The Wish Master (NetEnt)

[Finn]

Edit: It makes me really frustrated when people are afraid to thank that post.
Instead they mark it as a helpful post. Where is that one a helpful post?

Also it is frustrating in other ways, if you are curious to know who gave the helpful post, you have to do the extra work of of clicking member Profile -> Reputation of that person who received the helpful rating.

 

[Tirilej]

Also it is frustrating in other ways, if you are curious to know who gave the helpful post, you have to do the extra work of of clicking member Profile -> Reputation of that person who received the helpful rating.

Thanks!

I didn't know I could check who had given it to someone else, and in this case it means that they share the same rigging-complaining-antiNifty thoughts too
Well, time usually will tell people that Nifty is one of the good, smart and also actually a really nice guy...in case they dare to find that out

 

[mcgameboy]

Thanks!

I didn't know I could check who had given it to someone else, and in this case it means that they share the same rigging-complaining-antiNifty thoughts too
Well, time usually will tell people that Nifty is one of the good, smart and also actually a really nice guy...in case they dare to find that out

I've only been a member here for about 10 months. And I would agree that Nifty can be "a bit blunt" at times.

BUT it hasn't escaped my notice that his name has appeared in the "most thanked" top 5 on quite a number of occasions. In fact, I do believe at this very moment he is the 4th most thanked person in the last 30 days. That cannot be a fluke or accident. Maybe people on this forum appreciate his bluntness and honesty? I certainly do. I believe I can learn a hell of a lot more by being told the hurtful truth about my flaws, my stupidity and my bad-decision making (something Nifty is very willing to do) than to be given insincere compliments, have smoke blown up my ass and generally be told that I am just so smart, wonderful and perfect (something that Nifty is very unwilling to do).

If people want to live in denial about this, that or the other thing, then that's their funeral. If people want to criticise Nifty for "insulting them", all because he merely had the "audacity" to tell the truth, then maybe that says more about the person living in denial than it does about Nifty.

And the suggestion that he is an affiliate is absolutely pitiful. That insinuation just smacks of desperation on the part of someone who knows they have completely lost the argument.

If anyone were to read his posts objectively (and plenty of people do, judging by how often he is thanked), they would see he is all for fair play...on BOTH sides (the casinos AND the players).

After all, this site is an advocate for fair play, isn't it? Nifty has fully bought into that philosophy. Maybe the "anti-Nifty brigade" would do well to buy into that philosophy too.

 

[Tirilej]

Poor Nifty
I know how he hate when he is discussed...again :notworthy

 

[PaaskeDenmark]

Poor Nifty
I know how he hate when he is discussed...again :notworthy

Yeah but he is a NIFTY

 

[Gaz237]

Has Nifty been banned?

He is likeable, but can go over the top.

 

[Azzurri]

Nifty is as much an affiliate as I am.

In my open, accusing someone of being an affiliate has as much merit as accusing someone of being a sore loser. And I've been accused of both.

My opinion is there are a small minority within this forum that are too quick to judge, and will attack like a pack of wolves at the earliest sight of blood.

Maybe sometimes everyone just needs to chill and take a step back to think about what's been said.

I'm speaking generally here, but maybe we can all be a little more lenient in how we process someone's posts and opinions. I don't care who you are or how much your bankroll is, no one likes losing, and everyone has a right to vent after a loss. We should also be mindful of this when reading someones post and not just be focused on a preconceived notion that they are just another sore loser complaining.

I also think some are way to picky and analytical regarding how thread titles or posts are worded. Get over it! Not everyone here is a seasoned forum user or wordsmith. As long as the title or posts don't contain abusive or defamatory comments, who cares how someone wishes to convey their point?

Sometimes reading some threads just really annoys me as it often seems like groundhog day when every thread ends up being hijacked and follows the same path into turning into a sore loser vs. affiliate vs. any other insult that can be thrown around.

Not every claim or opinion needs scientific authorized proof, and members should be able to state their opinions based on feel, experience or emotion. If someone thinks a certain casino feels rigged, then let them have that opinion. Is it really going to be that damaging to casino that has a loyal following and reputation here? I highly doubt it. Furthermore, the majority here know about the randomness of slots etc therefore shouldn't get so worked up by any contrary claims. Rather then labeling someone a sore loser or the like, if you really care, perhaps reference past threads that can educate the person instead. If they continue after that, then ignore the comments and cease giving them an audience. Simple.

