New Slot Announcement Bonanza by Big Time Gaming

[dunover]

HERE IS THE 8-SCATTER OUTRAGE FROM @PMKFRUITPRO !!

WARNING - EXTREME PROFANITY (ABOUT AS BAD AS ON MY VIDEOS)






The top 3 causes of psychopathy and serial killing:

1. (General)
Childhood abuse/bullying.

2. (Children growing up in the 1970's & 80's)
Father/guardian taking you to school in, or owning a turd-brown Austin Allegro.

3. (21st. Century)
Getting 6+ scatters on a Bonanza bonus trigger.

 

[Kroffe]

Ive been saying its a bad game since 2016, and suddenly just because its trendy to call it a bad game alot of people jump on the bandwagon and pretend they think its bad.
And look now, 2-3 good bonuses later and suddenly its a good game again.
Pff, bunch of posers.

 

[slotmaster]

Ive been saying its a bad game since 2016, and suddenly just because its trendy to call it a bad game alot of people jump on the bandwagon and pretend they think its bad.
And look now, 2-3 good bonuses later and suddenly its a good game again.
Pff, bunch of posers.


View attachment 166352

Kroffe is turning heel!

 

[curremon]

HERE IS THE 8-SCATTER OUTRAGE FROM @PMKFRUITPRO !!

WARNING - EXTREME PROFANITY (ABOUT AS BAD AS ON MY VIDEOS)






The top 3 causes of psychopathy and serial killing:

1. (General)
Childhood abuse/bullying.

2. (Children growing up in the 1970's & 80's)
Father/guardian taking you to school in, or owning a turd-brown Austin Allegro.

3. (21st. Century)
Getting 6+ scatters on a Bonanza bonus trigger.

Lets all just stop playing their shit game until we get some answers from their rep to all asked questions ! @Big Time Gaming

 

[sufferinsilence]

Kroffe is turning heel!

 

[PMKFRUITPRO]

Woooooooooooooo

 

[Siohmy]

I always thought that if what BTG tell us is true, that their slots call an RNG with each spin on their features, that the more spins you get the worse reel set you get. That 32 spin trigger doesn’t exactly lend itself to disproving this. Piss poor on any level.

 

[snorky510238]

I am fairly convinced that the scatters are just for show. In as much as, the total win is triggered at the same time as the game knows a bonus is landing.

So, if the total is £86.40, it doesn’t matter if GOLD and 5, +5s land, it will only pay the said amount. The game knows the outcome and is programmed to display the graphics in various ways. This applies to all slots, as far as I am concerned.

Think about it logically. If the free spins were actually random then most features would actually pay next to nothing. Pick any batch of 12 spins in the normal game and play them as a feature in your mind. Most results would be atrocious.

How many times did it throw 3 carts for an extra 5 spins, only to negate that by following it with 5 dead spins or similar?

I have had a 4 scatter trigger that said 17 spins at the start. Thinking, hang on a minute, it gave 3 carts on the 1st spin to correct itself so obviously an error in the programming. How can you possibly defend that as random?

 

[pinnit2014]

I am fairly convinced that the scatters are just for show. In as much as, the total win is triggered at the same time as the game knows a bonus is landing.

So, if the total is £86.40, it doesn’t matter if GOLD and 5, +5s land, it will only pay the said amount. The game knows the outcome and is programmed to display the graphics in various ways. This applies to all slots, as far as I am concerned.

Think about it logically. If the free spins were actually random then most features would actually pay next to nothing. Pick any batch of 12 spins in the normal game and play them as a feature in your mind. Most results would be atrocious.

How many times did it throw 3 carts for an extra 5 spins, only to negate that by following it with 5 dead spins or similar?

I have had a 4 scatter trigger that said 17 spins at the start. Thinking, hang on a minute, it gave 3 carts on the 1st spin to correct itself so obviously an error in the programming. How can you possibly defend that as random?

