Casinos

Casinos By Status

Popular Filters

By Banking Options

Games

All Games

Bonuses

Popular Bonus Filters

Forums

Popular Forums

Forum User Features

Complaints

Submit A Complaint (PAB)

PAB Rules and Guidelines

Browse PABs

Gambling News

Popular News Sections

About Us

About Us

Immortal Romance slots suddenly turns very cold for me, anyone notice that?

This slot is cancer but I'm addicted to it.

I only like once hit a good BR with Amber.
Yet when 3 whadoyacallit appear ... i just love that.
Just feels so right :rolleyes:

Aside : what does 5oak mean?
I first thought it was a IR specific term and meant
5 of the freespin symbols which it obviously does not mean?
The session before last i two or three times it 4 threespin symbols at 90p.... yeah!
Alas the actual bonus round suck bad evrey time.
Then i set it to 30p , hit bonus, and get a good (close to 200x) bonus round
with amber... i nearly lost it :(
 
curremon said:
Im 99% sure its just not "bad luck" , They can, and they have done something to those games.
Click to expand...

I am not sure if they can manipulate the slots or not as they are supposed to be random as we all know but the 6 slots i do play it has to be really bad luck that they are all playing so poor at the same time.Only Game Of Thrones i would say has been keeping me going as the rest just of the slots are a bye bye money slot.
I also see that on the winner screenshot threads there seems to be a lack of decent wins on MG slots compared to usual.
I am sure my luck will turn again though????????
 
I'm sorry, but I just cannot agree with the suggestion that the games have been "adjusted".

I'd been on a really bad losing for darn near 7 weeks (I've just started to get some momentum this past week). But at no stage did I think
that they had been adjusted. I just put it down to bad luck. On a ridiculous and equally scary scale. Some of the sessions I had were unprecedentedly bad.
Maybe that was what was really rattling me. The fact I had so many so closely bunched together. But one game which has been getting "questioned" a lot
recently just happens to be the one game where I actually was doing fairly well....IR.

GOT absolutely crushed me one night (£260 to £0, 60p bets, less than 800 spins, no feature). The next time I played it, I got my best ever win (only 165x) and I didn't have to wait long at all to get it. Even GWG2 (a game which I have gone from loving last summer to detesting before Christmas) gave me a 200x win on Magnetic Wilds.

On the other hand, Avalon 2 (a game I was beating quite handily in January) has been absolutely dire for me for almost 3 months now.
Same with Dark Knight since the end of February (I FINALLY got my first 100x win on Dark Knight for EIGHT WEEKS at the weekend).
Jurassic Park has given me some good bonus rounds (100x), but they have come at too high a cost.
Playboy has also been quite nasty lately and I've been hesitant to return to it.
I haven't played Finer Reels at all. And to be honest, I don't really know why.

The hits are there, the problem was that they were coming too far apart and they weren't quite big enough. Loads of 100x hits, but very few of
them getting beyond 300x.

But somebody out there is getting them. It just doesn't happen to be any of us...at the moment.
 
mcgameboy said:
I'm sorry, but I just cannot agree with the suggestion that the games have been "adjusted".

I'd been on a really bad losing for darn near 7 weeks (I've just started to get some momentum this past week). But at no stage did I think
that they had been adjusted. I just put it down to bad luck. On a ridiculous and equally scary scale. Some of the sessions I had were unprecedentedly bad.
Maybe that was what was really rattling me. The fact I had so many so closely bunched together. But one game which has been getting "questioned" a lot
recently just happens to be the one game where I actually was doing fairly well....IR.

GOT absolutely crushed me one night (£260 to £0, 60p bets, less than 800 spins, no feature). The next time I played it, I got my best ever win (only 165x) and I didn't have to wait long at all to get it. Even GWG2 (a game which I have gone from loving last summer to detesting before Christmas) gave me a 200x win on Magnetic Wilds.

On the other hand, Avalon 2 (a game I was beating quite handily in January) has been absolutely dire for me for almost 3 months now.
Same with Dark Knight since the end of February (I FINALLY got my first 100x win on Dark Knight for EIGHT WEEKS at the weekend).
Jurassic Park has given me some good bonus rounds (100x), but they have come at too high a cost.
Playboy has also been quite nasty lately and I've been hesitant to return to it.
I haven't played Finer Reels at all. And to be honest, I don't really know why.