I think sometimes people like to shoot others down purely for self gratification and satisfaction, like they are on some type of crusade to save the precious casinos from harm's way and expose the wicked losers of the world. How wonderfully noble, lol.

I think all parties can be a little more casual in their approach. Again I'm speaking more generally and not just about this thread. This thread just ignited my thoughts as it contains the same boring accusations and hijack attempts that are consistently becoming the norm at this forum.

My 2 cents.

 

[Captain Chaos]

Has Nifty been banned?

He is likeable, but can go over the top.

Why on earth would he be banned? He speaks his mind and will normally only say things when backed up by strong evidence or the use of his vast experience.

 

[Gaz237]

Well I'm glad he is not.

 

[Azzurri]

Casinomeister banning Nifty is likened to one suddenly ignoring their favorite plush reclining armchair on match day. It's never going to happen.

Not sure where this rumor started.

Nifty has a right to his opinion just like everyone else. An easy solution is to cancel out the accusations and name calling from posts and stop treating the casinos like they are a precious personal old friend that needs defending or protecting. Realize that any business will have happy customers, and unhappy customers, and each is entitled to their opinion.

Casinos earn billions of dollars per year, so I'm sure the odd disgruntled player's comments is not going to damage their business or affect the loyalists experience what so ever.

The issue regarding Whodatrec is the deposit limit not being honored regardless if he won or loss. Separate the true issues that may affect other players, rather than focusing on the player venting about loses.

Yes he may have not raised the issue if he won, but then again, if he won he may have not exceeded the limit in the first place rendering it a non-existent issue.

Sometimes, and probably more usually, losing will uncover other issues that wouldn't become evident whilst winning. Instead of concentrating on the losing aspect, as a forum designed to help players on the whole, we should be focusing on the more concerning issues that may be associated to the loss and/or accompanying it.

Maybe Whodatrec is predominantly complaining about loses, however, we should appreciate that his complaint has raised a potentially further reaching issue regarding deposit limits not being honored. This is something that can affect others moving forward, and I know dunover is a strong advocate, therefore it is a major issue we would not have been made aware of if not for Whodatrec's posts.

Find the positives rather than being so quick to focus on the negatives.

 

[Operette]

Nifty is as much an affiliate as I am.

In my open, accusing someone of being an affiliate has as much merit as accusing someone of being a sore loser. And I've been accused of both.

My opinion is there are a small minority within this forum that are too quick to judge, and will attack like a pack of wolves at the earliest sight of blood.

Maybe sometimes everyone just needs to chill and take a step back to think about what's been said.

I'm speaking generally here, but maybe we can all be a little more lenient in how we process someone's posts and opinions. I don't care who you are or how much your bankroll is, no one likes losing, and everyone has a right to vent after a loss. We should also be mindful of this when reading someones post and not just be focused on a preconceived notion that they are just another sore loser complaining.

I also think some are way to picky and analytical regarding how thread titles or posts are worded. Get over it! Not everyone here is a seasoned forum user or wordsmith. As long as the title or posts don't contain abusive or defamatory comments, who cares how someone wishes to convey their point?

Sometimes reading some threads just really annoys me as it often seems like groundhog day when every thread ends up being hijacked and follows the same path into turning into a sore loser vs. affiliate vs. any other insult that can be thrown around.

Not every claim or opinion needs scientific authorized proof, and members should be able to state their opinions based on feel, experience or emotion. If someone thinks a certain casino feels rigged, then let them have that opinion. Is it really going to be that damaging to casino that has a loyal following and reputation here? I highly doubt it. Furthermore, the majority here know about the randomness of slots etc therefore shouldn't get so worked up by any contrary claims. Rather then labeling someone a sore loser or the like, if you really care, perhaps reference past threads that can educate the person instead. If they continue after that, then ignore the comments and cease giving them an audience. Simple.

I think sometimes people like to shoot others down purely for self gratification and satisfaction, like they are on some type of crusade to save the precious casinos from harm's way and expose the wicked losers of the world. How wonderfully noble, lol.