That's happened to me a few times - the first, I hadn't seen the scatters come in so assumed a plus 5 had fell in when said 17 (as you would!) - then got a 3 cart trigger on the fourth spin, meaning i thought, goodie 22.

Took me a good minute to work out what was going on and , by that time, i was already 8 dead spins into it anyway

 

[snorky510238]

There was also the one where you hadn’t pressed start and got disconnected and upon reconnecting, the winnings had been added to your balance. That’s was without even starting the feature.

 

[slotmaster]

1st GOLD hit as a Canadian able to play again and my return to this thread.

 

[slotmaster]

almost 100x

 

[goatwack]

1st GOLD hit as a Canadian able to play again and my return to this thread.

Wow, you have my sympathies

Thoughts and prayers ?

 

[irish-ranger]

Wow, you have my sympathies

Thoughts and prayers ?

????

 

[curremon]

So .. to all you who say this slot is compensated ? When does the compensation happens ? Or am i the one compensatin casinos for your winnings ? I mean over 50 features now and only one paid 100x .. 80% 20x bet or less

 

[pinnit2014]

So .. to all you who say this slot is compensated ? When does the compensation happens ? Or am i the one compensatin casinos for your winnings ? I mean over 50 features now and only one paid 100x .. 80% 20x bet or less

One million dollars

So I've heard.

 

[dunover]

Having had already ordered a T-Shirt with @PMKFRUITPRO 8-scatter shocker, I was playing it in demo today and actually twatted his appalling bonus! I had 12 spins, 4 x 3-scatter retriggers for 32 spins, same as him, 24 dead! /

NOTICE HOW BOTH BASTIDS FINISHED ON 13x multiplier with 24 deads.....hmmmmm....

 

[TheAddict]

 

[curremon]

Having had already ordered a T-Shirt with @PMKFRUITPRO 8-scatter shocker, I was playing it in demo today and actually twatted his appalling bonus! I had 12 spins, 4 x 3-scatter retriggers for 32 spins, same as him, 24 dead! /

View attachment 166497


NOTICE HOW BOTH BASTIDS FINISHED ON 13x multiplier with 24 deads.....hmmmmm....

@Big Time Gaming any comment ? IS this what you mean by saying that every spin during feature IS random and win hasnt been predetermined when you start feature ?

 

[snorky510238]

Forums exist so that people can exchange opinions or views about certain topics, right?

Well, here’s my opinion. Doesn’t mean, I am right or wrong. It’s just my take on things. The one thing I do have to back my opinion is one hell of a lot of experience when it comes to playing Bonanza.

At a fairly accurate guess, I have done well over 2 million spins and at a rough guess wagered a good £2,000,000 through the game so my findings aren’t from a small sample.

1. There are days when, as we have alluded to, the D will not drop and if you force it through a ridiculously large amount of spins, the result will be shite.

2. The game plays differently at certain sites. I don’t play at all Casinos, obviously but I play/have played at a good 40 or so and from my findings, I can categorically say that, Leo Vegas, Bet Victor and Sky are the absolute worse imo and play differently to other sites. One thing I never get at any of those, is a deposit that fluctuates. The odd small withdrawal aside, my deposits are usually swallowed up, in record time.

3. The game has been changed, despite what others will try and tell you. The feature is much harder to land and the majority of bonuses that paid between x100 and x500 have been removed and a bit of that rtp has been added to x500+ wins, which are extremely rare and some has been added to meaningless, small base hits. The rest has just disappeared. Only an opinion but totally feasible.

4. Why would they change the game? Seems an obvious question to ask. I mean, it has been lorded in the past (by myself included) as the best game ever. Why fix it if it ain’t bust?

Again imo, it was certainly one of the best games ever released, BUT did there come a point where, from a provider/Casino view, the game was too fair? I am just using logic here.

It was certainly possible in the early years to make a deposit of say £20, play 20-40p spins and have that deposit last a couple of hours. It may never have gone above £30 but you would get a lot of entertainment even if you lost it in the end. That absolutely, never happens now.

