Screen Shots that Suck!

[Jono777]

Dunover's 'Like' retracted, math was never his strongest point

(Yes, Marty, I know mine isn't either )

 

[sufferinsilence]

Wouldn't have been a monster win by any means...£73 plus a Jackpot amount, just missing the collect symbol on the last reel, of course I knew it wouldn't drop

Seem like all these big line ups are nothing but a big wind by the developers. I mean does anyone actually hit these "teasers"? Doubt it

I've seen someone win over €100k on a €100 spin in the top wins of the week this week, I guess it's possible but very rare and especially on that betsize.

 

[dunover]

Not £17,280 then? I said it was luckyscouser territory ie 14,400x.

Is it not $1.20 x 16 ways @ 50x on 18x multiplier?

Yes, yes, I was just getting over the shock of the Millionaire one above it which WAS on a 60p stake and took that stake through to the Chilli one for some reason, and worked it to 60p without even bothering to check the stake....

 

[mcgameboy]

Yes, yes, I was just getting over the shock of the Millionaire one above it which WAS on a 60p stake and took that stake through to the Chilli one for some reason, and worked it to 60p without even bothering to check the stake....

Given that you are the self-proclaimed "all seeing eye of slots" Mr. D, I think you might be in urgent need of a trip to Specsavers mate *

* Or do I have to call you "sir" when I banter with you, now that you're an admin?

 

[snorky510238]

What a pisspot. Usually reel 3 is full of blue gems acting as a blocker. Not this time.

 

[smart_croatia]

What a pisspot. Usually reel 3 is full of blue gems acting as a blocker. Not this time.View attachment 107722

lol i had same but more diamonds and full reel on last,also missing on 2nd reel

 

[SpinUk]

What a pisspot. Usually reel 3 is full of blue gems acting as a blocker. Not this time.View attachment 107722

How much would this have paid with a single blue gem on reel 3

 

[snorky510238]

How much would this have paid with a single blue gem on reel 3

£76.80

 

[snorky510238]

Here’s another from my never ending portfolio of Napoleon. I think I will follow @mcgameboy and say enough is enough. This must be the 20th time I have been 1 off 5oak soldiers.

Again you can see his hat just below on reel 1. Not that the reels are true on this game anyway. You can see another below reel 3 yet you never see 2 on a reel in view so it is false.

 

[Jono777]

Yet another record breaking win, made worse by the fact it was a 4-scatter trigger

 

[smart_croatia]

Yet another record breaking win, made worse by the fact it was a 4-scatter trigger

View attachment 107767

ouch i been there, has similar result, i was like oh retrigger it must pay now and then last spin nada and reality check, but maybe wild line is just around corner you never know

 

[goatwack]

ouch i been there, has similar result, i was like oh retrigger it must pay now and then last spin nada and reality check, but maybe wild line is just around corner you never know

Wildlines can always be created

#TN

 

[smart_croatia]

Wildlines can always be created

View attachment 107772 #TN

hahha ez for you mr. pro paint-er

 

[Jono777]

ouch i been there, has similar result, i was like oh retrigger it must pay now and then last spin nada and reality check, but maybe wild line is just around corner you never know

A bust was just around the corner sadly

 

[mcgameboy]

Here’s another from my never ending portfolio of Napoleon. I think I will follow @mcgameboy and say enough is enough. This must be the 20th time I have been 1 off 5oak soldiers.View attachment 107751Again you can see his hat just below on reel 1. Not that the reels are true on this game anyway. You can see another below reel 3 yet you never see 2 on a reel in view so it is false.

One has to wonder if this is bad, lazy programming or if it is something a little more sinister ie deliberately engineered trolling that is designed to achieve one outcome -
to provoke the player into tilting. Given the extremely high frequency of dead spins that this game can produce, I'd say it's the latter.

Regardless of what it is (or what it isn't), this kind of crap is just plain wrong. You end up wondering if these bloody developers are creating slots for our entertainment
or if they are just a bunch of nasty pisspots who seem to take great delight in pissing players off as much as they can with a so-called "random" RNG that seems to create near misses at such a frequency that it is scandalously disproportionate.

It makes me wonder if they misread the memo "create an engaging slot" by thinking it actually said "create an enRaging slot".

Take our money if you must, but do you really have to take our piss, our sanity and our spirit as well?
Tbh, I have now got to a point where I truly believe that some of these developers are so greedy that even taking our money isn't enough for them.
Losing on the slots was always a given, but now it has become far too easy, thanks to this crop (or crap) of new developers.
For all of Netent's and MG's faults, they were never guilty of ripping the arse out of things when it came to frustrating the player.
Even with that pesky, pernicious "Netent Variance", you at least had one upside - you would at least get a game/playtime for your money.

