- Joined
- May 22, 2012
OK, it's clear to me now too that Ivy affiliates are breaking their own terms in relation to negative carry-over (NCO).
Their terms:
4.2. The Affiliate may promote the Affiliate Programme to other potential affiliates by posting on the Affiliate´s Website a hyperlink made available by Ivy Affiliates for such purpose. If any person applies to join the Affiliate Programme directly via any such hyperlink (as recorded by Ivy Affiliates´ systems) and such person is accepted as an affiliate by Ivy Affiliates (a “Sub-Affiliate”), Ivy Affiliates will pay to the Affiliate an amount equal to 2% of the commission paid by Ivy Affiliates to such Sub-Affiliate (excluding any commission paid to such Sub-Affiliate in respect of any sub-affiliates successfully referred to the Affiliate Programme by such Sub-Affiliate) pursuant to Ivy Affiliates´ agreement with such Sub-Affiliate (the “Referral Commission”).
4.3. If the Affiliate has a negative monthly balance in respect of Commission payable by Ivy Affiliates, the Affiliate’s monthly balance is automatically reset to £0 at the beginning of each calendar month, to ensure that no negative balances are carried forward – this term only applies to affiliates promoting our brands on a straight revenue share deal.
4.3.1 No negative carry over only applies to revenue share deals – hybrid deals (CPA + Rev Share or Flat + Revenue Share) do not apply.
I have always been on RS only and as far as I know nothing has changed, I still am.
The only thing I have changed in 2 years is adding TEMPLE NILE to the account. I strongly suspect this has led to the problems people have latterly experienced here:
Ivy affiliates and legal action
This is odd as Temple Nile is on RS too. I have no CPA or other deals apart from basic RS.
I will contact the rep about this as it's clear something is amiss this month as I am way past the settlement date of the 15th. and this must only be because of NCO.
To have bunded brands is bad enough, but NCO on top means it's unworkable.
Their terms:
4.2. The Affiliate may promote the Affiliate Programme to other potential affiliates by posting on the Affiliate´s Website a hyperlink made available by Ivy Affiliates for such purpose. If any person applies to join the Affiliate Programme directly via any such hyperlink (as recorded by Ivy Affiliates´ systems) and such person is accepted as an affiliate by Ivy Affiliates (a “Sub-Affiliate”), Ivy Affiliates will pay to the Affiliate an amount equal to 2% of the commission paid by Ivy Affiliates to such Sub-Affiliate (excluding any commission paid to such Sub-Affiliate in respect of any sub-affiliates successfully referred to the Affiliate Programme by such Sub-Affiliate) pursuant to Ivy Affiliates´ agreement with such Sub-Affiliate (the “Referral Commission”).
4.3. If the Affiliate has a negative monthly balance in respect of Commission payable by Ivy Affiliates, the Affiliate’s monthly balance is automatically reset to £0 at the beginning of each calendar month, to ensure that no negative balances are carried forward – this term only applies to affiliates promoting our brands on a straight revenue share deal.
4.3.1 No negative carry over only applies to revenue share deals – hybrid deals (CPA + Rev Share or Flat + Revenue Share) do not apply.
I have always been on RS only and as far as I know nothing has changed, I still am.
The only thing I have changed in 2 years is adding TEMPLE NILE to the account. I strongly suspect this has led to the problems people have latterly experienced here:
Ivy affiliates and legal action
This is odd as Temple Nile is on RS too. I have no CPA or other deals apart from basic RS.
I will contact the rep about this as it's clear something is amiss this month as I am way past the settlement date of the 15th. and this must only be because of NCO.
To have bunded brands is bad enough, but NCO on top means it's unworkable.