- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Location
- England
I don't play with bonuses generally but sometimes when I am testing I inevitably do. The other day without really thinking to look at the bonus I whacked in £250 to test a new casino out. I was credited with a £200 bonus automatically.
I went onto support to ask some questions and in this instance asked them what the WR was. Turned out to be 40x D&B. I assumed that it was 40x on the "qualifying" part of the depost and bonus (ie: £200 + £200 x 40 = £16,000) but was told it was all of the deposit (£250 + £200 x 40 = £18,000).
Didn't matter as it turned out but this annoyed me. Why should a player get penalised for depositing £50 more with no extra benefit. I could have whacked in £500, still only received £200 and had to wager £500 + £200 x 40 (£28,000) before cashing out!
I tried showing the maths to the support guy but either they a) couldn't grasp it or b) had to stick to their rules, so I gave up in the end.
So my question: Is this normal? Or do most casinos only count the qualifying part of the deposit in the WR?
Cheers,
Simmo!
I went onto support to ask some questions and in this instance asked them what the WR was. Turned out to be 40x D&B. I assumed that it was 40x on the "qualifying" part of the depost and bonus (ie: £200 + £200 x 40 = £16,000) but was told it was all of the deposit (£250 + £200 x 40 = £18,000).
Didn't matter as it turned out but this annoyed me. Why should a player get penalised for depositing £50 more with no extra benefit. I could have whacked in £500, still only received £200 and had to wager £500 + £200 x 40 (£28,000) before cashing out!
I tried showing the maths to the support guy but either they a) couldn't grasp it or b) had to stick to their rules, so I gave up in the end.
So my question: Is this normal? Or do most casinos only count the qualifying part of the deposit in the WR?
Cheers,
Simmo!
