cipher said:Would those calls have been from Greg Rollins of Virtual Casino?
Cipher
No, it was from 5 Roses casino, made some pretty pathetic threats to me. I was like 'bring it on beeyotch'
cipher said:Would those calls have been from Greg Rollins of Virtual Casino?
Cipher
portia said:Phoenecian post is outstanding.
Bryan they need to be recognized for being a first class operation.
An RTG sw powered casino with a sensible management.
I don't see any problem with the ad. They paid Pc21. They need to get the message out to the gambling community.
dirk_dangerous said:Hampton, I think you should settle this problem and move forward; unless you can present some solid evidence that shows the player cheated, you really don't have a leg to stand on. And for heaven's sake, don't raise your limits again.
caruso said:Hee hee, from the C.M. newsletter:
"Lets look at an analogy to get a better understanding what is happening here. Let's say a casino forbids players from wearing a blue hat while playing the games: this is stated in the casino's terms and conditions - no blue hats to be worn while playing. Now let's say a player wins a million dollars at this casino, but says he wore a blue hat while playing. And then he changes his story saying that he never wore a hat of any color.
Is the casino liable to pay up? Does the casino have the right not to pay a player that wore a blue hat, even though most people feel the blue hat rule is a goofy-ass rule? I feel that the casino has a right not to pay, if it can show photographic evidence of the player wearing the blue hat. But there is no concrete evidence in this situation, no photos, no witnesses.
If the casino does not pay this player, it will always be remembered as "the casino that did not pay a player because of a stupid hat rule"."
LOL.
gamblinboi said:CM i think you are a BIT off here. This isn't about any rules - Pirate didn't break any
casinomeister said:Hi y'all,
Please PLEASE! Stop calling me C.M or CM. There is another webmaster who goes by this handle and it's super confusing. Casinomeister is one word by the way. I have no idea why people try to make it into two words all of the time.
The Pirate broke the rules in the the casino's opinion when he opened his mouth and said that he used a robot. This is on tape and has been broadcast everywhere but here, The breaking of the rule is clear and simple. Now whether or not this rule was ACTUALLY broken we'll probably never know.
What the bottom line is, can RTG tell its casinos what to do? Simple as that. Does RTG have the right to tell what the casino's rules are and what they aren't? Sure, RTG can pull the plug on a licensee, not let him renew their license or whatever, but still the issue is what can RTG dictate to the casino as in how to run their business(es).
casinomeister said:Gamblinboi,
If you want to address your issues with World Wide Vegas, please feel free to start a thread in the complaints section. Let's stay on track here. I'm sure there are a number of individuals that would like to see this thread derailed. Let's not do this. Thanks!
casinomeister said:Hi y'all,
Please PLEASE! Stop calling me C.M or CM. There is another webmaster who goes by this handle and it's super confusing. Casinomeister is one word by the way. I have no idea why people try to make it into two words all of the time.
The Pirate broke the rules in the the casino's opinion when he opened his mouth and said that he used a robot. This is on tape and has been broadcast everywhere but here, The breaking of the rule is clear and simple. Now whether or not this rule was ACTUALLY broken we'll probably never know.
What the bottom line is, can RTG tell its casinos what to do? Simple as that. Does RTG have the right to tell what the casino's rules are and what they aren't? Sure, RTG can pull the plug on a licensee, not let him renew their license or whatever, but still the issue is what can RTG dictate to the casino as in how to run their business(es).
gamblinboi said:My bad, folks. But the point remains - this guy was merely grabbing info from Hamptons by playing their game. And it worked - they revealed some lame crap about mouse tracking in the RTG software. RTG states that this is not the case. Pirate has managed to prove his case, the lame "confession" thrown at the window as it were because it's just him trying to get info from the casino. See, the casino was lying. Pirate knew it, so he asked them to elaborate on it. And that's where the casino had to make up even more lies, and finally the lies caught up to them.
casinomeister said:The Pirate broke the rules in the the casino's opinion when he opened his mouth and said that he used a robot. This is on tape and has been broadcast everywhere but here, The breaking of the rule is clear and simple. Now whether or not this rule was ACTUALLY broken we'll probably never know.