Expired Promo Multiplier Mayhem 1000EUR Casinomeister Exclusive Slots Comp

[SCATT3R]

Well, it could be that they have a valid license, but just hasn't updated the link properly after it was recently changed from 'CGB' to 'CGA' or whatever.
@mulven would likely know

 

[teckiwi]

All casinos that have a Curacao license are allowed. Stakemania has a Curacao license so screenshots should be valid.

Maybe I'm missing something but where is it said it's allowed, I thought anything unlisted on CM was excluded because of mod workload approving sites etc.

I would love to enter using it still etc as I did in the last comps

 

[Wait!What?]

Maybe I'm missing something but where is it said it's allowed, I thought anything unlisted on CM was excluded because of mod workload approving sites etc.

I can't find the exact post but I was asking for snatch and iwild casino and @conker said iwild is listed and snatch is allowed as it has a Curacao license.
If I am wrong again this would be my third offence in the past 2 hours. I will just proceed to bury myself somewhere.

 

[racingcat]

well see i guess... so far i continue with screenshots^^

stakemania
stormforged

890x

 

[racingcat]

and the first swap out, pyro fox out, candy craze in

stakemania
candycraze
865x

 

[racingcat]

i talked with livechat about the missing license info (which was there when i signed up) and they sent the info to the technical department. they still hold the licencse and it should be on the website again soon.
all the sister sistes owned by " Casiworx N.V. Casinos" have their license info shown so the the technical issues seem reasonable

 

[conker]

I am going to look into this tomorrow. I think it's only fair that the casino in question meets the requirements of the comp. Will be back tomorrow at some point with some answers.

 

[anddi32]

4th swap

Outlaw out, this one in

Videoslots
Gold Megaways 447.2x

 

[anddi32]

5th swap

Chocolates out, this one in. Last month several over 1000x, this month over 1000x seems impossible. Eternal roller coaster as usual

Videoslots
Pop 439.2x

 

[conker]

We've made a decision on Stakemania.

The rules for this competition are that no entries from casinos with no license, or advertise an Anjouan, Costa Rica, Tobique license.

That means, if you want to play at a casino that has not been reviewed at Casinomeister, and is not rogued, then that casino needs to hold a valid license, which has not expired, with one of the following gambling licensing jurisdictions: Curacao, Kahnawake, MGA, UKGC, Ontario, Sweden, IOM etc etc.

Stakemania.com has yet to prove that they hold a valid license at any of the aforementioned licensing jurisdictions and therefore entries for this casino are currently invalid.

If they update the certificate on their website to prove that the license is current and valid with Curacao before 11:59:59, on the 31st Jan 2026, then any entries for Stakemania can be reinstated. However, it must be done by this time and date for re-entry to the competition.

There is a bit of admin involved in correcting scores, as I need to make some side notes of members with entries from Stakemania. This should all be updated later today.

 

[teckiwi]

I have no doubt Stakemania is legit, all their sister sites(same company) hold active licenses(ie slotobit.io shows as active). It does seem like a technical issue.

 

[dunover]

Yes, to reiterate as per the rules, it's the entrant's responsibility to ensure the casino they use meets the licensing requirements of this comp, not the task of the staff.

Even if the casino does hold a valid license, in any recognised jurisdiction it's the licensee's responsibility to ensure their properties link to the licence in question at the domain of the licensing authority.

If the casino fails to do this, then as far as we are concerned it does not display a valid license.

It's a simple enough check for any player to make, as indeed the people who reported this matter managed to do.

 

[dunover]

I have no doubt Stakemania is legit, all their sister sites(same company) hold active licenses(ie slotobit.io shows as active). It does seem like a technical issue.

As said, it's not the task of the admin here who have enough work administering the comps to go investigating casinos that don't correctly provide their licensing details.

The onus is on the casino to do its job properly, if it hasn't then as far as we are concerned it doesn't meet the conditions of the comp.

 

[racingcat]

didnt expect that but looks like i have bad luck with the it department of stakemania

edit: it departement fixed it already

 

[johnnymcc1966]

Swap out Bonanza for Bonanza! Paid 250x at Virgin Games.

 

[cheekymonkey]

468.6/1
Pokerstars
Halloween III

 

[cheekymonkey]

406.5/1
Fishin' Frenzy
Pokerstars

 

[conker]

Yep, checked it this evening and they have duly updated it. So, with that in mind, Stakemania has provided enough evidence that they have a Curacao license and therefore entries from this casino are valid. This includes previous ones submitted before the query about their license was raised.

 

[conker]

Right, after our mid-comp drama with Stakemania, there feels like some calm has settled on this thread

All updated to this point, we also have a new 2nd place, with @racingcat using some cunning to take the place. Good luck everyone, just a few days left to get your entries in on this one.

 

[cheekymonkey]

534/1
Bigger Bass Blizzard Christmas Catch
Pokerstars

 

[incrediblestuff]

Right, after our mid-comp drama with Stakemania, there feels like some calm has settled on this thread

All updated to this point, we also have a new 2nd place, with @racingcat using some cunning to take the place. Good luck everyone, just a few days left to get your entries in on this one.