The hits are there, the problem was that they were coming too far apart and they weren't quite big enough. Loads of 100x hits, but very few of
them getting beyond 300x.

But somebody out there is getting them. It just doesn't happen to be any of us...at the moment.
Click to expand...

I think it is very hard to accept so many bad runs without something going on but i appreciate your right in what you are saying.
In my experience this last while Playboy and The Finer Reels have been a complete shocker especially for me as i play the second more than i should.
Jurrasic Park just been a mare and i have only 2 features to get the lot but cannot complete it.
IR has been good and bad.
GOT been very good overall and the other day i had 7 features within 200 odd spins and 3 of them were very good.
Also Thunder 2 has been behaving so overall if i had left the cold slots out and just played the 3 i might well have still had money to play this evening but i will never learn.
 
Played IR for around 7 hours last night, started off with lots of bonuses and wild desires and then suddenly went very cold and stayed cold for hours on end.

Dead or Alive is similar, but the cold spell only lasts an hour or so before picking up again.
 
Look it's a well known fact that when the casinos experience big pay-outs they retrieve money by removing a scatter from each reel of the 243-way games and a few wilds too. They temporarily replace these symbols with 9's and 10's so you get a higher frequency of small wins. This is done by simply editing 2 lines of master code by the CS agent. If they get players bitching and moaning about RTP and threatening to close their account, they reverse this by putting info into a ready reckoner. Say you're 2k down at that casino and they know you play IR at 60p, they simply enter this into the reckoner and it tells them how many 'good' symbols to add and for how long. Once they have observed you winning back 50% (some 'tighter' sites may make it 40% or even as low as 35%) of your lifetime losses, the game is restored to 'factory setting' and it's like it was when you first joined.
 
dunover said:
Look it's a well known fact that when the casinos experience big pay-outs they retrieve money by removing a scatter from each reel of the 243-way games and a few wilds too. They temporarily replace these symbols with 9's and 10's so you get a higher frequency of small wins. This is done by simply editing 2 lines of master code by the CS agent. If they get players bitching and moaning about RTP and threatening to close their account, they reverse this by putting info into a ready reckoner. Say you're 2k down at that casino and they know you play IR at 60p, they simply enter this into the reckoner and it tells them how many 'good' symbols to add and for how long. Once they have observed you winning back 50% (some 'tighter' sites may make it 40% or even as low as 35%) of your lifetime losses, the game is restored to 'factory setting' and it's like it was when you first joined.
Click to expand...


sarcasm_sign1.webp

:thumbsup:
 
I too have found out to add to Mr Dunovers post that they also do the following...

They employ a part - time minimum wage college leaver to trawl through your gaming history and 'move' any big wins you've had and log it into your last session.

Or they will pinch a 4-reel W/D payout from someone elses 'history' and put in to random players account history.

Then they get a freelance programmer to hack into the IR base code and add a program which bases your next play time on this big hit and get it to act like a pub style AWP (fruit machine)

Upon finding this out I now realise why Thunderstruck II no longer 'likes me'
 
dunover said:
Look it's a well known fact that when the casinos experience big pay-outs they retrieve money by removing a scatter from each reel of the 243-way games and a few wilds too. They temporarily replace these symbols with 9's and 10's so you get a higher frequency of small wins. This is done by simply editing 2 lines of master code by the CS agent. If they get players bitching and moaning about RTP and threatening to close their account, they reverse this by putting info into a ready reckoner. Say you're 2k down at that casino and they know you play IR at 60p, they simply enter this into the reckoner and it tells them how many 'good' symbols to add and for how long. Once they have observed you winning back 50% (some 'tighter' sites may make it 40% or even as low as 35%) of your lifetime losses, the game is restored to 'factory setting' and it's like it was when you first joined.
Click to expand...

I hope that this speech is not true otherwise if the casino is to decide who should win the random payout factor of the slot is a joke and now I know when i see the winners screenshoot section of the forum why the big win go always to the same people ...
 
jonmincher said:
:what::lolup::what:

c'mon - where the hidden camera :eek:

you can't have 'random' 'same' winners ;)
Click to expand...

the winner screenshoot phrase was a joke :) yes you can't have random same winner because these big wins is the result of almost always a lot of money played and big bet size of these people ... but if the casino can manipulate the slot is another matter and not fair
 
Unfortunately this is a topic we will never know the 'bottom line' to and nor will we ever see the end of this type of thread until maybe the day that MG etc fades into nothingness.

