Shouldn't minimum period of self-exclusion should be 6 months for UK players at least
if my memory serves me right as this link could suggest?
Other what i would ask is that if you were self-excluded (and you didn't just block your account from one single site), when and how you took "positive step" after your self-exclusion period was expired? Without you contacting operator to inform that you wish to return gambling, you shouldn't have access to your account even your self-exclusion period is over if you haven't take that positive action and then your account can be opened after one day cool off period which was one part of
LeoVegas quite big fine they got:
- Allowed 413 previously self-excluded [1] customers to gamble without speaking to those customers first or applying a 24-hour cooling off period before allowing them to gamble.
90 days self-exclusion sounds bit weird when reading UKGC guide lines as that if your account is opened without your own request (should remain self-excluded minimum of 7 years without your positive action to return gambling) if you haven't request it.
Something is not really perfectly matching here based on explanation above but as 90 days self-exclusions shouldn't exist, it really can be just bit incorrectly phrased, but then if you were blocked only from one site, it shouldn't go across all the sites under same license i guess. I assume that you will get clear explanation from casino group what has happen and that everything has been made without violating any UKGC terms. All this assumed that you live in UK like your profile suggests.