Already figured it would need some more effort so i saved this one for a little upgrade:

Hope it's visible like this..
777.nl (licensed Dutch), Monopoly Money Line (new Netent) 1176x (10pbet)

Swapping out Santa's Stack!

And @conker , i noticed you forgot to update my one previous swap, and misspelled Power Pops

"@incrediblestuff: 6001x (Hoarders xWays 1206x, Beam Boys 1079x, Santa's Stack Dream Drop 1006x, Power Ups <<---1291x, Miami Mayhem 1419x E:5/5 -->>S:0/10)"

Should get me back to 2nd, but i have another one, but im not quite sure of it'ss validity: how was the rule for enhanced bets? I have a Pragmatic play screen where i use the 2 euro bet (basebet 20p) where the spin starts with some active multis on screen, is that allowed?

Cheers!

 

[Reelsoffun]

Finally an upgrade, shame about the ten reel 1 or Ace reel 3.......

Swap out WWTBAM

WWTBAM
Videoslots
931.8x

 

[Reelsoffun]

And another swap

Out: Knights life
In : Soul of nature
Videoslots
412x

 

[sufferinsilence]

At this rate I'm not even going to finish in the money.

*makes mental note*

 

[sufferinsilence]

Should get me back to 2nd, but i have another one, but im not quite sure of it'ss validity: how was the rule for enhanced bets? I have a Pragmatic play screen where i use the 2 euro bet (basebet 20p) where the spin starts with some active multis on screen, is that allowed?

Cheers!

They weren't for me on Hacksaw so I don't see why they should be on Pragmatic. If they do I'm filing an official complaint

 

[incrediblestuff]

Yeah i saw that, but wasn't sure if this is the same...Those on Hacksaw are like mini features, this is sort of enhanced base? One side for bonuschance, other for multi: would the bonusside be o.k.? I just don't know hence checking here

If those Hacksaw were allowed by the way, i'd have a few good ones too..been loving the 10 euro spins on Toshi and Jaws of Justice! But other than that, been getting a lot of spanking...

 

[Reelsoffun]

At this rate I'm not even going to finish in the money.

*makes mental note*

Yeah once we got to this level its really hard to level up now, i need 500x wins now just to increase my score by 100x think im probably stuck now......

 

[sufferinsilence]

Yeah i saw that, but wasn't sure if this is the same...Those on Hacksaw are like mini features, this is sort of enhanced base? One side for bonuschance, other for multi: would the bonusside be o.k.? I just don't know hence checking here

If those Hacksaw were allowed by the way, i'd have a few good ones too..been loving the 10 euro spins on Toshi and Jaws of Justice! But other than that, been getting a lot of spanking...

On those enhanced 10x feature spins on Pragmatic that give you random multipliers you can't even trigger a bonus, I've been checking them out too but they're even higher volatility than the Hacksaw feature spins imo.

Not recommended for normal players.

 

[sufferinsilence]

Yeah once we got to this level its really hard to level up now, i need 500x wins now just to increase my score by 100x think im probably stuck now......

Everything has been dead for me. I don't start a session by going straight to Hacksaw or NLC because it's a recipe for disaster. If I've built a balance I'll give them a go and that's how I got my results for this comp. I probably won't try again before the deadline tbh.

Hope next months comp will be a little more budget friendly

 

[anddi32]

I have one extra hit in the score board. Chocolates should be gone by now, it changed to Pop hit few days ago. And my score before this post should be 2603,8, not 2593,8

Now my 6th swap, Pop out this one in. My calculator says that after this my score should be 3172.6

Videoslots
Book of RA Deluxe 1008x

 

[conker]

Yeah i saw that, but wasn't sure if this is the same...Those on Hacksaw are like mini features, this is sort of enhanced base? One side for bonuschance, other for multi: would the bonusside be o.k.? I just don't know hence checking here

If those Hacksaw were allowed by the way, i'd have a few good ones too..been loving the 10 euro spins on Toshi and Jaws of Justice! But other than that, been getting a lot of spanking...

Thanks for checking @incrediblestuff, but this one wont count. We added the enhancement rule, as we know a lot of members like to use them and therefore makes this comp more appealing. However, your win is too complex and there is too much ambiguity to fit the requirements of an entry to this comp. I hope you understand that we are just trying to keep things as close to a level playing field as we possibly can.

 

[conker]

All updated to this point.

Some activity in the top five, with @incrediblestuff taking 2nd place back and @Reelsoffun dropping into the top 5. Also some upward movement for @anddi32, who now has the correct score next to his name and @cheekymonkey sliding into 14th.

Keep your entries coming, just a few days left now!

 

[incrediblestuff]

Thanks for checking @incrediblestuff, but this one wont count. We added the enhancement rule, as we know a lot of members like to use them and therefore makes this comp more appealing. However, your win is too complex and there is too much ambiguity to fit the requirements of an entry to this comp. I hope you understand that we are just trying to keep things as close to a level playing field as we possibly can.

