NO CARD COUNTING BLACKJACK STRATEGY

[caldwell]

For years, the accepted approach for beating casinos at blackjack was to count cards and increase your bet when the point count was in your favor. However, with multiple decks, early shuffle, and continuous shuffling machines, counting cards is virtually impossible in today's casino environment.

So how can you win at blackjack and not count cards? The answer is in a brand new eBook called the Blackjack Success Total Package. To learn more about this fresh approach for winning at blackjack, just visit www.iamamuppet. It's only $9.95!

Since counting cards is not involved, this strategy can also help you dominate ONLINE CASINOS.

Don't miss out on this opportunity!

Thanks for your time.



Pete Caldwell

 

[GaryWatson]

As its in the correct section I am not going to comment on it.

 

[Simmo!]

I'll leave it for Meister to rule on, considering the section this is in, however I would advise all players that if you think you can find a system to beat a computer which has a built-in % advantage over the player, then get some advice from the fairies that live at the bottom of your garden first

 

[maxd]

 

[caldwell]

Thanks for your comments. Even though the house has a built-in edge in the number of winning hands, you can still beat the house by having larger bets on the table when you're winning hands versus when your losing hands. That's what this strategy is all about. You ought to check it out. It might be the best bet you ever make.

 

[GaryWatson]

Thanks for the advice. Im going to start betting $100 on blackjack hands and bet $1 on hands of 18 or less. All others I will play for $10

 

[NASHVEGAS]

Thanks for the advice. Im going to start betting $100 on blackjack hands and bet $1 on hands of 18 or less. All others I will play for $10

Glad THE HORSESHOE in Tunica just increased their maximum bet per hand to $50,000.00 from $10,000.00. As soon as I finish my new e-book, I'm on my way,NOT!!!

 

[suzecat]

you can still beat the house by having larger bets on the table when you're winning hands versus when your losing hands

Well duh!!

 

[brutaldeluxe]

And how do you do that ? By knowing when the remainder of the deck is favourable to the player. And how do you know that ? By card counting.
Oh wait, this system doesn't involve card counting.
So how else could it know ? Pyschic powers ?

Taken from the site....

"The package has taken the best parts from various strategies and sprinkled in lots of experience resulting in a unique hybrid strategy that’s low risk with unlimited potential."

(the amount of cash that you can lose using this system is unlimited.....pure unlimited potential)

Actually that's a lie, there's only a finite amount of cash in the world but hey, you get the point !



So it's a mutant version of basic strategy with a fancy betting pattern that's supposed to win ? I've got a large bet on it not working myself

 

[caldwell]

OK, here's an example of how you can have larger bets on the table when you're winning. Let's say your starting bet is $10 and you lose the first hand...then bet $12 and win the second hand...then drop back to $10 on the third hand and lose that one. So you're down a net $8 which is $2 better than playing the three hands at $10. This is just one of several ways that this strategy is an improvement over basic playing strategy with flat betting. Give it a try..it will give you a fair chance of beating the house.

Appreciate your comments. Believe I need to address these concerns on the website.

 

[brutaldeluxe]

What happens if you lose the $12 bet as well which is just as likely ?
Seeing as you are not counting you have no idea if the deck is more favourable for the $12 bet. In fact the deck could be LESS favourable.

If all you are doing is playing basic strategy then no betting pattern is ever going to win. It doesn't matter how you stake it the house edge will get you eventually. You need to know when the deck is favourable to get the higher bets on and you have to cound cards to do that. It also helps to deviate from basic strategy depending on the remaining cards, again you need to be counting to know when to do that.

Plus one rather obvious point, if this "system" is making you three and a half thousand over the course of 20 casino visits why are you selling it for around $10 ? It'd be almost more believable if you wanted $1000 for it.
Just how many do you have to sell to make as much as the system itself ?
A common saying is you get what you pay for. For $10 how good would you expect anything to be ?

 

[kakata]

well not always true.!!!
With $10 you can buy an excellent hot dog.

 

[caldwell]

The example that I used was just one way of doing business. It's a good tool since the majority of time the player and dealer are alternating winning hands. Your situation of losing the $12 bet falls into another category. Counting cards is a lost art...so we need to think out of the box.

I do think that the package is worth more than a thousand dollars, but who's going to buy it? Too many 100-300 page books out there for less than $20.

Thanks again for your comments.

 

[uungy]

The example that I used was just one way of doing business. It's a good tool since the majority of time the player and dealer are alternating winning hands.

This has got to be the funniest line I have ever seen.

Looks like someone has to play BJ for real here! it is NOT a 1 win and 1 lose! Chances of winning a hand is about 38%, and the extra 11% or so is returned via BJ's and doubling to the players advantage. I have had a 15 hand non winning streak, and in fact majority hands are not win one, lose one.

Looks like a little more time has to be invested into creating the perfect strategy, which is basically infinity, as it is impossible.

Why not take your strategy to the wizard, he'll offer you $20K, which is surely alot more then you will make on the site. Once done and dusted and proven, we will ALL buy the book from you for $9.95 (well i will fork it out anyway)

 

[caldwell]

The one way of doing business was referring to just those situations where the player and dealer go "back and forth". Losing streaks and winning streaks are each handled in a different manner. This strategy ties these three betting situations together in a way that will improve your bottom line versus basic playing strategy with flat betting. There are also some plays that go against "what the book says".

Hey, I wish I could still count cards, but I have to take what the casinos give me.

Appreciate your communication.

 

[NASHVEGAS]

This has got to be the funniest line I have ever seen.