My point being, the game possibly became so popular, that although they had the 4% house edge, it was taking too long for players to actually lose that 4%. I mean, it makes more sense from the providers point of view, to reprogram the game so that players lose more quickly. I always wondered why Redbet took Bonanza from their library when it was at its peak and it just may have been that the game was a liability.

Only opinions but not posted without a great deal of experience on the subject. Some of it won’t be right as I am surmising but I can guarantee one thing, it won’t all be wrong either.

 

[kennygamerboy]

Forums exist so that people can exchange opinions or views about certain topics, right?

Well, here’s my opinion. Doesn’t mean, I am right or wrong. It’s just my take on things. The one thing I do have to back my opinion is one hell of a lot of experience when it comes to playing Bonanza.

At a fairly accurate guess, I have done well over 2 million spins and at a rough guess wagered a good £2,000,000 through the game so my findings aren’t from a small sample.

1. There are days when, as we have alluded to, the D will not drop and if you force it through a ridiculously large amount of spins, the result will be shite.

2. The game plays differently at certain sites. I don’t play at all Casinos, obviously but I play/have played at a good 40 or so and from my findings, I can categorically say that, Leo Vegas, Bet Victor and Sky are the absolute worse imo and play differently to other sites. One thing I never get at any of those, is a deposit that fluctuates. The odd small withdrawal aside, my deposits are usually swallowed up, in record time.

3. The game has been changed, despite what others will try and tell you. The feature is much harder to land and the majority of bonuses that paid between x100 and x500 have been removed and a bit of that rtp has been added to x500+ wins, which are extremely rare and some has been added to meaningless, small base hits. The rest has just disappeared. Only an opinion but totally feasible.

4. Why would they change the game? Seems an obvious question to ask. I mean, it has been lorded in the past (by myself included) as the best game ever. Why fix it if it ain’t bust?

Again imo, it was certainly one of the best games ever released, BUT did there come a point where, from a provider/Casino view, the game was too fair? I am just using logic here.

It was certainly possible in the early years to make a deposit of say £20, play 20-40p spins and have that deposit last a couple of hours. It may never have gone above £30 but you would get a lot of entertainment even if you lost it in the end. That absolutely, never happens now.

My point being, the game possibly became so popular, that although they had the 4% house edge, it was taking too long for players to actually lose that 4%. I mean, it makes more sense from the providers point of view, to reprogram the game so that players lose more quickly. I always wondered why Redbet took Bonanza from their library when it was at its peak and it just may have been that the game was a liability.

Only opinions but not posted without a great deal of experience on the subject. Some of it won’t be right as I am surmising but I can guarantee one thing, it won’t all be wrong either.

??????????????????????????

 

[Slotter]

Forums exist so that people can exchange opinions or views about certain topics, right?

Well, here’s my opinion. Doesn’t mean, I am right or wrong. It’s just my take on things. The one thing I do have to back my opinion is one hell of a lot of experience when it comes to playing Bonanza.

At a fairly accurate guess, I have done well over 2 million spins and at a rough guess wagered a good £2,000,000 through the game so my findings aren’t from a small sample.

1. There are days when, as we have alluded to, the D will not drop and if you force it through a ridiculously large amount of spins, the result will be shite.

2. The game plays differently at certain sites. I don’t play at all Casinos, obviously but I play/have played at a good 40 or so and from my findings, I can categorically say that, Leo Vegas, Bet Victor and Sky are the absolute worse imo and play differently to other sites. One thing I never get at any of those, is a deposit that fluctuates. The odd small withdrawal aside, my deposits are usually swallowed up, in record time.

3. The game has been changed, despite what others will try and tell you. The feature is much harder to land and the majority of bonuses that paid between x100 and x500 have been removed and a bit of that rtp has been added to x500+ wins, which are extremely rare and some has been added to meaningless, small base hits. The rest has just disappeared. Only an opinion but totally feasible.

4. Why would they change the game? Seems an obvious question to ask. I mean, it has been lorded in the past (by myself included) as the best game ever. Why fix it if it ain’t bust?

