EC AND MALTA COMMENT ON ITALIAN ONLINE GAMBLING DRAFT REGULATIONS
Italian regulation welcomed, but reservations expressed on games, IT and consumer protection aspects
The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) has welcomed the European Commissions decision to issue formal comments on the Italian draft decree on the regulation of remote gaming, but wants recognition for protective measures already practised by operators licensed in other EU states.
The Italian draft, which lays down requirements for remote (online) gambling operators seeking to do business in Italy, also prompted concerns from Malta, in the form of a Detailed Opinion.
These decisions prevent Italy from adopting the decree in its current format before 29 April 2008 and should result in amendments.
Sigrid Lign, EGBA Secretary General said: The Commissions decision suggests that even if Italy has demonstrated a genuine improvement in bringing its legislation into line with EU law, the Italian remote gaming legislation still contains measures that dont serve a clear legitimate public order interest.
In particular, the EGBA believes that in establishing a level of protection for Italian citizens, the Italian authorities must take into account the protection already provided by operators that are fully regulated, licensed and established in other EU jurisdictions.
The new decree also seeks to impose severe restrictions on the types of games which a player based in Italy can bet on, thereby reducing competition, all to the ultimate detriment of the consumer.
Finally, the obligation for remote operators to connect continuously to the Italian regulator AAMS's centralised IT system generates additional costs and is a technological barrier for foreign operators. Even if this requirement has been imposed to limit crime prevention, it is disproportionate and does not take into account other less burdensome and less costly technological measures that already exist in other EU jurisdictions and have demonstrated success in achieving the same objective.
We hope that in the coming weeks, the Italian authorities will amend their draft decree in an attempt to solve the few remaining issues added Lign.
The Italian draft decree was notified to Commissioner Verheugens services and Member States under Directive 98/34/EC at the end of December 2007. The notification procedure is aimed at preventing EU member states from creating new barriers to the internal market freedoms by giving the opportunity to the European Commission and other EU member nations to evaluate the content of a draft law before it is adopted.
Italian regulation welcomed, but reservations expressed on games, IT and consumer protection aspects
The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) has welcomed the European Commissions decision to issue formal comments on the Italian draft decree on the regulation of remote gaming, but wants recognition for protective measures already practised by operators licensed in other EU states.
The Italian draft, which lays down requirements for remote (online) gambling operators seeking to do business in Italy, also prompted concerns from Malta, in the form of a Detailed Opinion.
These decisions prevent Italy from adopting the decree in its current format before 29 April 2008 and should result in amendments.
Sigrid Lign, EGBA Secretary General said: The Commissions decision suggests that even if Italy has demonstrated a genuine improvement in bringing its legislation into line with EU law, the Italian remote gaming legislation still contains measures that dont serve a clear legitimate public order interest.
In particular, the EGBA believes that in establishing a level of protection for Italian citizens, the Italian authorities must take into account the protection already provided by operators that are fully regulated, licensed and established in other EU jurisdictions.
The new decree also seeks to impose severe restrictions on the types of games which a player based in Italy can bet on, thereby reducing competition, all to the ultimate detriment of the consumer.
Finally, the obligation for remote operators to connect continuously to the Italian regulator AAMS's centralised IT system generates additional costs and is a technological barrier for foreign operators. Even if this requirement has been imposed to limit crime prevention, it is disproportionate and does not take into account other less burdensome and less costly technological measures that already exist in other EU jurisdictions and have demonstrated success in achieving the same objective.
We hope that in the coming weeks, the Italian authorities will amend their draft decree in an attempt to solve the few remaining issues added Lign.
The Italian draft decree was notified to Commissioner Verheugens services and Member States under Directive 98/34/EC at the end of December 2007. The notification procedure is aimed at preventing EU member states from creating new barriers to the internal market freedoms by giving the opportunity to the European Commission and other EU member nations to evaluate the content of a draft law before it is adopted.