Hey -no worries lol, i thought as much, but just checking to make sure

I think we will see some action in the last few days! Gonna have a little go myself too later, been rough but i'm hopeful i can squeeze out another banger on Hacksaw, if they slip up

Good luck all!

 

[mulven]

Well, it could be that they have a valid license, but just hasn't updated the link properly after it was recently changed from 'CGB' to 'CGA' or whatever.
@mulven would likely know

Bit late to the party! Sorry, I've been a bit ill.

As @teckiwi pointed out the rest of their licences indexed properly (google "site:cert.gcb.cw casiworx") which was a good indication, however the url/casino could have been moving to a different company (similar to snatch/iwild) so that was rightfully considered not enough by the staff.

With that said, after taking a look at the url of stakemania's certificate, I immediately saw the issue.

These certificate urls are base64 and a "=" is used to pad out the current block to its correct, predictable length. The indexed url for stakemania, which one can assume is the same url used previously in the footer, was missing its "=" at the end of its certificate key. Add that and hey presto you have the valid certificate! If it was indexed, I wonder how long it's been like this! If any of the original bunch still have the broken certificate in their history, this should do the trick.

Since the IT team fixed the issue it sounds like they just added an equals sign!

 

[lucks_maximus]

Swap Out: Deal with Death

Pinnacle
Starlight Princess Super Scatter
871.7x (@0.60 base bet)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[lucks_maximus]

Swap Out: Sugar Rush Super Scatter

Pinnacle
Sugar Rush Super Scatter
3685.6x (@0.20 base bet)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[conker]

Swap Out: Sugar Rush Super Scatter

Pinnacle
Sugar Rush Super Scatter
3685.6x (@0.20 base bet)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Nice hit, but I can't add it without some evidence you were playing at 0.20c base bet. There is nothing in the video or screenshot to show your base bet. I can see the Ante bet is on, but that is it. You will need to provide some evidence of the base bet to let this one in. The previous one I have allowed in, as there is only a small gap between the base bet and the ante bet.

 

[lockinlove]

spinfinity
loch ness loot
712.5x Just exchange the lowest win

 

[lucks_maximus]

Nice hit, but I can't add it without some evidence you were playing at 0.20c base bet. There is nothing in the video or screenshot to show your base bet. I can see the Ante bet is on, but that is it. You will need to provide some evidence of the base bet to let this one in. The previous one I have allowed in, as there is only a small gap between the base bet and the ante bet.

Here you go.

 

[conker]

Leaderboard updated. @lucks_maximus moves up to 2nd with that big hit.

Just 3 days to go on this comp!

 

[Reelsoffun]

Another small swap

Out: Extra chilli
In: Bonanza
Videoslots
426.95x

 

[Wait!What?]

@lucks_maximus when you joined this comp your balance was $19000 and now it's below $17000. Youve lost more money than the whole prize pool of this contest. How do you reassure yourself?
Btw did you lose bonus money or was it all real?

 

[sufferinsilence]

@lucks_maximus when you joined this comp your balance was $19000 and now it's below $17000. Youve lost more money than the whole prize pool of this contest. How do you reassure yourself?
Btw did you lose bonus money or was it all real?

Pinnacle is also one of the better sportsbooks out there so there might be some betting involved too

 

[lucks_maximus]

@lucks_maximus when you joined this comp your balance was $19000 and now it's below $17000. Youve lost more money than the whole prize pool of this contest. How do you reassure yourself?
Btw did you lose bonus money or was it all real?

I tell myself money isn't real, it's a social construct.. or something.

 

[incrediblestuff]

I tell myself money isn't real, it's a social construct.. or something.

I like that, you're not wrong either

 

[dunover]

@lucks_maximus when you joined this comp your balance was $19000 and now it's below $17000. Youve lost more money than the whole prize pool of this contest. How do you reassure yourself?
Btw did you lose bonus money or was it all real?

You are assuming he wouldn't have lost that 2k in his normal mode of online gambling but for this comp.

I would suggest this play pattern is normal for him and the comp is incidental, somewhere to drop big wins into as a side game.

 

[Wait!What?]

You are assuming he wouldn't have lost that 2k in his normal mode of online gambling but for this comp.

Nope. Absolutely not. That comment was not made to blame his loss on the comp.
I was trying to understand if he has the attitude of " In it to win it". Some people when they join comps like these they give more than 100% because they want to be on top. They don't care about going down in red.
For example if you look at the prize structure there is not much difference in prize money between 2nd, third and 4th. To clear that difference you will have to make a deposit of more than €40 to €50 with bonus. You may end up cleaning that difference but you would be in loss if you look at the whole picture. I personally wouldn't do that because I play comps on a budget. That was it.

 

[Copperzzz]

Casino: Starcasino
Xwin: 1000x
Game: Book of ra deluxe

 

[Copperzzz]

Casino: Starcasino
Xwin: 608x
Game: Bamboo ways

 

[ESCJAMIE]

Casino: Starcasino
Xwin: 1000x
Game: Book of ra deluxe

:O I never knew 4 of the men paid 1000x :O Nice win