But with this new lot, it seems that some kind of "prostitution in reverse" is taking place. We're coming to their "house of vice" to pay for some "entertainment",
but we're the ones who are leaving with a sore arse. The developers have become the proverbial bamboo that eats, shoots and leaves.
And we're the ones left with that "is that all we're getting?" feeling.

The thing is, I actually played Crapoloen/Tiltpoleon/Nearmisspoloen on Saturday and turned a £15 deposit into a £125 cashout, thanks to a 248x win.
I got a 3OAK of soldiers at 4x (wilds on each of the first 2 reels).

But even THAT somehow found a way to piss me off. Because they STILL found a way to create not one, but two near misses.
And the two near misses were for a hell of a lot more than 248x.

Blueprint....even when you win, they find a way to make you feel like you've lost/missed out. Maybe I should rename them Pooprint.

Actually, now I think about it, Boo-hooprint might be more appropriate. Because some of their windups have driven me close to tears.

Anyway, it's been a while since I had a good rant on here, I think the words "mission accomplished" spring to mind. So I'll stop here...for now.

 

[mcgameboy]

Yet another record breaking win, made worse by the fact it was a 4-scatter trigger

View attachment 107767

So if my maths is correct, 17 spins (with the last 5 of those 17 spins having at least one wild on each of the five reels) paid a grand total of....

57x?

That Heath Ledger line in The Dark Knight springs to mind....

"Even to a guy like me, that's cold".

 

[dunover]

One has to wonder if this is bad, lazy programming or if it is something a little more sinister ie deliberately engineered trolling that is designed to achieve one outcome -
to provoke the player into tilting. Given the extremely high frequency of dead spins that this game can produce, I'd say it's the latter.

Regardless of what it is (or what it isn't), this kind of crap is just plain wrong. You end up wondering if these bloody developers are creating slots for our entertainment
or if they are just a bunch of nasty pisspots who seem to take great delight in pissing players off as much as they can with a so-called "random" RNG that seems to create near misses at such a frequency that it is scandalously disproportionate.

It makes me wonder if they misread the memo "create an engaging slot" by thinking it actually said "create an enRaging slot".

Take our money if you must, but do you really have to take our piss, our sanity and our spirit as well?
Tbh, I have now got to a point where I truly believe that some of these developers are so greedy that even taking our money isn't enough for them.
Losing on the slots was always a given, but now it has become far too easy, thanks to this crop (or crap) of new developers.
For all of Netent's and MG's faults, they were never guilty of ripping the arse out of things when it came to frustrating the player.
Even with that pesky, pernicious "Netent Variance", you at least had one upside - you would at least get a game/playtime for your money.

But with this new lot, it seems that some kind of "prostitution in reverse" is taking place. We're coming to their "house of vice" to pay for some "entertainment",
but we're the ones who are leaving with a sore arse. The developers have become the proverbial bamboo that eats, shoots and leaves.
And we're the ones left with that "is that all we're getting?" feeling.

The thing is, I actually played Crapoloen/Tiltpoleon/Nearmisspoloen on Saturday and turned a £15 deposit into a £125 cashout, thanks to a 248x win.
I got a 3OAK of soldiers at 4x (wilds on each of the first 2 reels).

But even THAT somehow found a way to piss me off. Because they STILL found a way to create not one, but two near misses.
And the two near misses were for a hell of a lot more than 248x.

Blueprint....even when you win, they find a way to make you feel like you've lost/missed out. Maybe I should rename them Pooprint.

Actually, now I think about it, Boo-hooprint might be more appropriate. Because some of their windups have driven me close to tears.

Anyway, it's been a while since I had a good rant on here, I think the words "mission accomplished" spring to mind. So I'll stop here...for now.

Gimped graphics tend to be laziness, actually MG do it with Hitman and TS2 will more often than not give a split 4 high symbols with no win, and invariably the reels next spin will have the missing symbol. Heartstoppers or near-miss depictions are actually prohibited in many countries, US, UK definitely, or a disproportionate amount are. The Napoleon game isn't actually Blueprint's but Reel Time, an Australian developer.

 

[snorky510238]

Gimped graphics tend to be laziness, actually MG do it with Hitman and TS2 will more often than not give a split 4 high symbols with no win, and invariably the reels next spin will have the missing symbol. Heartstoppers or near-miss depictions are actually prohibited in many countries, US, UK definitely, or a disproportionate amount are. The Napoleon game isn't actually Blueprint's but Reel Time, an Australian developer.

Well they are the masters of the near misses. It’s literally every other spin. Yet amazingly the missing symbol for the monster is always missing on reel 1 or 2 so you get no win at all.