I think if a player ever discovered that there was any type of genuine 'fixing' or 'altering' going on and tried to publicly prove it then they would either get rich very quickly (hush money) or disappear off the planet equally as quick, probably the latter :eek:
 
jonmincher said:
Unfortunately this is a topic we will never know the 'bottom line' to and nor will we ever see the end of this type of thread until maybe the day that MG etc fades into nothingness.

I think if a player ever discovered that there was any type of genuine 'fixing' or 'altering' going on and tried to publicly prove it then they would either get rich very quickly (hush money) or disappear off the planet equally as quick, probably the latter :eek:
Click to expand...


Seriously... Why would anyone go to the effort of creating a game that is already designed to take peoples money & then rig it?

When you create an RTP of less than 100%, you (the house) are always going to be the long-term winner. As such, you get it independently tested, certified, and licensed by every jurisdiction you want to be able to release it though & once it's live, voila, start counting your money.

Why go through all that time / effort / expense of creating a 97% game if you are then going to risk it all / lose players trust / get bad PR / lose your license (thus losing revenue from all your games) / etc by 'rigging it' the game after it's live? Far simpler just to create it to pay 92% in the first place, don't you think?

(If it's any comfort, I have worked for and with a number of the biggest software suppliers in the industry for the last ~12-years. Yes I still play their games, and no I wouldn't do it if I thought for one moment they weren't fair)
 
funnymunny said:
Seriously... Why would anyone go to the effort of creating a game that is already designed to take peoples money & then rig it?

When you create an RTP of less than 100%, you (the house) are always going to be the long-term winner. As such, you get it independently tested, certified, and licensed by every jurisdiction you want to be able to release it though & once it's live, voila, start counting your money.

Why go through all that time / effort / expense of creating a 97% game if you are then going to risk it all / lose players trust / get bad PR / lose your license (thus losing revenue from all your games) / etc by 'rigging it' the game after it's live? Far simpler just to create it to pay 92% in the first place, don't you think?

(If it's any comfort, I have worked for and with a number of the biggest software suppliers in the industry for the last ~12-years. Yes I still play their games, and no I wouldn't do it if I thought for one moment they weren't fair)
Click to expand...

no one plays game with 92% rtp
 
It amazes me how some take everything that's posted so seriously, sometimes (and I say this with the utmost respect before I get 'shredded' again)without applying any thought or digesting the comment made.

Most members know how slots/RTP/TRTP/Variance etc etc etc etc etc works and that there are no gremlins etc etc etc etc.

So if a 'sarky' or 'jokey' comment gets posted, enjoy it, laugh it off, ignore it, just don't get so wound up so easily.

I appreciate 'comeback' from this may include 'Sick of seeing it' or 'what are you doing now yourself?' but at the end of the day it is a public forum and we are all different, no one (including me) is 100% wrong and no one is 100% correct.

(Apart from the fact that Starburst is shit!)

Enjoy your evening(s) :D
 
Last edited:
wd different reel set?

WildDesire uses a different reel set?
And this is not supposed to be a scam?

I never touch this slot and its likes again.

Come to think of, rest of 2015 i take a break on all slots.

Ah, one more thing:
The last time i played IR i chose against all heresay the Micheal feature...
and it actually was good... had wins of 70x+ !
Nothing great but compared to the utter crapfest the vine feature is
paying me most oft the time <10x this was really nice.
You really should give it a try.

Too bad, if it weren't for the reel "magic" I'd definitly give Micheal another go... :lolup::notworthy:rolleyes:

Vine/Loki feature is the biggest crock.
Last time on T2 i would have a nice 3xOdin hit if the fucking SHITE spread on to the forth.
There was supposedly a player who had a up to one fullscreen on VINES on IR,
that seems utterly insane or just made up.
Don't know what to make of it.
 
