- Joined
- Dec 13, 2014
- Location
- Glasgow and Home - N Ireland
They made a typo:Scots had the vote and the people said no, was a once in a generation vote so no need to address this for a while mate.
Generation was meant to read 'until ye say aye'
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
They made a typo:Scots had the vote and the people said no, was a once in a generation vote so no need to address this for a while mate.
Next career stop:Congrats to all involved, truly a great job.
A m5, french smokes and chocolate seems a good deal, add in some stella and I’ll be happy!Next career stop:
Hostage Negotiators.
Our demands?: some French smokes, some Belgian Chocolate and a BMW car.
And some fish.

And one which you should acquire...Where you get your info from? From Brexit busses? The ability to separate facts from fiction is a good skill to have.
Dont u fucking start lolScottish Independence,
N Ireland to Dublin,
Depends how bored we get.
So then, THE MIDNIGHT SKY on Netflix, directed by and starring that there George Clooney. Takes too long with a disjointed dual narrative to get to admittedly a very effective ending. Not a total disaster but I couldn't go more than 575/1000.
----------------
Back to Brexit, here are all the committees we're signed up to with the EU going forward, this excludes the Withdrawal Agreement and NI Protocol.
Now personally I think this is a good thing, it means we'll be talking to, and working with, the EU on an ongoing basis. For those who dreamed of a 'clean break' and us going it alone in the world, dream on, we are simply too intertwined for that.
What this also means of course is absolutely endless bureaucracy and meetings and debates, the likes of which Brexit was allegedly designed to eliminate, but will in fact magnify. We just have to do it all ourselves now instead of basically having the EU do it for us.
My personal feeling is that now 'BREXIT HAS BEEN DONE', what will actually happen over the years to come, quietly and without fanfare, because no one really cares anymore and everyone got thoroughly fed up with Brexit first time around, is we'll largely align with, and fundamentally co-operate with the EU, because ultimately that works out best for both the UK and the EU. (Well that's not just my personal feeling, a lot of better informed people than me seem to think that's what'll happen.)
I still think the whole thing is a monumental waste of time, effort and money, but we're out of the EU, we've left, transition is coming to an end, and at least we have something to build on. Brexit was always much favoured by older people, the young were very much against it, those young people will grow up, and one day, we'll be back in. Not in 5 years, I doubt in 10 years, but maybe 15-20 years down the line I can see the UK being an EU member again.
View attachment 147874
Here's one of the first full, impartial analysis of THE DEAL. (BIG RED LETTERS OOOOHHHHH.)
It's a longish read but they are condensing down hundreds of pages into a few relatively digestible paragraphs per area, and converting the legal document speak into plain English.
In honesty I'm surprised at some of the ground the EU has given, I really didn't expect them to move an inch on LPF and whilst the provisions are still there, they're not the same as the EU's starting position.
The UK has not done well on fish at all, and don't let Johnson's lies convince you otherwise.
Tariff and quota free access on goods is welcome, although very much in the EU's interests as they have a large trade surplus with us.
On services however (where the UK has a large surplus to the EU), there's really very little, the UK has done poorly there, and for an economy that is 80% services, well, that's not great.
It's also worth noting that this is going to be an organic, evolving agreement, major negotiations come around every five years, which just so happens to synchronise with the EU elections. If you wanted Brexit to mean the UK is out of the EU, then yes, you've got that, but the gravitational pull between the two doesn't vanish overnight, and we'll be negotiating with the EU forever. Literally forever.
There's a lot of 'boring' stuff in there, that's also very important, such as data sharing and security, we'll be renegotiating that on an ongoing basis.
It's strange in a way as both Leavers and Remainers have cause to be content on some level, but discontented in others.
For Leavers the UK is out of the EU, but very much still aligning with the EU in all sorts of key areas and we're basically going to track what the EU does without influencing its decisions, but hey, we're out of the EU and doing it as a SOVEREIGN NATION. Yes we'll take an economic hit, but it's worth it for < insert Daily Mail headline here >.
For Remainers the UK is out of the EU, but we have a Deal which provides a framework upon which to rebuild co-operation and trust over the years, and in many regards we're still going to be doing what the EU does anyway. As a country we'll get poorer, but we've avoided the catastrophe of No Deal.
One could legitimately ask the question what the bloody point of it all is.
Anyway, here it is if you want to read it for yourself:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 147996
Here's one of the first full, impartial analysis of THE DEAL. (BIG RED LETTERS OOOOHHHHH.)
It's a longish read but they are condensing down hundreds of pages into a few relatively digestible paragraphs per area, and converting the legal document speak into plain English.
In honesty I'm surprised at some of the ground the EU has given, I really didn't expect them to move an inch on LPF and whilst the provisions are still there, they're not the same as the EU's starting position.
The UK has not done well on fish at all, and don't let Johnson's lies convince you otherwise.
Tariff and quota free access on goods is welcome, although very much in the EU's interests as they have a large trade surplus with us.
On services however (where the UK has a large surplus to the EU), there's really very little, the UK has done poorly there, and for an economy that is 80% services, well, that's not great.
It's also worth noting that this is going to be an organic, evolving agreement, major negotiations come around every five years, which just so happens to synchronise with the EU elections. If you wanted Brexit to mean the UK is out of the EU, then yes, you've got that, but the gravitational pull between the two doesn't vanish overnight, and we'll be negotiating with the EU forever. Literally forever.
There's a lot of 'boring' stuff in there, that's also very important, such as data sharing and security, we'll be renegotiating that on an ongoing basis.
It's strange in a way as both Leavers and Remainers have cause to be content on some level, but discontented in others.
For Leavers the UK is out of the EU, but very much still aligning with the EU in all sorts of key areas and we're basically going to track what the EU does without influencing its decisions, but hey, we're out of the EU and doing it as a SOVEREIGN NATION. Yes we'll take an economic hit, but it's worth it for < insert Daily Mail headline here >.
For Remainers the UK is out of the EU, but we have a Deal which provides a framework upon which to rebuild co-operation and trust over the years, and in many regards we're still going to be doing what the EU does anyway. As a country we'll get poorer, but we've avoided the catastrophe of No Deal.
One could legitimately ask the question what the bloody point of it all is.
Anyway, here it is if you want to read it for yourself:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 147996
Happily this fishing think if i remember right was just really really small industry so even totally losing it wouldn't make permanent damage for UK (if it's some 1% of GDP)?'We can't export anything to the EU, it's a nightmare, we've lost all the stock we've sent this week, Brexit is the gift that just keeps giving, it's going to put me out of business'
This is why I voted to leave