Looks like someone has to play BJ for real here! it is NOT a 1 win and 1 lose! Chances of winning a hand is about 38%, and the extra 11% or so is returned via BJ's and doubling to the players advantage. I have had a 15 hand non winning streak, and in fact majority hands are not win one, lose one.

Looks like a little more time has to be invested into creating the perfect strategy, which is basically infinity, as it is impossible.

Why not take your strategy to the wizard, he'll offer you $20K, which is surely alot more then you will make on the site. Once done and dusted and proven, we will ALL buy the book from you for $9.95 (well i will fork it out anyway)

Expectation in round numbers is out of every 100 hands, the player will win 43 hands, lose 48 hands and push on 9 hands. Thus the house has a five percent advantage before you factor in a BJ every 21 hands. The 4.75 BJ'S (paying 3 to 2) per hundred hands,doubles,splits and house rules assuming perfect BS hopefully gets the HA down to between .03% and .05%.....Yes, Uungy we are saying the same thing, I simply added in the expectation of the number of BJ's that should be winning hands and thus the player should win in round numbers 43% of hands of which 4.75% (1 out of every 21 hands, kinda of ironic but true) should be BJ's as expectation for the perfect BS player (in the long run).....SIDENOTE:I can remember BandM streaks where I won 5 out of 50 hands,7 out of 37 hands,0 out of 16 hands,part of the game

 

[happygobrokey]

the stumbling point is how do you know what the previous hands are forecasting? and clearly the answer is you don't and you're just GUESSING and trying to make back the losses or tighten up after the wins. good luck with that, and i hope you won't get the false impression when it does seem to work sometimes... also you should sell it for more not only to make it "look more credible", but also because there are too few suckers/marks to get yourself rich shilling it for $10.

edit/ot: what up nash?

 

[NASHVEGAS]

the stumbling point is how do you know what the previous hands are forecasting? and clearly the answer is you don't and you're just GUESSING and trying to make back the losses or tighten up after the wins. good luck with that, and i hope you won't get the false impression when it does seem to work sometimes... also you should sell it for more not only to make it "look more credible", but also because there are too few suckers/marks to get yourself rich shilling it for $10.

edit/ot: what up nash?

Peace, HGB

 

[caldwell]

All I'm saying is that this strategy can improve your bottom line over a flat betting strategy by adjusting your bet a specific way during a win streak, a specific way during a losing streak, and a specific way during "back and forth" situations. I understand the percentages you're throwing at me. Here's one for you to consider...a few years back one blackjack author of note did some research and concluded that 80% of the time, a win is followed by a loss, or a loss is followed by a win.

Anyway, I'm not here to agitate you so this will be my last post. Thanks for your time.

Pete Caldwell

 

[GaryWatson]

Im going to spam one of my old articles

Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)

It took me years to convince my mate to give up on his systems

 

[vinylweatherman]

This system is similar to the Martingale system, in that it will APPEAR to work for a while, but when it fails you, it will BANKRUPT you! (if you don't bottle out first)

In the long term you will lose, since the dealer does not play to any strategy, but has to follow fixed rules.

A similar system was doing the rounds a while back, from a poster known as "Cipher" (any relation ). It appeared to work in the same way, looking for these changes between tit for tat exchanges and streaks, and the aim was to increase bets on winning hands to gain the advantage. It eventually collapsed as do many of these schemes, leaving many "investors" with large losses.

If you are happy to pay $10 for a story book, go ahead & buy, but don't expect it to work. If it DID work, and was being knocked out at $10, all the world's casinos would go bust within the year.

 

[funky_seagull]

Make money gambling ebooks are a con.

If the author's were doing so well with their system why would they want to sell it and risk lots of people getting hold of the information and casinos clamping down on it.

The thing is there isn't any system that can actually beat the casinos house edge and infinite bankroll in the long run...

Maybe you can win in the short term... but for it to work you have to be satisfied with winning 10 - 20% of your deposit and quitting, which takes a lot of willpower...

 

[lots0]

Ah leave the guy alone....

Buying one of these gambling 'systems' is no different in my mind than someone buying a one dollar US government lottery ticket.

Your odds of actually winning anything with this system are about the same as hitting the lottery jackpot.

Too bad caldwell didn't write an ebook about how to gamble more intelligently, you know debunking the 'system scams' and teaching people about playing smart, knowing the rules, the odds and most important... knowing when to quit. You know if caldwell were to write an ebook like that he might actually sell more than one or two...

 

[happygobrokey]

if i had a gambling/betting system, i would attempt to sell it too since that's the only way to actually make money from it. systems are b.s., but selling the system is guaranteed money. there's a mark born every minute... is exploiting people's stupidity unethical? it happens to some shade in all forms of advertising. people are naturally "sheep".

i'm thinking of getting that "sham-wow!" product though, because the guy on the commercial had a headset on and told me i would spend $20 a month on paper towels anyway, i was wasting my money (i'll get 8 shamwows if i call now for 19.95 which can last ten years), and the product is made in germany, and "you know they make great stuff there", and because olympic swimmers use them as towels since they soak up water instantly. makes sense to me... charge it!

 

[pubjoe]

Here's one for you to consider...a few years back one blackjack author of note did some research and concluded that 80% of the time, a win is followed by a loss, or a loss is followed by a win.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

If you can find someone who believes that, you could sell him magic beans for $10!

...and if a loss/win on blackjack could be predicted like you say, with even just 51% accuracy (let alone 80%!!!!), the casinos would not exist.

P.S: You've won $3,500 gambling with your system ...I've won 20,000 recently gambling like an idiot! ...I was chasing (similar to your strategy) and I got lucky. Anyone want to buy my strategy for $10? I guarantee that almost half of you will win your money back on your first bet.