Hit a record today at CasinoExtra.
Spent €450 on €1.5 bets (average) on The Finer Reels of Life and didn't hit a single feature.
Just a few 10x wins.
Plus, I was offered a €100 free money bonus and spent it in 5 mns in the same style.

One more casino to my self exclusion list, it won't take long to stay away from them all. (hopefully)
 
bigodz said:
Hit a record today at CasinoExtra.
Spent €450 on €1.5 bets (average) on The Finer Reels of Life and didn't hit a single feature.
Just a few 10x wins.
Plus, I was offered a €100 free money bonus and spent it in 5 mns in the same style.

One more casino to my self exclusion list, it won't take long to stay away from them all. (hopefully)
Click to expand...

Lately this slots has been harsh to me, too.

How did you feel after that session?
I'd be in goddamn agony.
This is why i take a LONG breather from slots,esp. 243 MG slots.
They're the devils work :mad::what::D
 
Just had my worst run on Immortal Romance to date. Spun over 3000 spins on one session @0.9€ bet and had the wild desire feature only three times. Once every thousand spins to get a key feature is just so piss poor that I can't even find the words for it :barf:

Might be time for me to give up on this slot anyways. I'm yet to hit 1000xbet on it with close to 400k spins. Easily the worst high variance slot I've played in terms of actually providing big hits censored
 
IR is generous to me so far. I just started playing IR from last month, this week I played 4th or 5th time on IR and 4 wilds show up on Wild Desire, 4 wilds on first 4 columns. 60 cents bet won more than $1300.

But DOA is really not generous to me. Millions of free spins, but only once I won around 400 times of bet size, all other times, I'm lucky if I can get more than 20times of bet size. Had 5 wilds a couple of times, but never on payline.

So I guess everybody has their own lucky game.
 
Valhalla said:
I have now had 60 (sixty) dead spins in a row in Amber's free spins, between Slotty Vegas and Energy Casino.

I'm not actually doing too bad on the game overall (I've had some nice wins), but Amber's free spins are an utter piss take :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Totally agree!

I never choose Amber (or Valkyrie on TSII) soon as I unlocked Troy (and Loki) all those years ago, I've never looked back :p

Only time I do is when I find/join a new casino so We've got no choice.

Still remember my 4 x re-trigger on Amber many moons ago - oh the good ol' days :rolleyes:
 
jonmincher said:
Totally agree!

I never choose Amber (or Valkyrie on TSII) soon as I unlocked Troy (and Loki) all those years ago, I've never looked back :p

Only time I do is when I find/join a new casino so We've got no choice.

Still remember my 4 x re-trigger on Amber many moons ago - oh the good ol' days :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I got £106 from Amber on 30p spin but most times naff all. Choosing Amber changes this high variance slot to ultra high and I think I'll choose the one feature where they explode in future with the multiplier. Sorry can't recall which character.
 
Michael on IR is 'rolling reels' (exploding symbols) best I got is about £100 from min bet but I do tend to select 'Troy' (bats) 9/10.

Dunover has got me selecting the TSII rolling reels equivalent (Thor) a lot more often that I used to after watching his videos.

Ironically this has resulted in my best ever return on both slots combined since they were launched :eek::eek::eek: (£154.00 from .30p bet) so :thumbsup: for that :D
 
Is that wild vine win for real?

Hi,
on the net you can find a wild vine feature win where all but
one position shows the wild vine.
Has this actually happened?
I cannot believe this to be true, it seems to be way out of the ordinary....
 
Yes, a couple of years ago a player at 32Red had a full screen on the wild vine feature. He/She was betting £3.00 a spin and it paid the same as 5 wilds would on Wild Desire.

Not sure if it is still online, but 32Red did a press release on it with screenshots.
 
Haven't played IR in a while but I used to play it a lot.
My best wins were on the x5 all wins feature with some very handsome 1000-1500x stake wins.
Wild Vines never went any further than one on reel 3 and maybe one on reel 5. ;);)
Still a nice slot tho,love the theme and the soundtracks in it.. :o
 
Then it seems to me, that
the wildvine feature is programmed to very rarely
go nuts.

No way is the amount of wild vines random, the must be some
kind of switch in there.

I played my fair share of IR and the most wild vines i got where... like 5 may be 6.

Anyway of you had significantly more of them?
In that insane hit, he got 15(!) wild vines holy christ.