It is a complete pisstake there is absolutely no doubt. The balance of symbols is so far out it’s unreal. If you take wilds, soldiers, ships, horses and cannons as the premium symbols in that order highest to lowest. Then play a session and count the amount of times these symbols appear in view. The list will be in reverse order almost every time as to what you would expect. The amount of times wilds, soldiers and ships that show up should make hitting a monster a walk in the park. It’s just laughable and doesn’t do anything to promote the “slots are random” theory.

 

[Playford7]

Yet another record breaking win, made worse by the fact it was a 4-scatter trigger

View attachment 107767

Ha no wildline!..

 

[goatwack]

Ha no wildline!..

That's wrong on so many levels, you cruel man

At least say it properly

 

[toph11]

i just did a 50 deposit at golden tiger casino
i did .90 bets and i went bust in 64 spins
only i can get 50 dead spins in a row

 

[Nicola]

i just did a 50 deposit at golden tiger casino
i did .90 bets and i went bust in 64 spins
only i can get 50 dead spins in a row

Had similar experiences on that game over the years. Very hard to bonus and often pays nothing. But when it's in the mood it can pay like crazy with the wilds.

 

[snorky510238]

Thought I would give it another try. Balance down to 80p hit the bonus. What a result. Better luck next time. That’s were you’re wrong! There won’t f:;-/:g be a next time.

 

[goatwack]

Thought I would give it another try. Balance down to 80p hit the bonus. What a result. Better luck next time. That’s were you’re wrong! There won’t f:;-/:g be a next time.View attachment 107917View attachment 107918View attachment 107919View attachment 107920

Sorry man, let out a chuckle there

You and this blimmin' game. You playing this is akin to Nap's excursion into the Mother Land that time

 

[snorky510238]

Sorry man, let out a chuckle there

You and this blimmin' game. You playing this is akin to Nap's excursion into the Mother Land that time

I assume everybody else gets the same bs from this game. It was only a short session and I had 5 other near misses I didn’t even screenshot. It is utterly ridiculous and I have had my fill.

Whilst I am in the mood for blaspheming slots that suck has anybody played 13? I have low rolled that on 20p for £10 every session and apart from 1 x20 hit I have hit nothing at all. Never had the bonus. Another bag o’shite to avoid.

 

[goatwack]

Just what on earth is 13?

If it's from the makers of Napoleon I think I'll give it a wide berth

 

[snorky510238]

I think it’s by green tube. Tbh didn’t take much notice it’s at Casumo. I have been trying a few different games but from the results I should stick with the usual. Tried that Jammin’ Jars. What a balance drainer that is.

 

[mcgameboy]

I think it’s by green tube. Tbh didn’t take much notice it’s at Casumo. I have been trying a few different games but from the results I should stick with the usual. Tried that Jammin’ Jars. What a balance drainer that is.

Another game where it is advisable to only play it with post-cashout leftovers. That game can "relieve" you of £100 on min bets in shockingly quick fashion.

 

[snorky510238]

Another game where it is advisable to only play it with post-cashout leftovers. That game can "relieve" you of £100 on min bets in shockingly quick fashion.

Funnily enough I played it today with £8 on 20p. Hit the bonus 3 times. Result x22 x6 x8. Is this what you should expect? I suppose given the fact it does hit monsters, it’s only logical there will be thousands of bonuses that produce nothing. Why me?

 

[mcgameboy]

Funnily enough I played it today with £8 on 20p. Hit the bonus 3 times. Result x22 x6 x8. Is this what you should expect? I suppose given the fact it does hit monsters, it’s only logical there will be thousands of bonuses that produce nothing.

I would say it is. For starters, you only get 6 spins. Think how easy it is to get 6 dead spins in a row.

Also, look at the size of the game board. You get trigger the feature by getting 3 jars, but those 3 jars can be spread so far apart, that they actually can
be rendered useless/inconsequential from the get go.

Sure I've even landed a 4th jar during the feature on occasion and it has been bugger all help to me.

Then you look at some of the insane payouts it can come up with. Anything from 10,000x to 22,000x IIRC.
That's a hell of a lot of losing that needs to be done in order to pay for wins on that colossal a scale.

And then of course, you need that perfect storm. For example, I think getting 3 jars straight in is actually what you don't want.
I think you want to get 2, build the multiplier up on both of them, THEN land the 3rd jar to give you a head start when the feature commences.

If you were to look closely at all the really big Jammin' Jars wins posted here, there is one common theme - multiple jars with multipliers of at least 9x and going up as high 19x. That represents a hell of a lot of wins/cascades in the space of 6 spins.

Personally, I think it is a very good game. But it just has to be approached with significant caution. Put it this way, I do make the odd £100 deposit.
But I would NEVER start play with that deposit on Jammin' Jars. With a £25 deposit, I would, but no more that.

