Winner Screenshots!

Status
Not open for further replies.
More than just luck here I'm afraid. Hoffman's got balls of steel. When the rest of us would be satisfied with a nice hit... Hoffman takes it to another level. Quite an adventerous guy he is. I predict Hoffman will be posting a six digit screenshot here someday.
 
slotchik said:
now he is what I call a GAMBLER!!

what is the most you ever LOST doing that Hoffman?? ( out of curiousity )
In my opinion Hoffman is either:
a) Ludicrously rich - and slightly mad.
b) Very wealthy - and a genius.
c) Moderately well off - and extremely lucky.
d) A poor fraudster - and posting screenshots of 'fun mode'.

Maybe we should run a poll on it.
I know what I'd be voting for! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
tim5ny said:
Yeah... I'm starting to hate Simmo!

Get to the back of the queue please :D

For what its worth, the Goose took $2,500 straight back (no win bigger than 12,000) from me over the past two days (til today, but thats another story ;))
 
Simmo! said:
Get to the back of the queue please :D

For what its worth, the Goose took $2,500 straight back (no win bigger than 12,000) from me over the past two days (til today, but thats another story ;))


Well.. I took your advice Simmo the last 2 days and had patience with the goose and it paid off... but I don't wager as much as you most of the time, so it's not as impressive. 5 scatters on Totem.. and 5-claws with wilds on two lines simultaneously again on Wizard with only .50 cent bet for over $350.00. Wish I had more bet on that one.
 
Bruce Hamilton said:
That's usually when you hit 'em, when you don't bet squat. :lolup:
What do you mean? The 200 spins before the win were at 1p/line - I was really sticking my neck out risking 2p/line! :D

You know, I used to think that Jungle Jim slot was rubbish...
and now I now for sure that it is!

2nd highest win = just 100 times the cost of the spin? :what:
What a heap of crap! :(
 
jonevegas said:
I am trying to put some pictures on here but even when I sketch/skew down to 45% the file still comes to large, I have posted using paint before without problems, any suggestions?

Yes.. I was doing the same thing as you. Lower the resolution of the screenshot. You're prolly at 1024X768 like I was.
 
I'm just wondering 1 thing... Is the screenshot for REAL money or just PLAY money? (blink KING eck)

If it's for REAL money, Congratulations. It's a really nice hit, but at $125 per pop, I think you've gotta really have a HUGE bankroll or...
 
aodat2 said:
I'm just wondering 1 thing... Is the screenshot for REAL money or just PLAY money? (blink KING eck)

If it's for REAL money, Congratulations. It's a really nice hit, but at $125 per pop, I think you've gotta really have a HUGE bankroll or...
if viny; is from UK he might be playing in pounds.....

which means


WELL DONE mate!!!!!
 
Real Money

It's for real.
Jackpot Factory run tournaments with a rule that you get 10 points for a 500 payout as well as 1 point for 50 deposited & wagered (once per game per day). You actually have to deposit ANOTHER 50 and wager it once for another point, you cannot get 2 points by wagering the same 50 twice. I have worked out that any deal of 3 of a kind above will have the potential to give a 500 payout, hence 3 Aces would have been enough, 4 was a welcome bonus - I got my 10 points! Music Hall has a "random" wheel of cash, but I find it favours the brave, and volatile games. Whilst you can run Double Magic at 1p per spin for days on end you will probably not see a single wheel (I have tried this!), but wager aggressively and I have had 6-7 in a day, and once had the magic 8 (the allowed upper limit per account per day).
The Video Poker is a high payback, and is less volatile in the 50 hand version than the 10 or 4 hand version. Wagering 125 at 50 hand is the same coin as wagering 10 a time at standard 4 hand power poker (my usual wager on this is 20). 50 hand Joker Poker is more risky as the more common deals do not pay as much, with the pay table weighted towards the specials (Joker Royal, 5 of a kind).
A pat Royal at 50 hand VP @125 would be very nice indeed, but rather unlikely, but not impossible, as I now know :D

At the end of the session with the 4 Aces at All Jackpots I was over 25,000 ahead (plus an iPod and Picnic basket!).

Naturally, the maths is against me if I continue long term at the same game, whatever the stake. I find Microgaming rather 'streaky', and often a game is 'hot' or absolutely dead. (I have both lost & won up to 20 consecutive hands at Blackjack, and the 3 card poker seems to bunch the 3 of a kind and straight flushes close together, and other times it's 100 deals with bugger all and the dealer is getting flushes, straights, pairs etc nearly all the time). I'm sure the debate about randomness will run and run, but it is impossible to prove that these streaks are statisticaly significant as an indication of some kind of controlled weighting. It would be interesting to have the actual mathematical formulae that convert the random numbers into game results, and hand them over to "wizard of odds" for an opinion!
 
