Main Street Casinos SLOW PAY????

[rtgkiller]

I made a withdrawal from Slots Plus and it's been pending for 9 days now. My docs have been approved and my CC deposit has been posted (cleared). I usually play at Sun Palace. And never had this to happened.

 

[KasinoKing]

This group have a long history of taking a long time to pay - typically 2 weeks if I remember correctly.
BUT... they do ALWAYS pay legitimate players.
They were Accredited here for a long time - I don't know why they were removed from the accredited list (?)

However, IMO you are safe with these people.

KK

 

[bb28]

This group have a long history of taking a long time to pay - typically 2 weeks if I remember correctly.
BUT... they do ALWAYS pay legitimate players.
They were Accredited here for a long time - I don't know why they were removed from the accredited list (?)

However, IMO you are safe with these people.

KK

If I recall correctly they were removed because they took soooo longggg to pay.

 

[cheetahwind]

You will get paid shortly after the 2 week waiting period. There just slow, but unlike some other casinos that are slow pay. There at least consistent with there payments. So don't worry about not getting paid. Just be patient. If it's been 3 weeks and you haven't seen a dime. Then that would give you reason to worry about it.

 

[shumantic]

They were removed because they conduct themselves as rogues.

delayed doc approval
theft of funds
delayed/no correspondence
changing of terms... and on and on

see the link below for more specifics

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/how-the-heck-is-mainstreet-accredited.43965/

 

[Casinomeister]

They were removed because they conduct themselves as rogues.

delayed doc approval
theft of funds
delayed/no correspondence
changing of terms... and on and on

see the link below for more specifics

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/how-the-heck-is-mainstreet-accredited.43965/

Since when did you start running this site?

They were removed because of the long pay out procedure. And I have made it clear to the operator that as soon as the payment procedures are squared away, they are welcome to come back on board.

 

[shumantic]

Since when did you start running this site?

They were removed because of the long pay out procedure. And I have made it clear to the operator that as soon as the payment procedures are squared away, they are welcome to come back on board.

I don't run the site of course.

So then all the other reasons in that thread didn't matter? It is just the slow payouts that got them off the accredited list? That is not how it appeared in that thread. Maybe I don't find a later thread that clarifies but is sure seems like it is more than that on this thread I listed.

 

[Casinomeister]

I don't run the site of course.

So then all the other reasons in that thread didn't matter? It is just the slow payouts that got them off the accredited list? That is not how it appeared in that thread. Maybe I don't find a later thread that clarifies but is sure seems like it is more than that on this thread I listed.

I guess you skipped this posting:
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/how-the-heck-is-mainstreet-accredited.43965/

There were no theft of funds.

 

[rtgkiller]

In Main Street defense. They are a GREAT group of casinos. Infact this is the only group of RTG I will play at. Mainly because their bonuses are cashable and table games are allowed. This was the first time out of nearly 5 months that I had a slow payment. Usually my payments are received in 4 to 7 days. By check in Regular mail or Courier. They explained to me. That their checks are mailed out by a third party in batches once a week. Which is understandable. My check was sent out Wednesday and should arrive today. I have given them the benefit of the doubt. They are a bunch of great guys there.

 

[shumantic]

I guess you skipped this posting:
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/how-the-heck-is-mainstreet-accredited.43965/

There were no theft of funds.

lol!

Well you had earlier said that slow payment was the only thing keeping them off the accredited list. Even if we take The bogus non payment to the Australian they claimed was from philadelphia, which they claimed photoshop but you couldn't see any evidence of and the lack of allowing that person to send in notarized proof of documents aside, There were multiple other examples of poor behaviour. including the one you commented on of no responsible gambling links. Along with deceptive advertising and every other example given in that thread.

Was there a post or thread about that later that I missed stating it was all cleared and only the slow payments were the issue? As it is, it seems like there were a LOT of issues brought up that would keep them out of the accredited list based on your criteria.

 

[Casinomeister]

Watch it with the attitude. Last warning.

Funny how you dredge up the PA gang again. Nothappy was connected to them - and that was made clear in a number of threads. That had nothing to do with the casino's removal from the accredited list.

 

[shumantic]

Watch it with the attitude. Last warning.

Funny how you dredge up the PA gang again. Nothappy was connected to them - and that was made clear in a number of threads. That had nothing to do with the casino's removal from the accredited list.

I respectfully ask if any of the other multitude of reasons in that thread had anything to do with the removal or was it JUST ONLY the slow pay? Did it have nothing to do with the other breaches of the accredited terms? That is all I really want to know. I don't want to sound like an attitude. It is just confusing me. Earlier in this thread it seemed like you were saying the slow pay was the only reason. I said it seemed like a LOT of reasons were in that thread I linked. Is that not the case? were all the other issues not reasons for removal from accreditation list? that is all I ask. thank you.

 

[Casinomeister]

I respectfully ask if any of the other multitude of reasons in that thread had anything to do with the removal or was it JUST ONLY the slow pay? Did it have nothing to do with the other breaches of the accredited terms? That is all I really want to know. I don't want to sound like an attitude. It is just confusing me. Earlier in this thread it seemed like you were saying the slow pay was the only reason. I said it seemed like a LOT of reasons were in that thread I linked. Is that not the case? were all the other issues not reasons for removal from accreditation list? that is all I ask. thank you.

It had to do with a number of complaints dealing with slow payments. That's the official reason why they were removed.

 

[AudiManinBoro]

To be perfectly honest here I cannot for the life of me understand why ANYONE would choose to play at a casino that takes 2 weeks or longer to pay out. Its inconceivable to me and yet many people know this and still choose to play there yet then come and complain that they havent been paid quickly. Boggles my mind lol

 

[rtgkiller]

Was paid yesterday. And was given a nice free bonus for the troubles. Thank you MSC.

@audiman - This was the first time I had to wait this long. I'm sure this has happened at CWC, Inetbet, etc. as well. MSC has been accredited here before. And was removed because of slow payment. Mr. Casinomeister has said he may reconsider them. Once they prove their have stepped up their payment time. Then How are they supposed to prove it. If some players don't give them a chance? I've made a total of 9 withdrawals from their casinos. This was the 1st one that I waited over 7 days. And it was explained to me by finance the reasons.

Good Day all