It's one of those games where starting play with a big balance could be very dangerous, as you could so easily get sucked into a long and futile chase.
A bit like Bonanza, but without the safety net of a solid base game.

 

[goatwack]

Still a Jammin' Jars virgin

And a regular virgin

 

[mcgameboy]

Still a Jammin' Jars virgin

And a regular virgin

Well if you're going to dip your...ahem...into a jar with the intention of filling it up with.....uhm...."jam"...then wear some protection. *
Jars are made of glass after all, and they can cut deep.

* A condom might not be enough. You might have to go with a suit of armour instead.

But I'll leave it to you to decide if a peephole suit of armour is doable.

We should call ourselves the Tone Lowering Brothers. A bit like Dr. Dre and Ice Cube singing Natural Born Killers at the local parish bingo hall.

 

[goatwack]

Just a small footnote in history. Went to clear my staggering 5p leftover 'funds' at LV on an old favourite, foregoing my usual 3p spins

First spin in

bugger

 

[gambyx7]

This is evil, not laziness...

 

[DavidShush]

Was playing a game called Dragons Champion by Playtech. After depleting my account of funds I won a sports bet and had another attempt. Luckily after about 20 teasers the feature finally landed. This is what it gave me. Sweet FA.

 

[DavidShush]

Trying my luck at the new Fishin Frenzy game too. After playing on demo and getting countless bonuses for 50-100x I played for real and finally landed a bonus after about 300 spins.

 

[DavidShush]

Having been defeated by Fishin Frenzy I went on to Count Duckula. Surely my luck has to change? Free spins bonus with sticky wilds. Surely it should pay something...

 

[goatwack]

Loving the DavidShush Chronicles so far

Except for the results maybe

 

[DavidShush]

Loving the DavidShush Chronicles so far

Except for the results maybe

Jokes on them, 32 is my lucky number.

 

[snorky510238]

I assume everybody else gets the same bs from this game. It was only a short session and I had 5 other near misses I didn’t even screenshot. It is utterly ridiculous and I have had my fill.

Whilst I am in the mood for blaspheming slots that suck has anybody played 13? I have low rolled that on 20p for £10 every session and apart from 1 x20 hit I have hit nothing at all. Never had the bonus. Another bag o’shite to avoid.

Oops humble pie eaten see April screenshots.

 

[gambyx7]

Sick...MG loves to do that

 

[nikantw]

My 1st time Monopoly live. Look at the numbers drawn

 

[smart_croatia]

My 1st time Monopoly live. Look at the numbers drawn

View attachment 108360

o man i have never seen this one so bad

 

[goatwack]

WELCOME BUDDY

 

[polli123]

Ouch, that hurts!

 

[incrediblestuff]

Hmm, been checking Monopoly Live for the last few days..seen a lot of it, and i mean a LOT of those sequences and worse...and then the chat..it's mental how much abuse is going on in there

Started to make slightly more sense after seeing such results for long stretches, complete with technical errors costing me and other players money. Mind you i was only rolling a 10p on three fields most of the time, but still. I've seen autoplay boots at exactly the time a bonus would land, more than once, i've had a spin land on the 10, but the game history displayed a 2, and despite the outraged that screaming for their money (i'm guessing some bet more than 10p) the game went on and so far no refunds or player support tickets..

On two occasions i raised my own tickets due to bets not being accepted after they clearly were taken, and/or autoplay failure resulting in a missed bonus, which were never answered...

As a matter of fact, i'll repost this in a new thread, as i want people to read it and tell me if they experienced similar things?

Edit: went and made the thread so feel free to comment there please guys!
ATTN: Casino Rep - Monopoly Live - What is this game really?

 

[Reelsoffun]

Another Better luck next time, 0.00 bonus for my collection

 

[snorky510238]

Took the 10 spins with the multiplier starting at x5 and got a retrigger. This game Imo is one of the biggest let downs ever. It’s slow, the base hits rarely exceed x10, the bonus is not easy to trigger and when it does appear it consistently fails to deliver.

In terms of excitement I liken it to being pecked to death by a woodpecker with a blunt beak. There are others but not printable.

 

[smart_croatia]

so got 12 spins bonus+2 retriggers... dead spins city and on top of that i had 0 117k ways :axeman2:

 

[snorky510238]

so got 12 spins bonus+2 retriggers... dead spins city and on top of that i had 0 117k ways :axeman2:

View attachment 108701

Time and again with this slot. Apart from in theory more spins = more wins I don’t think it makes the slightest bit of difference, so much evidence where taking the min spins pays decent and higher amounts of spins produces nothing. We are told it’s not predetermined I am really struggling to swallow it I am afraid.