In my experience when you have to start going into complicated (yes that it is for the average reader, and yes I can follow) explanations and math examples for an otherwise simple problem, to explain your point then you are stretching.
Millions play at casinos on a regular basis and for years on end, yet I haven't seen all of these wrongfully accused players complaining? Why is that if it's so likely that random players will naturally be flagged while only during their normal play? With the volume of players playing at any given time at a casino I would think players would be having their accounts flagged left and right but as it would appear it seems that maybe just maybe....something more needs to be done to raise a red flag for the casino.
I would have thought the below would have been /thread in regards to the specific topic, but I guess not.
Millions play at casinos on a regular basis and for years on end, yet I haven't seen all of these wrongfully accused players complaining? Why is that if it's so likely that random players will naturally be flagged while only during their normal play? With the volume of players playing at any given time at a casino I would think players would be having their accounts flagged left and right but as it would appear it seems that maybe just maybe....something more needs to be done to raise a red flag for the casino.
I would have thought the below would have been /thread in regards to the specific topic, but I guess not.
For those that want to know how things really work as opposed to some pre-conceived notion you have and favour then read and re-read the following:
Think about it, that can mean anything from organized multi-accounting to shared fake documents to ... you name it. The key elements there are (a) someone is working with someone else and (b) it is for "fraudulent purposes".
AFAIC if case satisfies those two requirements -- with a strong emphasis on (b) -- then fine, it's collusion. Call it cheating or scamming or playing silly buggers or whatever you like, the point is that it's some person or persons working toward "some wrongful or improper purpose" insofar as their casino activity is concerned.
Our primary effort in most PAB cases is to determine if that is in fact what happened. In other words did the player knowingly do something "wrongful or improper" generally for the purposes of prising money out of the casino and has the casino provided sufficient proof of said activity? If the answers are "yes" and "yes" then the hammer falls and the bugger is toast. If the answers are anything else -- "maybe" and "yes", or "yes" and "maybe", or "maybe" and "sometime soon", or whatever -- then too bad for the casino, they don't have a case and we'll almost certainly side for the player. There are minor variations on the theme but hopefully you get the idea: conspiracy to defraud + proof = bad news for the fraudster.
My point is this: speculating that we are so thick as to think that two blokes having a pint and then going to play some blackjack online is a conspiracy to cheat is a monumental misunderstanding of what we do and how we do it. In fact it's so BS that it can only be intentional. If you look at the record and what we do disclose about cases and the number of people that we work with and the number of cases we've handled over the years then you'd have to be taking the piss to suggest that we are so blind and stupid that we can't tell the difference between casual friends and dedicated fraudsters. Truth be told we let a good percentage of the latter walk because we don't have the data -- yet-- to make a proper case against them and make it stick.
If you've done your homework and you like what we do then great, hopefully we can help you someday too. If you haven't done your homework or you have and still have reason to doubt us then that's fine too, we'll be of no use to you and happy trails to all. But pulling some bogus scenario out of your arse and pretending it's documented fact -- or has any bearing on reality -- is just being a troll: may you get what's coming to you before your cheap shots cause any more mischief.
-- to make a proper case against them and make it stick.