What's going on?
My favorites Spring Break & Ladies Nite have dried up completely and big feature wins on What on Earth had disappeared into space!
So I gave 'Struck a spin - best hit I've seen here for about 6-months!
Also it gave me 3-rams (goats) on the VERY NEXT spin, and again 32 spins later! :thumbsup:

I can see why some people think MG tweak the payout % on various slots from time to time...
 
vinylweatherman said:
I'm sure the debate about randomness will run and run, but it is impossible to prove that these streaks are statisticaly significant as an indication of some kind of controlled weighting.

If you're talking about slots, there's no great mystery:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
I read that

I have seen this before, though it discusses real slots in casinos. Many people are unsure about online slots, although there should be no difference as both should use the same method. Perhaps microgaming have very large reel bands as suggested. I find it odd that 2 scatters on, say, thunderstruck come in so often, yet 3 scatters much less so. I once had 700+ spins on thunderstruck without a free spin trigger at all, then got 5 hammers with wild, so payout did balance out. I have also had hundreds of spins on Totem Treasure at spin palace and not once had the Golden Goose, annoying as it is an extra side bet rather than part of the game. I would have expected the GG to be triggered far more often than free spins. I am also puzzled at the observation that when in free spins I can get 14 losing spins out of 15, yet the game normally drops small 2 symbol & 3 symbol wins far more often when outside this feature. Are the 15 spins also randomly generated, or are they displaying a randomly predetermined prize decided at the start of the feature.
Maybe Microgaming multi-line slots do use weighted reels, as suggested in the above article as being for single line slots.

Here in the UK, this does not apply at all to our "slots", often called fruit machines. These work in the way that the wizard describes as myth!! The software WILL kill the game if a large payout has recently been won, to enforce an operator set percentage over the fairly short term. The software uses "blocks", either variable of fixed, above which any player choice offered will result in 0% chance of winning the gamble, as the software has determined the machine to be unable to afford to allow the win at the current stage due to having paid out prior to this. Some of our UK games also have pre-programmed streaks, which are saved for into a hidded "pot". When triggered, the machine will deliver an enriched period where the player will seem invincible, until this separate pot has emptied. This has enabled players in the UK to REALLY get one over on our slots, despite returns of only 80% or less, as all this "cheating" in the code leaves scope for bugs to creep in. Only recently have true random slots been introduced here outside of the big casinos, and I suspect these DO behave as stated in the article, and online, since most players who play to weaknesses in the coding hate them.
 
Its Seems i dont have to share my expirends here anymore
Too bad Was fun Too show u my Gambling Style :)
butt i dont like to be treating like this
there for i wont post my winnings here anymore


and yes i lose too
this week over a 150 grand:eek2:

butt in vegas
 
Its not that we dont want to believe you its just an astronomical amount of money and bets which most of us could not or are not willing to lose. If you want to clear yourself just post screenshots of you playcheck or cashcheck statements. :thumbsup:
 
jonevegas said:
Its not that we dont want to believe you its just an astronomical amount of money and bets which most of us could not or are not willing to lose. If you want to clear yourself just post screenshots of you playcheck or cashcheck statements. :thumbsup:


So anyone who plays with a bigger bankroll then you needs to show you his/her playcheck or they are fraudsters?
 
Just the answer I would have expected from you. Maybe read the post again and have someone explain it to you if you dont understand, I dont care if you are worth 1penny or 10 billion, I just said Post a screenshot from Playceck or your withdrawl from Cashcheck from the Microgaming casino you play at not your bank info. 59 million euro hey, just like a guy I knew who used to brag about the size of his c**k all the time, had to keep talking about it because there was nothing there. :lolup:
 
Hoffman, please don't get offended so easily. It's nothing much at all. We're not being mean or anything at all, just that we're asking if it's true that anyone actually play that much at an online casino.

Dude, I come from an average family and the money here compared to USD or EURO is about 3.8 - 4.3. So, that's why I'm asking... $125 a pop is actually about RM470+. Some people over here (maids and etc) are only earning about RM600 per month, which is about $170. So that's why I'm asking that question.

It's nothing due to your status or anything at all regarding to your wealth. You might be the richest man on earth for all I care. I'm just saying that $125 a pop is a HUGE amount in my eyes. That's why I'm asking.

And as for Playcheck or Cashcheck, it's nothing against you but since you have that much money, just give us a small screenshot of how much you usually have in your play. It's a really fun and nice thing to actually watch the WHALES play. They bet unimaginable amount of money (which I don't think I'll see in my lifetime) but hey, it's still fun watching them WIN.

Hoffman, I hope that you don't take anything to heart. It's just nice to know a HIGH roller and if you could let us see, it would be nice. We'd be in awe!
 
NO, NO

HOFFMAN said:
there is a big divrent between u and my
my bankroll say add home 59.million euro
ur bank roll?
what u need a screenshot of my bank?
u wanna login online?
let my know

just a shot of your playing records that proves you are not playing with play money.
Most people in their right minds wouldn't gamble that much, especially as quickly as the spins go. That is why we doubt you! This big hurt feeling act isn't necessary: just show us a screenshot that shows that you are in real play and we can go back to being amazed :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top