means every spin is independent and random. No memory, no problem.

The former is the interesting and more relevant one here - but we need to split games into three parts:

The Fakes
  • Slots that infer store value, but are lying or misleading - and will explicitly state as such in the game rules, using nonsensical statements like "purely for visual entertainment"
  • Examples include many "three pots" games - although for clarity, 333 Fat Frogs mentioned above is half and half - the "growth" of the frog is fake (the nonsensical statement above is actually from that slot), but the collection part could be "real" depending on whether the slot adapts to the bonus trigger or not.

The Unlockables
  • Slots that unlock - whether temporarily or permanently - a different or enhanced game mode.
  • This may include a marginal increase in RTP, but often is a change in volatility instead.
  • Examples include the IGT "Level Up" series, Microgaming's Immortal Romance, Push Gaming's Wild Swarm 2 and Red Tiger's Dynamite Riches
The Collectables
  • Slots that allow a player to build up / collect stored value - whether that be progress saved on the reels (e.g. persisting wilds or scatters), progress towards a bonus round (whether guaranteed or not), or money to a genuine progressive pot.
  • This will - assuming the provider has done their maths properly - be fully costed into the RTP, so any adjustments to stake or playstyle should be accounted for.
  • The amount of RTP attributable to the collection can vary - some will be under 1%, some can be more than 10%
  • The duration of the collection can similarly vary - some will be linked spins (so next 1-5 spins) and some can be over thousands of spins.
  • There is a risk of permanent RTP loss here - providers can expire stored value after a period of time (e.g. 180 days), or operators can make system-level changes that cause a reset (RTP change, platform migration, account closure).
  • Examples include NetEnt's retired Big Bang (for those old enough to remember), BTG's Kingmaker, Red Tiger's Jewel Scarabs and Relax's Book of 99

There is a lot of energy in this space, particularly from providers and streamers alike trying to infer behaviour that isn't true. Anyone who has listened to streamers "build up" a Wild Swarm bonus by betting bigger inferring they have an advantage - ignoring the game rules which point out it's a different maths model with a 0.1% RTP increase (so unlock, rather than collection).

That's not to say providers haven't got it wrong either - The Dark Knight Rises and Street Fighter II dropped absolute clangers where they forgot to (in the former) or incorrectly (in the latter) apply stake averaging - which caused a significant increase in RTP as a result. They don't happen often with all the testing going on now-a-days, but happy days when they do :laugh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top