Again imo, it was certainly one of the best games ever released, BUT did there come a point where, from a provider/Casino view, the game was too fair? I am just using logic here.

It was certainly possible in the early years to make a deposit of say £20, play 20-40p spins and have that deposit last a couple of hours. It may never have gone above £30 but you would get a lot of entertainment even if you lost it in the end. That absolutely, never happens now.

My point being, the game possibly became so popular, that although they had the 4% house edge, it was taking too long for players to actually lose that 4%. I mean, it makes more sense from the providers point of view, to reprogram the game so that players lose more quickly. I always wondered why Redbet took Bonanza from their library when it was at its peak and it just may have been that the game was a liability.

Only opinions but not posted without a great deal of experience on the subject. Some of it won’t be right as I am surmising but I can guarantee one thing, it won’t all be wrong either.

Absolutely on (3)
Have seen (4c) too elsewhere

 

[Jono777]

It was certainly possible in the early years to make a deposit of say £20, play 20-40p spins and have that deposit last a couple of hours. It may never have gone above £30 but you would get a lot of entertainment even if you lost it in the end. That absolutely, never happens now.

Great post mate.

This part could be said about 90% of games these days also. It is the part which pisses me off the most too.

Said on this forum so many times that casinos are welcome to my deposits, just take them s-l-o-w-l-y and give me some game time.

Cut right back to virtually pennies when it comes to activity these days but when I do play, it seems and feels like 99% of the time that the casino in question is on the verge of going bust and NEEDS your balance munched in nano seconds.

DoA is a speed gobbler and no way on this planet running at 94% - Like you with Bonanza, I've played it way too much over the years to not notice the change in the game (math and win/feature rate not speed)

Something else I've repeated until I'm 'Blue in the face' and that is that all these changes are due to GREED and nothing more.

 

[kennygamerboy]

Great post mate.

This part could be said about 90% of games these days also. It is the part which pisses me off the most too.

Said on this forum so many times that casinos are welcome to my deposits, just take them s-l-o-w-l-y and give me some game time.

Cut right back to virtually pennies when it comes to activity these days but when I do play, it seems and feels like 99% of the time that the casino in question is on the verge of going bust and NEEDS your balance munched in nano seconds.

DoA is a speed gobbler and no way on this planet running at 94% - Like you with Bonanza, I've played it way too much over the years to not notice the change in the game (math and win/feature rate not speed)

Something else I've repeated until I'm 'Blue in the face' and that is that all these changes are due to GREED and nothing more.

agree mate, i don’t mind losing but like to have a good fair chance and some play time i don’t really care if i don’t withdraw half the time so long as i’ve had play time cos i don’t deposit thinking i’m gonna win grands anyway it’s nice to withdraw but i hate the feeling of being cheated and robbed when you deposit say £50 and it’s eaten in 15 minutes it’s sickening to be honest

 

[snorky510238]

Absolutely true Jono, I know from my experience that things have changed dramatically.

When I first started playing it was rare not to hit a couple of bonus rounds with a £20 deposit, playing 20-40p, on run of the mill games. Occasionally, I might have to deposit £40 before seeing one and very rarely £60. If I hadn’t seen one by then, I would class it as an awful night and think twice about playing again.

Fast forward 6 years and I don’t mind admitting, that I can very frequently deposit £100 that lasts less than 30 minutes and not see a bonus. In fact, it’s the norm.

For the past year it has become way too easy to deposit £300 a day and not see GOLD. This doesn’t just happen occasionally, it’s at least a couple of times a week and hardly any game time to boot.

This never happened in the first 4 years, now it is a regular occurrence and we’re supposed to believe nothing changed. That’s just an insult to your intelligence. Then again, I have questioned whether I have any, after continuing to play the game.

