Well, obviously I should have but who wants to gamble with a cut off time? Specially when you don't really have a high balance when the WR is cleared.
In this case I cleared the WR in about a half an hour. In that half hour I had free spins in Triple Toucan, T-Rex and Honey to the Bee. I even had 4 white diamonds in Diamond dozen and then 3 more after that. I'm usually lucky if I can get 3 white diamonds after a few hundred spins. So you're finally having a good session and the very minute you clear the WR you're supposed to quit?
Besides RTG casinos don't pay overnight. If I'm going to wait a week to get paid I'd like to withdraw more than 50 bucks.
It was free, I didn't lose anything (for a change) but seriously... It would be nice if the winning streak would last longer than the WR once in a while.
OK skiny......you think that the software knows when you make WR, and then drops the RTP immediately to ensure you can't cashout.
I won't mention the fact that the software allowed you the opportunity to walk away a winner in the first place, or the fact that the more bets you place the more likely you are to lose, or the fact that many players meet WR and continue winning and cashout the max, as that would make it impossible for you to prove your theory.
Instead, I challenge you to provide the details of all these times that you "can't count" so that we can see exactly where the "switch" gets thrown. If the software does as you suggest, it should show very clearly. I'm sure ms sloto and other RTGs here would be happy to supply detailed logs. I would also like you to explain just how the software does this, given that the RTPs of these spots are controlled by adding and removing symbols from reels. I have no doubt that some kind of restart would be required to implement such, whether it be the casino as a whole or just the game. It is also logical that there would have to be a change server-side. I just don't see how all this could happen seamlessly......and I also can't see how the operator could benefit in cases like yours where you actually reached the $50 max cashout AFTER meeting WR. Why give you the opportunity to cashout the max at all? If the idea is to make you lose, which it has to be, then why not keep ripping you off until you hit zero?
Your argument makes no sense from a commercial or practical perspective......but hey, I'm not the one telling the story. Show me I'm wrong. I'm all ears.
GM is correct....you COULD have cashed out the max. Instead, you kept playing because you didn't want to be time restricted I.e. you wanted a long playing session. Fact is, it was YOU, not the software, that made the decision that you wouldn't win. Instead of taking the $50 and walking away a winner, you chose to play on (in spite of the fact that you couldn't win more anyway) and lost it all. If you just wanted to play on for no monetary advantage whatsoever, you only needed to cash out your $50 and change to fun mode.
I don't begrudge anyone having an opinion, but posts like yours go beyond opinion IMO.....they are shrouded "suggestions" that the casino/software/operator is dishonest, and if you're going to make such "suggestions", you should provide some kind of evidence to back it up. Otherwise, it just looks like a sore loser blaming something/someone else for their losses.
The age old defence used by many to such challenges is "Oh its just my opinion and I'm entitled to it".....which of course everyone is, but by the same token, if you're going to express an "opinion" in public, and fail to present even a logical argument let alone evidence, you're going to have to accept that you're going to be seen by some as a tinfoil hatter.....and rightly so.
You can choose to wordsmith around it, and I'm sure you will, but the fact remains that you ARE suggesting that an accredited casino is offering an unfair/rigged game......and without a shred of evidence. IMO this is ridiculous, and I'm surprised that someone with your tenure would still buy in to these "on/off switch" tinfoil theories.......which, strangely enough, always come right after someone has lost what they know they could have cashed out.
Nothing personal skiny, and it really isn't, but this is stuff I'd expect from a newb or someone who knew nothing about casinos and slots. Whichever way I read and re-read it, it still comes out looking like sour grapes and remorse about making a poor choice.