Must Read Woman Campaigns to Ban Gambling Ads after Husband runs up £85,000 Debt

Must read this

Webzcas

Winter is Coming!
Staff member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Location
Block S25, South Stand, Ashton Gate, BS3
A woman from Merton, London, is leading a campaign to ban gambling advertisements nationwide after her husband accumulated £85,000 ($104,621) in gambling-related debt.

Tracy O’Shaughnessy has partnered with Haringey Council, which recently joined the Coalition to End Gambling Ads (CEGA), an organisation advocating for stricter regulations on gambling promotions to protect vulnerable individuals.

Haringey Council’s involvement with CEGA highlights the growing concern over gambling-related harm in the borough, where over 8,000 individuals have been directly affected, impacting an additional 25,000 people in their immediate circles. The council's commitment to the cause aims to put pressure on the Labour government to enact a nationwide ban on gambling advertisements.

During a parliamentary debate in October 2024, Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media, and Sport, acknowledged the government’s commitment to balancing recreational gambling with robust protections against problem gambling.

However, CEGA’s director, Will Prochaska, criticised this stance, arguing that it is impossible to expand the gambling industry while effectively safeguarding people from harm. “We urgently need Lisa Nandy to grasp this principle,” he said.

A spokesperson for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport emphasised that the gambling industry must continue raising its standards to ensure advertising does not contribute to harm, adding that this will be closely monitored.

Haringey Council reports that it spends over £8 million ($9.8 million) annually on costs associated with gambling harm, including expenses related to homelessness, adult social care, unpaid rent, and healthcare. Prochaska pointed out that while councils lack the authority to regulate the gambling industry directly, they hold significant influence in shaping national policy. “It’s important now that more councils follow Haringey’s lead,” he urged.


Since the introduction of the Gambling Act 2005, gambling advertisements in the UK have “increased substantially,” according to the government. A December 2023 report from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport highlighted an “urgent need to better understand the effects of gambling advertising on the risk of harm.”

The Betting and Gaming Council, representing 90% of the UK’s gambling industry, mandates that its members comply with the Industry Code for Socially Responsible Advertising, last updated in September 2023.

The Labour Party’s 2024 manifesto includes a promise to “reduce gambling-related harm” across the UK. On page 103 of its Change document, the party outlines plans to reform gambling regulations and strengthen protections, while continuing to collaborate with the industry to promote responsible gambling.

As Haringey Council and CEGA amplify the conversation around gambling advertisements, the Labour government’s campaign promises suggest potential support for stricter regulations in the near future.
 
Last year Sadiq Khan banned wedding cakes ads on the tube, Yesterday the SNP wanted to ban cats, today it's someone wanting online gambling ads, tomorrow it will something else, journos are so devoid of stuff to write about they will pick up on anything.

Unfortunately in the year 2025 you can find someone wanting to ban something online and with some many social media and online news gathers these stories can be plucked from anywhere online.

I googled her name found one story about it from msn/bbc which it says is no loner available.
 
The best one is when you watch a gambling addiction video on youtube and you get a casino add before the video starts
Or what happened to me on Saturday, I received an offer of 50 spins on Rainbow Riches for £10 deposit so did it, got over an hours play without using the free spins, eventually the £10 disappeared so went to play the 50 spins and checked my emails and received a message "we notice you are using our site more than usual take a break". Now I know they are quivvering at the Gambling Commission but don't offer an incentive then tell people to get off your site. I won £8 on the free spins but you can't play them because you already been on the site too long and we want you gone.

On Monday an email do you need to use our tools they are here to help you err no I want to play my winnings.
 
Last edited:
Or what happened to me on Saturday, I received an offer of 50 spins on Rainbow Riches for £10 deposit so did it, got over an hours play without using the free spins, eventually the £10 disappeared so went to play the 50 spins and checked my emails and received a message "we notice you are using our site more than usual take a break". Now I know they are quivvering at ofcom but don't offer an incentive then tell people to get off your site. I won £8 on the free spins but you can't play them because you already been on the site too long and we want you gone.

On Monday an email do you need to use our tools they are here to help you err no I want to play my winnings.

Or what happened to me on Saturday, I received an offer of 50 spins on Rainbow Riches for £10 deposit so did it, got over an hours play without using the free spins, eventually the £10 disappeared so went to play the 50 spins and checked my emails and received a message "we notice you are using our site more than usual take a break". Now I know they are quivvering at the Gambling Commission but don't offer an incentive then tell people to get off your site. I won £8 on the free spins but you can't play them because you already been on the site too long and we want you gone.

On Monday an email do you need to use our tools they are here to help you err no I want to play my winnings.
this makes no sense, how does a tenner last an hour on RR, can't stand that game
 
What they should do is at least balance adverts out, in this day and age. If they want to promote gambling, fair enough but let’s also have an advert that shows how “X”, had a wonderful career and the perfect family, until gambling came into their life.

Show them, homeless, depressed and desperate, which is exactly what happens to some people, if not worse.

Better still put me on an advert so I can explain to the whole world how players are being cheated out of their hard earned cash and the dark arts that go on behind the scenes of the seemingly squeaky clean Industry.
 
Or what happened to me on Saturday, I received an offer of 50 spins on Rainbow Riches for £10 deposit so did it, got over an hours play without using the free spins, eventually the £10 disappeared so went to play the 50 spins and checked my emails and received a message "we notice you are using our site more than usual take a break". Now I know they are quivvering at the Gambling Commission but don't offer an incentive then tell people to get off your site. I won £8 on the free spins but you can't play them because you already been on the site too long and we want you gone.

On Monday an email do you need to use our tools they are here to help you err no I want to play my winnings.
I had similar this week-ads on the site to deposit and play £50 on a slot to get free spins. Did that and miraculously won a few hundred with the deposit-didn't play any of it back but took a break for a couple days yet now they've restricted my account and want to talk to me about my gambling. It's not worth playing winnings back anymore cos that gets your account limited, so I didn't, but now we have to justify being...lucky? I wasn't even on the site long, probably 20 mins max then I stopped after I won. It was their incentive for people to deposit and play the offer in the first place! If that £50 had gone down the slots drain they would not be wanting to talk to me. It's such BS they only worry about affordability after you've had a big win. Make it make sense.
 
The issue is the casino business vs regulatory requirements. Clearly the casino from a business point of view wants to encourage you to play whilst from a regulatory point of view they want to avoid fines.

I think most people understand that. The issue is that the situation is absurd.
The UKGC have slowed down spin speed and removed auto plays and bonus buys. This means bonuses have to land naturally. With manual spinning and the spin speed regs, spins take much much longer. Combine that with ever increasing volatility and it takes ever longer to land a bonus. So it's not unusual to have to play for an hour or more to land one bonus. This means that long play sessions are inevitable. But the UKGC seem oblivious to this fact. Why am I getting pop ups after an hour telling me to take a break...I haven't landed a bonus yet. If you're going to slow down play then sessions will be longer. In the good old days you put pragmatics on turbo and you'd have a bonus land in a few mins. Now that same bonus takes an hour to land. So what do you the UKGC expect to happen. A lot of rtp seems to come from the bonuses so I want to play until at least one lands. And if I want to play more than one game then I know I'm in for a long session.
But yeah please play and then we'll tell you off for it is the crazy situation we find ourselves in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top