 

[PMKFRUITPRO]

Having had already ordered a T-Shirt with @PMKFRUITPRO 8-scatter shocker, I was playing it in demo today and actually twatted his appalling bonus! I had 12 spins, 4 x 3-scatter retriggers for 32 spins, same as him, 24 dead! /

View attachment 166497


NOTICE HOW BOTH BASTIDS FINISHED ON 13x multiplier with 24 deads.....hmmmmm....

Was that on bonus buy version Dazwold?

 

[dunover]

Was that on bonus buy version Dazwold?

Yes, the demo in my BTG a/c. That's why it has to be played in euros. 90x bonus buy. It's creeped me out how similar it was to your real-money one. I dread ever getting the fabled 8-scatters in real money, it scares me.

 

[brianmon]

DoA is a speed gobbler and no way on this planet running at 94% - Like you with Bonanza, I've played it way too much over the years to not notice the change in the game (math and win/feature rate not speed)

Something else I've repeated until I'm 'Blue in the face' and that is that all these changes are due to GREED and nothing more.

Got to agree with you there, although I refuse to play at 94%. The 96.8% version is atrocious now.
It used to be a case of spending my last £10 on DOA, and I'd usually expect to get 2 or features before either busting out or getting a decent win.

These days I'm lucky if I get even one feature from £10. Sometimes even a £15 starting balance gets eaten without a single feature.

Coincidentally the feature frequency seemed to change when the introduced the bonus buy.

 

[TheAddict]

Got to agree with you there, although I refuse to play at 94%. The 96.8% version is atrocious now.
It used to be a case of spending my last £10 on DOA, and I'd usually expect to get 2 or features before either busting out or getting a decent win.

These days I'm lucky if I get even one feature from £10. Sometimes even a £15 starting balance gets eaten without a single feature.

Coincidentally the feature frequency seemed to change when the introduced the bonus buy.

i recently said I'd done 140 quid on 9p. The a biggest win was 5oak hats. Im pretty confident that Never happened to me during millions of spins prior to evo. Those 5oaks hats/boots and even shot glasses that used to turn the balance over have been ridiculously absent.
i used to get regular sessions of 10-20 hours for a £20-£50 deposit on 9p. Since ive been playing shitty evo, allbeit not for as long obviously, I'm noticed it's costing 15quid an hour on average. Laughing at how I used to agree with Nicola when she said that £50 starting balance on 9p is almost always good for a full night in session on DOA.

 

[pinnit2014]

Not played DOA anywhere near what i used to but certainly on the 96.xx% it's been grim, so the 94 must be even more joyful.

IIRC the last 3 sessions playing with 20-25 quid, didn't even yield a bonus round on 9p. Haven't gone Rainman, so don't have stats from a while ago, but pretty sure it would normally have gave more than zero usually.

Bit like above - you'd put in a decent deposit and it would have done you for an evening. Now it comes to 10pm and you're being forced to remember your CVV number again.

 

[kennygamerboy]

check this selection of filth since my 1000x last week, so random ?????

 

[pinnit2014]

Bonanza will giveth but it's a bigger fan of taketh.

You just simply have to fill the pot up to the tune of 1500 minimum to get a chance at another 1000x

One time i got 1000x, 2000x and 3000x in two weeks but, in hindsight, it was probably the magic mushrooms.

 

[PMKFRUITPRO]

What ever site I play at currently I seem to get the dead reel sets load up every time!! And I’m not talking the bent feature ones either.

£150 down yesterday on 40p for just 1 cascade chance ffs. I mean whats the odds of a feature when you can’t even get a fucking tease??

The miracle roll in every 5 thousand spins?

To make matters worse I’m currently on the BTG patented ‘I refuse to drop a scatter on a tease for 10k spins’ on millionaire at the moment also. Nothing like waiting an hour for each roll in to get fucked over on the 89% ask the audience which is quite clearly full of thick c**ts.

I think I should become a member of that audience as I must be a complete c**t for rowing these stupid fucking games every day.

I’m thinking of taking up waterproofing fence panels as a hobby as it would give far more entertainment and be a lot easier on the wallet.

