I have always objected to having any max cashout when Im depositing my own funds and Ive overcome wagering requirements. Fair enough for no-deposit bonuses, but not deposit-based.
If the casinos are afraid of getting hit, then increase the wagering - dont go along the path of what is IMO theft. I also wonder what effect on total payback to the player the removal of excess winnings has?
I think anyone would agree that 30xDB on a 100% bonus is very tough to beat in any case, so I dont see the need for restrictions. Ive mentioned this to Vegas Regal as they are currently doing this for just about all bonuses. FWIW I think wagering 60x your deposit to be able to cashout 10x that amount bites the big one.
HUGE - Slots are so HIGH VARIANCE that EVERY half decent session will have most of the positive variance payout confiscated, but the bad sessions will have NONE of the NEGATIVE variance capped. These are also pretty LOW percentages of bonus, so around HALF (in one case) of the starting bankroll is the player's OWN MONEY.
I was often wondering if these 0.37% or something must demonstrate how carefully their matematicians work and how seriously they take it.
Yep,they do Taking such bonus you buy a good amount of PLAYMONEY and playtime.
If I just wanted playtime I would do fun play, for free, right ?
Rivals, like many others, are just not worth it any more.