I think all parties can be a little more casual in their approach. Again I'm speaking more generally and not just about this thread. This thread just ignited my thoughts as it contains the same boring accusations and hijack attempts that are consistently becoming the norm at this forum.

My 2 cents.

I loathe these village witch hunts. Can we move on please?

 

[sandtag]

We can say this for most other Netbents too - when have you seen:

12 or more wilds on DoA?
The maximum 500x win on St*rb*rst?
The max win on Twitspin?
Full screen of wilds on TFTUT?
Full screen of wilds JaTB?
The ultimate 480,000 coins on Wild Rockets?
Full Wilds on Wanky Robbits?
The highest winline at x32 on Bog Bang?

Ive hit these along with 5 scatters 5 times on wild rockets. Here´s the kicker: 9 out of 10 times these wins requires 100´s of thousands of spins, the only ones who wil lsee these wins (9 out of 10 times) are people willing to do said amount of spins. It´s like when i spammed TFROL and hit 4 wilds 2 times in a month, I played 300k spins .

 

[chayton]

I loathe these village witch hunts. Can we move on please?

Casinomeister award - most discussed forum member, or discussions about which forum member derails the most threads. Nominations?

Seriously though, back on track. I don't know why people dislike NetEnt slots so much, I really like them. I think they've put a lot of thought into developing new and innovative games. Of course I'm the same as everyone else, I enjoy them much more if they're paying, but I like the high variance types with the chance of winning something big on a smallish bet. I actually got a decent win on Wishmaster the first time I played it. It reminds me of Muse in a way, the potential for a big would keep me playing it - even though it's been pretty dead for me since that first time.

 

[tinybettor]

Had another go at this slot and bloody ****** oath its the biggest pile of **** I've ever played. That is all.

 

[Azzurri]

This slot would be great if the features counted as free spins. I think it is a shock to most how quickly a balance can be lost because there are no breaks and every spin costs. Sometimes I like to play up to $15 spins, and that would never be possible on this slot. I wouldn't play this slot at more than the minimum bet personally.

And there's nothing more frustrating then going bust during a feature whereby you can't finish the feature without having to make another deposit. For that reason I think it's a little unfair and sneaky cash grab by netent. Obviously you have to be mindful of this when you choose to play. Not a classic, but will love to see a screenshot of someone hitting big on a feature at $10+ a spin. I also hope it doesn't take many goes for them to hit it, lol.

 

[aceking123]

im pretty sure nifty can hold his own & shall be back soon with some choice words or at least i hope he does )

 

[spintee]

What?! You guys win on slots??!!

NO

 

[steveh35]

I played for fun today and I will not be depositing for a £1 stake most of the returns were 25p to 50p no bonus must be one of the worst payers I have ever seen.

 

[lockinlove]

I feel like im reading a life biography on nifty. Please stop its really really retarded.

Just talk about the goddamn slot. I like reading opinions on it, not opinions on whether nifty sat on a narrow bicycle seat or not

 

[Nifty29]

I don't want to derail the thread any more.

So, thankyou to those who paid me some compliments, and also to those who provided constructive criticism. Both are welcome. As for the rest.....too bad, so sad.

IMO, Wishmaster is a complete and total mongrel.

P.S. The word "retarded" is really offensive.

 

[lockinlove]

From all the posts in here, Im glad I never tried it. I couldnt get it working on Betat so its probably a good thing.

 

[Perez777]

Today
Bet 0,60 eu
Total wagered: 2386 eu (3976 spins)
Loses: 986 eu (1643 total bet)

:baby:censored

 

[floopyzicer]

Can one raise bet size once he get the bonus you still spending your money for those extra spins,anyone tested that ?

 

[dave1888]

Can one raise bet size once he get the bonus you still spending your money for those extra spins,anyone tested that ?

Nope definitely can't do that. As essentially the bonus is almost as good as a free spins equivalent on other games and can win massive. If you could alter the bet people would have exploited this ages ago.

 

[spintee]

Can one raise bet size once he get the bonus you still spending your money for those extra spins,anyone tested that ?

I do not know but I trust Dave on this one and he said no,

Years ago there was machines you could do this sort of things on, Infact there are still slots where you can build up certain bits until need one more needed, than bet bigger, Now I am unsure if the machines calculate the average bet, I know some machines do, But if machines are random and than how do they know?