For a while I knew I was chasing too much, had some horrendous losses and decided it was time to call it a day, so i signed up for Gamstop and instigated the 6 month exclusion.
A few weeks back I started getting emails from an accredited site, free spins on your next deposit etc, so i did a small deposit, played and lost. Deposited again on Friday, lost my nuts, around 2,500. So I logged into their sister site, under the same license, and lo and behold I had an exclusion in place that lasts for another 2 years.
My question is, why wasnt the exclusion extended as per the T&C's of the original site? Would I have been paid of I had won?
At least its made me put blocking software on my laptop.
I know I should have had more sense than to deposit and chase, but as the title says, when you cant protect yourself, and you see the red mist, surely RG should be there as a safety net.
A few weeks back I started getting emails from an accredited site, free spins on your next deposit etc, so i did a small deposit, played and lost. Deposited again on Friday, lost my nuts, around 2,500. So I logged into their sister site, under the same license, and lo and behold I had an exclusion in place that lasts for another 2 years.
My question is, why wasnt the exclusion extended as per the T&C's of the original site? Would I have been paid of I had won?
At least its made me put blocking software on my laptop.
I know I should have had more sense than to deposit and chase, but as the title says, when you cant protect yourself, and you see the red mist, surely RG should be there as a safety net.