 

[snorky510238]

I played it yesterday at about 8 different sites and it was shocking. I think I could have spun until my bank account was empty and still wouldn’t have hit a feature.

And that is where the biggest problem lies for me. How is it, that no matter which site you play at, the results seem like they are all from the same pool.

I am convinced there is only one server, I am absolutely convinced the game is compensated, I am convinced Evolution are a bunch of croo%+¥!~,/;-:.s, I am convinced if this was looked into BY SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE DOING, then something would have to change.

The slotting industry has become a blatant, goalpost moving, underhanded, shady place to hangout. Never thought I would say this but it wouldn’t bother me one bit if the UKGC banned it altogether. It’s poison.

 

[kennygamerboy]

I played it yesterday at about 8 different sites and it was shocking. I think I could have spun until my bank account was empty and still wouldn’t have hit a feature.

And that is where the biggest problem lies for me. How is it, that no matter which site you play at, the results seem like they are all from the same pool.

I am convinced there is only one server, I am absolutely convinced the game is compensated, I am convinced Evolution are a bunch of croo%+¥!~,/;-:.s, I am convinced if this was looked into BY SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE DOING, then something would have to change.

The slotting industry has become a blatant, goalpost moving, underhanded, shady place to hangout. Never thought I would say this but it wouldn’t bother me one bit if the UKGC banned it altogether. It’s poison.

same yesterday was absolutely despicable especially on betvictor that site needs investigating the reels act weird on there as well on bonanza genuinely though if you have a concern about a games fairness on a certain site who do you complain to it’s all designed for you to be not able to bring anyone to account, this isn’t sour grapes btw i am just convinced 110% that betvictors bonanza is tampered with

 

[PMKFRUITPRO]

Bentvictor

 

[pinnit2014]

Was playing the Legend of the Dragon, Doggy Megaways and a few others. 490x, few 100x - was 300 up, took out 250 and left 50 for Bonanza

two hours of play, then onto 25 minutes probably with a max win of 15x

Been a fan of Bonanza, for better or worse, but even testing my resolve of not thinking of it as a game on its arse.

 

[snorky510238]

Coincidentally (or not) it’s Bent Victor, that I have the biggest concerns about. I was checking my deposits vs withdrawals the other day and it becomes even more obvious something isn’t right. Very similar to Sky and LeoVegas.

I have 4 year samples of all these sites and it just doesn’t stack up against the other sites I play at. It’s not bad luck, there is just no comparison. It’s as if certain outcomes aren’t available at those sites.

I could accept it, if the sample sizes were very small but they aren’t. I am talking over 30 deposits without a feature. Not once or twice but every time. This just seems too coincidental, nothing random whatsoever. It’s only down to other sites playing “as normal” (if you can call it that), that has enabled me to bankroll these 3 sites.

I keep playing there in the hope, (would say good faith but that’s laughable) that I get a decent win to bring my rtp somewhere near but I am at the point where I would need the miracle of all miracles to get it anywhere near, as I am that far behind.

 

[Downsman]

Just had a go at Hollywoodbets..20 in, hit the bonus fairly quickly and cashed out 70.

Didn't stick around trying for another GOLD, grateful for small miracles!

( Incidentally, withdrawls are really fast with this outfit )

 

[kennygamerboy]

Coincidentally (or not) it’s Bent Victor, that I have the biggest concerns about. I was checking my deposits vs withdrawals the other day and it becomes even more obvious something isn’t right. Very similar to Sky and LeoVegas.

I have 4 year samples of all these sites and it just doesn’t stack up against the other sites I play at. It’s not bad luck, there is just no comparison. It’s as if certain outcomes aren’t available at those sites.

I could accept it, if the sample sizes were very small but they aren’t. I am talking over 30 deposits without a feature. Not once or twice but every time. This just seems too coincidental, nothing random whatsoever. It’s only down to other sites playing “as normal” (if you can call it that), that has enabled me to bankroll these 3 sites.