I don't think i ever play IR or a similar slot again.
If you don't get a good hit it just drains ya sometimes
slowly someties it rips right through the stack :)

Come to think of it... that's what slots do and that's why I won't touch them. At least til tomrrow :what::what::D:mad:

My best wins were on the x5 all wins feature with some very handsome 1000-1500x stake wins
Click to expand...

I guess you retriggered plus had a few 5oak sarah's?


BTW why is Micheal so rare?
He's the only regular kind where I don't even have a 4 of a kind, not to mention a 5oak.
I guess it's an incentive to keep playing and make the paytable golden.
It's defenitely at odds with how much he pays vs. Sarah - she's more common.

Still a nice slot tho,love the theme and the soundtracks in it..
Click to expand...
And yeah, the slot has great design.
That elusive 5 wild reel wild desire feature, though...
When i finally hit,maybe i get all the $ back i put into IR :thumbsup::lolup:
This slot owes me quite a bit of doe :D
 
Despite the potential to pay out the absolute jackpot (same as Wild Desire as already mentioned), Sarah's feature is THE most infuriating and God-awful bonus game that was ever shat into existence.
I've never seen it do anything remotely interesting in all my years of playing Immortal Romance. Absolutely fucking gash :rolleyes:
 
tataru said:
BTW why is Micheal so rare?
He's the only regular kind where I don't even have a 4 of a kind, not to mention a 5oak.
I guess it's an incentive to keep playing and make the paytable golden.
It's defenitely at odds with how much he pays vs. Sarah - she's more common
Click to expand...

He's so rare because there are 3 or 4 of him on reels 1,3,4 and 5. But only 1 of him on the whole of reel 2
 
Valhalla said:
Despite the potential to pay out the absolute jackpot (same as Wild Desire as already mentioned), Sarah's feature is THE most infuriating and God-awful bonus game that was ever shat into existence.
I've never seen it do anything remotely interesting in all my years of playing Immortal Romance. Absolutely fucking gash :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yeah.

Jumping Wilds free spin mode has the highest per spin potential. Giving it also the highest number of spins, 25, was not a good idea, since to balance out this, you would have to lower the odds of Jumping Wilds, or increase the odds that they go to a useless spot, like filling the fifth reel. Jumping Wilds are much less annoying in slots with only 15 free spins on that mode, like TSII and Finer Reels of Life.
 
Last edited:
Finn said:
Yeah.

Jumping Wilds free spin mode has the highest per spin potential. Giving it also the highest number of spins was not a good idea, since to balance out this, you would have to lower the odds of Jumping Wilds, or increase the odds that they go to a useless spot, like filling the fifth reel. Jumping Wilds are much less annoying in slots with only 15 free spins on that mode, like TSII and Finer Reels of Life.
Click to expand...

The 'wild feature' is actually useful on the slots you mention as does not appear 'limited' to just reels 3 n 5. Seen some amazing screen shots, especially on TFROL, yet to have one myself tho :rolleyes:
 
tataru said:
I guess you retriggered plus had a few 5oak sarah's?
Click to expand...

Yeah m8,one was with a retrigger but I also had twice in a row at different casino's that I hit a biggie with the sarah's & wilds combined.
I have put them in the winner screenshot sections but probably it is like looking for a needle in a haystack with so many pages. ^^
But they are defo in there somewhere,but like I said it has been a while that I had those hits.
Haven't played it much lately but maybe I should give it a go again.
 

Similar threads

YouTubeSlots
Asking Google A.I Why do slots suck now compared to the early 2000's? (Immortal Romance, The Doom Switch! etc)
Replies
19
Views
655
Webzcas
Webzcas
Glunn11
  • Poll Poll
Immortal Romance - good to finally meet you!
Replies
25
Views
2K
Glunn11
Glunn11
avfcalex23
Brick snake 2000 (NLC)
Replies
6
Views
949
slaman29
slaman29
Webzcas
Expired Promo Multiplier Mayhem 1000EUR Casinomeister Exclusive Slots Comp
2 3 4
Replies
184
Views
6K
Webzcas
Webzcas
gambyx7
Top 10 of this and that (slots)
Replies
14
Views
3K
Bump_Dude
Bump_Dude

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top