This is why I voted to leave

Many businesses were simply trying to survive 2020 as it is with Covid, they simply had no spare capacity or resource to prepare for an unknown Brexit as well.
Is NI in a stickier situation? funny that because I was in tescos in Newtownards today and there was no empty shelfs loads of fruit/veg etc.Stuff will be getting in reasonably unimpeded, not least because we've basically decided to just wave everything through for six months. NI is in a much stickier situation as they're still inside the single market and a lot of stuff is now getting stopped, and there are shortages of some products on the shelves.
Just because you can still buy everything you want from Tesco doesn't mean that UK businesses aren't suffering horrendous strife, added cost, paperwork and red-tape in dealing with the EU, with many of them now facing ruination.
NI can screw itself over on its own, so wouldn't worry: a few flegs and a heating scheme normally seal the deal.Is NI in a stickier situation? funny that because I was in tescos in Newtownards today and there was no empty shelfs loads of fruit/veg etc.

No, the EU did NOT fund it, the UK taxpayer did, by paying £10bn into the E-USSR, of which they grudgingly gave us about half back in 'grants' where they saw fit as to how the UK taxpayers should spend their own money.Just a short one,
as you know I voted brexit etc..
anyhow the past few months it’s astonishing how many sites, new builds etc ive been on that have been solely funded by the EU, I’m talking almost all of them..
just hoping now we left there is something in place to replace what we lost regards the above.
many projects I’m now managing are massive, one will be the biggest high rise in manchester, guess whom paid and funded it? The EU and it’s projects..
this is paid for and signed off so no issues, but what about future projects?
as a massive advocate of brexit I’m happy to say work wise I may of shot myself in the foot.
Fair point.No, the EU did NOT fund it, the UK taxpayer did, by paying £10bn into the E-USSR, of which they grudgingly gave us about half back in 'grants' where they saw fit as to how the UK taxpayers should spend their own money.
UK funded, via the EU.Fair point.
only going on when I get said projects, I get the budgeting etc from the start..
also what we have whilst said project is ongoing.
I’ve now enough work on paper to see me into retirement (in theory)
but it’s after these projects, they are officially EU funded, I’ve seen it.
where will the other funding come from?
Yeah get that,UK funded, via the EU.
The UK now decides where those regional grants (which is what you have there, regeneration etc.) go. Some they may retain, some will be changed and some new ones could replace the ones the 'EU paid for' that have been halted. Who knows? This is where your local government comes in, i.e. a bit of democracy is thrown into the mix which was an anathema to the old EU.
No, the EU did NOT fund it, the UK taxpayer did, by paying £10bn into the E-USSR, of which they grudgingly gave us about half back in 'grants' where they saw fit as to how the UK taxpayers should spend their own money.

In fairness chop, a lot of the new builds I’m on are actually social housing.As reductive and disingenuous an outlook as ever there dunover
A lot of these builds were done through EU regeneration funds and other socially aware projects designed to spend money on neglected areas of the country, and indeed in many cases directed funds into projects that would never have been funded directly by the UK government.
We can argue the numbers endlessly and never agree, but several studies have shown that the economic damage caused by Brexit has already outstripped all our contributions to the EU over the entire course of our membership.
As for Ben's question about what will replace the spend of these EU projects, that in many cases have regenerated parts of the UK that were crying out for the investment, the Tories are notoriously bad at spending money on areas that don't vote for them (which also tend to be poorer areas), so I expect vast swathes of the North and other left-leaning regions will just get fucked again.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
View attachment 148885
In fairness chop, a lot of the new builds I’m on are actually social housing.
hence my concern about funding.