I keep playing there in the hope, (would say good faith but that’s laughable) that I get a decent win to bring my rtp somewhere near but I am at the point where I would need the miracle of all miracles to get it anywhere near, as I am that far behind.

betvictor has same version as bet365 so i depo on betvictor the past week and not one bonus on there and deposits gone in minutes i’m talking like 2-3 mins and that’s on 20p stake ? not normal in any shape or form and the reels are very strange on there i then went to bet365 which is also shit but not as bent as victor and it was playing completely different no noticeable wins but still some play time so im struggling with how the same version is like different game on betvictor. genuinely if anybody knows who i can send my videos too the relevant people please let me know i would love to take some of these casinos to account

 

[Kroffe]

Why do you guys keep playing at these sites that you are convinced are worse than others?
Ive seen some sites mentioned as being much better to play at, why is not all play made at those sites?

There are so many restaurants to choose from, stop going to the ones you are convinced spit in the food.

 

[pinnit2014]

Not played on BV for around 4 years - it was my go to place from 2007-2011 (or Victor C as it was) - the site that i got the 10k win on some Ainsworth and at the time they had a great loyalty Programme: 25% back on Losses AND Wins, random 100 quid cash drops, 250 on birthday. Those were the days - think they also had some nifty 5x wagering on deposit bonus's sometimes

Most memorable session was winning 250 quid in the bonus money, think it was 20x wagering and playing Wild Rockets (a very underrated Netent game) and the game went insane - from going to thinking i can't meet wagering to having 4k with 50 quid left - joyful experience. Might have played Bonanza there at the start but certainly not long.

Writing that, perks, w/ds after bonus's, hell - even bonus's, is pretty depressing given the current landscape.

BV - RIP

 

[dionysus]

Why do you guys keep playing at these sites that you are convinced are worse than others?
Ive seen some sites mentioned as being much better to play at, why is not all play made at those sites?

There are so many restaurants to choose from, stop going to the ones you are convinced spit in the food.

because..REASONS, K

 

[mack341]

Coral's version has the scatters in the 'all the ways' screen, it's also tight with GOL chances.

If a spokesman came out and said 'sorry due to unknown mistakes the rtp has been running at 94 rather than the advertised 96' it would make a lot of sense!

 

[snorky510238]

It probably is, that’s the thing Mack. It would be so easy to do. If and that’s a massive IF, in my book an audit was requested then a bit of tampering or even “well it’s within 2%, we’ll check it again at a later date”, would suffice.

A bit like when HSE give notice that they are coming to inspect the workshop. All production stops immediately, guards put back on machines, electrical cables checked, etc. You know where I am coming from.

 

[snorky510238]

Talk of the devil and it’s sure to appear. Only at Sky (well and a couple of others).

You despicable filthy cheating bas-s. This after £140’s worth of losing deposits. Absolutely disgusting, where are these f/;/-ing auditors? Get and do a job for Christ sake.

 

[goatwack]

Talk of the devil and it’s sure to appear. Only at Sky (well and a couple of others).

You despicable filthy cheating bas-s. This after £140’s worth of losing deposits. Absolutely disgusting, where are these f/;/-ing auditors? Get and do a job for Christ sake.

View attachment 166589

Perhaps like all good things, like bum-bags and mullets, it's probably best to leave this game in the past and move on to pastures new. That is, unless you enjoy having new derrieres sculpted by it every session!

 

[pinnit2014]

Talk of the devil and it’s sure to appear. Only at Sky (well and a couple of others).

You despicable filthy cheating bas-s. This after £140’s worth of losing deposits. Absolutely disgusting, where are these f/;/-ing auditors? Get and do a job for Christ sake.

View attachment 166589

They're normally in cahoots with the management

 

[brianmon]

Sorry, but I can't fault Betvictor, lol

2006x

 

[kennygamerboy]

Coral's version has the scatters in the 'all the ways' screen, it's also tight with GOL chances.

If a spokesman came out and said 'sorry due to unknown mistakes the rtp has been running at 94 rather than the advertised 96' it would make a lot of sense!

94? more like 89%